Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Microsc Res Tech ; 81(1): 88-96, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29083086

RESUMEN

This research aims to probe the porosity profile and polymerization shrinkage of two different dual cure resin cements with different dentin bonding systems. The self-adhesive resin cement RelyX U200 (named RU) and the conventional Allcem Core (named AC) were analyzed by x-ray microtomography (µCT) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Each cement was divided into two groups (n = 5): dual-cured (RUD and ACD) and self-cured (RUC and ACC). µCT demonstrated that the method of polymerization does not influence the porosity profile but the polymerization shrinkage. Fewer concentration of pores was observed for the conventional resin cement (AC), independently the method used for curing the sample. In addition, SEM showed that AC has more uniform surface and smaller particle size. The method of polymerization influenced the polymerization shrinkage, since no contraction for both RUC and ACC was observed, in contrast with results from dual-cured samples. For RUD and ACD the polymerization shrinkage was greater in the lower third of the sample and minor in the upper third. This mechanical behavior is attributed to the polymerization toward the light. µCT showed to be a reliable technique to probe porosity and contraction due to polymerization of dental cements.


Asunto(s)
Polimerizacion , Cementos de Resina/análisis , Cementos de Resina/química , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Análisis del Estrés Dental , Recubrimientos Dentinarios/análisis , Recubrimientos Dentinarios/química , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales/métodos , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo/métodos , Porosidad , Resistencia a la Tracción , Microtomografía por Rayos X/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...