Assisted human reproduction legislation: Listening to the voice of patients.

OBJECTIVE: Legislation and policies regarding assisted human reproduction (AHR) vary widely across nations and societies. As one of only 5 European countries which currently lacks legislation, Ireland now has a unique opportunity to learn from other jurisdictions and introduce AHR law that is reflective of the ongoing myriad developments in this complex field. Draft legislation, initially published in 2017, was revised in 2022 with strong political commitment to enacting in the same year. This study sought to ascertain the views of fertility patients (service users) to the proposed AHR legislation in its current format, prior to its implementation. STUDY DESIGN: A survey questionnaire, previously designed to investigate the attitudes and perceptions of healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards a broad range of issues contained within the draft AHR Bill, was adapted for a patient/service user population. The survey link was distributed via secure email to all patients that had a doctor consult at our fertility clinic in 2020-2021. RESULTS: The survey link was sent to 4420 patients/service users, of whom 1044 (23.6%) responded. A majority had experienced AHR treatment. Service users indicated strong support for AHR regulation and for access to all AHR techniques for all patients, irrespective of relationship or gender status. A majority of respondents disagreed with aspects of the draft bill regarding mandatory counselling, the timing of assignment of parentage in surrogacy, the exclusion of international surrogacy and the exclusion of men from posthumous AHR. Interestingly, the fertility patient cohort were more liberal in their views and opinions regarding AHR than the Irish HCPs previously surveyed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the views of a large group of AHR patients/service users towards proposed AHR legislation. Many of their views concur with but others differ from those of the drafters of the legislation and from those of healthcare professionals. Consideration of the views of all these groups and a collaborative approach would help ensure that Ireland has AHR legislation that is inclusive and fit for purpose in the 21st century.

Assisted human reproduction legislation: Acknowledging the voice of health care professionals.

OBJECTIVE: Ireland is one of 5 European countries which currently lacks specific legislation on Assisted Human Reproduction (AHR). Draft legislation was introduced in 2017 and revised in 2022 with a view to enacting legislation this year (2022). This study sought to ascertain the views of healthcare professionals to proposed AHR legislation, prior to the implementation of that legislation. STUDY DESIGN: A survey questionnaire based on all clinically relevant aspects of the Irish draft AHR Bill 2017 was distributed to relevant healthcare professionals using an online platform. RESULTS: Over 200 healthcare personnel indicated strong support for the availability of AHR techniques, access to treatment for all patient populations regardless of relationship or gender status, and appropriate legislation and regulation in the field. Views of respondents are at variance with several proposals surrounding surrogacy, with 84 % favouring a pre-birth order to assign parentage from birth, rather than the proposed birth order 6 weeks after birth. The majority also support legislation around international surrogacy. Contrary to the draft Bill, respondents believe that men, as well as women, should be able to use posthumously any stored gametes or embryos belonging to the deceased partner or the couple. While the majority favour altruistic gamete donation, respondents support more generous compensation for donors, such as compensation for time lost at work. CONCLUSION: This study has uniquely ascertained the views of healthcare professionals to imminent AHR legislation. It is hoped that the results will help inform the national legislation as it nears completion. Similar studies could help other countries, and policy bodies such as ESHRE to frame good legislation in this extremely specialised and complex field.

COVID-19 Vaccine and Fertility: The Male Perspective.

Aims The expedited development of multiple COVID-19 vaccines has raised concerns for some, with vaccine hesitancy described in many populations. A U.S. study assessing fertility patients attitudes towards the COVID -19 vaccine revealed that over half were unsure, or would not accept the vaccine if offered. Only 7.4% of participants in this study were male. We therefore sought to assess the perspective of male fertility patients towards COVID-19 vaccination. Methods Men with a fertility appointment were invited to complete an anonymous 21-item questionnaire. Results Willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccination was influenced by stage of fertility journey. Overall, 76% (n=102) of participants were willing to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Men with a pregnant partner were most likely to accept or have already accepted the vaccine (97%, 30/31). Conclusion Although concerns around COVID-19 vaccines persist, this study demonstrates the growing rate of acceptance and engagement among the male fertility population.