Barriers and facilitators for an effective palliative care communication with older people: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The present mixed-method systematic review identifies facilitators and barriers in palliative care communication among health professionals and older people. METHODS: The review process was conducted by three reviewers who searched studies in four different databases (January 2009-January 2022), exploring experiences of communication among health professionals and older people without cognitive impairments. Relevant articles were quality assessed with a standardized tool. RESULTS: Twenty-eight articles were included and the following 5 clusters were identified: 1) training and education for health professionals, 2) team working and coordination among health professionals, 3) communication skills, 4) time and availability, 5) emotional, cultural and psychological factors. The articles highlighted the need for greater preparation of health professionals around the management of palliative care communication with older people. CONCLUSION: Palliative care communication among health professionals and older people are characterized by several challenges. However, there are facilitating aspects that may be considered to improve the quality of communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Facilitators are promising approaches to support health professionals in providing high-quality palliative care communication to older people, developing a person-centred practice. Facilitators include palliative care training and educational opportunities for health professionals, like ELNEC Geriatric Curriculum, permitting them to develop specific competences in communication and aging.

Working memory and emotional interpretation bias in a sample of Syrian refugee adolescents.

The number of adolescent refugees around the world has been continuously increasing over the past few years trying to escape war and terror, among other things. Such experience not only increases the risk for mental health problems including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but also may have implications for socio-cognitive development. This study tested cognitive-affective processing in refugee adolescents who had escaped armed conflict in Syria and now resided in Istanbul, Turkey. Adolescents were split into a high trauma (n = 31, 12 girls, mean age = 11.70 years, SD = 1.15 years) and low trauma (n = 27, 14 girls, mean age = 11.07 years, SD = 1.39 years) symptom group using median split, and performed a working memory task with emotional distraction to assess cognitive control and a surprise faces task to assess emotional interpretation bias. The results indicated that high (vs. low) trauma symptom youth were ~ 20% worse correctly remembering the spatial location of a cue, although both groups performed at very low levels. However, this finding was not modulated by emotion. In addition, although all youths also had a ~ 20% bias toward interpreting ambiguous (surprise) faces as more negative, the high (vs. low) symptom youth were faster when allocating such a face to the positive (vs. negative) emotion category. The findings suggest the impact of war-related trauma on cognitive-affective processes essential to healthy development.