Infliximab in neurosarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and relapse rates in neurosarcoidosis patients administered infliximab. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases. The search included studies from their inception to March 2023. We included case-series studies with at least 10 neurosarcoidosis patients undergoing any treatment type. Studies were also required to report at least one of the following outcomes: response rate, overall survival rate, or relapse rate. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A random-effects model facilitated the analysis of proportional treatment outcomes. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale, while a funnel plot helped detect any publication bias. RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 237 patients with neurosarcoidosis were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 184 (77.6%) received treatment with infliximab. The pooled proportion of patients showing clinical improvement after infliximab treatment was 0.74 (95% CI 0.64-0.84, I2 = 49.73%). Relapse rates, derived from four studies, stood at 0.38 (95% CI 0.22-0.55, I2 = 56.92%). Most studies reported successful tapering or cessation of corticosteroid dosage in patients receiving infliximab. Adverse effects were reported in 52 (29.4%) patients, of which 39 out of 54 events (72.2%) were linked to infections. INTERPRETATION: Infliximab demonstrated potential improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with refractory neurosarcoidosis and showed potential for reducing the dosage of concurrent corticosteroids. However, a degree of relapse was observed, with infections being the primary concern for adverse events.

Familial neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Case series and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is considered a complex multifactorial disorder. Most cases are sporadic, and familial NMOSD is assumed as a rare occurrence. However, few studies reported familial aggregation of the disorder. OBJECTIVES: To report familial NMOSD cases in Thailand and conduct a systematic review of familial NMOSD. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of familial NMOSD patients at the university hospital was performed. Articles related to "genetic" and "NMOSD" were systematically searched and reviewed. We included NMOSD patients whose one or more relatives were diagnosed with the same disease or multiple sclerosis (MS). Data regarding demographics, clinical features, disease outcomes, and genetic testing were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We identified 6 familial cases from 165 NMOSD cases (3.6%) at our hospital and gathered 77 cases from a systematic review, totaling 83 cases from 40 families. The mean (SD) age at onset was 37.2 (18.0) years. Familial NMOSD involved 1-2 generations with mainly 2 affected individuals. The most common kinship pattern was siblingship in 21 families (52.5%). Initial syndromes were mostly optic neuritis and transverse myelitis. Serum aquaporin-4 IgG was positive in 79.7% of cases. Median number of relapses was 3 (range 1-26). Median expanded disability status scale in the last visit was 2 (range 0-8). Reported human leukocyte antigens (HLA) alleles shared between familial cases were HLA-A*01 and HLA-DRB1*03. CONCLUSION: Familial clustering of NMOSD is more common than would be expected in the general population. The demographic, clinical, and outcome profiles of familial cases were not different from sporadic cases. Certain specific HLA haplotypes were shared among familial cases. Our systematic review highlighted complex genetic predisposition to NMOSD.