RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ratio of oxygen saturation index (ROX index; or SpO2 /FIO2 /breathing frequency) has been shown to predict risk of intubation after high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) support among adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure primarily due to pneumonia. However, its predictive value for other subtypes of respiratory failure is unknown. This study investigated whether the ROX index predicts liberation from HFNC or noninvasive ventilation (NIV), intubation with mechanical ventilation, or death in adults admitted for respiratory failure due to an exacerbation of COPD. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 260 adults hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation and treated with HFNC and/or NIV (continuous or bi-level). ROX index scores were collected at treatment initiation and predefined time intervals throughout HFNC and/or NIV treatment or until the subject was intubated or died. A ROX index score of ≥ 4.88 was applied to the cohort to determine if the same score would perform similarly in this different cohort. Accuracy of the ROX index was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operator curve. RESULTS: A total of 47 subjects (18%) required invasive mechanical ventilation or died while on HFNC/NIV. The ROX index at treatment initiation, 1 h, and 6 h demonstrated the best prediction accuracy for avoidance of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (area under the receiver operator curve 0.73 [95% CI 0.66-0.80], 0.72 [95% CI 0.65-0.79], and 0.72 [95% CI 0.63-0.82], respectively). The optimal cutoff value for sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) was a ROX index score > 6.88 (sensitivity 62%, specificity 57%). CONCLUSIONS: The ROX index applied to adults with COPD exacerbations treated with HFNC and/or NIV required higher scores to achieve similar prediction of low risk of treatment failure when compared to subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure/pneumonia. ROX scores < 4.88 did not accurately predict intubation or death.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Reducing the rising health-care burden associated with shoulder surgical site infection (SSI) is of paramount importance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of protocatechuic acid (PCA) as a topical reagent for surgical skin antisepsis surrounding the shoulder joint. METHODS: This was a 2-phase skin-disinfection trial involving the human shoulder. The shoulders of healthy volunteers were randomized to topical treatment with PCA (a 10% concentration of PCA in Phase I [11 subjects] and a 17% concentration in Phase II [12 subjects]), with a control of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) applied to the contralateral shoulder. Mechanical scraping was performed for skin harvest following reagent application, and samples were sent for aerobic and anaerobic culture. Sterilization rates and bacterial counts were determined for each treatment group, and the proportion of subjects with persistent Cutibacterium acnes colonization following topical application of PCA was determined using DNA sequencing analysis. RESULTS: The topical application of 10% PCA was associated with significantly higher aerobic and anaerobic sterilization rates (90.9% and 81.8%, respectively) compared with treatment with IPA (p = 0.0143 and p = 0.0253, respectively). The topical application of 17% PCA was associated with a significantly higher anaerobic sterilization rate (83.3%) and trended toward a significantly higher aerobic sterilization rate (91.7%) compared with treatment with IPA (p = 0.0143 and p = 0.083, respectively). C. acnes was identified in 18.2% and 0% of subjects following treatment with 10% and 17% PCA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The topical application of PCA was associated with a reduction in the bacterial burden of human shoulder skin and demonstrated dose-dependent antimicrobial activity against C. acnes in young, healthy subjects. Clinical studies in a shoulder surgical population are warranted to determine the potential for application in surgical skin antisepsis to reduce shoulder SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a need for novel skin antiseptic agents to combat the health-care burdens associated with surgical site infection (SSI) and bacterial resistance. The purpose of this proof-of-principle pilot study was to investigate the potential of the phenolic compound protocatechuic acid (PCA) as a topical antimicrobial for surgical skin antisepsis. METHODS: The Kirby-Bauer method of disc diffusion was used to investigate the in vitro antimicrobial activity and comparative effectiveness of PCA and 7 related compounds against SSI pathogens. To explore the in vivo efficacy of topical PCA for providing deep, penetrating skin antisepsis, living Cutibacterium acnes was intradermally injected into the skin of female BALB/c mice. Mice were assigned to treatment with daily applications of topical PCA at 3 doses (78, 39, and 19.5 mM) or no treatment (n = 2 mice per group). After 96 hours, infected skin samples were harvested to compare mean C. acnes counts by treatment. RESULTS: Compared with other polyphenols, PCA demonstrated the broadest spectrum of antimicrobial activity against tested SSI pathogens, including drug-resistant organisms. At 96 hours following infection, the mean C. acnes burden in untreated mice was 6.65 log colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram of skin. Compared with the untreated group, daily topical application of 78 mM of PCA was associated with a significantly lower C. acnes CFU burden in mice skin (mean, 5.51 log CFUs per gram of skin; p = 0.0295). Both lower dosages of topical PCA failed to show an effect. CONCLUSIONS: PCA demonstrated laboratory efficacy against pathogens implicated in SSI, including drug-resistant organisms. In vivo, topical PCA demonstrated dose-dependent skin penetration and antimicrobial activity against mouse skin C. acnes loads. Human clinical studies exploring the antimicrobial efficacy of topical PCA for preoperative shoulder skin antisepsis are warranted. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Topical PCA may have the potential to improve current shoulder SSI treatment and prevention protocols.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction has become an essential metric in addition to the type of care they receive. Phone calls, emails, and text to patients after their healthcare visit are the typical way of obtaining the data reflecting patient satisfaction. The purpose of this retrospective quality improvement study is to compare the traditional post-outpatient clinic survey method with an onsite concise two-question survey using a tablet method immediately after the patient visit using Net Promoter Score (NPS) questions. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from February to August 2018 from an outpatient subspecialty clinic in southern California using an existing database from two different sources: the traditional method (TM) and the tablet-based tool (TBT), using NPS. The TM data were obtained from a third-party company using two questions via phone, email, and text collected 2-4 weeks after the patient's visit. The TBT has only two questions that were given to patients upon their visit check-out. These two questions assessed both provider and clinic's performance using the NPS method. RESULTS: In total, there were 1708 patients seen from February to August 2018. In the TM, the total outgoing messages during this period were 580 (34.0%) with 156 responses (27%). In the TBT, 648 out of 1708 (37.9%) surveys were collected with a 100% response rate. The NPS score showed that 99.2% of the providers were promoters. The NPS score for the clinic was 96% which reflects a promoter score. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that when using the TBT immediately after their visit to the clinic, a higher response rate was noted. In addition, both methods had similar outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction NPS scores. Future prospective studies with a larger sample size are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TBT tool in assessing patient satisfaction.
RESUMEN
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airway that is characterized by bronchial hyperresponsiveness and variable airflow limitation. Approximately 235 million people are affected by asthma worldwide and 5-10% are considered to be refractory to standard asthma treatment. These patients are known to have repeated exacerbations requiring multiple courses of systemic corticosteroids and as a result, are at risk for increased adverse effects (i.e., osteoporosis, infections). Several new medications known as biologic agents have been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthmatics. These biologic agents target essential parts of the cell-mediated allergic and to a lesser degree non-allergic immune response (IgE, IL-5, and IL-4/IL-13). They are gaining more favor in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma due to their efficacy and excellent safety profile. Despite the most common adverse events being minor, such as injection site reactions, upper respiratory infections, or headaches, these agents carry a small risk of more severe complications such as anaphylaxis and decreased defense against parasitic infections (PI). The incidence of PI compared with other rare adverse events is not well reported, and there are no consensus guidelines for risk prevention of PI in asthmatics undergoing evaluation for, or currently using, biologic therapy. Thus, this article sets out to review the incidence of reported PI and other rare adverse events among asthmatics using current FDA-approved biologic therapies. Secondly, we discuss the clinical implications for the importance of risk prevention of PI with the use of biologic therapies in asthmatics. Lastly, we share an educational handout to assist providers in informing their patients of behaviors that could potentially increase their risk of PI while being on a biologic agent.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors are among the immunotherapies that have revolutionized our approach to treating several cancers. These novel agents act by blocking PD-1 receptor/PD-1 ligand interactions that would otherwise allow tumor cells to evade host immune destruction by inhibiting response of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. They are overall well tolerated, though they have been associated with a constellation of immune mediated adverse events (irAEs). CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of rare nivolumab mediated adverse events in a patient with nodular recurrence of melanoma. The patient presented with rhabdomyolysis and shortly thereafter developed a constellation of immune-mediated organ derangements. This case further demonstrates the utility and effectiveness of steroid therapy in the setting of irAEs despite our patient's eventual poor clinical outcome. While PD-1 inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of several cancers, they require vigilance by the clinician for early detection and treatment of uncommon but potentially fatal irAEs. CONCLUSIONS: PD-1 inhibitors are now widely used in a multitude of cancer types including melanoma, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma amongst others. While these agents are often well tolerated, they are associated with a unique profile of immune-related toxicities that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Education of both patients and healthcare providers is essential for diagnosis and treatment of these adverse events early in their course. This case highlights the uncommon but potentially serious PD-1-associated toxicity of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis along with other organ involvement and is directly applicable to use of these agents in patients with advanced cancers.
