RESUMEN
Background: Paediatric femoral shaft fractures can be managed with single- or double-leg hip spica casting between ages six-months and six-years. The aim of this review was to determine if single-leg hip spicas reduce the impact on family life without compromising fracture stability. Methods: The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023454309). MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registers were searched to May 2023 for level I-III evidence. Primary outcomes were impact on family life and fracture stability. Where appropriate, Meta-analysis was completed using RevMan v5.4. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-RCTs). Certainty of evidence was measured with GRADE. Results: From 234 identified papers, four met the inclusion criteria (two RCTs; two non-RCTs). A total of 339 children were included (single-leg spica: 176; double-leg spica: 163). Three studies were 'high risk' and one study 'moderate risk' of bias. Impact on family life parameters were too heterogenous for pooled meta-analysis. Non-pooled data identified significantly more missed work days in the double-leg spica group and the 'Impact on Family' Scale significantly favoured single-leg spicas. For fracture stability, meta-analysis identified that (i) mal-union rates were significantly lower in single-leg spica: OR 0.08 (95 % CI 0.01 to 0.69; p = 0.02); (ii) MUA in theatre was not significantly different: OR 0.97 (95 % CI 0.19 to 4.86; p = 0.97); and (iii) wedge adjustment was not significantly different: OR 3.46 (95 % CI 0.48 to 24.92; p = 0.22). Certainty of evidence was assessed as 'very low'. Conclusion: Single-leg hip spicas may be associated with reduced impact on family life without compromising fracture stability compared with double-leg hip spicas. However, the evidence is weak. Therefore, a propensity score matched observational study is required to understand if subgroups of patients (age, fracture pattern, mechanism of injury) would benefit from a single- or double-leg hip spica.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Infected non-unions of proximal femoral fractures are difficult to treat. If debridement and revision fixation is unsuccessful, staged revision arthroplasty may be required. Non-viable tissue must be resected; coupled with the introduction of an antibiotic-eluting temporary spacer before definitive reconstruction. Tissue microbiological diagnosis and targeted antibiotic therapy are required. In cases of significant proximal femoral bone loss, spacing options are limited. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a bisphosphonate-induced subtrochanteric fracture that progressed to infected non-union. Despite multiple washouts and two revision fixations, the infection remained active with an unfavorable antibiogram. The patient required staged revision arthroplasty including a proximal femoral resection. To improve function through maintaining leg length and offset, the Cement-a-TAN was fabricated. It is a custom-made antibiotic-eluting articulating temporary spacer. Using a trochanteric entry cephalocondylar nail as a scaffold, bone cement was molded around the nail to fashion an anatomical and patient-specific proximal femoral spacer. Following resolution of the infection, the Cement-a-TAN was removed and a proximal femoral arthroplasty was successfully performed. CONCLUSION: Cement-a-TAN is an excellent temporary spacing technique in staged proximal femoral replacement for infected non-union of the proximal femur where there has been significant bone loss. It preserves mobility and maintains leg length, offset, and periarticular soft-tissue tension, while offering good stability.
RESUMEN
Modular dual-mobility (MDM) constructs can be used to reduce dislocation rates after total hip replacement (THR). However, there are concerns about adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) as a result of fretting corrosion between the metal liner and shell. This systematic review reports outcomes following THR using MDM components. It was registered with PROSPERO and conducted in line with Cochrane and PRISMA recommendations.Sixteen articles were included overall, with meta-analysis performed on relevant subsets using a random intercept logistic regression model. Estimated median incidence of ARMD requiring revision surgery within study follow-up period was 0.3% (95% CI 0.1 - 1.8%, from 11 cohort studies containing 1312 cases).Serum metal ion levels were mildly raised in 7.9% of cases, and significantly raised in 1.8%, but there was no correlation with worse clinical hip function scores within studies. Dislocation rate was 0.8%. Revision rate was 3.3%.There are mixed reports of wear on the backside of the metal liner from the acetabular shell and screw heads. Both implant design and component malseating are implicated, but currently it is unclear to what extent each factor is responsible.Studies were poor quality with high risk of confounding, especially from trunnion corrosion. We have made recommendations for further work. In the meantime, surgeons should be aware of the potential risk of ARMD when considering using an MDM prosthesis, and, if selecting one, must ensure proper seating of the liner and screws intraoperatively. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:343-353. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200146.
RESUMEN
A parotid gland abscess is uncommon and if not responding to conservative management, requires surgical intervention. However, surgery is invasive with the risk of complicating facial nerve damage and possible poor cosmetic outcome. We present a case of a parotid gland abscess in association with an underlying Warthin's tumour requiring percutaneous drainage, as patient co-morbidity precluded a safe surgical approach. Percutaneous drainage was aided by a contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination, which permitted delineation of the fluid aspects of the collection from the underlying tumour and allowed successful percutaneous ultrasound-guided aspiration without complication.
