Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 32, 2020 Jan 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31931761

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Women with a migration background are reportedly at a higher risk of emergency caesarean section. There is evidence that this is due in part to suboptimal antenatal care use and quality of care. Despite the fact that migrant women and descendants of migrants are often at risk of socioeconomic disadvantage, there is, in comparison, scarce and incomplete evidence on the role of socioeconomic position as an independent risk factor for emergency caesarean delivery. We therefore investigate whether and how migration background and two markers of socioeconomic position affect the risk of an emergency caesarean section and whether they interact with each other. METHODS: In 2013-2016, we recruited women during the perinatal period in Bielefeld, Germany, collecting data on health and socioeconomic and migration background, as well as routine perinatal data. We studied associations between migration background (1st generation migrant, 2nd/3rd generation woman, no migration background), socioeconomic status (educational attainment and net monthly household income), and the outcome emergency caesarean section. RESULTS: Of the 881 participants, 21% (n = 185) had an emergency caesarean section. Analyses showed no association between having an emergency caesarean section and migration status or education. Women in the lowest (< 800€/month) and second lowest (between 800 and 1750€/month) income categories were more likely (aOR: 1.96, CI: 1.01-3.81; and aOR: 2.36, CI: 1.27-4.40, respectively) to undergo an emergency caesarean section than women in the higher income groups. CONCLUSIONS: Migration status and education did not explain heterogeneity in mode of birth. Having a low household income, however, increased the chances of emergency caesarean section and thereby contributed towards producing health disadvantages. Awareness of these findings and measures to correct these inequalities could help to improve the quality of obstetric care.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Urgencias Médicas/epidemiología , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Clase Social , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Embarazo
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 300(3): 555-567, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31267197

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 21% of Germany's inhabitants have been born abroad or are of direct descent of immigrants. A positive birth experience has an effect on a woman's mental health and her future family planning choices. While international studies showed that immigrant women are less satisfied with their birth experience, no such study has been conducted in Germany until now. METHODS: At our center of tertiary care in Berlin, with approximately 50% immigrants among patients, pregnant women of at least 18 years of age were offered participation in this study. A modified version of the Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire (MFMCQ) designed by Gagnon et al. in German, English, French, Spanish, Arabic and Turkish was used. We compared non-immigrant women to immigrant women and women with direct descent of immigrants. For certain analysis, the latter two groups were included together under the category "migration background". RESULTS: During the study period, 184 non-immigrant, 214 immigrant women and 62 direct descendants of immigrants were included. The most frequent countries of origin were Syria (19%), Turkey (17%), and Lebanon (9%). We found a slight difference between groups regarding age (non-immigrants: mean 33 years versus women with any migration background: mean 31) as well as parity with more non-immigrants delivering their first child. No difference in the satisfaction with care was observed between immigrant and any migration background groups (p ≥ 0.093 in the two-sided Fisher's exact test). At least 75.8% of all participating women reported complete satisfaction with care during labor, birth and after birth. Interestingly, the level of German language proficiency did not influence the immigrant patient's satisfaction with care. CONCLUSION: The study results show no difference regarding overall satisfaction with care during labor and birth despite a relevant language barrier. We are for the first time providing the MFMCQ in German and Turkish. Further future analyses on the impact of patient expectations on satisfaction with care will be conducted.


Asunto(s)
Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Trabajo de Parto/psicología , Salud Materna , Madres/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Satisfacción Personal , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto/etnología , Líbano/etnología , Paridad , Parto , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Siria/etnología , Turquía/etnología
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 16: 105, 2016 Mar 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27020703

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In many European countries, foreign nationals experience, on average, less favorable treatment outcomes in rehabilitative care than the respective majority population. In Germany, this for example is reflected in a lower occupational performance and a higher risk of disability retirement after rehabilitation as analyses of routine data show. However, little is known about the perspective of health care users. The aim of the present study was to compare self-rated treatment outcomes between German and non-German nationals undergoing in-patient medical rehabilitation in Germany. METHODS: We analyzed data from a cross-sectional representative rehabilitation patient survey of 239,811 patients from 642 clinics in Germany who completed about 3 weeks of in-patient rehabilitative treatment. The self-rating of the treatment outcome was based on a dichotomized Likert scale consisting of three items. A multilevel logistic regression analysis adjusted for various demographic, socio-economic, health and other covariates was conducted to examine differences in the self-rated treatment outcome between German and non-German nationals. RESULTS: Of the 239,811 respondents 0.9% were nationals from Turkey, 0.8% had a nationality from a former Yugoslavian country, 0.9% held a nationality from the South European countries Portugal, Spain, Italy or Greece and 1.9% were nationals from other countries. Non-German nationals reported a less favorable self-rated outcome than Germans. Adjusted odds ratios [OR] for reporting a less favorable treatment outcome were 1.24 (95%-confidence interval [95%-CI]: 1.12-1.37) for nationals from the South European countries Portugal/Spain/Italy/Greece, 1.62 (95%-CI: 1.45-1.80) for Turkish nationals and 1.68 (95%-CI: 1.52-1.85) for nationals from Former Yugoslavia. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge on health outcomes from the patients' point of view is important for the provision of patient-centered health care. Our study showed that non-German nationals report less favorable outcomes of rehabilitative care than Germans. This may be due to cultural and religious needs not sufficiently addressed by health care providers. In order to improve rehabilitative care for non-German nationals, rehabilitative services must become sensitive to the needs of this population group. Diversity management can contribute to this process.


Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Rehabilitación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad , Europa Oriental/etnología , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Satisfacción del Paciente/etnología , Portugal , Turquía/etnología
4.
Br J Anaesth ; 115(4): 621-8, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26385671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We compared the effectiveness and cost of a pain screening and treatment program, with usual care in head and neck cancer patients with significant pain. METHODS: Patients were screened for the presence of pain and then randomly assigned to either an intervention group, consisting of a pain treatment protocol and an education program, or to usual care. Primary outcome was change in the Pain Severity Index (PSI) over three months. RESULTS: We screened 1074 patients of whom 156 were randomized to either intervention or usual care. Mean PSI was reduced over three months in both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups. The Pain Management Index (PMI) at three months, was significantly improved in the intervention group compared with usual care (P<0.001), as was Patient Satisfaction (mean difference in scores was statistically significant: -0.30 [-0.60 to -0.15]). All subjects reported clinically significant levels of anxiety and depression throughout the study. Treatment costs were significantly higher for intervention (mean=£400) compared with usual care (£200), with a low likelihood of being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the Pain Severity Index between the two groups. However there were significant improvements in the intervention group in patient satisfaction and PMI. The pain screening process itself was effective. Sufficient benefit was demonstrated as a result of the intervention to allow continued development of pain treatment pathways, rather than allowing pain treatment to be left to nonformalised ad hoc arrangements.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/economía , Manejo del Dolor/economía , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/economía , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven
5.
Clin Otolaryngol ; 40(6): 691-7, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25925071

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the reliability of tubomanometry (TMM) described by Estéve in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive Eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction. STUDY DESIGN: Combined prospective and retrospective clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre, affiliated to university. METHODS: Two hundred and fifteen healthy subjects were examined once, 25 healthy subjects underwent TMM weekly for 6 weeks, and six healthy subjects were tested three times a day on at least three different days. The results of tubomanometry in healthy subjects were compared to data obtained from 171 patients with chronic obstructive ET dysfunction. RESULTS: In healthy subjects, there was an immediate opening of the ET at 30-50 mbar with an R-value ≤ 1 in at least 94% of the cases. In patients with chronic ET dysfunction, an opening of the ET could be registered in only 42% of patients at 30 mbar and in 58% at 50 mbar. The average of the R-value in these subjects always indicated towards a delayed opening (R > 1). When measurements are repeated in the same subject with a weekly interval, the intraclass correlation (ICC) was 0.49 for the TMM with 30 mbar, 0.51 for the TMM with 40 mbar and 0.52 for the TMM with 50 mbar in healthy people. For the patients with symptoms of ET dysfunction, the ICC for up to four repeated measures was 0.50 for the TMM with 30 mbar, 0.53 for the TMM with 40 mbar and 0.54 for the TMM with 50 mbar. A complete agreement of the results in repeated measurements within seconds was present in 86% for 30 and 40 mbar and in 79% for 50 mbar. The ICC was 0.61 for the TMM with 50 mbar, 0.62 for the TMM with 40 mbar and 0.68 for the TMM with 30 mbar. CONCLUSIONS: Tubomanometry can support the diagnosis of ET dysfunction. An R-value ≤ 1 indicates a regular function of the ET, an R-value >1 indicates a delayed opening of the ET, and no definable R-value means no detectable opening of the ET. TMM is a reliable and valid instrument to support the diagnosis of chronic obstructive ET dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Oído/diagnóstico , Trompa Auditiva/fisiopatología , Manometría/instrumentación , Enfermedad Crónica , Enfermedades del Oído/fisiopatología , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Stat Med ; 33(26): 4547-59, 2014 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24989698

RESUMEN

Dichotomisation in medical research is sometimes necessary for decision-making or communication purposes. This practice has been criticised in the case of continuous data, and it has been said that means should be compared instead. However when the two groups have unequal variances, comparing means might not show the whole picture as a particular group with a risk defined by a threshold in an outcome may have been affected differently by an intervention than when there is a simple shift of distribution. A statistically sound method using a distributional approach for the dichotomisation of normally distributed outcomes has been described under the assumption of equal variances. This assumption is not sustainable in some situations, and in this work, we develop the method further to cover the case of unequal variances. Through examples from the literature and our own data, we illustrate the effect of unequal variance on dichotomised estimates and present a validation of the method through simulations.


Asunto(s)
Intervalos de Confianza , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Oportunidad Relativa , Simulación por Computador , Humanos
7.
Stat Med ; 32(8): 1429-38, 2013 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23027676

RESUMEN

In cluster-randomised trials, the problem of non-independence within clusters is well known, and appropriate statistical analysis documented. Clusters typically seen in cluster trials are large in size and few in number, whereas datasets of preterm infants incorporate clusters of size two (twins), size three (triplets) and so on, with the majority of infants being in 'clusters' of size one. In such situations, it is unclear whether adjustment for clustering is needed or even possible. In this paper, we compared analyses allowing for clustering (linear mixed model) with analyses ignoring clustering (linear regression). Through simulations based on two real datasets, we explored estimation bias in predictors of a continuous outcome in different size datasets typical of preterm samples, with varying percentages of twins. Overall, the biases for estimated coefficients were similar for linear regression and mixed models, but the standard errors were consistently much less well estimated when using a linear model. Non-convergence was rare but was observed in approximately 5% of mixed models for samples below 200 and percentage of twins 2% or less. We conclude that in datasets with small clusters, mixed models should be the method of choice irrespective of the percentage of twins. If the mixed model does not converge, a linear regression can be fitted, but standard error will be underestimated, and so type I error may be inflated.


Asunto(s)
Análisis por Conglomerados , Modelos Estadísticos , Tamaño de la Muestra , Preescolar , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro/fisiología , Masculino
8.
Stat Med ; 31(26): 3089-103, 2012 Nov 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22865598

RESUMEN

Dichotomisation of continuous data is known to be hugely problematic because information is lost, power is reduced and relationships may be obscured or changed. However, not only are differences in means difficult for clinicians to interpret, but thresholds also occur in many areas of medical practice and cannot be ignored. In recognition of both the problems of dichotomisation and the ways in which it may be useful clinically, we have used a distributional approach to derive a difference in proportions with a 95% CI that retains the precision and the power of the CI for the equivalent difference in means. In this way, we propose a dual approach that analyses continuous data using both means and proportions to replace dichotomisation alone and that may be useful in certain situations. We illustrate this work with examples and simulations that show good performance of the parametric approach under standard distributional assumptions from our own research and from the literature.


Asunto(s)
Bioestadística/métodos , Biometría , Peso al Nacer , Intervalos de Confianza , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Tamaño de la Muestra , Fumar/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...