RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate whether automated coregistration of optical coherence tomography (OCT) with angiography reduces geographic miss (GM) during coronary stenting. BACKGROUND: Previous intravascular ultrasound or OCT studies have showed that residual disease at the stent edge or stent edge dissection was associated with stent thrombosis or edge restenosis. This has been termed GM. METHODS: Two hundred de novo coronary lesions were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with versus without automated coregistration of OCT with angiography. GM, the primary endpoint, was defined as angiographic ≥type B dissection or diameter stenosis >50% or OCT minimum lumen area <4.0 mm2 with significant residual disease or dissection (dissection flap >60°) within 5 mm from the stent edge. RESULTS: The prevalence of GM was not different comparing OCT-guided PCI with versus without automated coregistration (27.6% vs 34.0%, P = 0.33). However, there was a trend toward a reduced prevalence of significant distal stent edge dissection in lesions with automated coregistration (11.1% vs 20.8%, P = 0.07). The discrepancy in the distance between planned versus actual implanted stent location with automated coregistration was significantly shorter than without coregistration (1.9 ± 1.6 mm vs 2.6 ± 2.7 mm, P = 0.03), especially the prevalence of ≥5 mm discrepancy that was less frequent with automated coregistration. CONCLUSIONS: Automated coregistration of OCT with angiography did not reduce the primary endpoint of GM after stent implantation.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Anciano , Automatización , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal , New York , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We determined if high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) can be overcome on the day of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with or without previous maintenance thienopyridine therapy. Patients with HTPR, as defined as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) >230, were switched to an alternate thienopyridine. Patients with HTPR undergoing PCI are at increased risk for ischemic complications. A total of 429 patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents were enrolled. Patients on maintenance thienopyridine (n = 249) with PRU >230 were loaded with the alternative thienopyridine. Patients who were thienopyridine naïve (n = 180) were randomized to clopidogrel 600 (n = 90) or prasugrel 60 mg (n = 90). Patients with HTPR were loaded with the alternative agent. Patients on maintenance clopidogrel (n = 192) had a higher prevalence of HTPR compared with prasugrel (n = 57; 51% vs 4%, p <0.001). Patients on maintenance clopidogrel with HTPR (n = 98) who were loaded with prasugrel achieved PRU ≤230 in 97%. Thienopyridine-naïve patients loaded with clopidogrel had a higher prevalence of HTPR compared with prasugrel (37% vs 3%, p <0.001). Clopidogrel-loaded patients with HTPR (n = 33) who were reloaded with prasugrel achieved PRU ≤230 in 94%. All 3 prasugrel-loaded patients with HTPR treated with clopidogrel achieved PRU ≤230. Two patients experienced 30-day major adverse clinical events. One patient experienced Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major bleeding. In conclusion, HTPR can be overcome in patients with and without previous maintenance thienopyridine therapy by identifying patients with HTPR and switching to an alternate thienopyridine.
