Progesterone levels do not differ between patients with or without endometriosis/adenomyosis both in those who conceive after hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer cycles and those who do not.

STUDY QUESTION: Do women with endometriosis who achieve a live birth (LB) after HRT-frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) have different progesterone levels on the day of transfer compared to unaffected women? SUMMARY ANSWER: In women achieving a LB after HRT-FET, serum progesterone levels on the day of the transfer did not differ between patients with endometriosis and unaffected patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In HRT-FET, several studies have highlighted the correlation between serum progesterone levels at the time of FET and LB rates. In the pathophysiology of endometriosis, progesterone resistance is typically described in the eutopic endometrium. This has led to the hypothesis that women with endometriosis may require higher progesterone levels to achieve a LB, especially in HRT-FET cycles without a corpus luteum. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted an observational cohort study at the university-based reproductive medicine center of our institution, focusing on women who underwent a single autologous frozen blastocyst transfer after HRT using exogenous estradiol and micronized vaginal progesterone for endometrial preparation between January 2019 and December 2021. Women were included only once during the study period. Serum progesterone levels were measured on the morning of the FET by a single laboratory. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients were divided into groups based on whether they had endometriosis or not and whether they achieved a LB. The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria (transvaginal sonography/magnetic resonance imaging) and/or confirmed histology. The primary outcome was progesterone levels on the day of the HRT-FET leading to a LB in patients with endometriosis compared to unaffected women. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis or adenomyosis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 1784 patients were included. The mean age of the women was 35.1 ± 4.1 (SD) years. Five hundred and sixty women had endometriosis, while 1224 did not. About 179/560 (32.0%) with endometriosis and 381/1224 (31.2%) without endometriosis achieved a LB. Among women who achieved a LB after HRT-FET, there was no significant difference in the mean progesterone level on the day of the HRT-FET between those with endometriosis and those without (13.6 ± 4.3 ng/ml vs 13.2 ± 4.4 ng/ml, respectively; P = 0.302). In the subgroup of women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (n = 142) and adenomyosis (n = 100), the mean progesterone level was 13.1 ± 4.1 ng/ml and 12.6 ± 3.7 ng/ml, respectively, with no significant difference compared to endometriosis-free patients. After adjusting for BMI, parity, duration of infertility, tobacco use, and geographic origin, neither the presence of endometriosis (coefficient 0.38; 95% CI: -0.63 to 1.40; P = 0.457) nor the presence of adenomyosis (coefficient 0.97; 95% CI: -0.24 to 2.19; P = 0.114) was associated with the progesterone level on the day of HRT-FET. Among women who did not conceive, there was no significant difference in the mean progesterone level on the day of the HRT-FET between those with endometriosis and those without (P = 0.709). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The primary limitation of our study is associated with its observational design. Extrapolating our results to other laboratories or different routes and/or dosages of administering progesterone also requires validation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study shows that patients diagnosed with endometriosis do not require higher progesterone levels on the day of a frozen blastocyst transfer to achieve a LB in hormonal replacement therapy cycles. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Intra-individual variability of serum progesterone levels on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer in hormonal replacement therapy cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a significant intra-individual variability of serum progesterone levels on the day of single blastocyst Hormone Replacement Therapy-Frozen Embryo Transfer (HRT-FET) between two consecutive cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: No significant intra-individual variability of serum progesterone (P) levels was noted between two consecutive HRT-FET cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In HRT-FET cycles, a minimum P level on the day of embryo transfer is necessary to optimise reproductive outcomes. In a previous study by our team, a threshold of 9.8 ng/ml serum P was identified as significantly associated with the live birth rates in single autologous blastocyst transfers under HRT using micronized vaginal progesterone (MVP). Such patients may benefit from an intensive luteal phase support (LPS) using other routes of P administration in addition to MVP. A crucial question in the way towards individualising LPS is whether serum P measurements are reproducible for a given patient in consecutive HRT-FET cycles, using the same LPS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We conducted an observational cohort study at the university-based reproductive medicine centre of our institution focusing on women who underwent at least two consecutive single autologous blastocyst HRT-FET cycles between January 2019 and March 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients undergoing two consecutive single autologous blastocyst HRT-FET cycles using exogenous oestradiol and vaginal micronized progesterone for endometrial preparation were included. Serum progesterone levels were measured on the morning of the Frozen Embryo Transfer (FET), by a single laboratory. The two measurements of progesterone levels performed on the day of the first (FET1) and the second FET (FET2) were compared to evaluate the intra-individual variability of serum P levels. Paired statistical analyses were performed, as appropriate. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Two hundred and sixty-four patients undergoing two consecutive single autologous blastocyst HRT-FET were included. The mean age of the included women was 35.0 ± 4.2 years. No significant intra-individual variability was observed between FET1 and FET2 (mean progesterone level after FET1: 13.4 ± 5.1 ng/ml vs after FET2: 13.9 ± 5.0; P = 0.08). The characteristics of the embryo transfers were similar between the first and the second FET. Forty-nine patients (18.6%) had discordant progesterone levels (defined as one progesterone measurement > and one ≤ to the threshold of 9.8 ng/ml) between FET1 and FET2. There were 37/264 women (14.0%) who had high intra-individual variability (defined as a difference in serum progesterone values >75th percentile (6.0 ng/ml)) between FET1 and FET2. No specific clinical parameter was associated with a high intra-individual variability nor a discordant P measurement. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited by its retrospective design. Moreover, only women undergoing autologous blastocyst HRT-FET with MVP were included, thereby limiting the extrapolation of the study findings to other routes of P administration and other kinds of endometrial preparation for FET. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: No significant intra-individual variability was noted. The serum progesterone level appeared to be reproducible in >80% of cases. These findings suggest that the serum progesterone level measured on the day of the first transfer can be used to individualize luteal phase support in subsequent cycles. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding or competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Endometriosis-related infertility: severe pain symptoms do not impact assisted reproductive technology outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: Do severe endometriosis-related painful symptoms impact ART live birth rates? SUMMARY ANSWER: Severe pain symptoms are not associated with reduced ART live birth rates in endometriosis patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ART is currently recognized as one of the main therapeutic options to manage endometriosis-related infertility. Presently, no data exist in the literature regarding the association between the core symptom of the disease, e.g. pain and ART reproductive outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Observational cohort study of 354 endometriosis patients, who underwent ART at a tertiary care university hospital, between October 2014 and October 2021. Diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria using transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging, and histologically confirmed in women who had a previous history of endometriosis surgery (n = 127, 35.9%). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The intensity of painful symptoms related to dysmenorrhea (DM), dyspareunia (DP), noncyclic chronic pelvic pain, gastrointestinal (GI) pain, or lower urinary tract pain was evaluated using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), before ART. Severe pain was defined as having a VAS of 7 or higher for at least one symptom. The main outcome measure was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per patient. We analyzed the impact of endometriosis-related painful symptoms on ART live births using univariable and multivariate analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Three hundred and fifty-four endometriosis patients underwent 711 ART cycles. The mean age of the population was 33.8 ± 3.7 years, and the mean duration of infertility was 3.6 ± 2.1 years. The distribution of the endometriosis phenotypes was 3.1% superficial endometriosis, 8.2% ovarian endometrioma, and 88.7% deep infiltrating endometriosis. The mean VAS scores for DM, DP, and GI pain symptoms were 6.6 ± 2.7, 3.4 ± 3.1, and 3.1 ± 3.6, respectively. Two hundred and forty-two patients (68.4%) had severe pain symptoms. The CLBR per patient was 63.8% (226/354). Neither the mean VAS scores for the various painful symptoms nor the proportion of patients displaying severe pain differed significantly between patients who had a live birth and those who had not, based on univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.229). The only significant factors associated with negative ART live births were age >35 years (P < 0.001) and anti-Müllerian hormone levels <1.2 ng/ml (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on imaging rather than surgery. This limitation is, however, inherent to the design of most studies on endometriosis patients reverting to ART first. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Rather than considering a single argument such as pain, the decision-making process for choosing between ART and surgery in infertile endometriosis patients should be based on a multitude of aspects, including the patient's choice, the associated infertility factors, the endometriosis phenotypes, and the efficiency of medical therapies in regard to pain symptoms, through an individualized approach guided by a multidisciplinary team of experts. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding; no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Severe pelvic pain is associated with sexual abuse experienced during childhood and/or adolescence irrespective of the presence of endometriosis.

STUDY QUESTION: Is endometriosis associated with childhood and/or adolescent sexual abuse? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometriosis is not associated with a history of sexual abuse, unlike the presence of severe pelvic pain. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Several studies have highlighted a link between pelvic pain and sexual abuse during childhood/adolescence. Moreover, an inflammatory state has been described in patients with a history of childhood maltreatment. Given that inflammation and pelvic pain are two entities often encountered with endometriosis, several teams have investigated whether endometriosis is associated with abuse during childhood/adolescence. However, the results are conflicting, and the link between sexual abuse and the presence of endometriosis and/or pain is hard to disentangle. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A survey nested in a cohort study of women surgically explored for benign gynecological indications at our institution between January 2013 and January 2017. For each patient, a standardized questionnaire was completed during a face-to-face interview with the surgeon in the month preceding the surgery. Pelvic pain symptoms (dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, non-cyclic chronic pelvic pain, and gastrointestinal or lower urinary tract symptoms) and their intensities were assessed with a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). Pain was considered to be severe when the VAS score was ≥7. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A 52-question survey was sent in September of 2017 to evaluate abuses, especially sexual abuse during childhood and/or adolescence, and the psychological state during childhood and adolescence. The survey was structured to cover the following sections: (i) abuses and other life events during childhood and adolescence; (ii) puberty and body changes; (iii) onset of sexuality; and (iv) family relationships during childhood and adolescence. The patients were divided into groups according to whether or not they exhibited histologically proven endometriosis. Statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Two hundred and seventy-one patients answered all the questions of the survey: 168 with (endometriosis group) and 103 without endometriosis (control group). The mean ± SD overall population age was 32.2 ± 5.1 years. There were 136 (80.9%) and 48 (46.6%) women who experienced at least one severe pelvic pain symptom in the endometriosis and the control groups, respectively (P < 0.001). No differences were found between the two study groups regarding the following characteristics: (i) a history of sexual, physical, or emotional abuse; (ii) a history of abandonment or bereavement; (iii) the psychological state regarding puberty; and (iv) the family relationships. After multivariable analysis, we found no significant association between endometriosis and a history of sexual abuse during childhood and/or adolescence (P = 0.550). However, the presence of at least one severe pelvic pain symptom was independently associated with a history of sexual abuse (odds ratio = 3.6, 95% CI (1.2-10.4)). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Evaluation of the psychological state during childhood and/or adolescence can be subject to recall bias. In addition, selection bias is also a possibility given that some of the patients surveyed did not return the questionnaire. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Severe gynecological painful symptoms in women with or without histologically proven endometriosis may be linked to sexual abuse experienced during childhood and/or adolescence. Patient questioning about painful symptoms and abuses is important to provide comprehensive care to the patients, from a psychological to a somatic point of view. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding or competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Clinical factors associated with low serum progesterone levels on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer in hormonal replacement therapy cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Which factors are associated with low serum progesterone (P) levels on the day of frozen embryo transfer (FET), in HRT cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: BMI, parity and non-European geographic origin are factors associated with low serum P levels on the day of FET in HRT cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The detrimental impact of low serum P concentrations on HRT-FET outcomes is commonly recognized. However, the factors accounting for P level disparities among patients receiving the same luteal phase support treatment remain to be elucidated, to help clinicians predicting which subgroups of patients would benefit from a tailored P supplementation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Observational cohort study with 915 patients undergoing HRT-FET at a tertiary care university hospital, between January 2019 and March 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients undergoing single autologous blastocyst FET under HRT using exogenous estradiol and vaginal micronized progesterone for endometrial preparation. Women were only included once during the study period. The serum progesterone level was measured in the morning of the FET, in a single laboratory. Independent factors associated with low serum P levels (defined as ≤9.8 ng/ml, according to a previous published study) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Two hundred and twenty-six patients (24.7%) had a low serum P level, on the day of the FET. Patients with a serum P level ≤9.8 ng/ml had a lower live birth rate (26.1% vs 33.2%, P = 0.045) and a higher rate of early miscarriage (35.2% vs 21.5%, P = 0.008). Univariate analysis showed that BMI (P < 0.001), parity (P = 0.001), non-European geographic origin (P = 0.001), the duration of infertility (P = 0.018) and the use of oral estradiol for endometrial preparation (P = 0.009) were significantly associated with low serum P levels. Moreover, the proportion of active smokers was significantly lower in the 'low P concentrations' group (P = 0.002). After multivariate analysis, BMI (odds ratio (OR) 1.06 95% CI (1.02-1.11), P = 0.002), parity (OR 1.32 95% CI (1.04-1.66), P = 0.022), non-European geographic origin (OR 1.70 95% CI (1.21-2.39), P = 0.002) and active smoking (OR 0.43 95% CI (0.22-0.87), P = 0.018) remained independent factors associated with serum P levels ≤9.8 ng/ml. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The main limitation of this study is its observational design, leading to a risk of selection and confusion bias that cannot be ruled out, although a multivariable analysis was performed to minimize this. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Extrapolation of our results to other laboratories, or other routes and/or doses of administering progesterone also needs to be validated. There is urgent need for future research on clinical factors affecting P concentrations and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, to help clinicians in predicting which subgroups of patients would benefit from individualized luteal phase support. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding/no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Presence of adenomyosis at MRI reduces live birth rates in ART cycles for endometriosis.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the impact of adenomyosis on the live birth rate (LBR) in women affected by endometriosis women undergoing ART? SUMMARY ANSWER: For women undergoing ART, the presence of adenomyosis at MRI, especially T2 high-signal intensity spots within the myometrium, has a negative impact on the LBR. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disease. The development of imaging techniques for the diagnosis has led to several adenomyosis phenotypes being described, and fertility issues appear to vary according to the characteristics of the lesions. What makes assessment of the impact of adenomyosis on fertility issues even more difficult is its frequent association with endometriosis, which is another known risk factor of infertility. Although data suggest that adenomyosis may worsen the ART prognosis, there is no clear consensus regarding the impact of adenomyosis on ART outcomes in women affected by endometriosis. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was an observational study that included phenotyped patients with endometriosis, aged between 18 and 42 years, who underwent IVF/ICSI treatment in a tertiary care center between June 2015 and July 2018. Only women who had undergone a pelvic MRI during the pre-therapeutic ART workup were retained for this study. The MRI data were interpreted by radiologists who had expertise in gynecological MRI. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A continuous series of 202 women affected by endometriosis was included. The women were monitored until four ART cycles had been completed, until delivery, or until discontinuation of treatment before the completion of four cycles. The primary outcome was the delivery of at least one live infant after up to four IVF/ICSI cycles. The patient and the MRI characteristics were compared between the women who achieved a live birth versus those who did not. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The patients' mean age was 32.5 ± 3.7 years. Deep infiltrating endometriosis was present in 90.1% (182/202) of the included population. Adenomyosis (lesions of the internal and/or the external myometrium) was found in 71.8% (145/202) of the included women. The cumulative LBR was 57.4% (116/202). The women who gave birth were significantly younger (32.0 ± 3.3 versus 33.3 ± 4.1, P = 0.026) and had significantly better ovarian reserve parameters (anti-Müllerian hormone levels, antral follicle count) than those who did not. The presence of adenomyosis, irrespective of the phenotype (76/116 (65.5%) versus 69/86 (80.2%), respectively, P = 0.022) and the presence of T2 high-signal intensity myometrial spots (27/116 (23.3%) and 37/86 (43.0%), respectively, P = 0.003) was significantly less frequent in the group of women who gave birth versus those who did not. After multivariate analysis, the presence of adenomyosis (odds ratio (OR): 0.48, 95% CI (0.29-0.99), P = 0.048) and the presence of T2 high-signal intensity myometrial spots (OR: 0.43, 95% CI (0.22-0.86), P = 0.018) were independently found to be associated with a decrease in the cumulative chance of live birth. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The inclusion of patients from a referral center specialized in the management of women affected by endometriosis could constitute a selection bias, as these women may have had particularly severe forms of adenomyosis and/or endometriosis. A sensitive issue is that there is no consensual classification of adenomyosis and several lesions of adenomyosis can co-exist. Therefore, a comparison of fertility outcomes between women with and without adenomyosis is difficult to perform in practice. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In women exhibiting endometriosis, the practitioner should perform an appropriate imaging workup to search for adenomyosis, identify prognostic factors, and personalize the patient management strategy in the setting of ART. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was obtained and there were no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

[Adenomyosis pathophysiology: An unresolved enigma]. / Physiopathologie de l'adénomyose : une énigme non résolue.

Adenomyosis is a chronic benign uterine disease characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma within the myometrium. It is a heterogeneous disease, presenting various clinical forms, depending on the location of the ectopic lesions within the myometrium. Adenomyosis can be responsible for several symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding and/or infertility. Its pathophysiology is a real conundrum and several theories have been proposed: development of adenomyosis lesion could initiate de novo from Mullerian rests or from stem cells. Moreover, multiple factors could be involved in initiating lesions, including specific hormonal, immune and/or genetic changes. The objective of this review is to provide an update on adenomyosis pathophysiology, in particular on the various theories proposed concerning the invasion of the myometrium by endometrial cells and the inducing mechanisms, and to study the link between the physiopathology, the symptoms and the medical treatments.

[Guidelines for Clinical Practice of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2021: Prophylactic procedures associated with gynecologic surgery]. / Recommandations pour Pratique Clinique du Collège des Gynécologues Obstétriciens français 2021 : gestes prophylactiques associés en chirurgie gynécologique.

OBJECTIVE: To draw up recommendations on the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures during surgery for other indications. DESIGN: A consensus panel of 19 experts was convened. A formal conflict of interest policy was established at the onset of the process and applied throughout. The entire study was performed independently without funding from pharmaceutical companies or medical device manufacturers. The panel applied the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system to evaluate the quality of evidence on which the recommendations were based. The authors were advised against making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence. Some recommendations were ungraded. METHODS: The panel studied 22 key questions on seven prophylactic procedures: 1) salpingectomy, 2) fimbriectomy, 3) salpingo-oophorectomy, 4) ablation of peritoneal endometriosis, 5) adhesiolysis, 6) endometrial excision or ablation, and 7) cervical ablation. RESULTS: The literature search and application of the GRADE system resulted in 34 recommendations. Six were supported by high-quality evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 28 by low-quality evidence (GRADE 2+/-). Recommendations on two questions were left ungraded due to a lack of evidence in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: A high level of consensus was achieved among the experts regarding the use of prophylactic gynecologic procedures. The ensuing recommendations should result in improved current practice.

Immune cells and Notch1 signaling appear to drive the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in the development of adenomyosis in mice.

The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been implicated in the development of adenomyosis, along with dysregulated immune responses. Inflammation potentially induces Notch signaling, which could promote this EMT. The objective of this study was to investigate the involvement of immune cells and Notch1-mediated EMT in the development of adenomyosis. Adenomyosis was induced in 18 CD-1 mice by neonatal oral administration of tamoxifen (TAM group), while 18 neonates received vehicle only (Control group). Their uteri were sampled at 30, 60 or 90 days of age. Immune cell markers (Cd45, Ly6c1, Cd86, Arginine1, Cd19, Cd4, Cd8), Notch1 and its target genes (Hey1, Hey2, Hes1, Hes5) and biomarkers of EMT (E-Cadherin, Vimentin, Tgfb, Snail1, Slug, Snail3) were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Activated-Notch1 protein was measured by western blot. Aberrant expression of immune cell markers was observed in the uteri of mice as they developed adenomyosis. The expression of inflammatory cell markers, notably M1 macrophages and natural killer cells, was increased from Day 30 in the TAM group compared to controls, followed by an increase in the Cd4 marker (T cells) at Day 60. Conversely, expression of the Cd19 marker (B cells) was significantly reduced at all of the stages studied. Notch1 signaling was also highly activated compared to controls at Day 30 and Day 60. Concomitantly, the levels of several markers for EMT were also higher. Therefore, the activation of Notch1 coincides with aberrant expression of immune and EMT markers in the early development of adenomyosis.

Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles.

STUDY QUESTION: Do adenomyosis phenotypes such as external or internal adenomyosis, as diagnosed by MRI, have the same clinical characteristics? SUMMARY ANSWER: External adenomyosis was found more often in young and nulliparous women and was associated with deep infiltrating endometriosis, whereas, in contrast, internal adenomyosis was more often associated with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) but no differences were noted in terms of pain symptoms. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Adenomyosis is characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma deep within the myometrium, giving rise to dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain and menorrhagia. Various forms have been described, including adenomyosis of the outer myometrium (external adenomyosis), which corresponds to lesions separated from the junctional zone (JZ), and adenomyosis of the inner myometrium (internal adenomyosis), which is mostly characterized by endometrial implants scattered throughout the myometrium and enlargement of the JZ. Although the pathogenesis of adenomyosis is not clearly understood, several lines of evidence suggest that these two phenotypes could have distinct origins. The clinical presentation of different forms of adenomyosis in patients warrants further investigation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was an observational study that used data collected prospectively in non-pregnant patients aged between 18 and 42 years who had undergone surgical exploration for benign gynecological conditions at our institution between May 2005 and May 2018. Only women with a pelvic MRI performed by a senior radiologist during the preoperative work-up were retained for this study. For each patient, a standardized questionnaire was completed during a face-to-face interview conducted by the surgeon in the month preceding the surgery. The women's histories (notably their age, gravidity, history of surgery and associated endometriosis), as well as clinical symptoms such as the pain intensity, presence of menorrhagia and infertility, were noted. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A pelvic MRI was performed in 496 women operated at our center for a benign gynecological disease who had provided signed informed consent. Of these, 248 women had a radiological diagnosis of adenomyosis. Based on the MRI findings, the women were diagnosed as having external and/or internal adenomyosis. The women were allocated to two groups according to the adenomyosis phenotype (only external adenomyosis vs only internal adenomyosis). Women exhibiting an association of both adenomyosis forms were analyzed separately. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In all, following the MRI findings, 109 women (44.0%) exhibited only external adenomyosis, while 78 (31.5%) had only internal adenomyosis. The women with external adenomyosis were significantly younger (mean ± SD; 31.9 ± 4.6 vs 33.8 ± 5.2 years; P = 0.006), more often nulligravid (P ≤ 0.001) and more likely to exhibit an associated endometriosis (P < 0.001) compared to the women in the internal adenomyosis group. Moreover, the women exhibiting internal adenomyosis significantly more often had a history of previous uterine surgery (P = 0.002) and HMB (62 (80%) vs 58 (53.2%), P < 0.001) compared to the women with external adenomyosis. No differences in the pain scores (i.e. dysmenorrhea, non-cyclic pelvic pain and dyspareunia) were observed between the two groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The exclusive inclusion of surgical patients could constitute a possible selection bias, as the women referred to our center may have suffered from particularly severe clinical symptoms. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Further studies are needed to explore the pathogenesis by which these types of adenomyosis occur. This could help with the development of new treatment strategies specific for each entity. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): none. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Immunological changes associated with adenomyosis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Adenomyosis is a benign gynecological disorder associated with subfertility, pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding that have significant consequences for the health and quality of life of women. Histologically, it is defined as the presence of ectopic endometrial islets within the myometrium. Its pathogenesis has not yet been elucidated and several pieces of the puzzle are still missing. One process involved in the development of adenomyosis is the increased capacity of some endometrial cells to infiltrate the myometrium. Moreover, the local and systemic immune systems are associated with the onset of the disease and with maintaining it. Numerous observations have highlighted the activation of immune cells and the release of immune soluble factors in adenomyosis. The contribution of immunity occurs in conjunction with hormonal aberrations and activation of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway, which promotes migration of endometrial cells. Here, we review current knowledge on the immunological changes in adenomyosis, with the aim of further elucidation of the pathogenesis of this disease. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The objective was to systematically review the literature regarding the role of the immune system in development of adenomyosis in the inner and the outer myometrium, in humans. SEARCH METHODS: A systematic review of published human studies was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases from 1970 to February 2019 using the combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): Adenomyosis AND ('Immune System' OR 'Gonadal Steroid Hormones'), and free-text terms for the following search terms (and their variants): Adenomyosis AND (immunity OR immune OR macrophage OR 'natural killer cell' OR lymphocyte* OR leucocyte* OR HLA OR inflammation OR 'sex steroid' OR 'epithelial to mesenchymal transition' OR 'EMT'). Studies in which no comparison was made with control patients, without adenomyosis (systemic sample and/or eutopic endometrium), were excluded. OUTCOMES: A total of 42 articles were included in our systematic review. Changes in innate and adaptive immune cell numbers were described in the eutopic and/or ectopic endometrium of women with adenomyosis compared to disease-free counterparts. They mostly described an increase in lymphocyte and macrophage cell populations in adenomyosis eutopic endometrium compared to controls. These observations underscore the immune contributions to the disease pathogenesis. Thirty-one cytokines and other markers involved in immune pathways were studied in the included articles. Pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL) 6, IL1ß, interferon (IFN) α, tumor necrosis factor α, IFNγ) as well as anti-inflammatory or regulatory mediators (IL10, transforming growth factor ߅) were found to be elevated in the eutopic endometrium and/or in the ectopic endometrium of the myometrium in women with adenomyosis compared to controls. Moreover, in women affected by adenomyosis, immunity was reported to be directly or indirectly linked to sex steroid hormone aberrations (notably changes in progesterone receptor in eutopic and ectopic endometrium) in three studies and to EMT in four studies. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: The available literature clearly depicts immunological changes that are associated with adenomyosis. Both systemic and local immune changes have been described in women affected by adenomyosis, with the coexistence of changes in inflammatory as well as anti-inflammatory signals. It is likely that these immune changes, through an EMT mechanism, stimulate the migration of endometrial cells into the myometrium that, together with an endocrine imbalance, promote this inflammatory process. In light of the considerable impact of adenomyosis on women's health, a better understanding of the role played by the immune system in adenomyosis is likely to yield new research opportunities to better understand its pathogenesis.

Associated ileocaecal location is a marker for greater severity of low rectal endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ileocaecal endometriosis (ICE) is a marker for low rectal endometriosis (LRE) severity. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: France. POPULATION AND SAMPLE: Analysis of 375 colorectal resections performed in women undergoing complete surgery for LRE from January 1995 to December 2015 in a university centre for endometriosis. METHODS: Univariate and multivariate analysis of anatomical, postoperative clinical, and long-term outcomes according to presence of ICE. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mean number and type of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) lesions, the existence of an associated endometrioma, and mean total American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) score. RESULTS: The prevalence of ICE was 25.6%. Primary end-point data showed that women with ICE had a significantly higher adjusted number of DIE lesions (OR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-3.03; P = 0.048), higher prevalence of endometriomas (OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.04-3.51; P = 0.044), more associated DIE sigmoid lesions (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.07-3.91; P = 0.025), and a higher mean total ASRM score (OR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.12-4.14; P = 0.025). Women with ICE resected during the surgical procedure for LRE did not have more adverse postoperative clinical outcomes than ICE-negative patients. CONCLUSION: Ileocaecal endometriosis was significantly associated with greater LRE severity. In a complete surgical resection strategy, combining resection of ICE and LRE did not appear to increase postoperative rates of complications, morbidity or recurrence, nor did it seem to impair long-term clinical outcomes. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: In women with low rectal endometriosis, 25% have an associated ileocaecal location that is a marker for severity.

B lymphocytes inactivation by Ibrutinib limits endometriosis progression in mice.

STUDY QUESTION: What are the effects of B lymphocyte inactivation or depletion on the progression of endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER: Skewing activated B cells toward regulatory B cells (Bregs) by Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) inhibition using Ibrutinib prevents endometriosis progression in mice while B cell depletion using an anti-CD20 antibody has no effect. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A polyclonal activation of B cells and the presence of anti-endometrial autoantibodies have been described in a large proportion of women with endometriosis though their exact role in the disease mechanisms remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study included comparison of endometriosis progression for 21 days in control mice versus animals treated with the anti-CD20 depleting antibody or with the Btk inhibitor Ibrutinib that prevents B cell activation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: After syngeneic endometrial transplantation, murine endometriotic lesions were compared between treated and control mice using volume, weight, ultrasonography, histology and target genes expression in lesions. Phenotyping of activated and regulatory B cells, T lymphocytes and macrophages was performed by flow cytometry on isolated spleen and peritoneal cells. Cytokines were assayed by ELISA. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Btk inhibitor Ibrutinib prevented lesion growth, reduced mRNA expression of cyclooxygenase-2, alpha smooth muscle actin and type I collagen in the lesions and skewed activated B cells toward Bregs in the spleen and peritoneal cavity of mice with endometriosis. In addition, the number of M2 macrophages decreased in the peritoneal cavity of Ibrutinib-treated mice compared to anti-CD20 and control mice. Depletion of B cells using an anti-CD20 antibody had no effect on activity and growth of endometriotic lesions and neither on the macrophages, compared to control mice. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: It is still unclear whether B cell depletion by the anti-CD20 or inactivation by Ibrutinib can prevent establishment and/or progression of endometriosis in humans. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Further investigation may contribute to clarifying the role of B cell subsets in human endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by a grant of Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale and Paris Descartes University. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to disclose.

Management of endometriosis: CNGOF/HAS clinical practice guidelines - Short version.

First-line diagnostic investigations for endometriosis are physical examination and pelvic ultrasound. The second-line investigations are: targeted pelvic examination performed by an expert clinician, transvaginal ultrasound performed by an expert physician sonographer (radiologist or gynaecologist), and pelvic MRI. Management of endometriosis is recommended when the disease has a functional impact. Recommended first-line hormonal therapies for the management of endometriosis-related pain are combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) or the 52mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (IUS). There is no evidence base on which to recommend systematic preoperative hormonal therapy solely to prevent surgical complications or facilitate surgery. After surgery for endometriosis, a CHC or 52mg levonorgestrel-releasing IUS is recommended as first-line treatment when pregnancy is not desired. In the event of failure of the initial treatment, recurrence, or multiorgan involvement, a multidisciplinary team meeting is recommended, involving physicians, surgeons and other professionals. A laparoscopic approach is recommended for surgical treatment of endometriosis. HRT can be offered to postmenopausal women who have undergone surgical treatment for endometriosis. Antigonadotrophic hormonal therapy is not recommended for patients with endometriosis and infertility to increase the chances of spontaneous pregnancy, including postoperatively. Fertility preservation options must be discussed with patients undergoing surgery for ovarian endometriomas.

[Definition, description, clinicopathological features, pathogenesis and natural history of endometriosis: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. / Définition, description, formes anatomo-cliniques, pathogenèse et histoire naturelle de l'endométriose, RPC Endométriose CNGOF-HAS.

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are histologically defined. The frequency of endometriosis cannot be precisely estimated in the general population. Endometriosis is considered a disease when it causes pain and/or infertility. Endometriosis is a heterogeneous disease with three well-recognized subtypes that are often associated with each other: superficial endometriosis (SUP), ovarian endometrioma (OMA), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DIE is frequently multifocal and mainly affects the following structures: the uterosacral ligaments, the posterior vaginal cul-de-sac, the bladder, the ureters, and the digestive tract (rectum, recto-sigmoid junction, appendix). The role of menstrual reflux in the pathophysiology of endometriosis is major and explains the asymmetric distribution of lesions, which predominate in the posterior compartment of the pelvis and on the left (NP3). All factors favoring menstrual reflux increase the risk of endometriosis (early menarche, short cycles, AUB, etc.). Inflammation and biosteroid hormones synthesis are the main mechanisms favoring the implantation and the growth of the lesions. Pain associated with endometriosis can be explained by nociception, hyperalgia, and central sensitization, associated to varying degrees in a single patient. Typology of pain (dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, digestive or urinary symptoms) is correlated with the location of the lesions. Infertility associated with endometriosis can be explained by several non-exclusive mechanisms: a pelvic factor (inflammation), disrupting natural fertilization; an ovarian factor, related to oocyte quality and/or quantity; a uterine factor disrupting implantation. The pelvic factor can be fixed by surgical excision of the lesions that improves the chance of natural conception (NP2). The uterine factor can be corrected by an ovulation-blocking treatment that improves the chances of getting pregnant by in vitro fertilization (NP2). The impact of endometrioma exeresis on the ovarian reserve (NP2) should be considered when a surgery is scheduled. Endometriosis is a multifactorial disease, resulting from combined action of genetic and environmental factors. The risk of developing endometriosis for a first-degree relative is five times higher than in the general population (NP2). Identification of genetic variants involved in the disease has no implication for clinical practice for the moment. The role of environmental factors, particularly endocrine disrupters, is plausible but not demonstrated. Literature review does not support the progression of endometriosis over time, either in terms of the volume or the number of the lesions (NP3). The risk of acute digestive occlusion or functional loss of a kidney in patients followed for endometriosis seems exceptional. These complications were revealing the disease in the majority of cases. IVF does not increase the intensity of pain associated with endometriosis (NP2). There is few data on the influence of pregnancy on the lesions, except the possibility of a decidualization of the lesions that may give them a suspicious aspect on imaging. The impact of endometriosis on pregnancy is debated. There is an epidemiological association between endometriosis and rare subtypes of ovarian cancer (endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas) (NP2). However, the relative risk is moderate (around 1.3) (NP2) and the causal relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer is not demonstrated so far. Considering the low incidence of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer, there is no argument to propose a screening or a risk reducing strategy for the patients.

[Endometriosis and fertility preservation: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. / Endométriose et préservation de la fertilité, RPC Endométriose, CNGOF-HAS.

Fertility preservation (FP) techniques are progressing rapidly these past few years thanks to the oocyte vitrification. Indication of FP techniques is now extended to non-oncological situation that may induce risk of premature ovarian failure. Ovarian endometriosis can lead to premature ovarian failure and further infertility due to the high risk of ovarian cysts recurrence and surgery. To date, there is no cohort study regarding FP and endometriosis as well as no recommendation. Our purpose is to review the arguments in favor of FP in this specific area and to elaborate strategies according to each clinical form.

[Management of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in case of endometriosis related infertility: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. / Stratégies de prise en charge de l'infertilité en assistance médicale à la procréation dans un contexte d'endométriose, RPC Endométriose, CNGOF-HAS.

The management of endometriosis related infertility requires a global approach. In this context, the prescription of an anti-gonadotropic hormonal treatment does not increase the rate of non-ART (assisted reproductive technologies) pregnancies and it is not recommended. In case of endometriosis related infertility, the results of IVF management in terms of pregnancy and birth rates are not negatively affected by the existence of endometriosis. Controlled ovarian stimulation during IVF does not increase the risk of endometriosis associated symptoms worsening, nor accelerate the intrinsic progression of endometriosis and does not increase the rate of recurrence. However, in the context of IVF management for women with endometriosis, pre-treatment with GnRH agonist or with oestrogen/progestin contraception improve IVF outcomes. There is currently no evidence of a positive or negative effect of endometriosis surgery on IVF outcomes. Information on the possibilities of preserving fertility should be considered, especially before surgery.

[First line management without IVF of infertility related to endometriosis: Result of medical therapy? Results of ovarian superovulation? Results of intrauterine insemination? CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. / Prise en charge de l'infertilité en première intention hors FIV : performances du traitement médical ? Performances de la stimulation ovarienne ? Performances des inséminations ? RPC Endométriose CNGOF-HAS.

INTRODUCTION: Using the structured methodology of French guidelines (HAS-CNGOF), the aim of this chapter was to formulate good practice points (GPP), in relation to optimal non-ART management of endometriosis related to infertility, based on the best available evidence in the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This guideline was produced by a group of experts in the field including a thorough systematic search of the literature (from January 1980 to March 2017). Were included only women with endometriosis related to infertility. For each recommendation, a grade (A-D, where A is the highest quality) was assigned based on the strength of the supporting evidence. RESULTS: Management of endometriosis related to infertility should be multidisciplinary and take account into the pain, the global evaluation of infertile couple and the different phenotypes of endometriotic lesions (good practice point). Hormonal treatment for suppression of ovarian function should not prescribe to improve fertility (grade A). After laproscopy for endometriosis related to infertility, the Endometriosis Fertility Index should be used to counsel patients regarding duration of conventional treatments before undergoing ART (grade C). After laparoscopy surgery for infertile women with AFS/ASRM stage I/II endometriosis or superficial peritoneal endometriosis, controlled ovarian stimulation with or without intrauterine insemination could be used to enhance non-ART pregnancy rate (grade C). Gonadotrophins should be the first line therapy for the stimulation (grade B). The number of cycles before referring ART should not exceed up to 6 cycles (good practice point). No recommendation can be performed for non-ART management of deep infiltrating endometriosis or endometrioma, as suitable evidence is lacking. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Non-ART management is a possible option for the management of endometriosis related to infertility. Endometriosis Fertilty Index could be a useful tool for subsequent postoperative fertility management. Controlled ovarian stimulation can be proposed.

[Deeply infiltrating endometriosis and infertility: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. / Endométriose profonde et infertilité, RPC Endométriose CNGOF-HAS.

Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is a severe form of the disease, defined by endometriotic tissue peritoneal infiltration. The disease may involve the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligaments, digestive tract or bladder. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is responsible for disabling pain and infertility. The purpose of these recommendations is to answer the following question: in case of deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility, what is the best therapeutic strategy? First-line surgery and then in vitro fertilization (IVF) in case of persistent infertility or first-line IVF, without surgery? After exhaustive literature analysis, we suggest the following recommendations: studies focusing on spontaneous fertility of infertile patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis found spontaneous pregnancy rates about 10%. Treatment should be considered in infertile women with deeply infiltrating endometriosis when they wish to conceive. First-line IVF is a good option in case of no operated deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility. Pregnancy rates (spontaneous and following assisted reproductive techniques) after surgery (deep lesions without colorectal involvement) varie from 40 to 85%. After colorectal endometriosis resection, pregnancy rates vary from 47 to 59%. The studies comparing the pregnancy rates after IVF, whether or not preceded by surgery, are contradictory and do not allow, to date, to conclude on the interest of any surgical management of deep lesions before IVF. In case of alteration of ovarian reserve parameters (age, AMH, antral follicle count), there is no argument to recommend first-line surgery or IVF. The study of the literature does not identify any prognostic factors, allowing to chose between surgical management or IVF. The use of IVF in the indication "deep infiltrating endometriosis" allows satisfactory pregnancy rates without significant risk, regarding disease progression or oocyte retrieval procedure morbidity.