RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Walch classification has been widely accepted and further developed as a method to characterize glenohumeral arthritis. However, many studies have reported low and inconsistent measures of the reliability of the Walch classification. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the reliability of the Walch classification and characterize how imaging modality and classification modifications affect reliability. METHODS: A systematic review of publications that included reliability of the Walch classification reported through intraobserver and interobserver kappa values was conducted. A search in January 2021 and repeated in July 2023 used the terms ["Imaging" OR "radiography" OR "CT" OR "MRI"] AND ["Walch classification"] AND ["Glenoid arthritis" OR "Shoulder arthritis"]. All clinical studies from database inception to July 2023 that evaluated the Walch or modified Walch classification's intraobserver and/or interobserver reliability were included. Cadaveric studies and studies that involved subjects with previous arthroplasty, shoulder débridement, glenoid reaming, interposition arthroplasty, and latarjet or bankart procedure were excluded. Articles were categorized by imaging modality and classification modification. RESULTS: Thirteen articles met all inclusion criteria. Three involved the evaluation of plain radiographs, 10 used CT, two used three-dimensional (3D) CT, and four used magnetic resonance imaging. Nine studies involved the original Walch classification system, five involved a simplified version, and four involved the modified Walch. Six studies examined the reliability of raters of varying experience levels with none reporting consistent differences based on experience. Overall intraobserver reliability of the Walch classifications ranged from 0.34 to 0.92, and interobserver reliability ranged from 0.132 to 0.703. No consistent trends were observed in the effect of the imaging modalities or classification modifications on reliability. DISCUSSION: The reliability of the Walch classification remains inconsistent, despite modification and imaging advances. Consideration of the limitations of the classification system is important when using it for treatment or prognostic purposes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gender bias in graduate medical evaluations remains a challenging issue. This study evaluates implicit gender bias in video-based evaluations of microsurgical technique, which has not previously been described in the literature. METHODS: Two videos were recorded of microsurgical anastomosis; the first was performed by a hand/microsurgery fellow and the second by an expert microsurgeon. A total of 150 surgeons with microsurgical experience were recruited to evaluate the videos; they were told these videos depicted a surgical trainee 1 month into fellowship followed by the same trainee 10 months later. The only variable was the name ("Rachel" or "David") that each participant was randomly assigned to evaluate. Participants were asked to score each video for quality, technique, efficiency, as well as overall progression and development after the second video compared with the initial video. To focus on bias, these outcome measures were selected to be purposefully subjective and all ratings were based on a subjective 1to 10 scale (10 = excellent). RESULTS: The analysis included 150 participants (75% male). There were no statistically significant differences in scores between the "female" and "male" trainee. The trainees received the same median initial (1-month video) and final (11th-month video) scores for all criteria except initial technique, in which the female trainee received a 7 and the male trainee received an 8. Notably, 11-month scores were consistently the same or lower than 1-month scores for both study groups (p < 0.001). There were also no differences within either study group based on participant sex. Microsurgery practitioners overall rated both groups lower than those who do not currently practice microsurgery. CONCLUSION: Our study did not identify a gender bias in this evaluation method. Further investigation into how we assess and grade trainees as well as the presence and impact of implicit biases on varying surgical assessment methods is warranted.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Letters of recommendation (LORs) function as an indicator of competence and future potential for a trainee. Our purpose was to evaluate gender bias in hand surgery fellowship applicant LORs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all LORs submitted to a hand surgery fellowship program between 2015 and 2020. Demographic data about applicants and letter writers were collected. Linguistic analysis was performed using a text analysis software, and results were evaluated with nonparametric tests, multiple linear regression models, and a mixed effects regression model. RESULTS: Letters of recommendation were analyzed; 720 letters for 188 (23.4%) female applicants and 2,337 letters for 616 (76.6%) male applicants. Compared with LORs written for men, those written for women had more references to categories of anxiety (eg, worried and fearful) and affiliation (eg, ally and friend). Letters for women had more "clout." In subgroup analysis, letters for female plastic surgery applicants had more words signaling power, whereas recommendations for female applicants from orthopedic residencies had more words related to anxiety, achievement, work, and leisure. CONCLUSIONS: Letters of recommendation written for female residents applying to hand fellowship had more references to anxiety but were written with higher clout and more words of affiliation. Subgroup analysis looking at orthopedic and plastic surgery applicants separately found a mixed picture. Overall, these LORs written for applicants to hand fellowship had no notable specific patterns of gender bias in our analyses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because programs look to train the next generation of hand surgeons, alerting letter readers to trends in implicit bias may help in the selection of qualified applicants. Bringing topics of implicit bias forward may help writers think more critically about word choice and topics.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Neuroma formation following upper-extremity peripheral nerve injury often results in persistent, debilitating neuropathic pain with a limited response to medical management. Vascularized, denervated muscle targets (VDMTs) offer a newly described surgical approach to address this challenging problem. Like targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve targets, VDMTs are used to redirect regenerating axons from an injured nerve into denervated muscle to prevent neuroma formation. By providing a vascularized muscle target that is reinnervated via direct neurotization, VDMTs offer some theoretical advantages in comparison with the other contemporary surgical options. In this study, we followed the short-term pain outcomes of patients who underwent VDMT surgery for neuroma prevention or treatment. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 9 patients (2 pediatric and 7 adult) who underwent VDMTs either for symptomatic upper-extremity neuromas or as a prophylactic measure to prevent primary neuroma formation. In-person and/or telephone interviews were conducted to assess their postoperative clinical outcomes, including the visual analog pain scale simple pain score. Results: Of the 9 patients included in this study, 7 underwent VDMT surgery as a prophylactic measure against neuroma formation, and 2 presented with symptomatic neuromas that were treated with VDMTs. The average follow-up was 5.6 ± 4.1 months (range, 0.5-13.2 months). The average postoperative pain score of the 7 adult patients was 1.1 (range, 0-8). Conclusions: This study demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes in a small cohort of patients treated with VDMTs in the upper extremity. Larger, prospective, and comparative studies with validated patient-reported and objective outcome measures and longer-term follow-ups are needed to further evaluate the benefits of VDMTs in upper-extremity neuroma management and prevention. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes of patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using suture tape augmentation. METHODS: Patients with a proximal tear of the ACL who underwent primary ACL repair with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. The exclusion criteria included multiligamentous knee injuries, midsubstance tears, tibial avulsion fractures, and distal tears. Demographic characteristics, injury pattern, concomitant injury pattern, and patient-reported outcome measures were recorded. Patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up for clinical success, defined as stability not requiring revision ACL reconstruction, and for patient-reported outcome measurements. Failure was defined as the need for revision surgery. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 2.8 ± 0.9 years. Thirty-five patients met the inclusion criteria, with an average age of 32.2 ± 7.2 years, and 2-year follow-up was obtained for 29 of these patients. Revision surgery was required in 2 of the 29 patients (6.9%); successful treatment was achieved in the remaining 93.1%. The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for the 27 successfully treated patients were recorded, with 70.4% having Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores of 80 or greater. CONCLUSIONS: This case series shows that primary surgical repair of proximal ACL tears using suture tape augmentation results in a low rate of revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective case series.
