Immunity and Protection Provided by Live Modified Vaccines Against Paratyphoid Salmonella in Poultry-An Applied Perspective.

Several serotypes of non-host-specific or paratyphoid Salmonella have been linked with contamination of poultry meat, and eggs, resulting in foodborne outbreaks in humans. Vaccination of poultry against paratyphoid Salmonella is a frequent strategy used to reduce the levels of infection and transmission, which ultimately can lead to lower rates of human infections. Live vaccines have been developed and used in poultry immediately after hatching as a result of their ability to colonize the gut, stimulate a mucosal immune response, induce a competitive inhibitory effect against homologous wild strains, and reduce colonization and excretion of Salmonella. Furthermore, vaccines can competitively exclude some heterologous strains of Salmonella from colonizing the gastrointestinal tract when young poultry are immunologically immature. In addition, various studies have suggested that booster vaccination with live vaccines a few weeks after initial vaccination is essential to increase the level of protection and achieve better cross-protective immunity. Vaccination of breeders, broilers, layers, and turkeys with modified live Salmonella vaccines is a common intervention that has become an important component in poultry companies' multistep prevention programs to meet increasingly demanding customer and regulatory food safety requirements. Both live and inactivated vaccines play a critical role in a comprehensive control program for chicken and turkey breeders and commercial layers. This review examines the response and protection conferred by live modified vaccines against non-host-specific Salmonella that can be considered for the design and implementation of vaccination strategies in poultry.

Artículo regular­Inmunidad y protección que brindan las vacunas vivas modificadas contra salmonelas paratíficas en la avicultura­Una perspectiva aplicada. Varios serotipos de Salmonella paratífica no específica de huésped se han relacionado con la contaminación de la carne de pollo y huevos lo que ha provocado brotes de origen alimentario en los seres humanos. La vacunación de aves comerciales contra Salmonella paratífica es una estrategia que se utiliza con frecuencia para reducir los niveles de infección y transmisión, que en última instancia puede conducir a tasas más bajas de infecciones en humanos. Se han desarrollado y utilizado vacunas vivas en aves comerciales inmediatamente después de la eclosión como resultado de su capacidad para colonizar el intestino, estimular una respuesta inmunitaria de la mucosa, inducir un efecto inhibidor competitivo contra cepas silvestres homólogas y reducir la colonización y excreción de Salmonella. Además, las vacunas pueden excluir competitivamente algunas cepas heterólogas de Salmonella de colonizar el tracto gastrointestinal cuando las aves jóvenes son inmunológicamente inmaduras. Además, varios estudios han sugerido que la vacunación de refuerzo con vacunas vivas unas semanas después de la vacunación inicial es esencial para aumentar el nivel de protección y lograr una mejor inmunidad de protección cruzada. La vacunación de reproductoras, pollos de engorde, aves de postura y pavos con vacunas vivas modificadas contra Salmonella es una intervención común que se ha convertido en un componente importante en los programas de prevención de múltiples pasos de las empresas avícolas para cumplir con los requisitos de los clientes y regulatorios de seguridad alimentaria. Tanto las vacunas vivas como las inactivadas desempeñan un papel fundamental en un programa de control integral para productores de pollos, pavos y aves ponedoras comerciales. Esta revisión examina la respuesta y la protección conferidas por las vacunas vivas modificadas contra Salmonella no específica del huésped que pueden ser consideradas para el diseño e implementación de estrategias de vacunación en la avicultura.

Effect of in ovo vaccine delivery route on herpesvirus of turkeys/SB-1 efficacy and viremia.

A study was designed to ascertain the influence of in ovo site of inoculation and embryonic fluid type on the development of Marek's disease (MD) vaccine viremia and efficacy against MD challenge. The experiments were divided into in vitro and in vivo phases. In the in vitro phase, herpesvirus of turkeys/SB-1 vaccine was combined with basal medium eagle (BME) medium (control), amniotic fluid, or allantoic fluid and subsequently titrated on secondary chick embryo fibroblast cultures. There were no significant differences in titer between the virus inoculum carried in BME and the virus inoculum combined with either the allantoic fluid or the amniotic fluid. In the in vivo phase, five routes of inoculation, amniotic, intraembryonic, allantoic, air cell, and subcutaneous at hatch, were compared for generation of protection against virulent MD challenge. Comparisons were made in both specific-pathogen-free and commercial broiler embryos/chicks and, for the amniotic and allantoic routes, injection at either day 17 or day 18 of embryonation. Reisolation of the vaccine virus at day 3 of age was also done for all routes with the exception of the air cell route. Vaccine virus was recovered from all birds tested that were injected in ovo via the amniotic and intraembryonic routes and the subcutaneously at hatch route but was isolated only sporadically from birds inoculated via the allantoic route. Vaccination protective efficacy against virulent MD for all birds vaccinated in ovo via the amniotic or intraembryonic routes and birds vaccinated subcutaneously at hatch was over 90% regardless of day of in ovo injection or bird type. Protective efficacy for vaccines delivered in ovo by either the allantoic or the air cell routes was less than 50% regardless of day of injection or bird type. Therefore, in ovo MD vaccines must be injected either via the amniotic route or the intraembryonic route for optimal performance.