Disease-specific health-related quality of life trajectories up to 15 years after curative treatment for esophageal cancer-a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of distinct long-term disease-specific HRQL trajectories after curative treatment for esophageal cancer and factors associated with such trajectories are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This population-based and longitudinal cohort study included 425 esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative treatment, including esophagectomy, in Sweden in 2001-2005 and were followed up until 2020, that is, 15-year follow-up. The outcomes were 10 disease-specific HRQL symptoms, measured by the well-validated EORTC QLQ-OES18 questionnaire at 6 months (n = 402 patients), and 3 (n = 178), 5 (n = 141), 10 (n = 92), and 15 years (n = 52) after treatment. HRQL symptoms were examined for distinct trajectories by growth mixture models. Weighted logistic regression models provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for nine factors in relation to HRQL trajectories: age, sex, education, proxy baseline HRQL, comorbidity, tumor histology, chemo(radio)therapy, pathological tumor stage, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Distinct HRQL trajectories were identified for each of the 10 disease-specific symptoms. HRQL trajectories with more symptoms tended to persist or alleviate over time, while trajectories with fewer symptoms were more stable. Eating difficulty had three trajectories: persistently less, persistently moderate, and persistently more symptoms. The OR of having a persistently more eating difficulty trajectory was decreased for adenocarcinoma histology (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.95), and increased for pathological tumor stage III-IV (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 0.99-4.82) and 30-day postoperative complications (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.26-5.12). CONCLUSION: Distinct trajectories with long-term persistent or deteriorating disease-specific HRQL symptoms were identified after esophageal cancer treatment. Tumor histology, tumor stage, and postoperative complications may facilitate detection of high-risk patients for unwanted trajectories.

Using the GAP score as a complement to the new injury severity score in identifying severely injured patients- A registry-based cohort study of adult trauma patients in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and Glasgow Coma Scale, Age and Pressure (GAP) scoring systems have cutoffs to define severe injury and identify high-risk patients. This is important in trauma quality monitoring and improvement. The overall aim was to explore if GAP scoring system can be a complement or an alternative to the traditional NISS scoring system. METHODS: Adults exposed to trauma between 2017 and 2021 were included in the study, using data from The Swedish Trauma Registry. The performance of NISS and GAP scores in predicting mortality, and ICU admissions were assessed using the area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) in all patients and in subgroups (blunt, penetrating trauma and older (≥65 years) trauma patients). Patients were classified as severely injured by NISS >15 as Severely Injured NISS (SIN) or with a high-risk for mortality, by GAP 3-18 as High Risk GAP (HRG). Undertriage was calculated based on the cutoffs HRG and SIN. RESULTS: Overall, 37,017 patients were included. The AUROC (95 % CI) for mortality using NISS was 0.84 (0.83-0.85) and for GAP 0.92 (0.91-0.93) (p-value <0.001), the AUROC (95 % CI) for ICU-admissions was 0.82 (0.82-0.83) using NISS and for GAP 0.70 (0.70-0.71) p-value <0.001, in the overall cohort. In older patients the AUROC (95 % CI) for mortality was 0.76 (0.75-0.78) using NISS and 0.79 (0.78-0.81) using GAP, p-value <0.001. Overall, 8,572 (23.2 %) and 2,908 (7.9 %) were classified as SIN and HRG, respectively, with mortality rates of 13.7 % and 34.3 %. In the HRG group low-energy falls dominated and in the SIN group most patients were exposed to MVCs. In the SIN and HRG groups the rate of Emergency Trauma Interventions according to Utstein guidelines (ETIU) and ICU admission was 14.0 vs 9.5 % and 47.0 vs 62.5 % respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the GAP score and its cutoff 3-18 can be used to define severe trauma as complement to NISS >15 and can be a valuable tool in trauma quality monitoring and improvement. However, both scoring systems were less accurate in predicting mortality for the older trauma patients and should be explored further.

The paradox of workplace violence in the intensive care unit: a focus group study.

BACKGROUND: Conflicts with patients and relatives occur frequently in intensive care units (ICUs), driven by factors that are intensified by critical illness and its treatments. A majority of ICU healthcare professionals have experienced verbal and/or physical violence. There is a need to understand how healthcare professionals in ICUs experience and manage this workplace violence. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive analysis of four hospitals in Sweden was conducted using semi-structured focus-group interviews with ICU healthcare professionals. RESULTS: A total of 34 participants (14 nurses, 6 physicians and 14 other staff) were interviewed across the four hospitals. The overarching theme: "The paradox of violence in healthcare" illustrated a normalisation of violence in ICU care and indicated a complex association between healthcare professionals regarding violence as an integral aspect of caregiving, while simultaneously identifying themselves as victims of this violence. The healthcare professionals described being poorly prepared and lacking appropriate tools to manage violent situations. The management of violence was therefore mostly based on self-taught skills. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to understanding the normalisation of violence in ICU care and gives a possible explanation for its origins. The paradox involves a multifaceted approach that acknowledges and confronts the structural and cultural dimensions of violence in healthcare. Such an approach will lay the foundations for a more sustainable healthcare system.

Severe reflux, malnutrition and health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer surgery: A prospective nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: While most survivors of oesophageal cancer suffer from multiple symptoms, studies on combined symptom burden are scarce, particularly when looking at long-term outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between gastro-oesophageal reflux and health-related quality of life in malnourished survivors during the first years after oesophagectomy for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide prospective cohort study included all Swedish patients who underwent curatively intended oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between 2013 and 2020 with 3-year follow-up. Linear mixed effect models were used to analyse the associations between reflux symptoms, malnutrition and HRQL at 1-, 2- and 3 years post-surgery and were presented with mean score difference (MSD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 406 included individuals, malnourished survivors with severe reflux reported more problems with nausea/vomiting (MSD 16.3, 95 % CI: 11.4 to 21.3), pain (MSD 16.5, 95 % CI: 10.2 to 22.8), body image (MSD 12.3, 95 % CI: 5.6 to 19.0), eating restrictions (MSD 11.3, 95 % CI: 6.1 to 16.5), swallowing saliva (MSD 10.0, 95 % CI: 5.2 to 14.8), dry mouth (MSD 10.5, 95 % CI: 2.4 to 18.7), and taste (MSD 14.1, 95 % CI: 7.1 to 21.0) compared to malnourished survivors with no reflux. Nausea/vomiting, financial difficulties, body image, and cognitive function were consistently worse for malnourished individuals with reflux throughout the 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that gastro-oesophageal reflux negatively influences health-related quality of life in malnourished oesophageal cancer survivors. Nausea and/or vomiting were consistently worse for malnourished individuals with reflux independent of time point.

Trajectories of patient-reported outcomes after oesophageal cancer surgery - A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the trajectories of patient-reported outcomes for individuals who have undergone surgery for oesophageal cancer over a five-year post-surgical period, and to identify modifiable factors that contribute to a decline in quality of life. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection in Sweden between 2013 and 2020 were included. Data were collected at one-year post-surgery and at regular pre-determined intervals during the five-year post-surgical period. Latent class analysis and logistic regression models were used to identify symptom trajectories and determine their association with lifestyle factors, respectively. RESULTS: This study included 408 patients, and the majority experienced consistent symptom burdens during the five-year post-surgery period. Current smokers had a higher risk of belonging to the severe dysphagia, severe eating restriction, and severe reflux trajectory. Physically active patients were less likely to belong to the severe dysphagia, severe eating restriction, and severe pain and discomfort trajectory. Patients with a stable weight were less likely to belong to the severe eating restriction and to the recovering body image trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are smokers, have a low level of physical activity, and experience weight loss need further attention and individual support to mitigate long-term symptom burden.

First mobilisation after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery: when is it actually performed? A national, multicentre, cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Knowledge of clinical practice regarding mobilisation after surgery is lacking. This study therefore aimed to reveal current mobilisation routines after abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery and to identify factors associated with mobilisation within 6 hours postoperatively. DESIGN: A prospective observational national multicentre study. SETTING: 18 different hospitals in Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: 1492 adult patients undergoing abdominal and cardiothoracic surgery with duration of anaesthesia>2 hours. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Primary outcome was time to first postoperative mobilisation. Secondary outcomes were the type and duration of the first mobilisation. Data were analysed using multivariate logistic regression and general structural equation modelling, and data are presented as ORs with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Among the included patients, 52% were mobilised to at least sitting on the edge of the bed within 6 hours, 70% within 12 hours and 96% within 24 hours. Besides sitting on the edge of the bed, 76% stood up by the bed and 22% were walking away from the bedside the first time they were mobilised. Patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery required the longest time before mobilisation with an average time of 11 hours post surgery. Factors associated with increased likelihood of mobilisation within 6 hours of surgery were daytime arrival at the postoperative recovery unit (OR: 5.13, 95% CI: 2.16 to 12.18), anaesthesia <4 hours (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17 to 2.40) and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1-2, (OR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.36). CONCLUSIONS: In total, 96% if the patients were mobilised within 24 hours after surgery and 52% within 6 hours. Daytime arrival at the postoperative recovery unit, low ASA classification and shorter duration of anaesthesia were associated with a shorter time to mobilisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: FoU, Forskning och Utveckling in VGR, Vastra Gotaland Region (Id:275357) and Clinical Trials (NCT04729634).

Self-care advice for patients after surgery for oesophageal cancer - a mixed-methods systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim of the literature review was to identify and synthesise research on self-care advice for oesophageal cancer survivors. METHODS: A mixed-methods systematic review and synthesis of existing literature on the topic. Five databases were searched for studies providing information on self-care advice for survivorship after oesophageal cancer surgery, in English, with no time filter. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program was used to assess the risk of bias. Data were presented by textual descriptions and grouping of data. RESULTS: Among the 13 studies included in the review, five pieces of self-care advice were identified; reconstructing eating habits, bed-head elevation, health-promoting advice, monitoring symptoms and body functions, and involving family and friends. The self-care advice was experienced to be hard work, but worth the effort. They also provided reassurance and an increased understanding of bodily changes and social consequences of the disease and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There are is little evidence-based self-care advice for oesophageal cancer survivors. However, the existing self-care advice was appreciated and contributed to an increased understanding of the situation. Comprehensible and easy-to-follow recommendations should be provided to all oesophageal cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Evidence-based self-care advice helpful for the individual oesophageal cancer survivor may be imperative to cope with the consequences of oesophagectomy after hospital discharge.

Family members' experiences of COVID-19 visiting restrictions in the intensive care unit-A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how family members of critically ill patients experienced the COVID-19 visiting restrictions in Sweden. BACKGROUND: In Sweden, the response to COVID-19 was less invasive than in many other countries. However, some visiting restrictions were introduced for intensive care units, with local variations. Although there is a growing body of literature regarding healthcare professionals' and family caregivers' perspectives on visiting restriction policies, there may be inter-country differences, which remain to be elucidated. DESIGN: This study has a qualitative descriptive design. Focus group interviews with 14 family members of patients treated for severe COVID-19 infection were conducted. The interviews took place via digital meetings during the months after the patients' hospital discharge. Qualitative content analysis was used to interpret the interview transcripts. Reporting of the study followed the COREQ checklist. RESULTS: Two categories-dealing with uncertainty and being involved at a distance-described family members' experiences of coping with visiting restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. These restrictions were found to reduce family members' ability to cope with the situation. Communication via telephone or video calls to maintain contact was appreciated but could not replace the importance of personal contact. CONCLUSIONS: Family members perceived that the visiting restriction routines in place during the COVID-19 pandemic negatively influenced their ability to cope with the situation and to achieve realistic expectations of the patients' needs when they returned home. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study suggests that, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the visiting restrictions were experienced negatively by family members and specific family-centred care guidelines need to be developed for use during crises, including the possibility of regular family visits to the ICU. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: None in the conceptualisation or design of the study.

Cancer-related fatigue trajectories up to 5 years after curative treatment for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Whether cancer-related fatigue develops differently after curative-intended oesophageal cancer treatment and the related modifiable factors are unclear. METHODS: This population-based and longitudinal cohort included 409 oesophageal cancer patients who underwent curative oesophagectomy in 2013-2020 in Sweden. The main outcome was cancer-related fatigue trajectories with measurements at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4 and 5 years postoperatively by validated EORTC QLQ-FA12 questionnaire, and analysed using growth mixture models. Weighted logistic regressions provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for underlying sociodemographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome factors in relation to the identified trajectories. RESULTS: Two distinct overall cancer-related fatigue trajectories were identified: low level of persistent fatigue and high level of increasing fatigue, with 64% and 36% of patients, respectively. The odds of having high level of fatigue trajectory were increased by Charlson comorbidity index (≥ 2 versus 0: OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.07-5.94), pathological tumour Stage (III-IV versus 0-I: OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.33-4.77), anxiety (OR = 7.58, 95% CI 2.20-26.17), depression (OR = 15.90, 95% CI 4.44-56.93) and pain (continuous score: OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term trajectories with high level of increasing cancer-related fatigue and the associated modifiable factors were identified after oesophageal cancer treatment. The results may facilitate early identification and targeted intervention for such high-risk patients.

Health-related quality of life trajectories up to 15 years after curative treatment for esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The differentiation of specific, long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) trajectories among esophageal cancer survivors remains unclear. The authors aimed to identify potentially distinctly different HRQL-trajectories and uncover the underlying factors of such trajectories in patients having undergone surgery (esophagectomy) for esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide, prospective, and longitudinal cohort study included 420 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer, including esophageal cancer surgery, in Sweden from 2001to 2005. The main outcome was HRQL summary score trajectories, measured by the well-validated EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at 6 months, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after esophagectomy, and analyzed using growth mixture models. Potentially underlying factors for these trajectories (age, sex, education, proxy baseline HRQL, comorbidity, tumor histology, chemo(radio)therapy, pathological tumor stage, and postoperative complications) were analyzed using weighted logistic regression providing odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Four distinct HRQL summary score trajectories were identified: Persistently good, improving, deteriorating, and persistently poor. The odds of belonging to a persistently poor trajectory were decreased by longer education (>12 years versus <9 years: OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05-0.66) and adenocarcinoma histology (adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma: OR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.85), and increased by more advanced pathological tumor stage (III-IV versus 0-I: OR 2.82, 95% CI: 1.08-7.41) and postoperative complications (OR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.36-6.36). CONCLUSION: Distinct trajectories with persistently poor or deteriorating HRQL were identified after curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Education, tumor histology, pathological tumor stage, and postoperative complications might influence HRQL trajectories. The results may contribute to a more tailored follow-up with timely and targeted interventions. Future research remains to confirm these findings.

Comparing severe COVID-19 outcomes of first and second/third waves: a prospective single-centre cohort study of health-related quality of life and pulmonary outcomes 6 months after infection.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors between the first and second/third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. More specifically, to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) and respiratory health 6 months post-ICU and to study potential associations between patient characteristic and treatment variables regarding 6-month outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-centre study of adult COVID-19 patients with respiratory distress admitted to two Swedish ICUs during the first wave (1 March 2020-1 September 2020) and second/third waves (2 September 2020- 1 August 2021) with follow-up approximately 6 months after ICU discharge. PARTICIPANTS: Critically ill COVID-19 patients who survived for at least 90 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HRQL, extent of residual changes on chest CT scan and pulmonary function were compared between the waves. General linear regression and multivariable logistic regression were used to present mean score differences (MSD) and ORs with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Of the 456 (67%) critically ill COVID-19 patients who survived at least 90 days, 278 (61%) were included in the study. Six months after ICU discharge, HRQL was similar between survivors in the pandemic waves, except that the second/third wave survivors had better role physical (MSD 20.2, 95% CI 7.3 to 33.1, p<0.01) and general health (MSD 7.2, 95% CI 0.7 to 13.6, p=0.03) and less bodily pain (MSD 12.2, 95% CI 3.6 to 20.8, p<0.01), while first wave survivors had better diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.5, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that even though intensive care treatment strategies have changed with time, there are few differences in long-term HRQL and respiratory health seems to remain at 6 months for patients surviving critical COVID-19 in the first and second/third waves of the pandemic.

Healthcare workers' experiences of patient safety in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicentre qualitative study.

AIM: To describe healthcare workers' experiences of preconditions and patient safety risks in intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic. BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers' ability to adapt to changing conditions is crucial to promote patient safety. During the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers' capacity to maintain safe care was challenged and a more in-depth understanding on frontline experiences of patient safety is needed. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive design. METHODS: Individual interviews were conducted with 29 healthcare workers (nurses, physicians, nurse assistants and physiotherapists) from three Swedish hospitals directly involved in intensive care of COVID-19 patients. Data were analysed with inductive content analysis. Reporting followed the COREQ checklist. RESULTS: Three categories were identified. Hazardous changes in working conditions describes patient safety challenges associated with the extreme workload with high stress level. Imperative adaptations induced by changed preconditions for patient safety which include descriptions of safety risks following adaptations related to temporary intensive care facilities, handling shortage of medical equipment and deviations from routines. Safety risks triggered by reorganisation of care describe how the diluted skill-mix and team disruptions exposed patients to safety risks, and that safety performance mostly relied on individual healthcare worker's responsibility. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that healthcare workers experienced an increase in patient safety risks during the COVID-19 pandemic mainly because the extremely high workload, imperative adaptations, and reorganisation of care regarding skill-mix and teamwork. Patient safety performance relied on the individuals' adaptability and responsibility rather than on system-based safety. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study provides insights on how healthcare workers' experiences can be used as a source of information for recognition of patient safety risks. To improve detection of safety risks during future crises, guidelines on how to approach safety from a system perspective must include healthcare workers' perceptions on safety risks. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: None in the conceptualisation or design of the study.

The long-term experience of being a family caregiver of patients surgically treated for oesophageal cancer.

AIM: This qualitative study aimed to explore the experience of being family caregivers of patients treated for oesophageal cancer 2 years after treatment. To better understand the family caregiver's situation, a conceptual model was used in the analysis. The results of the study can guide future interventions to support family caregivers of patients treated for oesophageal cancer. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured telephone interviews. An abductive approach was used in the analysis to reach deeper knowledge about the family caregivers' experiences and to better understand deeper patterns. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted and included 13 family caregivers of patients surgically treated for oesophageal cancer in Sweden in 2018 who participated in a population-based nationwide cohort study. Individual telephone interviews were held in 2020, 2 years after the patients' surgery. The analysis of the interviews started with an inductive approach using thematic analysis. Thereafter, a deductive approach was used to interpret the findings in relation to the conceptual model, The Cancer Family Caregiving Experience. RESULTS: The most essential/evident stress factors for the family caregivers were distress regarding the patients' nutrition, fear of tumour recurrence and worry about the future. In addition, a transition was experienced, going from a family member to a caregiver, and the many psychosocial aspects of this transition were highlighted during the disease trajectory. CONCLUSION: Despite, the long-term survival of the patient, family caregivers were still struggling with psychosocial consequences because of the patient's cancer diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, there is a need to improve supportive interventions for family caregivers during the whole disease trajectory. IMPACT: The current study includes comprehensive information about the family caregivers' experiences when caring for a patient treated for oesophageal cancer. Family caregivers struggle with the psychosocial consequences of the patient's cancer and worry about tumour recurrence even 2 years after surgery. These findings can be useful in the development of supportive interventions, which may facilitate life for family caregivers. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study was discussed and planned together with our research partnership group including patients and family caregivers. In addition, the manuscript was reviewed by some of the members to cross-check the results and discussed them to avoid misinterpretation.

Associations in health-related quality of life between patients and family caregivers 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: Whether patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) influences the HRQL of their family caregivers remains to be clarified. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association in HRQL between patients and family caregivers one year after oesophageal cancer surgery. METHODS: The study was based on a prospective, nationwide, and population-based cohort including patients treated by surgery for oesophageal cancer in Sweden from 2013 to 2021 and their family caregivers. Data were collected one year after surgery, using the summary score of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the RAND-36 questionnaire. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models providing regression coefficients with confidence intervals (CI) were used to estimate the association between the HRQL among patients and family caregivers. The analyses were adjusted for potential covariates. RESULTS: In total, 275 patients and paired family caregivers were included in the study. Patients reported a mean HRQL summary score of 81.4, indicating reductions in functions as well as many burdensome symptoms. Among family caregivers, lowest HRQL scores were reported for pain (69.2 ± 26.0) and energy/fatigue (65.1 ± 20.4). A 10-point change in the patients' summary score corresponded to a 7-point change for family caregivers' emotional role function (ß = 7.0; 95% CI: 3.6-10.3). For other HRQL dimensions among the family caregivers, no clinically relevant associations with patients HRQL were found. CONCLUSION: The current study indicates that family caregivers' emotional role function is influenced by patients' overall HRQL one year after surgery. The finding suggests that follow-up interventions should include not only patients but also their family caregivers.

Health-related quality of life 15 years after oesophageal cancer surgery: a prospective nationwide cohort study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to study oesophageal cancer survivors' health-related quality of life (HRQL) 15 years after surgery and to identify factors related to reduced HRQL. METHODS: A nationwide, prospective cohort study enrolling 616 patients who underwent open oesophageal cancer surgery in Sweden between April 2, 2001, and December 21, 2005. HRQL was evaluated by questionnaires 15 years after surgery. HRQL data for the 15-year survivors were individually matched for age, sex and comorbidity by using values from a Swedish background population. Multivariable linear regression models provided mean score differences (MSD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each HRQL scale and item. RESULTS: Among the 616 individuals in the original study group, 70 (11%) survived for 15 years and 52 (74%) responded to the questionnaires. Compared with a matched background population, the survivors reported problems in 10 of 25 HRQL aspects. Most of these were related to symptoms of the digestive tract, such as reflux (MSD 26.4, 95%CI: 18.3 to 34.4), dysphagia (MSD 17.7, 95%CI: 10.0 to 25.4) and eating difficulties (MSD 16.4, 95%CI: 11.3 to 21.4). Major postoperative complications after surgery were related to worse HRQL in 11 of 25 aspects. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that surgery for oesophageal cancer entails long-term, possibly life-long, symptoms related to the digestive tract. IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Comprehensive support from healthcare may be imperative for oesophageal cancer survivors to adapt to and cope with consequences of oesophageal cancer surgery. Prevention, early identification and adequate treatment of postoperative complications may improve patient outcome.

Intensive care nurses' lived experience of altruism and sacrifices during the Covid-19 pandemic: A phenomenological study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to understand the lived experience of altruism and sacrifices among Swedish nurses working in intensive care units (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: This was a descriptive phenomenological study. METHODS: The study was conducted between June 2020 and March 2021 and included 20 nurses who were directly involved in the ICU care of COVID-19 patients in Sweden during the pandemic. The text transcripts were analysed using Malterud's Systematic Text Condensation. FINDINGS: The analysis revealed four themes. The work situation changed from 1 day to another-the nurses were brutally confronted with a new and highly demanding situation. Adapting to the chaotic situation-despite fear, anguish and exhaustion, the nurses adapted to the new premises. They shouldered the moral responsibility and responded to the needs of the patients and the health care system since they had the competence. Being confronted with ethical and moral challenges-the nurses were overwhelmed by feelings of helplessness and inadequacy because despite how hard they worked, they were still unable to provide care with dignity and of acceptable quality. The importance of supporting each other-collegiality was fundamental to the nurses' ability to cope with the situation. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, being exposed to a constantly changing situation, facing the anguish and misery of patients, families, and colleagues, and being confronted with a conflict between the moral obligation to provide care of high quality and the possibility to fulfil this commitment resulted in suffering among the nurses. Collegial back-up and a supportive culture within the caring team were important for the nurses' endurance. IMPACT: The study contributes an understanding of nurses' lived experience of working during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlights the importance of protecting and preparing nurses and nursing organisation for potential future crises.

Patients' experiences of preparing for transfer from the intensive care unit to a hospital ward: A multicentre qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The transfer from an intensive care unit (ICU) to a regular ward often causes confusion and stress for patients and family members. However, little is known about the patients' perspective on preparing for the transfer. AIM: The purpose of the study was to describe patients' experiences of preparing for transfer from an ICU to a ward. STUDY DESIGN: Individual interviews with 14 former ICU patients from three urban hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden were conducted 3 months after hospital discharge. Qualitative content analysis was used to interpret the interview transcripts. Reporting followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research checklist. RESULTS: The results showed that the three categories, the discharge decision, patient involvement, and practical preparations were central to the patients' experiences of preparing for the transition from the intensive care unit to the ward. The discharge decision was associated with a sense of relief, but also worry about what would happen on the ward. The patients felt that they were not involved in the decision about the discharge or the planning of their health care. To handle the situation, patients needed information about planned care and treatment. However, the information was often sparse, delivered from a clinician's perspective, and therefore not much help in preparing for transfer. CONCLUSIONS: ICU patients experienced that they were neither involved in the process of forthcoming care nor adequately prepared for the transfer to the ward. Relevant and comprehensible information and sufficient time to prepare were needed to reduce stress and promote efficient recovery. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study suggests that current transfer strategies are not optimal, and a more person-centred discharge procedure would be beneficial to support patients and family members in the transition from the ICU to the ward.

Extended physiotherapy after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay: A prospective pilot study with a before and after design.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether extended compared to standard level of physiotherapy is feasible and has beneficial effects on physical function in ICU survivors. METHODS: This prospective pilot study with a before and after design included patients discharged from ICU to a surgical ward. The comparison group were recruited between January and April 2019 and received standard level of physiotherapy. The intervention group were recruited between May and December 2019 and received extended physiotherapy, corresponding to 50% additional physiotherapist, working 4 hours per weekday. The intervention participants received an individual rehabilitation plan developed in collaboration with a ward-based physiotherapist, and an extended number of sessions provided by the extra resource included practicing individualized exercises, for example walking and stair climbing. Physical function was measured with the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) at ICU discharge, during hospital stay and discharge. Group differences were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Chi2 test. RESULTS: Out of 46 eligible patients, 39 (85%) fulfilled the study (comparison n = 12, intervention n = 27) and were included in the final analyses. No adverse events occurred, and the attendance rate was high (98.5%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding physical function, hospital stay, and readmissions, but there were tendencies to better outcomes in all these parameters in favor of the intervention group. Additionally, patients in the intervention group had statistically significantly higher scores in the CPAx items "transferring from bed to chair" (median 5 vs 4, p = .039) and "stepping" (median 5 vs 4, p = .005) at hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: This pilot study indicates that extended physiotherapy after ICU discharge is feasible and does not entail patient safety risks. However, determining the potential beneficial effects for the patients remains to be evaluated in a larger trial.

Caregiver burden and health-related quality of life among family caregivers of oesophageal cancer patients: a prospective nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer surgery is extensive with high risk of long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) reductions. After hospital discharge, the family members often carry great responsibility for the rehabilitation of the patient, which may negatively influence their wellbeing. The purpose was to clarify whether a higher caregiver burden was associated with psychological problems and reduced HRQL for family caregivers of oesophageal cancer survivors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a nationwide prospective cohort study enrolling family members of all patients who underwent surgical resection for oesophageal cancer in Sweden between 2013 and 2020. The family caregivers reported caregiver burden, symptoms of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, and HRQL 1 year after the patient's surgery. Associations were analysed with multivariable logistic regression and presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Differences between groups were presented as mean score differences (MSD). RESULTS: Among 319 family caregivers, 101 (32%) reported a high to moderate caregiver burden. Younger family caregivers were more likely to experience a higher caregiver burden. High-moderate caregiver burden was associated with an increased risk of symptoms of anxiety (OR 5.53, 95%CI: 3.18-9.62), depression (OR 8.56, 95%CI: 3.80-19.29), and/or posttraumatic stress (OR 5.39, 95%CI: 3.17-9.17). A high-moderate caregiver burden was also associated with reduced HRQL, especially for social function (MSD 23.0, 95% CI: 18.5 to 27.6) and role emotional (MSD 27.8, 95%CI: 19.9 to 35.7). CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that a high caregiver burden is associated with worse health effects for the family caregiver of oesophageal cancer survivors.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (CBT-ACT) vs. Standard Care After Critical Illness Due to COVID-19: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Post-covid syndrome is an emerging condition involving a wide range of symptoms, including high rates of poor mental health. The diagnostic relevance and clinical severity of these symptoms are largely unknown, and evidence for treatment of post-covid mental health symptoms is lacking. This protocol describes a pilot randomized clinical trial, primarily aiming to assess feasibility, participant adherence and satisfaction in a novel phycho-therapeutic intervention on post-covid anxiety and depression symptoms ≥1 year after critically ill COVID-19. Whether the intervention may generate improvements in post-covid depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) will be addressed in a following larger trial. Methods: A multicenter, investigator-initiated randomized controlled trial (Clinical Trial Identifier number NCT05119608) including Intensive Care Unit (ICU)-treated COVID-19 survivors, who display symptoms of anxiety and/or depression at follow-up 12 months after hospitalization (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ≥8 for depression or anxiety). Eligible individuals are referred to a psychiatrist for structured diagnostic assessment and inclusion in the trial. Participants will be randomized to either a 10-week cognitive behavioral therapy intervention with added acceptance and commitment therapy (CBT-ACT) or standard care (primary care referral). Primary study outcome measure is feasibility and patient adherence, defined as the proportion of participants who consent to randomization and remain in the study including follow-up. Secondary outcome measures include reduced symptoms in the HADS depression/anxiety subscales, post-traumatic symptoms, HRQoL and user satisfaction at 3 months after the intervention. Discussion: This protocol describes a pilot trial to assess feasibility and preliminary effects of a structured psycho-therapeutic intervention to ameliorate mental health in a population severely affected by COVID-19, where evidence for structured psycho-therapy is lacking.