Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 185
Filtrar
1.
Eur Heart J ; 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747246

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the first choice to treat older patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). This study aimed to compare TAVI with surgery in low-risk patients ≤ 75 years of age, including both tricuspid and bicuspid AS. METHODS: The NOTION-2 trial enrolled and 1:1 randomized low-risk patients aged ≤ 75 years with severe symptomatic AS to TAVI or surgery. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke or rehospitalization (related to the procedure, valve or heart failure) at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 71.1 years and a median Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score of 1.1%. A total of 100 patients had bicuspid AS. The 1-year incidence of the primary endpoint was 10.2% in the TAVI group and 7.1% in the surgery group (absolute risk difference 3.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.7% to 8.8%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.4, 95% CI: 0.7 to 2.9; p=0.3). Patients with TAVI, when compared to surgery, had lower risk of major bleeding and new-onset atrial fibrillation and higher risk of non-disabling stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation and moderate-or-greater paravalvular regurgitation. The risk of the primary composite endpoint was 8.7% and 8.3% in patients with tricuspid AS (HR 1.0, 95% CI: 0.5 to 2.3) and 14.3% and 3.9% in patients with bicuspid AS (HR 3.8, 95% CI: 0.8 to 18.5) treated with TAVI or surgery, respectively (P for interaction=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk patients aged ≤ 75 years with severe symptomatic AS, the rate of the composite of death, stroke, or rehospitalization at one year was similar between TAVI and surgery. TAVI outcomes in young bicuspid AS patients warrant caution and should be further investigated. (NOTION-2, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02825134).

2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247525, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38639933

RESUMEN

Importance: Aggregated data and long-term follow-up in national health data registers offer the opportunity to compare the performance of mechanical aortic prostheses within the same population. Objective: To investigate the clinical performance of mechanical aortic valve prostheses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cohort study included all 5224 patients who underwent primary mechanical aortic valve replacement in Sweden between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed between May and September 2023. Exposures: Surgical aortic valve replacement with the On-X, Carbomedics, Bicarbon, Standard, Regent, Open Pivot, Masters, or Advantage valve models. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes were reintervention, heart failure, major bleeding, stroke, and embolic events. Regression standardization was used to account for baseline differences. Results: Overall, 5224 patients (mean [SD] age, 56.8 [11.7] years; 3908 men [74.8%]) were included. Total follow-up time was 43 982 person-years (mean [SD], 8.4 [4.6] years; maximum, 17.2 years). After regression standardization, there was a significant difference in 10-year mortality between the Carbomedics model group (17%; 95% CI, 15%-18%), Regent model group (17%; 95% CI, 13%-20%), and Standard model group (17%; 95% CI, 14%-19%) compared with the Bicarbon model group (27%; 95% CI, 21%-34%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of mechanical valve surgical aortic replacement outcomes in Sweden, the rate of all-cause mortality was higher in the Bicarbon group than in the Carbomedics, Regent, and Standard model groups. These findings warrant further research on the long-term clinical performance of the Bicarbon valve.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Diseño de Prótesis
3.
BJA Open ; 10: 100279, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38680128

RESUMEN

Background: We hypothesised that a continuous 72-h bilateral parasternal infusion of lidocaine at 2×35 mg h-1 would decrease pain and the inflammatory response after sternotomy for open heart surgery, subsequently improving quality of recovery. Methods: We randomly allocated 45 participants to a 72-h bilateral parasternal infusion of lidocaine or saline commencing after wound closure. The primary outcome was the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption at 72 h. Secondary outcomes included total morphine requirement, pain, peak expiratory flow, and serum interleukin-6 concentration. In addition, we used an eHealth platform for a 3-month follow-up of pain, analgesic use, and Quality of Recovery-15 scores. Results: The 72-h PCA morphine requirement was significantly lower in the lidocaine than the saline group (10 mg [inter-quartile range: 5-19 mg] and 28.2 mg [inter-quartile range: 16-42.5 mg], respectively; P=0.014). The total morphine requirement (including morphine administered before the start of PCA) was significantly lower at 24, 48, and 72 h. Pain was well controlled with no difference in pain scores between treatment groups. The peak expiratory flow was lower in the lidocaine group at 72 h. Interleukin-6 concentrations showed no difference at 24, 48, or 72 h. Quality of Recovery-15 scores did not differ between treatment groups at any time during the 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: After sternotomy for open heart surgery, a 72-h bilateral parasternal lidocaine infusion significantly decreased PCA and total morphine requirement. However, neither signs of decreased inflammatory response nor an improvement in recovery was seen. Clinical trial registration: EudraCT number 2018-004672-35.

4.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 65(4)2024 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38547393

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and safety of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy compared with lobectomy by studying early postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent uniportal segmentectomy and lobectomy between 2017 and 2022 at Karolinska University Hospital. Early clinical outcomes were compared between the uniportal segmentectomy and lobectomy groups. Differences in baseline characteristics were addressed using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: A total of 833 patients (232 segmentectomy, 601 lobectomy) were included. The number of uniportal operations increased during the study period. Patients in the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups, respectively, had stage I lung cancer in 65% and 43% of the cases; 97% and 94% had no postoperative complications, the median number of lymph node stations sampled was 4 vs 5, and non-radical microscopic resection occurred in 1.7% vs 1.8%. The drains were removed on postoperative day 1 in 75% vs 72% of the patients following segmentectomy and lobectomy, respectively, and 90% vs 89% were discharged directly home. CONCLUSIONS: Uniportal video-assisted segmentectomy was performed with similar early postoperative clinical results compared with uniportal lobectomy in patients with benign, metastatic or early-stage lung cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Humanos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Neumonectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Pulmón/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
5.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 65(3)2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38485689

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Depression has been associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to determine whether self-reported preoperative depressive symptoms were associated with worse long-term survival in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: This population-based, observational cohort study included patients who had undergone cardiac surgery at Karolinska University Hospital between 2013 and 2016. Self-reported data about depressive symptoms were collected using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and other patient data were collected from the institutional surgical database and medical charts. Depression was defined as a PHQ-9 score ≥10. Weighted flexible parametric survival models were used to estimate the association between self-reported preoperative depressive symptoms and all-cause mortality and to quantify absolute survival differences. RESULTS: Of the 1120 study patients, 162 (14.5%) had depressive symptoms before cardiac surgery. During a mean follow-up of 7.2 years (maximum, 9.2 years), there were 36 deaths in 1129 person-years (PYs) in the depressed group, compared to 160 deaths in 6889 PYs in the non-depressed group. In the adjusted analysis, self-reported depressive symptoms were associated with worse long-term survival (hazard ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval 1.09-2.54) compared with no reported depressive symptoms. The absolute survival differences (% and 95% confidence interval) between the non-depressed and the depressed patients were -1.9 (-3.9 to 0.19), -5.7 (-11 to -0.01) and -9.7 (-19 to -0.4) after 1, 5 and 8 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported preoperative depressive symptoms were associated with worse long-term survival following cardiac surgery and should be regarded as important as other classical risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Depresión , Humanos , Depresión/epidemiología , Autoinforme , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
6.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 38(1): 101-108, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052689

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of elevated preoperative renal-resistive index (RRI) with persistent renal dysfunction, major adverse kidney events (MAKE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: RRI measurement the day before surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (60%) had elevated RRI ≥0.70. Five years after surgery, persistent renal dysfunction (sustained decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥25%) had occurred in 25 patients (26%), MAKE (persistent renal dysfunction, renal replacement therapy, or death) in 34 (35%), and MACE (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, decompensated heart failure, stroke, or cardiovascular death) in 28 (29%). RRI was higher in patients who developed persistent renal dysfunction (median, 0.78 [IQR, 0.74-0.82] v 0.70 [0.66-0.77], p = 0.001), MAKE (0.77 [0.72-0.81] v 0.68 [0.65-0.76], p = 0.002), and MACE (0.77 [0.72-0.81] v 0.70 [0.66-0.77], p = 0.006). Patients with elevated RRI had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of all long-term outcomes. After adjustment for baseline renal function and heart failure, elevated RRI was associated with persistent renal dysfunction (hazard ratio [HR], 5.82 [95% CI, 1.71-19.9]), MAKE (HR, 4.21 [1.59-11.1]), and MACE (HR, 2.81 [1.03-7.65]). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated preoperative RRI is associated with persistent renal dysfunction, MAKE, and MACE after cardiac surgery. Preoperative RRI may be used for long-term risk assessment in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Adulto , Humanos , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Riñón , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(1): e031387, 2024 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38156596

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether a bovine or porcine aortic valve bioprosthesis carries a higher risk of endocarditis after aortic valve replacement is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of prosthetic endocarditis in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a bovine versus porcine bioprosthesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: This nationwide, population-based cohort study included all patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with a bovine or porcine bioprosthesis in Sweden from 1997 to 2018. Regression standardization was used to account for intergroup differences. The primary outcome was prosthetic valve endocarditis, and the secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality and early prosthetic valve endocarditis. During a maximum follow-up time of 22 years, we included 21 022 patients, 16 603 with a bovine valve prosthesis and 4419 with a porcine valve prosthesis. The mean age was 73 years, and 61% of the patients were men. In total, 910 patients were hospitalized for infective endocarditis: 690 (4.2%) in the bovine group and 220 (5.0%) in the porcine group. The adjusted cumulative incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis at 15 years was 9.5% (95% CI, 6.2%-14.4%) in the bovine group and 2.8% (95% CI, 1.4%-5.6%) in the porcine group. The absolute risk difference between the groups at 15 years was 6.7% (95% CI, 0.8%-12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of endocarditis was higher in patients who received a bovine compared with a porcine valve prosthesis after surgical aortic valve replacement. This association should be considered in patients undergoing both surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.


Asunto(s)
Bioprótesis , Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Masculino , Humanos , Animales , Bovinos , Porcinos , Anciano , Femenino , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Endocarditis/epidemiología , Endocarditis/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos
8.
J Thorac Dis ; 15(7): 3543-3545, 2023 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37559629
10.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 67(9): 1256-1265, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37344999

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peripheral blocks are increasingly used for analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). We hypothesised that addition of sufentanil and adrenaline to levobupivacaine would improve the analgesic effect of a continuous extrapleural block. METHODS: We randomised 60 patients undergoing VATS to a 5-mL h-1 extrapleural infusion of levobupivacaine at 2.7 mg mL-1 (LB group) or levobupivacaine at 1.25 mg mL-1 , sufentanil at 0.5 µg mL-1 , and adrenaline at 2 µg mL-1 (LBSA group). The primary outcome was the cumulative morphine dose administered as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA-morphine) at 48 and 72 h. The secondary outcomes were pain according to numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and after two deep breaths twice daily, peak expiratory flow (PEF) daily, quality of recovery (QoR)-15 score at 1 day and 3 weeks postoperatively, serum levobupivacaine concentrations at 1 h after the start and at the end of the intervention, and adverse events. RESULTS: At 48 h, the median cumulative PCA-morphine dose for the LB group was 6 mg (IQR, 2-10 mg) and for the LBSA group 7 mg (IQR, 3-13.5 mg; p = .378). At 72 h, morphine doses were 10 mg (IQR, 3-22 mg) and 12.5 mg (IQR, 4-21 mg; p = .738), respectively. Median NRS score at rest and after two deep breaths was 3 or lower at all time points for both treatment groups. PEF did not differ between groups. Three weeks postoperatively, only the LB group returned to baseline QoR-15 score. The LB group had higher, but well below toxic, levobupivacaine concentrations at 48 and 72 h. The incidence of nausea, dizziness, pruritus and headache was equally low overall. CONCLUSION: For a continuous extrapleural block, and compared to plain levobupivacaine at 13.5 mg h-1 , levobupivacaine at 6.25 mg h-1 with addition of sufentanil and adrenaline did not decrease postoperative morphine consumption. The levobupivacaine serum concentrations after 48 and 72 h of infusion were well below toxic levels, therefore our findings support the use of the maximally recommended dose of levobupivacaine for a 2- to 3-day continuous extrapleural block.


Asunto(s)
Sufentanilo , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Humanos , Analgesia Controlada por el Paciente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Epinefrina , Levobupivacaína/uso terapéutico , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos
11.
Pulm Circ ; 13(2): e12219, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37128353

RESUMEN

Little is known about long-term quality of life (QOL) and functional status after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We investigated QOL and functional status late after PEA. All patients who underwent PEA for CTEPH 1993-2020 at one Swedish center were included. Baseline characteristics and data from right heart catheterization, 6-min walk test, and Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) were obtained from patient charts and national registers. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey was sent by post, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was evaluated by telephone. A total of 110 patients were included. The survey was completed by 49/66 (74%) patients who were alive in 2020. In all domains except for bodily pain, QOL was slightly lower than that of an age-matched reference population. The KPS score was obtained from 42/49 (86%) patients; of these, 31 patients (74%) had a KPS score of ≥80% (able to carry on normal activity). All 42 patients were able to live at home and care for personal needs. The median postoperative CAMPHOR scores were: 4 for symptoms, 4 for activity, and 2.5 for QOL. We observed that QOL after PEA approached the expected QOL in a reference population and that CAMPHOR scores were comparable to those of a large UK cohort after PEA. Functional status improved when assessed late after PEA. Three-quarters of the study population were able to conduct normal activities at late follow-up. Our findings suggest that many patients enjoy satisfactory QOL and high functional status late after PEA.

12.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 81(10): 964-975, 2023 03 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36889875

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is common following surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of PPM on all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and reintervention following bioprosthetic SAVR. METHODS: This observational nationwide cohort study from SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) and other national registers included all patients who underwent primary bioprosthetic SAVR in Sweden from 2003 to 2018. PPM was defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. Outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and aortic valve reintervention. Regression standardization was used to account for intergroup differences and to estimate cumulative incidence differences. RESULTS: We included 16,423 patients (no PPM: 7,377 [45%]; moderate PPM: 8,502 [52%]; and severe PPM: 544 [3%]). After regression standardization, the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality at 10 years was 43% (95% CI: 24%-44%) in the no PPM group compared with 45% (95% CI: 43%-46%) and 48% (95% CI: 44%-51%) in the moderate and severe PPM groups, respectively. The survival difference at 10 years was 4.6% (95% CI: 0.7%-8.5%) and 1.7% (95% CI: 0.1%-3.3%) in no vs severe PPM and no vs moderate PPM, respectively. The difference in heart failure hospitalization at 10 years was 6.0% (95% CI: 2.2%-9.7%) in severe vs no PPM. There was no difference in aortic valve reintervention in patients with or without PPM. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing grades of PPM were associated with long-term mortality, and severe PPM was associated with increased heart failure. Moderate PPM was common, but the clinical significance may be negligible because the absolute risk differences in clinical outcomes were small.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Diseño de Prótesis
13.
Am Heart J ; 259: 1-8, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36681173

RESUMEN

The TACSI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03560310) tests the hypothesis that 1-year treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and ticagrelor is superior to only ASA after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The TACSI trial is an investigator-initiated pragmatic, prospective, multinational, multicenter, open-label, registry-based randomized trial with 1:1 randomization to dual antiplatelet therapy with ASA and ticagrelor or ASA only, in patients undergoing first isolated CABG, with a planned enrollment of 2200 patients at Nordic cardiac surgery centers. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of time to all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new coronary revascularization within 12 months after randomization. The primary safety end point is time to hospitalization due to major bleeding. Secondary efficacy end points include time to the individual components of the primary end point, cardiovascular death, and rehospitalization due to cardiovascular causes. High-quality health care registries are used to assess primary and secondary end points. The patients will be followed for 10 years. The TACSI trial will give important information useful for guiding the antiplatelet strategy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with CABG.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg ; 11(4): 448-458, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35958533

RESUMEN

Background: The objective of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) after surgical treatment for endocarditis. Methods: This was a population-based, observational cohort study, conducted on all patients who received aortic valve surgery for native or prosthetic valve endocarditis at Karolinska University Hospital between 2002-2020. Baseline characteristics and postoperative complications were collected from the institutional surgical database and patient medical charts. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. We used unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression to determine the association between valve morphology and long-term mortality. Results: Of the 338 patients, 122 (36%) had a BAV and 216 (64%) had a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). The mean follow-up was 5.8 years (maximum 18.4 years). Survival rates at one, five, ten and 14 years were 88%, 81%, 78% and 76% versus 85%, 69%, 58% and 43%, in BAV and TAV patients, respectively [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-1.05]. In patients with native valve endocarditis, those with BAV had lower all-cause mortality compared to those with TAV (adjusted HR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.22-0.89), despite having a higher prevalence of perivalvular abscess (40% versus 22%, respectively, in BAV and TAV patients). In patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis, original valve morphology did not affect all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.94; 95% CI: 0.64-5.87). Conclusions: In patients with native valve endocarditis, a BAV was associated with improved survival after surgical treatment. In patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis, survival was not affected by the original valve morphology of the patient.

16.
Eur Heart J Open ; 2(2): oeac015, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35919122

RESUMEN

Aims: A diagnosis of depression in patients with coronary heart disease is associated with worse outcomes. This study examined the long-term risk for new onset of depression after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared to an age- and sex-matched control group from the general population. Methods and results: In total, 125 418 primary isolated CABG patients and 495 371 matched controls were included from 1992 to 2017. The SWEDEHEART registry and three other national registers were used to acquire information about baseline characteristics and depression. The adjusted risk of depression was estimated by using Cox regression models adjusted for patient characteristics, and socioeconomic variables, described by hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In total, 6202 (4.9%) CABG patients and 17 854 (3.6%) controls developed depression. The cumulative incidence of depression was higher in CABG patients than in the control population [6.1%, 95% CI 6.0-6.3 vs. 4.7% (4.7-4.8), P < 0.0001]. Overall, the CABG group had a marginally increased adjusted risk of depression compared to controls [adjusted HR (aHR): 1.05 (1.01-1.09), P = 0.0091]. In age-specific analyses, the increased risk compared to controls was only present in patients <65 years [aHR: 1.19 (1.11-1.27), P <0.0001] and was only evident during the first 5 years after surgery. Conclusion: Patients who underwent CABG had a higher risk of new onset of depression compared to sex- and age-matched controls in the general population. The risk of depression was especially pronounced in younger patients during the first 5 years after surgery.

17.
Pulm Circ ; 12(2): e12093, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35795490

RESUMEN

This study investigated whether residual pulmonary hypertension (PH), defined as early postoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of ≥30 mmHg, after undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) was associated with long-term survival. All patients who underwent PEA for CTEPH at two Scandinavian centers were included in this study. Baseline characteristics and vital statuses were obtained from patient charts and national health-data registers. The patients were then categorized based on residual PH measured via right heart catheterization within 48 h after undergoing PEA. Crude and weighted flexible parametric survival models were used to estimate the association between residual PH and all-cause mortality and to quantify absolute survival differences. From 1992 to 2020, 444 patients underwent surgery. We excluded 6 patients who died on the day of surgery and 12 patients whose early postoperative pulmonary hemodynamic data was unavailable. Of the total study population (n = 426), 174 (41%) and 252 (59%) patients had an early postoperative mPAP <30 and ≥30 mmHg, respectively. After weighting, there was a significant association between residual PH and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60-3.87), and the absolute survival difference between the groups at 10 and 20 years was -22% (95% CI: -32% to -12%) and-32% (95% CI: -47% to -18%), respectively. A strong and clinically relevant association of residual PH with long-term survival after PEA for CTEPH was found. After accounting for differences in baseline characteristics, the absolute survival difference at long-term follow-up was clinically meaningful and imply careful surveillance to improve clinical outcomes in these patients. Early postoperative right heart catheter measurements of mPAP seem to be helpful for prognostication following PEA for CTEPH.

19.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 11(13): e023743, 2022 07 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35766293

RESUMEN

Background As patients derive variable benefit from generator changes (GCs) of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) with an original primary prevention (PP) indication, better predictors of outcomes are needed. Methods and Results In the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry, patients undergoing GCs of initial non-cardiac resynchronization therapy PP ICDs in 2012 to 2016, predictors of post-GC survival and survival benefit versus control heart failure patients without ICDs were assessed. These included predicted annual mortality based on the Seattle Heart Failure Model, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35%, and the probability that a patient's death would be arrhythmic (proportional risk of arrhythmic death [PRAD]). In 40 933 patients undergoing GCs of initial noncardiac resynchronization therapy PP ICDs (age 67.7±12.0 years, 24.5% women, 34.1% with LVEF >35%), Seattle Heart Failure Model-predicted annual mortality had the greatest effect size for decreased post-GC survival (P<0.0001). Patients undergoing GCs of initial noncardiac resynchronization therapy PP ICDs with LVEF >35% had a lower Seattle Heart Failure Model-adjusted survival versus 23 472 control heart failure patients without ICDs (model interaction hazard ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.11-1.31]). In patients undergoing GCs of initial noncardiac resynchonization therapy PP ICDs with LVEF ≤35%, the model indicated worse survival versus controls in the 21% of patients with a PRAD <43% and improved survival in the 10% with PRAD >65%. The association of the PRAD with survival benefit or harm was similar in patients with or without pre-GC ICD therapies. Conclusions Patients who received replacement of an ICD originally implanted for primary prevention and had at the time of GC either LVEF >35% alone or both LVEF ≤35% and PRAD <43% had worse survival versus controls without ICDs.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Anciano , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Función Ventricular Izquierda
20.
Trials ; 23(1): 516, 2022 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35725494

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multimodal analgesia that provides optimal pain treatment with minimal side effects is important for optimal recovery after open cardiac surgery. Regional anaesthesia can be used to block noxious nerve signals. Because sternotomy causes considerable pain that lasts several days, a continuous nerve block is advantageous. Previous studies on continuous sternal wound infusion or parasternal blocks with long-acting local anaesthetics have shown mixed results. This study aims to determine whether a continuous bilateral parasternal block with lidocaine, which is a short-acting local anaesthetic that has a favourable safety/toxicity profile, results in effective analgesia. We hypothesise that a 72-hour continuous parasternal block with 0.5% lidocaine at a rate of 7 ml/hour on each side provides effective analgesia and reduces opioid requirement. We will evaluate whether recovery is enhanced. METHODS: In a prospective, randomised, double-blinded manner, 45 patients will receive a continuous parasternal block with either 0.5% lidocaine or saline. The primary endpoint is cumulated intravenous morphine by patient-controlled analgesia at 72 hours. Secondary end-points include the following: (1) the cumulated numerical rating scale (NRS) score recorded three times daily at 72 hours; (2) the cumulated NRS score after two deep breaths three times daily at 72 hours; (3) the NRS score at rest and after two deep breaths at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery; (4) oxycodone requirement at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery; (5) Quality of Recovery-15 score preoperatively compared with that at 24, 48 and 72 hours, and at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery; (6) preoperative peak expiratory flow compared with postoperative daily values for 3 days; and (7) serum concentrations of interleukin-6 and lidocaine at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours postoperatively compared with preoperative values. DISCUSSION: Adequate analgesia is important for quality of care and vital to a rapid recovery after cardiac surgery. This study aims to determine whether a continuous parasternal block with a short-acting local anaesthetic improves analgesia and recovery after open cardiac procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the European Clinical Trials Database on 27/9/2019 (registration number: 2018-004672-35).


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Lidocaína , Analgésicos Opioides , Anestésicos Locales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Esternotomía/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA