Minimal residual disease-driven treatment intensification with sequential addition of ibrutinib to venetoclax in R/R CLL.

Undetectable measurable residual disease (uMRD) is achievable in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax alone or combined with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. This phase 2, multicenter, MRD-driven study was designed to discontinue treatment upon reaching uMRD4 (<10-4) in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL receiving venetoclax monotherapy or after the addition of ibrutinib. Primary end point of the study was proportion of uMRD4 with venetoclax ± ibrutinib. Secondary end points were overall response rate, partial response, complete response, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety of venetoclax ± ibrutinib. Patients with uMRD4 at Cycle 12 Day 1 discontinued venetoclax. MRD+ patients added ibrutinib and continued both drugs up to Cycle 24 Day 28/uMRD4/progression/toxicity. After Cycle 24 Day 28, MRD+ patients continued ibrutinib. Thirty-eight patients (29% with TP53 aberrations; 79% with unmutated IGHV) started venetoclax. Overall response rate with venetoclax was 36 (95%) of 38 patients (20 complete; 16 partial response). Seventeen patients (45%) with uMRD4 at Cycle 12 Day 1 discontinued venetoclax. Nineteen (55%) MRD+ subjects added ibrutinib. After a median of 7 months (range, 3-10 months) of combined treatment, 16 (84%) of 19 achieved uMRD4, thus stopping both drugs. Two MRD+ patients at Cycle 24 Day 28 continued ibrutinib until progression/toxicity. After a median follow-up of 36.5 months, median progression-free survival was not reached; 10 patients progressed (4 restarted venetoclax, 3 without treatment need, 2 developed Richter transformation, and 1 dropped out). Seven (22%) of 32 patients remain uMRD4 after 3 years of follow-up. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse event; no grade 5 events occurred on study. This sequential MRD-guided approach led to uMRD4 in 33 (87%) of 38 patients, with venetoclax monotherapy or combined with ibrutinib, delivering treatment combination only in a fraction, and ultimately identifying the few patients benefiting from continuous therapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT04754035.

Improving the antitumor activity of R-CHOP with NGR-hTNF in primary CNS lymphoma: final results of a phase 2 trial.

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Primary DLBCL of the central nervous system (CNS) (primary central nervous system lymphoma [PCNSL]) is an exception because of the low CNS bioavailability of related drugs. NGR-human tumor necrosis factor (NGR-hTNF) targets CD13+ vessels, enhances vascular permeability and CNS access of anticancer drugs, and provides the rationale for the treatment of PCNSL with R-CHOP. Herein, we report activity and safety of R-CHOP preceded by NGR-hTNF in patients with PCNSL relapsed/refractory to high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy enrolled in a phase 2 trial. Overall response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint. A sample size of 28 patients was considered necessary to demonstrate improvement from 30% to 50% ORR. NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP would be declared active if ≥12 responses were recorded. Treatment was well tolerated; there were no cases of unexpected toxicities, dose reductions or interruptions. NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP was active, with confirmed tumor response in 21 patients (75%; 95% confidence interval, 59%-91%), which was complete in 11. Seventeen of the 21 patients with response to treatment received consolidation (ASCT, WBRT, and/or lenalidomide maintenance). At a median follow-up of 21 (range, 14-31) months, 5 patients remained relapse-free and 6 were alive. The activity of NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP is in line with the expression of CD13 in both pericytes and endothelial cells of tumor vessels. High plasma levels of chromogranin A, an NGR-hTNF inhibitor, were associated with proton pump inhibitor use and a lower remission rate, suggesting that these drugs should be avoided during TNF-based therapy. Further research on this innovative approach to CNS lymphomas is warranted. The trial was registered as EudraCT: 2014-001532-11.

Long-lasting efficacy and safety of lenalidomide maintenance in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are not eligible for or failed autologous transplantation.

We report final results of a phase II trial addressing efficacy and feasibility of lenalidomide maintenance in patients with chemosensitive relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not eligible for or failed after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients with relapsed DLBCL who achieved at least a partial response to salvage chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled and treated with lenalidomide 25 mg/day for 21 of 28 days for 2 years or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was 1-year PFS. Forty-six of 48 enrolled patients were assessable. Most patients had IPI ≥2, advanced stage and extranodal disease before the salvage treatment that led to trial registration; 28 (61%) patients were older than 70 years. Lenalidomide was well tolerated. With the exception of neutropenia, grade-4 toxicities occurred in <1% of courses. Three patients died of complications during maintenance and three died due to second cancers at 32 to 64 months. There were 13 SAEs recorded in 12 patients; all these patients but two recovered. Lenalidomide was interrupted due to toxicity in other 6 patients, and 25 patients required dose reduction (transient in 21). At 1 year from registration, 31 patients were progression free. After a median follow-up of 65 (range 39-124) months, 22 patients remain progression free, with a 5-year PFS of 48% ± 7%. The duration of response to lenalidomide was longer than response to prior treatment in 30 (65%) patients. Benefit was observed both in de novo and transformed DLBCL, germinal-center-B-cell and nongerminal-center-B-cell subtypes. Twenty-six patients are alive (5-year OS 62% ± 7%). With the limitations of a nonrandomized design, these long-term results suggest that lenalidomide maintenance might bring benefit to patients with chemosensitive relapse of DLBCL not eligible for or failed after ASCT. Lenalidomide was associated with durable disease control and was well tolerated in this elderly population. Further investigations on immunomodulatory drugs as maintenance in these high-risk patients are warranted.

R-CHOP preceded by blood-brain barrier permeabilization with engineered tumor necrosis factor-α in primary CNS lymphoma.

Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are treated with high-dose methotrexate-based chemotherapy, which requires hospitalization and extensive expertise to manage related toxicity. The use of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) could overcome these difficulties, but blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration of related drugs is poor. Tumor necrosis factor-α coupled with NGR (NGR-hTNF), a peptide targeting CD13+ vessels, induces endothelial permeabilization and improves tumor access of cytostatics. We tested the hypothesis that NGR-hTNF can break the BBB, thereby improving penetration and activity of R-CHOP in patients with relapsed/refractory PCNSL (NCT03536039). Patients received six R-CHOP21 courses, alone at the first course and preceded by NGR-hTNF (0.8 µg/m2) afterward. This trial included 2 phases: an "explorative phase" addressing the effect of NGR-hTNF on drug pharmacokinetic parameters and on vessel permeability, assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and 99mTc-diethylene-triamine-pentacetic acid-single-photon emission computed tomography, and the expression of CD13 on tumor tissue; and an "expansion phase" with overall response rate as the primary end point, in which the 2-stage Simon Minimax design was used. At the first stage, if ≥4 responses were observed among 12 patients, the study accrual would have continued (sample size, 28). Herein, we report results of the explorative phase and the first-stage analysis (n = 12). CD13 was expressed in tumor vessels of all cases. NGR-hTNF selectively increased vascular permeability in tumoral/peritumoral areas, without interfering with drug plasma/cerebrospinal fluid concentrations. The NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP combination was well tolerated: there were only 2 serious adverse events, and grade 4 toxicity was almost exclusively hematological, which were resolved without dose reductions or interruptions. NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP was active, with 9 confirmed responses (75%; 95% confidence interval, 51-99), 8 of which were complete. In conclusion, NGR-hTNF/R-CHOP was safe in these heavily pretreated patients. NGR-hTNF enhanced vascular permeability specifically in tumoral/peritumoral areas, which resulted in fast and sustained responses.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide as preoperative treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

AIM: To evaluate the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide as primary systemic treatment in locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The activity and safety of intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg sqm(-1) biweekly for eight courses in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide 50 mg day(-1) orally were evaluated in 29 patients with locally advanced breast cancer who were not suitable to receive a standard chemotherapy due to age or co-morbidities or who asked for a regimen with low incidence of toxic effects irrespective of age. RESULTS: The rate of breast-conserving surgery was 44.8%. Eighteen patients (62.1%) achieved a partial response (including one pathological complete response), 10 (34.5%) a stable disease and one patient experienced a progressive disease. Treatment was well tolerated, with no grade 4 toxicities, and with grade 3 skin toxicity in three patients and hand-foot syndrome in four patients. CONCLUSION: The regimen was well tolerated but with limited activity in the preoperative setting. Other options (e.g., endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor -positive disease) should be considered in locally advanced breast cancer patients who are not suitable to receive a standard chemotherapy.

Letrozole plus GnRH analogue as preoperative and adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive locally advanced breast cancer.

Patients with large ER positive tumors candidate to preoperative chemotherapy may also benefit from a concurrent endocrine intervention, but this issue has been scarcely investigated due to concerns arising from unfavorable results emerged from an adjuvant trial of concurrent tamoxifen and chemotherapy. We retrospectively investigated the activity of letrozole plus GnRH analogue (GnRH-a) administered concurrently with preoperative chemotherapy and as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal women with locally advanced ER positive breast cancer consecutively admitted at the European Institute of Oncology. Results were compared with those of a non-randomized unmatched control group of premenopausal women with locally advanced ER positive breast cancer receiving preoperative chemotherapy, followed by tamoxifen and GnRH-a after surgery. Primary endpoints were pathological complete response (pCR) rate, decrease of Ki67 and disease free survival (DFS). One-hundred and nineteen women constituted the study group, while 95 patients served as controls. The pCR rate was 5.0 vs 1.1% in the study and control group, respectively. A statistically significant greater suppression of Ki67 was observed in patients receiving chemoendocrine therapy as compared with controls (P = 0.003). At a median follow up of 59 months, 26 events occurred in the chemoendocrine group and 48 in the control group. Five-year DFS was 78 vs 41% in the study and in the control group, respectively [adjusted HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.79, P = 0.0047]. The concurrent administration of letrozole and GnRH-a with preoperative chemotherapy was highly effective in premenopausal women with large ER positive breast cancer in terms of decreased proliferation and of improved DFS. Randomized studies are warranted to establish the role of the addition of endocrine therapy to chemotherapy as standard preoperative approach for ER positive locally advanced breast cancer as well as of letrozole in combination with GnRH-a for the treatment of premenopauasal women with early breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with cisplatin and infusional fluoruracil (CCF) with and without endocrine therapy in locally advanced primary or recurrent breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To explore the activity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) as neoadjuvant therapy of breast cancer. METHODS: The combination of PLD with cisplatin and infusional fluorouracil (CCF) for 8 courses was investigated in patients with primary or recurrent T2-T4a-d N0-3 M0 breast cancer. Patients with ER and/or PgR ≥10% tumors also received letrozole (±triptorelin). RESULTS: Forty patients entered the study. Four patients had recurrent tumors and 13 had cT4d tumors. Overall, clinical response rate was 77.5% whereas a pathological complete response (pCR) was obtained in 3 patients (7.7%), 4 when considering bilateral tumors. Noticeably 3 pCR were observed among the 10 patients with T4d ER positive tumors (33%). Eleven patients discontinued treatment before completion of the 8 planned courses. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that CCF yielded an appreciable rate of clinical responses in a series of very locally advanced tumors and an unusually high rate of pCR in T4d ER positive tumors, suggesting an enhanced cutaneous activity of PLD.

Infusional fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cisplatin followed by weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in locally advanced breast cancer with unfavorable prognostic features.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and biological activities of bevacizumab in combination with preoperative anthracyclines and taxane-based chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer selected for unfavorable prognostic features. Patients with cT2-4c, cN0-2, estrogen and progesterone receptors less than 10% of the cells or cT4d and any estrogen/progesterone receptors expression received four courses of ECF-chemotherapy (epirubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil as continuous infusion) followed by three courses of weekly paclitaxel in combination with bevacizumab. Thirty patients were included in the study. An objective response, either complete or partial, was observed in 26 patients (87%; 95% confidence interval: 69-96%), stable disease was observed in two patients (7%), and two patients (7%) progressed. A pathological complete response was obtained in 10 patients (33%; 95% confidence interval: 17-53%). Side effects related to bevacizumab with grade >or=2 included headache and hypertension. A nonstatistical significant decrease in the median value of circulating endothelial cells was observed at surgery (3.0/microl vs. 5.7/microl, P=0.19). In conclusion, high rates of both clinical and pathological responses with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy followed by weekly paclitaxel plus bevacizumab were observed in locally advanced breast cancer with unfavorable prognostic features. A non-negligible rate of progressive disease was observed, suggesting careful monitoring of the patients. Further studies evaluating the potential benefit of bevacizumab in neoadjuvant treatment need to be tested.

Increasing steroid hormone receptors expression defines breast cancer subtypes non responsive to preoperative chemotherapy.

The predictive role of the degree of endocrine responsiveness to preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) is unclear. We reviewed pretreatment biopsies of 553 patients with locally advanced breast cancer who were treated with PCT. The incidence of pathological complete remission (pCR) and outcome were assessed with respect to the degree of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) expression (ER and PgR absent, vs. ER or PgR 0-49%, vs. ER and PgR >or=50% of the cells positive). A statistically significant higher pCR rate was observed at the multivariate analysis for patients with ER and PgR absent tumors (17.7%) versus patients with tumors expressing high ER and PgR (0%) (OR 14.4 P < 0.001). Despite the higher incidence of pCR, a statistically significant worse disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) was observed for patients with ER and PgR absent tumors versus patients with tumors expressing high ER and PgR (HR 6.4, 95% CI 3.5-11.6, for DFS; HR 3.6 95% CI 2.4-5.6 for OS). Response and outcome after PCT are correlated with the degree of expression of steroid hormone receptors. Studies on tailored preoperative therapies are needed.

Role of endocrine responsiveness and HER2/neu overexpression in inflammatory breast cancer treated with multimodality preoperative therapy.

We analyzed the role of endocrine responsiveness and HER2/neu overexpression in inflammatory breast cancer treated with multimodality preoperative therapy. Thirty-eight patients (estrogen receptor [ER] and/or progesterone receptor [PgR] >or=10% of the cells 21, premenopausal 14, Ki-67 expression >or=20% of the cells 30, HER2/neu overexpressed 11) were treated with six courses of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil (FU) as continuous infusion, perioperative FU as continuous infusion, mastectomy and loco-regional radiotherapy. In endocrine-responsive patients, endocrine treatment (letrozole, either alone or if premenopausal with triptorelin) was given preoperatively and as adjuvant treatment. There were 32 objective responders (84.2%; 95% CI 70.0-94.6%), three of whom had pathologic complete remission. At the multivariate analysis disease-free survival was significantly worse in patients with ER and PgR absent tumors compared with the positive expression cohort (hazards ratio [HR]: 5.91; 95% CI 1.69-20.7; p = 0.005), in particular if HER2/neu overexpression was detected (HR: 16.5; 95% CI 4.24-64.5; p < 0.0001). New multimodality and targeted strategies should be explored in endocrine nonresponsive breast cancer.

Metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine combined with bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Metronomic chemotherapy has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. When used in association with targeted antiangiogenic drugs, it was more active than metronomic therapy alone in preclinical and clinical studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced breast cancer were candidates to receive metronomic oral capecitabine (500 mg thrice daily) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily) plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). RESULTS: In 46 assessable patients, we observed one complete response (CR; 2%), 21 partial responses (PR; 46%), 19 patients (41%) with stable disease (SD), and five patients (11%) with progressive disease, for an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI, 33% to 63%). Additional long-term disease stabilization (SD > or = 24 weeks) occurred in eight patients, for an overall clinical benefit (CR + PR + SD > or = 24 weeks) of 68% (95% CI, 51% to 81%). Median time to progression was 42 weeks (95% CI, 26 to 72 weeks). Toxicity was generally mild. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic adverse effects included hypertension (n = 8), transaminitis (n = 2), and nausea/vomiting (n = 2). Higher baseline circulating endothelial cells (CECs) were correlated with overall response (P = .02), clinical benefit (P = .01), and improved progression-free survival (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Treatment with metronomic capecitabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with bevacizumab was effective in advanced breast cancer and was minimally toxic. The number of baseline CECs significantly correlated with response and outcome, therefore supporting further studies on this surrogate marker for the selection of patients to be candidates for antiangiogenic treatments.

Vaccine immunotherapy in breast cancer treatment: promising, but still early.

Cancer vaccine-based immunotherapy should potentiate immunosurveillance function, preventing and protecting against growing tumors. Tumor cells usually activate the immune system, including T lymphocytes and natural killer cells, which are able to eliminate the transformed cells. Immunosubversion mechanisms related to tumor cells antigenic immunoediting induces mechanisms of tolerance and immunoescape. This condition impairs not only host-generated immunosurveillance, but also attempts to harness the immune response for therapeutic purposes. Most trials evaluating breast cancer vaccines have been carried out in patients in the metastatic and adjuvant setting. The aim of this review is to analyze the activity of vaccination strategies in current clinical trials. We summarize the differential approaches, protein-based and cell-based vaccines, focusing on vaccines targeting HER2/neu protein. Another focus of the review is to provide the reader with future challenges in the field, taking into account both the immunological and clinical aspects to better target the goal.