RESUMEN
We are very thankful to the commentator for pointing out the issues in the review article by Satam et al [...].
RESUMEN
The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has brought about a paradigm shift in genomics research, offering unparalleled capabilities for analyzing DNA and RNA molecules in a high-throughput and cost-effective manner. This transformative technology has swiftly propelled genomics advancements across diverse domains. NGS allows for the rapid sequencing of millions of DNA fragments simultaneously, providing comprehensive insights into genome structure, genetic variations, gene expression profiles, and epigenetic modifications. The versatility of NGS platforms has expanded the scope of genomics research, facilitating studies on rare genetic diseases, cancer genomics, microbiome analysis, infectious diseases, and population genetics. Moreover, NGS has enabled the development of targeted therapies, precision medicine approaches, and improved diagnostic methods. This review provides an insightful overview of the current trends and recent advancements in NGS technology, highlighting its potential impact on diverse areas of genomic research. Moreover, the review delves into the challenges encountered and future directions of NGS technology, including endeavors to enhance the accuracy and sensitivity of sequencing data, the development of novel algorithms for data analysis, and the pursuit of more efficient, scalable, and cost-effective solutions that lie ahead.
RESUMEN
Somatic mutations of EGFR and KRAS gene represent the most common alterations currently known in NSCLC patients. This study explored the frequency, distribution pattern of EGFR and KRAS mutations in Indian patients. The frequencies of EGFR and KRAS mutations were 29 % (116/400) and 4.5 % (6/132) respectively. Both EGFR and KRAS mutations were prevalent in females, and a trend towards higher mutation frequency was seen in patients under ≥ 60 years age. The presence of EGFR and KRAS mutations were higher in adenocarcinomas in comparison to other histological subtype. Sequencing analysis of EGFR exon 18 revealed Inframe deletion (G709_T710 > A) and missense mutation (K713R). Among exon 19 positive cases, 49.3 % (37/75) were in-frame deletions, of which E746_A750del was frequent. Similarly, ~47 % (35/75) cases showed complex mutation involving indel. Among mutations in exon 20 (N = 9), 8 were substitutions, one showed duplication, while all exon 21 mutations were of the missense types with L858R as the most recurrent type. Sequencing analysis of KRAS exon 1 revealed three different types codon 12 substitutions resulting in c34G > T (G12C) (n = 4), c.35G > A (G12D) (n = 1), and c.35G > T (G12V) (n = 1). In conclusion, the present study is an example of molecular diversity of EGFR and KRAS gene in Indian patients and further confirms that the frequency of EGFR and KRAS mutations varies considerably globally. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first Indian study to evaluate KRAS mutation. The current study also served to identify novel variations that added new insights into the genetic heterogeneity of NSCLC.
