Comparative elucidation of bioactive and volatile components in dry mature jujube fruit (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) subjected to different drying methods.

This study investigated the effects of convective drying(CD) and freeze drying(FD) on bioactive and volatile components in jujube. No significant difference in total phenolic, total flavonoids and antioxidant capacity among CD60, CD70, CD80 and FD samples (P > 0.05). LC-MS/MS analysis showed that this trend mainly originated from the dynamic equilibrium relationships between caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, rutin, epicatechin, and quercetin. HS-SPME-GC-MS identified 31 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) comprising more than 80% aldehydes and acids. Principal component analysis distinguished the VOC characteristics of samples subjected to different drying methods. Six VOCs had an odor activity value (OAV) >1, most of which were fatty acid oxidation or Maillard reaction products. Combined with the precursor components, these reactions were speculated to be the major VOC-producing pathways in dried jujube. Considering the bioactive components and flavor retention, CD at 60 °C was an effective drying method with potential to replace FD.

Analysis of volatility characteristics of five jujube varieties in Xinjiang Province, China, by HS-SPME-GC/MS and E-nose.

In this study, headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC/MS) was used to identify individual volatile compounds in five jujube varieties, and E-nose was used to identify their flavor. The results showed that a total of 45 volatile compounds were detected by GC-MS in the five varieties, and the proportion of acids was the highest (38.29%-54.95%), followed by that of aldehydes (22.94%-47.93%) and esters (6.33%-26.61%). Moreover, different varieties had obviously different volatile components. E-nose analysis showed that the R7 and R9 sensors were more sensitive to the aroma of jujube than other sensors. The strong response of R7 sensor was attributed to terpenes (or structurally similar substances) in jujube fruit, such as 1-penten-3-one, 2-octenal, (E)-2-heptanaldehyde, and (E)-2-hexenal and that of R9 sensor was attributed to the cyclic volatile components such as benzaldehyde, benzoic acid, and methyl benzoate. The multivariate data analysis (PCA, OPLS-DA, and HCA) of the results of GC/MS and E-nose showed that the five varieties could be divided into three groups: (1) Ziziphus jujuba Mill. cv. Huizao (HZ) and Z. jujuba cv. Junzao (JZ). Acids were the main volatile components for this group (accounting for 47.44% and 54.95%, respectively); (2) Z. jujuba cv. Hamidazao (HMDZ). This group had the most abundant volatile components (41), and the concentrations were also the highest (1285.43 µg/kg); (3) Winter jujube 1 (Z. jujuba cv. Dongzao, WJ1) and Winter jujube 2 (Z. jujuba cv. Dongzao, WJ2). The proportion of acids (38.38% and 38.29%) and aldehydes (40.35% and 38.19%) were similar in the two varieties. Therefore, the combination of headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and E-nose could quickly and accurately identify the volatile components in jujube varieties from macro- and microperspectives. This study can provide guidance for the evaluation and distinguishing of jujube varieties and jujube cultivation and processing.