The Role of Paramedics in Disclosure of Patient Safety Incidents: A Mixed Methods Study.

OBJECTIVE: Critical care transport is a high-risk environment ripe for patient safety incidents (PSIs). Disclosure is the process by which a PSI is communicated to a patient or substitute decision maker. Little is known on paramedic perceptions on disclosure PSIs. This study evaluated the impact of a disclosure training program on the perceptions of paramedics on disclosing PSIs. METHODS: This was a before-and-after mixed methods survey study on paramedic disclosure training at Ornge, the provincial critical care transport organization for Ontario, Canada. A paramedic disclosure training program was implemented at Ornge between 2020 and 2022. All paramedics were eligible for participation through pre- and posttraining surveys. RESULTS: In total, 54 and 69 paramedics completed the pretraining and posttraining surveys, respectively, representing 25% to 30% of all active paramedics. All of the paramedics (100%) expressed a moral and professional responsibility to disclose PSIs. All paramedics felt disclosure training was somewhat to extremely useful. After training, more paramedics felt comfortable disclosing PSIs, and more paramedics felt disclosure could occur at the time of transport. CONCLUSION: A training program on PSIs can improve paramedics' perceptions on disclosure. This study shows its feasible for paramedics to feel comfortable and participate in disclosure of PSIs within a critical care environment.

The effect of a multi-faceted quality improvement program on paramedic intubation success in the critical care transport environment: a before-and-after study.

INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is an infrequent but key component of prehospital and retrieval medicine. Common measures of quality of ETI are the first pass success rates (FPS) and ETI on the first attempt without occurrence of hypoxia or hypotension (DASH-1A). We present the results of a multi-faceted quality improvement program (QIP) on paramedic FPS and DASH-1A rates in a large regional critical care transport organization. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective database analysis, comparing FPS and DASH-1A rates before and after implementation of the QIP. We included all patients undergoing advanced airway management with a first strategy of ETI during the time period from January 2016 to December 2021. RESULTS: 484 patients met the inclusion criteria during the study period. Overall, the first pass intubation success (FPS) rate was 72% (350/484). There was an increase in FPS from the pre-intervention period (60%, 86/144) to the post-intervention period (86%, 148/173), p < 0.001. DASH-1A success rates improved from 45% (55/122) during the pre-intervention period to 55% (84/153) but this difference did not meet pre-defined statistical significance (p = 0.1). On univariate analysis, factors associated with improved FPS rates were the use of video-laryngoscope (VL), neuromuscular blockage, and intubation inside a healthcare facility. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-faceted advanced airway management QIP resulted in increased FPS intubation rates and a non-significant improvement in DASH-1A rates. A combination of modern equipment, targeted training, standardization and ongoing clinical governance is required to achieve and maintain safe intubation by paramedics in the prehospital and retrieval environment.

Canceled Air Ambulance Trauma Scene Calls: A Prospective Observational Study of Causes and Outcomes of Trauma Auto-launch Cancellations.

OBJECTIVE: Direct transport, occasionally by helicopter, to a trauma hospital for severely injured patients is associated with decreased mortality. This study sought to determine causes for air ambulance trauma response cancellations and secondarily to identify patients who underwent secondary transfer to a trauma center after a canceled air ambulance dispatch. METHODS: This prospective cohort study used administrative databases from August 2020 to August 2021 to collect data related to canceled trauma calls. Frequencies of cancellation reasons and transferred patients were summarized, and the estimated delay to trauma center arrival was calculated. Subsequent probabilistic matching was performed to identify patients who underwent secondary transfer. RESULTS: Of 3,232 trauma calls, 1,924 were canceled for reasons including the trauma bypass criteria not being met, patient brought to trauma center, and patient refused transfer. Of the 1,117 patients for whom an air ambulance was canceled because they did not meet the trauma bypass criteria, 184 (16.5%) were later transferred to a lead trauma hospital, with a median delay of 4.12 hours (interquartile range = 2.57-7.35 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Most scene call cancellations were due to patients not meeting the trauma bypass criteria; yet, 16.5% of these patients were later transported to a trauma center. Interventions are needed in education, adherence, and modification of the trauma bypass criteria.

Prepatching Reduces Paramedic In-Hospital Time for Emergent Interfacility Transfers of Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation or Vasopressors: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Regionalization of specialty medical services may necessitate an interfacility transfer. Prepatching is a model of care adopted by critical care transport organizations to reduce the transfer time to specialty care. In this model, paramedics communicate with a transport medical physician before arrival at the sending hospital to discuss a patient's condition and management plan, allowing paramedics to focus solely on packaging the patient when he or she arrives at the sending hospital. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of prepatching on paramedic in-hospital time for emergent interfacility transfers of patients requiring mechanical ventilation or vasopressor support. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of all emergent interfacility transfers by Ornge, the provincial critical care transport organization in Ontario, Canada, over a 4-year period. All patients over 18 years old who were either intubated or on vasopressor medications were included in the study population. Quantile regression was used to evaluate the impact of prepatching as well as patient and paramedic characteristics on paramedic in-hospital time. RESULTS: A total of 4,466 emergent interfacility transports were included. Of these, 1,898 were completed with prepatching, and 2,568 were not. Vasopressor use was associated with significantly higher prepatching rates. Overall, prepatching reduced in-hospital time by 9 minutes at the 90th quantile across all patients. Increased in-hospital time was noted for patients on mechanical ventilation, on vasopressor medications, and transported by a fixed wing vehicle by 38, 29, and 49 minutes at the 90th quantile, respectively (P < .05). Conversely, patients transported by a critical care paramedic crew configuration were associated with a 27-minute decrease in in-hospital time at the 90th quantile compared with transport by an advanced care paramedic crew configuration (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Prepatching reduced paramedic in-hospital time for emergent interfacility transports for patients who were mechanically ventilated or require vasopressors. These results suggest that prepatching can reduce the overall time to definitive care in high-risk patients, potentially improving patient outcomes in critically ill patients.

Impact of Prepatching on Paramedic In-Hospital Times for Emergent Interfacility Transfers.

Background: The care required for patients at times necessitates they be transferred to another hospital capable of providing specialized care, a process known as an interfacility transfer. Delays to appropriate care for critically ill patients are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Improving efficiencies in interfacility transport process can thus expedite the time to critical treatment. Traditionally paramedics would patch to a transport medicine physician (TMP) after initial patient contact to discuss the case and expected management during transport. The concept of prepatch shifts this discussion between the TMP and paramedics prior to initial patient contact. The objective of this study was to assess if prepatching with paramedics prior to arrival at the patient reduced the in-hospital time for emergent interfacility transfers transported by a provincial critical care transport organization. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all emergent, adult interfacility transports for patients transported by a provincial critical care transport organization in Ontario, Canada from January 2016 to December 2019. Quantile regression was used to evaluate the impact of prepatching as well as patient and paramedic characteristics on paramedic in-hospital time. Results: A total of 10,088 patients were included in the study, with 3,606 patients having a prepatch conducted and 6,482 without. Ventilated patients and vasopressor use were associated with higher prepatch rates; with the use of prepatch in these patients increasing over subsequent years of the study. Additionally, patients requiring higher levels of care, including being mechanically ventilated or dependent on vasopressors, were associated with longer in-hospital times. Prepatching reduced in-hospital time by 4 minutes at the 90th quantile across all patients. Conclusion: Prepatching reduced paramedic in-hospital time for emergent interfacility transports. Although the clinical impact of this reduction in time is uncertain, prepatching may serve in facilitating shared mental modeling between paramedics and TMPs which may be beneficial to patient safety and team performance.

Can a screening tool safely identify low risk cardiac patients to be transported with primary care flight paramedics?

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the rate of adverse events during interfacility transport of cardiac patients identified as low risk by a consensus-derived screening tool and transported by primary care flight paramedics (PCP(f)). METHODS: We conducted a health records review of adult patients diagnosed with a cardiac condition who were identified as low risk by the screening tool and transported by PCP(f). We excluded patients transported by an advanced care crew, those accompanied by a clinical escort from hospital, and those transported from a scene call, by rotary wing or ground vehicle. We recorded patient and transportation parameters using a piloted-standardized collection tool. We defined adverse events during transport a priori. We report descriptive statistics using mean (standard deviation), [range], (percentage). RESULTS: We included 400 patients: mean age 66.9 years old, 66.5% male. Mean transport duration was 136.2 (74.9) minutes. Most common comorbidities were hypertension (50.3%) and coronary artery disease (39.5%). Most transports originated out of Northern Ontario and were for cardiac catheterization (61.8%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (26.8%). Overall, the adverse event rate was low (0.3%), with no serious event such as cardiac arrest, death, or airway intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A screening tool can identify cardiac patients at low risk for clinical deterioration during air-medical transport. We believe patients screened with this tool can be transported safely by a PCP(f) crew, leading to potentially significant resource savings.

Air medical transport myths.

The role of air medical and land-based critical care transport services is not always clear amongst traditional emergency medical service providers or hospital-based health care practitioners. Some of this is historical, when air medical services were in their infancy and their role within the broader health care system was limited. Despite their evolution within the regionalized health care system, some myths remain regarding air medical services in Canada. The goal is to clarify several commonly held but erroneous beliefs regarding the role, impact, and practices in air medical transport.

Risk Factors for Non-optimal Resource Utilization for Emergent Interfacility Transfers by Air Ambulance in Ontario.

Background: The use of air ambulance to facilitate interfacility transfer has been associated with improved mortality; however, air ambulance is a limited resource and sometimes the optimal resource to transport a patient is unavailable. When a non-optimal resource is used there is an inherent delay and critically unwell patients may deteriorate as a result. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with non-optimal resource utilization for adult patients undergoing emergent interfacility transport by air ambulance in Ontario, Canada. A secondary objective was to determine if non-optimal resource utilization was associated with deterioration in clinical status by measuring a delta rapid emergency medicine score (REMS). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all emergent, adult interfacility transfers transported by air ambulance over a 5-year period in Ontario, Canada. Determination of optimal resource use was based on distances and historic time data for all sending-receiving facility pairs. A logistic regression model was used to explore patient, provider and institutional risk factors for non-optimal resource use. To explore the secondary objective a linear regression model was used to explore impact of non-optimal resource use on deltaREMS. Results: There were a total of 9,687 patients included in the study cohort, with 4,984 having an optimal resource use and 4,703 having non-optimal resource. The median delay in interfacility transfer caused by a non-optimal transfer strategy was 35.7 minutes. Patients who required mechanical ventilation (OR 1.13, p = 0.031) and or were transferred out of nursing stations had higher odds of non-optimal resource use (OR 2.84, p = 0.019). Paramedic level of care of advanced (OR 0.37, p = < 0.001) and critical care (OR 0.28, p = < 0.001) as well as spring season (OR 0.75, p = < 0.001) had lower odds of non-optimal resource utilization. Optimal resource utilization did not significantly affect delta REMS (beta coefficient 0.002, p = 0.64). Conclusions: Patients who required mechanical ventilation and were transferred out from a nursing station had higher odds of non-optimal resource utilization while patients that required advanced or critical care level of care and spring season had lower odds of non-optimal resource use. Additionally, non-optimal resource use for air ambulance interfacility transfers did not result in patient deterioration as measured by a delta REMS score.

Canceled to Be Called Back: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Canceled Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Scene Calls That Are Later Transferred to a Trauma Center.

INTRODUCTION: In our trauma system, helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) can be requested to attend a scene call for an injured patient before arrival by land paramedics. Land paramedics can cancel this response if they deem it unnecessary. The purpose of this study is to describe the frequency of canceled HEMS scene calls that were subsequently transferred to 2 trauma centers and to assess for any impact on morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Probabilistic matching was used to identify canceled HEMS scene call patients who were later transported to 2 trauma centers over a 48-month period. Registry data were used to compare canceled scene call patients with direct from scene patients. RESULTS: There were 290 requests for HEMS scene calls, of which 35.2% were canceled. Of those canceled, 24.5% were later transported to our trauma centers. Canceled scene call patients were more likely to be older and to be discharged home from the trauma center without being admitted. CONCLUSION: There is a significant amount of undertriage of patients for whom an HEMS response was canceled and later transported to a trauma center. These patients face similar morbidity and mortality as patients who are brought directly from scene to a trauma center.

Can a single primary care paramedic configuration safely transport low-acuity patients in air ambulances?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if utilizing a single paramedic crew configuration is safe for transporting low acuity patients requiring only a primary care paramedic (PCP) level of care in Air Ambulances. METHODS: We studied single-PCP transports of low acuity patients done by contract air ambulance carriers, organized by Ornge (Ontario's Air Ambulance Service) for one year. We only included interfacility transports. We excluded all scene calls, and all Code 4 (emergent) calls. Our primary outcome was clinical deterioration during transport. We then asked a panel to analyze each case of deterioration to determine if a dual-PCP configuration might have reasonably prevented the deterioration or have better treated the deterioration, compared to a single-PCP configuration. RESULTS: In one year, contract carriers moved 3264 patients, who met inclusion criteria. 85% were from Northern Ontario. There were 21 cases of medical deterioration (0.6%±0.26%). Paper charts were found for 20 of these cases. Most were self-limited cases of pain or nausea. A small number of cases (n=5) were cardiorespiratory decompensation. There was 100% consensus amongst the panel that all cases of clinical deterioration were not related to team size. There was also 100% consensus that a dual-PCP team would not have been better able to deal with the deterioration, compared to a single-PCP crew. CONCLUSIONS: We found that using a single-PCP configuration for transporting low acuity patients is safe. This finding is particularly important for rural areas where air ambulance is the only means for accessibility to care and where staffing issues are magnified.

Comparison of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Transport Types and Delays on Patient Outcomes at Two Level I Trauma Centers.

BACKGROUND: Helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) have become an engrained component of trauma systems. In Ontario, transportation for trauma patients is through one of three ways: scene call, modified scene call, or interfacility transfer. We hypothesize that differences exist between these types of transports in both patient demographics and patient outcomes. This study compares the characteristics of patients transported by each of these methods to two level 1 trauma centers and assesses for any impact on morbidity or mortality. As a secondary outcome reasons for delay were identified. METHODS: A local trauma registry was used to identify and abstract data for all patients transported to two trauma centers by HEMS over a 36-month period. Further chart abstraction using the HEMS patient care reports was done to identify causes of delay during HEMS transport. RESULTS: During the study period HEMS transferred a total of 911 patients of which 139 were scene calls, 333 were modified scene calls and 439 were interfacility transfers. Scene calls had more patients with an ISS of less than 15 and had more patients discharged home from the ED. Modified scene calls had more patients with an ISS greater than 25. The most common delays that were considered modifiable included the sending physician doing a procedure, waiting to meet a land EMS crew, delays for diagnostic imaging and confirming disposition or destination. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist between the types of transports done by HEMS for trauma patients. Many identified reasons for delay to HEMS transport are modifiable and have practical solutions. Future research should focus on solutions to identified delays to HEMS transport. Key words: helicopter emergency medical services; trauma; prehospital care; delays.

A randomized controlled feasibility trial comparing safety and effectiveness of prehospital pacing versus conventional treatment: 'PrePACE'.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of a prehospital randomized controlled trial comparing transcutaneous pacing (TCP) with dopamine for unstable bradycardia. METHODS: Unstable bradycardic patients who failed to respond to a fluid bolus and up to 3mg atropine were enrolled. The intervention was dopamine or TCP with crossover to dopamine if TCP failed. The primary outcome was survival to discharge or 30 days. Randomization compliance, safety, follow-up rates, primary outcome, and sample size requirements were assessed. RESULTS: Of 383 patients with unstable bradycardia, 151 (39%) failed to respond to atropine or fluid and were eligible for enrollment and 82 (55%) were correctly enrolled. Fifty-five (36%) of eligible patients could not be enrolled for practical reasons; 3 had advance directives, 32 met inclusion criteria on arrival at hospital and in 20 cases, paramedics chose not to enroll based on the circumstances of the case. The remaining 13 were missed cases; 8 were missing randomization envelopes and in 5, the paramedic forgot. Randomization compliance was 95% (78/82). Forty-two (51%) patients were randomized to TCP and seven of these crossed over to dopamine. Two cases were randomized but did not receive the intervention; either due to lack of time or loss of IV access. Three adverse events occurred in each group. Survival to discharge or 30 days in hospital was 70% (28/40) and 69% (29/42) in the dopamine and TCP groups, respectively with 100% follow up. To detect a 10% relative difference in 30 days survival between treatment arms, a sample size of 690 per group would be required. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to conduct a prehospital randomized controlled trial of TCP for unstable bradycardia and a definitive trial would require a multi-centre study.

Interfacility transport of patients with decompression illness: literature review and consensus statement.

OBJECTIVE: Decompression illness (DCI) is a potentially lethal complication of diving and may occur far from hyperbaric facilities. The need for prompt transport to a hyperbaric facility often involves air medical transport, but this may exacerbate DCI. The authors reviewed available literature to establish evidence-based transport strategies utilizing safe altitudes for patients, with DCI. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and materials from organizations with expertise in diving medicine were searched for the following terms: decompression sickness, caisson disease, hyperbaric oxygenation, depth intoxication, or diving. Two reviewers independently selected relevant citations involving patients with DCI and air medical transport for review and consensus statement development by an expert working group. RESULTS: A total of 341 citations were identified, and 53 unique citations were reviewed. Nine relevant citations were selected for consensus statement development. There were no clinical trials or prospective cohort studies. Only two retrospective case series, including nine patients, specifically examined the effect of altitude on patients with DCI during transport. No symptom recurrence occurred when the cabin altitude remained within 500 feet of ground level. Seven citations were either letters or statements of expert opinion, recommending a maximum cabin altitude of 500-1000 feet (152-305 meters). CONCLUSIONS: The working group identified the paucity of clinical studies and evidence-based recommendations for air medical transport of patients with DCI. Transport selection should be based on minimizing total transport time and, when transporting by air, ensuring that a cabin altitude of the transporting vehicle does not exceed 500 feet (152 meters) above the departure point.

Prehospital transcutaneous cardiac pacing for symptomatic bradycardia or bradyasystolic cardiac arrest: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines suggest transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) for the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia (SB) and bradyasystolic cardiac arrest (BACA). Many EMS systems are extrapolating these guidelines and employing TCP in the prehospital setting. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review to determine the efficacy of prehospital TCP in the management of these two conditions. METHODS: MEDLINE (1966-2004), EMBase and Science Citation Index (1980-2004) were searched using: prehospital/emergency medical services; external/transcutaneous; pacing. Two reviewer teams blinded to the source and author conducted a hierarchical selection (title, abstract, article) and quality assessment using a validated scale. Kappa agreement at each level of review was measured. Data abstraction was done by consensus. RESULTS: Thirty-four articles were identified and seven selected (Kappa agreement; title: 0.85, abstract: 0.78, full article: 0.82). Article quality was poor in all trials. There were three case series (BACA, n=215), three unblinded randomised controlled trials (one BACA, two BACA+SB), and one subgroup (SB) analysis. In the case series of paced BACA patients, 0/215 survived to hospital discharge. In the BACA trials 16/509 (paced) versus14/497 (control) survived to discharge. In a subgroup of one SB trial 5/6 (paced) versus 1/7 (control) survived to discharge (p=0.01). When a SB trial subgroup was combined with a case series 4/27 (paced) versus 0/24 (control) survived to discharge (p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: In the prehospital setting, there is no evidence to support the use of TCP in bradyasystolic cardiac arrest. There is inadequate evidence to determine the efficacy of prehospital TCP in the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia.

Delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: summary of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario Consensus Report.

Tremendous debate has developed over the efficacy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with fibrinolysis as the preferred treatment for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In 2002, the Ontario Ministry of Heath and Long-Term Care commissioned the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario to develop consensus recommendations regarding the provincial coordination and provision of urgent PCI for STEMI patients. The panel's work has provided important insights into the acute treatment of STEMI that may be useful to other jurisdictions and may provide a reference for other regions considering the implementation of primary PCI for the management of STEMI patients in their community. In the present report, the evidence for primary PCI is reviewed, the important barriers to implementing this strategy are summarized and several recommendations and models of care for the delivery of primary PCI for STEMI on a wide scale are presented.

Prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography impact on acute myocardial infarction treatment times and mortality: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram (PHECG) interpretation and advance emergency department (ED) notification may improve time-to-treatment intervals for a variety of treatment strategies to improve outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Despite consensus guidelines recommending this intervention, few emergency medical services (EMS) employ this. The authors systematically reviewed the literature to report whether mortality or treatment time intervals improved when compared with standard care. METHODS: The authors used the Cochrane strategy to search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, Dissertation Abstracts, Cochrane Library, and Index of Scientific and Technical Proceedings. Bibliographies and grant-agency Websites were reviewed, and primary investigators and industry were contacted for published and unpublished studies. Inclusion criteria included PHECG and advance ED notification versus standard EMS care; controlled trials; English only; and evaluation of treatment time intervals, all-cause mortality, or both. Study selection was hierarchical, blinded, and independent. Agreement at each level of review was evaluated by using a kappa statistic. Study quality was measured with a validated scale and was interpreted by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 1,283 citations were identified, and five studies met the inclusion criteria. The weighted kappa for selection was 0.61 (standard error [SE], 0.045) for titles, 0.63 (SE, 0.051) for abstracts, and 0.79 (SE, 0.146) for full articles. Mean study quality measures by two independent reviewers were 6.0/15 and 5.5/15 (correlation coefficient, 0.85; p = 0.06). PHECG and advance ED notification increased the weighted mean on-scene time by 1.2 minutes (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = -0.84 to 3.2). The weighted mean door-to-needle interval was shortened by 36.1 minutes (95% CI = 9.3 to 63.0: range of means, 22-48 minutes vs. 50-97 minutes). One study reported all-cause mortality, with a statistically nonsignificant reduction from 15.6% to 8.4%. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with AMI, the literature would suggest that PHECG and advanced ED notification reduces in hospital time to fibrinolysis. One controlled trial found no difference in mortality with this out-of-hospital intervention.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).

BACKGROUND: Although biphasic defibrillation waveforms appear to be superior to monophasic waveforms in terminating VF, their relative benefits in out-of-hospital resuscitation are incompletely understood. Prior comparisons of defibrillation waveform efficacy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are confined to patients presenting in a shockable rhythm and resuscitated by first responder (basic life support). This effectiveness study compared monophasic and biphasic defibrillation waveform for conversion of ventricular arrhythmias in all OHCA treated with advance life support (ALS). METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective randomized controlled trial compared the rectilinear biphasic (RLB) waveform with the monophasic damped sine (MDS) waveform, using step-up energy levels. The study enrolled OHCA patients requiring at least one shock delivered by ALS providers, regardless of initial presenting rhythm. Shock success was defined as conversion at 5s to organized rhythm after one to three escalating shocks. We report efficacy results for the cohort of patients treated by ALS paramedics who presented with an initially shockable rhythm who had not received a shock from a first responder (MDS: n=83; RLB: n=86). Shock success within the first three ascending energy shocks for RLB (120, 150, 200J) was superior to MDS (200, 300, 360J) for patients initially presenting in a shockable rhythm (52% versus 34%, p=0.01). First shock conversion was 23% and12%, for RLB and MDS, respectively (p=0.07). There were no significant differences in return of spontaneous circulation (47% versus 47%), survival to 24h (31% versus 27%), and survival to discharge (9% versus 7%). Mean 24h survival rates of bystander witnessed events showed differences between waveforms in the early circulatory phase at 4-10 min post event (mean (S.D.) RLB 0.45 (0.07) versus MDS 0.31 (0.06), p=0.0002) and demonstrated decline as time to first shock increased to 20 min. CONCLUSION: Shock success to an organized rhythm comparing step-up protocol for energy settings demonstrated the RLB waveform was superior to MDS in ALS treatment of OHCA. Survival rates for both waveforms are consistent with current theories on the circulatory and metabolic phases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

A Canadian fellowship training program in emergency medical services.

Emergency medical services (EMS) is increasingly recognized to be an integral part of the health care system. Given the expanding role and scope of EMS, there is need for structured education of emergency physicians interested in pursuing subspecialization in EMS. In 2001, a group of academic emergency specialists at the University of Toronto developed the first Canadian EMS Fellowship Program. This paper describes the development, current status, and future directions of this Program. The University of Toronto EMS Fellowship Program may serve as a template for the development of similar programs elsewhere in Canada and internationally.