Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
J Surg Res ; 278: 100-110, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35597024

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is commonly used in open abdomen management, where there may be a simultaneous need for prevention of abdominal hypertension, tamponade of hemorrhage, and continuous fascial tension. The regional pressure dynamics of vacuum dressings are poorly understood. METHODS: Three duroc swine underwent mid-line laparotomy and application of vacuum open abdomen dressing, with and without sponge packing. Twenty-five catheters were placed throughout the abdomen to capture and record pressures in each quadrant as the vacuum system was ranged between (-75 mmHg to -200 mmHg pressure). Vital signs and ventilator pressures were measured and recorded concomitantly. RESULTS: No variations in ventilatory pressures or vital signs were observed with any setting. NPWT changed pressure in seven of seventy-five catheters (9%), five of which were related to abdominal packing. When data were grouped into abdominal wall, perihepatic, perisplenic, and deep abdominal regions, there was no significant change in abdominal pressure when packing was absent. With packing, only the abdominal wall region showed a pressure change, reaching a maximum of 20% of the set vacuum pressure. CONCLUSIONS: NPWT does only little to change the intraabdominal pressure, except in superficial locations in packed abdomens and does not appear to cause hemodynamic changes in a porcine open abdomen model. While NPWT may play an important role in fluid scavenging and fascial tensioning, there are likely to be few benefits or drawbacks specifically related to negative abdominal pressure in the deep abdomen.


Asunto(s)
Cavidad Abdominal , Pared Abdominal , Técnicas de Cierre de Herida Abdominal , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Abdomen/cirugía , Cavidad Abdominal/cirugía , Animales , Vendajes , Laparotomía , Porcinos
2.
J Surg Res ; 274: 153-159, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35151958

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Medical-legal needs are health-harming adverse social conditions with a legal remedy. Medical-legal partnerships in primary care settings have been proposed to address these needs for at-risk patients already seeking medical care. Our hypothesis is that trauma patients represent a unique population that may be more likely to have baseline medical-legal needs. METHODS: A trauma-specific medical-legal needs survey was developed. Adult trauma patients who were able to give consent and were admitted to our urban Level I hospital were surveyed. Medical-legal needs were tabulated from the surveys. Those patients in the top decile of medical-legal needs were categorized as having a High Burden of medical-legal needs. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify those independent risk factors for having a High Burden of medical-legal needs. RESULTS: A total of 566 participants completed the survey (78.2% response rate). The mean number of medical-legal needs for our population was 2.5 (SD = 3.1). 73% of our respondents had at least one medical-legal need. The most common needs were Housing (n = 229, 40%) and Education/Employment (n = 223, 39%). Older age (aOR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.2-8.1, P = 0.02), being separated or divorced (aOR = 4.25, 95% CI 1.2-14.0, P = 0.02), self perceived poor health (aOR = 8.4, 95% CI 2.61-26.86, P < 0.001), penetrating mechanism of injury (aOR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.22-5.2, P = 0.01), and having been admitted to the hospital for a longer period of time (aOR = 5.48, 95% CI 1.55-19.4, P = 0.008) were all independently associated with a High Burden of medical-legal needs. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients have a high baseline burden of medical-legal needs. Medical-legal partnerships embedded in trauma teams may offer an innovative strategy to help address long-term health outcomes in a highly vulnerable population that would not otherwise have contact with the healthcare system.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Adulto , Vivienda , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Poblaciones Vulnerables
9.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 53(6): 746-754, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30639629

RESUMEN

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) are common and confer significant morbidity, mortality and costs. In this era of evolving antimicrobial resistance, selection of appropriate empirical antimicrobials is paramount. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials compared the effectiveness and safety of fluoroquinolone (FQ)-based versus ß-lactam (BL)-based regimens for the treatment of patients with cIAIs. Primary outcomes were treatment success in the clinically evaluable (CE) population and all-cause mortality in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Subgroup analyses were performed based on specific antimicrobials, infection source and isolated pathogens. Seven trials (4125 patients) were included. FQ-based regimens included moxifloxacin (four studies) or ciprofloxacin/metronidazole (three studies); BL-based regimens were ceftriaxone/metronidazole (three studies), carbapenems (two studies) or piperacillin/tazobactam (two studies). There was no difference in effectiveness in the CE (2883 patients; RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.95-1.04) or ITT populations (3055 patients; RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.01). Mortality (3614 patients; RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.75-1.43) and treatment-related adverse events (2801 patients; RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.70-1.33) were also similar. On subset analysis, moxifloxacin was slightly less effective than BLs in the CE (1934 patients; RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99) and ITT populations (1743 patients; RR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98). Although FQ- and BL-based regimens appear equally effective and safe for the treatment of cIAIs, limited data suggest slightly inferior results with moxifloxacin. Selection of empirical coverage should be based on local bacterial epidemiology and patterns of resistance as well as antimicrobial stewardship protocols.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Intraabdominales/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
Am Surg ; 84(1): 140-143, 2018 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29428042

RESUMEN

Revascularization after extremity vascular injury has long been considered an important skill among trauma surgeons. Increasingly, some trauma surgeons defer vascular repair in response to training or practice patterns. This study was designed to document results of extremity revascularization surgery to evaluate trauma surgeon outcomes and judicious referral of more complex injuries to vascular surgeons (VAS). The trauma registry of an urban level I trauma center was used to identify all patients from 2003 to 2013 who underwent an early (<24 hours) procedure for urgent management of acute injury to extremity vessels. Patients were managed by trauma (TRA) versus VAS based on the practice pattern of the on-call trauma surgeon. Injury and outcome variables were recorded. Of 115 patients, 84 patients were revascularized by trauma and 31 vascular surgeries. There was no difference in complication rates or frequency of any type of complication associated with repairs performed by VAS or TRA. There were similar rates between the two groups for patients with multiple injuries, such as venous, bone or tendon, and nerve injury to the affected extremity. One VAS patient and two TRA patients developed compartment syndrome. In appropriately selected patients, trauma surgeons achieve good outcomes after revascularization of injured extremities.


Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Selección de Paciente , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Síndromes Compartimentales/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares
11.
Am Surg ; 83(8): 842-846, 2017 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28822388

RESUMEN

the prevalence of ventricular assist devices (VADs) is increasing as advanced cardiac therapies progress. These patients commonly require non-cardiac surgical procedures (NCS), although data are scant regarding the safety, timing, and operations that may safely be performed. We aim to describe our experience with VAD patients undergoing NCS. We retrospectively reviewed records on patients who underwent NCS after VAD implantation between 2013 and 2015 at a single Joint Commission-accredited VAD institution. Data collection included demographics, ischemic cardiomyopathy or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, operative details, and perioperative anticoagulation management and outcomes. Seventy-two NCS were performed by general surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, urologists, vascular surgeons, ENTs, and other services. Procedures were similarly varied, including video-assisted thoracoscopy with decortications or lung biopsy, tracheostomies, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies , exploratory laparotomies, and wound debridements and/or closures. The ten deaths in the study group were judged not to be directly related to NCS. Eleven cases had postoperative bleeding and two cases had postoperative thrombosis, including one pump thrombosis. Based on our results, VAD is not an absolute contraindication to NCS, and a variety of NCS procedures can safely be performed. Further study should focus on quantifying and mitigating the risk that VADs bring to NCS.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Am Surg ; 80(6): 572-9, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24887795

RESUMEN

Controversy remains as to which patients with small bowel obstruction (SBO) need immediate surgery and which may be managed conservatively. This study evaluated the ability of clinical risk factors to predict the failure of nonoperative management of SBO. The electronic medical record was used to identify all patients with SBO over one year. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were recorded. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors predicting need for surgery. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify risk factors that influence need and timing for surgery. Two hundred nineteen consecutive patients were included. Most patients did not have a prior history of SBO (75%), radiation therapy (92%), or cancer (70%). The majority had undergone previous abdominal or pelvic surgery (82%). Thirty-five per cent of patients ultimately underwent laparotomy. Univariate analysis showed that persistent abdominal pain, abdominal distention, nausea and vomiting, guarding, obstipation, elevated white blood cell count, fever present 48 hours after hospitalization, and high-grade obstruction on computed tomography (CT) scan were significant predictors of the need for surgery. Multivariable analysis revealed that persistent abdominal pain or distention (hazard ratio [HR], 3.04; P = 0.013), both persistent abdominal pain and distention (HR, 4.96; P < 0.001), fever at 48 hours (HR, 3.66; P = 0.038), and CT-determined high-grade obstruction (HR, 3.45; P = 0.017) independently predicted the need for surgery. Eighty-five per cent of patients with none of these four significant risk factors were successfully managed nonoperatively. Conversely, 92 per cent of patients with three or more risk factors required laparotomy. This analysis revealed four readily evaluable clinical parameters that may be used to predict the need for surgery in patients presenting with SBO: persistent abdominal pain, abdominal distention, fever at 48 hours, and CT findings of high-grade obstruction. These factors were combined into a predictive model that may of use in predicting failure of nonoperative SBO management. Early operation in these patients should decrease length of stay and diagnostic costs.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Diagnóstico por Imagen/métodos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Obstrucción Intestinal/terapia , Intestino Delgado , Laparotomía , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , District of Columbia/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción Intestinal/mortalidad , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
13.
Am Surg ; 79(4): 375-80, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23574847

RESUMEN

Angiography has long been a mainstay of lower gastrointestinal bleeding localization. More recently, angioembolism has been used therapeutically for bleeding control, but there are limited data on its efficacy. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of angiography and embolization for localizing and treating lower gastrointestinal bleeding as well evaluate the occurrence of bowel ischemia after embolization. This study is a retrospective descriptive review of all patients undergoing mesenteric angiography at a tertiary hospital over an eight-year period. Clinical data were recorded including patient demographics, causes of bleeding, procedures, and outcomes. Patients were excluded if the cause of bleeding was upper gastrointestinal bleeding or the medical record was missing data. Localization and definitive control of bleeding was the primary end point. One hundred fifty-nine angiograms were performed on 152 patients. Mean age was 72 years. Angiographic localization was successful in 23.7 per cent of patients. Although embolization after angiographic localization achieved definitive control of bleeding in 50 per cent of patients, the success rate was only 8.6 per cent of all patients who had angiography. One patient developed postembolization ischemia requiring laparotomy. Angiographic localization of lower gastrointestinal bleeding is successful in only 23.7 per cent of patients. Definitive hemostasis through embolization was successful in only 8.6 per cent of patients who underwent angiography for lower gastrointestinal bleeding.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía , Comorbilidad , Diverticulosis del Colon/complicaciones , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemostasis Quirúrgica , Humanos , Tracto Gastrointestinal Inferior , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
14.
J Surg Res ; 184(1): 49-53, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23587456

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Night-float work schedules were designed to address growing concerns of the affect of fatigue on resident psychomotor and cognitive skills after traditional 24-h call work schedules. Whether this transition has achieved these results is debatable. This study was designed to compare the psychomotor performance of general surgery residents on both work schedule types. We hypothesized that when measured with novel laparoscopic simulator tasks, residents on a 24-h call schedule would exhibit worse psychomotor performance compared with those on a night-float work schedule. METHODS: Nine general surgery residents at the post-graduate year (PGY) 2, 3, and 5 levels were recruited and trained on the Simbionix LAP Mentor Simulator (Simbionix, Cleveland, OH). Performance on two tasks was tested before and after a 24-h call work shift and a night-float shift. A survey assessing levels of work shift activity and fatigue were administered after all work shifts. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in resident accuracy, speed of movement, economy of movement, and time to completion of the two simulation tasks. The only measures of work shift activity achieving statistically significant difference were number of patients seen and numbers of steps walked on call. There was no statistically significant difference in subjective evaluation of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of general surgery residents, a statistically significant difference in psychomotor performance between residents working 24-h call shift versus a 12-h night-float shift could not be found. Psychomotor performance does not appear to suffer after a work shift. Additionally, post-shift subjective evaluations of fatigue are comparable regardless of shift type.


Asunto(s)
Fatiga/psicología , Cirugía General/organización & administración , Hospitales Urbanos/organización & administración , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Desempeño Psicomotor , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Cognición , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/psicología , Destreza Motora , Cuidados Nocturnos/organización & administración , Cuidados Nocturnos/psicología , Médicos/organización & administración , Médicos/psicología , Trastornos del Sueño del Ritmo Circadiano/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Carga de Trabajo/psicología
15.
J Emerg Med ; 44(6): 1190-5, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23473818

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trauma airway management is commonly performed by either anesthesiologists or Emergency Physicians (EPs). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of switching from one group of providers to the other, focusing on outcomes and complications. METHODS: Medical records were used to identify all patients during a 3-year period who were intubated emergently after traumatic injury. Before November 1, 2007, airway management was supervised by anesthesiologists, after that date airways were supervised by EPs. Complications evaluated included failure to obtain a secure airway, multiple attempts at airway placement, new or worsening hypoxia or hypotension during the peri-intubation period, bronchial intubations, dysrhythmia, aspiration with development of infiltrate on chest x-ray study within 48 h, and facial trauma. RESULTS: Of the 490 tracheal intubations, 250 were attended by EPs and 240 were attended by anesthesiologists. The groups were well matched with respect to age and sex, but the EP group treated more severely injured patients on average. Intubation was accomplished in one attempt 98.3% of the time in the anesthesia group; those requiring multiple attempts went on to need surgical airways 2.1% of the time. EPs accomplished intubation in one attempt 98.4% of the time, with an overall success rate of 96.8%; surgical airways were needed in 3.2% of patients. The complication rate was 18.3% for the anesthesia group and 18% for the EP group. There were no statistically significant differences between the EP and anesthesia groups with regard to complication rates, although the EP patients had a higher Injury Severity Score on average. CONCLUSIONS: EPs can safely manage the airways of trauma patients with rates of complication and failure comparable with those of anesthesiologists.


Asunto(s)
Anestesiología , Competencia Clínica , Medicina de Emergencia , Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Intubación Intratraqueal/normas , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología
16.
J Surg Res ; 177(2): 315-9, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22677611

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although indications for surgery in lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) are widely described, practice varies. This study was designed to assess outcomes of patients allowed to exceed traditional triggers for surgery because of LGIB. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients at an urban tertiary hospital over a 3-y period that had LGIB necessitating (99m)Tc-labeled red blood cell scintigraphy. Traditional indications for operative treatment of LGIB were defined as transfusion of >6U of packed red blood cells, hemodynamic instability, bleeding lasting >72h, and rebleeding after cessation of bleeding for >24h. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-four LGIB patients had scintigraphy during the period of study with 180 meeting inclusion criteria. Fifty-six (31%) patients had at least one operative indication, and 32 (60%) were managed nonoperatively without a mortality. There were two (8.3%) mortalities in those who had operative management, one of which was because of exsanguination. Eighteen (32%) patients who met operative criteria were unlocalized. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LGIB can be safely managed nonoperatively, even when the bleed is unlocalized and traditional indications for surgery are met. Exsanguinations because of LGIB treated nonoperatively are rare except in patients deemed not to be surgical candidates.


Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Espera Vigilante , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cintigrafía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
17.
Am Surg ; 77(2): 166-8, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21337873

RESUMEN

Most patients with anorectal abscess are diagnosed clinically based on pain, erythema, warmth, and fluctuance. Some patients, however, present with subtle or atypical signs. CT is easily accessible and is commonly used for diagnosis and delineation of anorectal abscess. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of CT scan in detecting perirectal abscesses and to see if immune status impacts the accuracy of CT. A retrospective study was conducted to identify patients from 2000 to 2009 with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 566 (anal or rectal abscess). Patients included had a CT scan less than 48 hours before drainage. Patients with CT-positive abscess were compared with patients with CT-negative abscess. Patients were categorized as either immunocompetent or immunosuppressed based on documentation of diabetes mellitus, cancer, human immunodeficiency virus, or end-stage renal disease. One hundred thirteen patients were included in this study. Seventy-four (65.5%) were male and the average age was 47 years. Eighty-seven of 113 (77%) patients were positive on CT for anorectal abscess. Sixty of 113 (53%) patients included in this study were immunocompromised. CT missed 26 of 113 (23%) patients with confirmed perirectal abscess. Eighteen (69%) of these patients were immunocompromised compared with CT-positive patients (42 [48%], P = 0.05). The overall sensitivity of CT in identifying abscess was 77 per cent. CT lacks sensitivity in detecting perirectal abscess, particularly in the immunocompromised patient.


Asunto(s)
Absceso/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
Am Surg ; 77(12): 1656-60, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22273225

RESUMEN

Fasciotomy is a limb-saving procedure in the management of ischemic extremities. Little evidence exists as to the best method of fasciotomy wound management. We hypothesized that the use of vacuum dressing (VAC) or creation of dynamic tension (DYN) would increase rates of primary closure, reducing the need for split thickness skin grafting (STSG). The records of a large urban Level I trauma center were used to identify fasciotomy recipients over a 10-year period and were retrospectively analyzed. Data collected included injury characteristics, wound management, and outcomes. Wound management was dictated by surgeon preference, and categorized as gauze packing, DYN, or VAC. The primary outcome was primary closure versus need for STSG. Wound management cohorts were compared using logistic regression. Fisher's exact test and χ(2) were performed to compare proportions and categorical variables respectively. From 2000 to 2009, 227 patients had a fasciotomy performed. Mechanism, age, and incidence of fracture were different between the groups. There was a trend towards increased primary closure with DYN (83%). Average length of stay (LOS) was 21 days for those receiving primary closure and 27 days for STSG. There was a significant decrease in LOS for the DYN group (average 16 days) when compared with gauze packing and VAC. In this series of 227 patients who underwent fasciotomy, no technique of wound management produced a significant improvement in primary closure rate. A trend toward more primary closure was seen in the DYN group. LOS was longer for patients receiving STSG. The DYN cohort had a significantly shorter LOS.


Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Fasciotomía , Isquemia/cirugía , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Trasplante de Piel/métodos , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/terapia , Cicatrización de Heridas , Adulto , Humanos , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
J Trauma ; 67(5): 1087-90, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19901672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested worse outcomes for patients hospitalized during the beginning of the academic calendar, though these findings have not been reproduced among trauma patients. This study compares outcomes of patients during the beginning of the academic year with those at the end of the academic year. METHODS: Retrospective trauma registry analysis of a large urban level I trauma center. Patients admitted during April/May (ENDYEAR group) or July/August (FRESH group) between 1998 and 2007 were included. Demographic and injury parameters were recorded, and outcomes compared including crude mortality, complication rate, length of stay (LOS), and intensive care unit LOS (ICU-LOS). TRISS methodology was used to evaluate risk-adjusted performance. RESULTS: Three thousand sixty-seven patients were included in the FRESH group and 3626 in the ENDYEAR group. Groups were similar in age (36 +/- 17 years and 36 +/- 17 years, p = 0.39) and mean Injury Severity Score (8 +/- 11 and 8 +/- 10, p = 0.85). There was no difference in LOS (4.6 +/- 0.2 days versus 4.5 +/- 0.2 days, p = 0.92) or ICU-LOS (5.6 +/- 0.2 days versus 5.3 +/- 0.2 days, p = 0.96). Per patient complication rates for the FRESH and ENDYEAR groups were 6% and 6% (p = 0.8), total complication rates were 12% and 13% (p = 0.07), and crude mortality was 7% and 6% (p = 0.11), respectively. FRESH and ENDYEAR groups had similar W-Statistics (1.0 and 1.2) and z scores (3.5 and 4.4). CONCLUSION: Outcomes were similar between patients injured at the beginning of the academic year compared with the end of the academic year. Our data does not support the concept of a July effect in level I trauma centers.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales de Enseñanza/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Adulto , District of Columbia/epidemiología , Femenino , Cirugía General/normas , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estaciones del Año , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
20.
J Am Coll Surg ; 206(1): 131-7, 2008 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18155578

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trauma systems are designed to bring the injured patient to definitive care in the shortest practical time. This depends on prehospital destination criteria (primary triage) and interfacility transfer guidelines (secondary triage). Although primary undertriage is associated with increased costs and worse outcomes for selected injuries, secondary overtriage can overwhelm system resources and delay definitive care. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of secondary overtriage in a region without a formal trauma system. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of trauma registry data at an American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma-verified Level I trauma center and regional referral center. Secondary overtriage was defined as patients transferred from another hospital emergency department to our trauma receiving unit who had an injury severity score < 10, did not require an operation, and who were discharged to home within 48 hours of admission. RESULTS: Data on 9,064 patients were reviewed; 6,875 (76%) arrived directly from the scene and 2,189 (24%) were transferred. Although the transferred group was more severely injured, the majority (64%) had minor injuries and 824 (39%) met secondary overtriage criteria. The degree of secondary overtriage and injury pattern varied with respect to referring facility. Peak admission day and times for overtriage patients coincided with scene admissions trauma receiving unit closure events. Patient payor mix and facility cost and reimbursement profiles did not differ between scene and transfer overtriage patients. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of transferred trauma patients require only brief diagnostic or observational care. Excessive overtriage calls for development of a regional inclusive trauma system with established primary and secondary triage guidelines to improve access to care and trauma system efficiency.


Asunto(s)
Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Triaje/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/clasificación , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...