An extended clinical EEG dataset with 15,300 automatically labelled recordings for pathology decoding.

Automated clinical EEG analysis using machine learning (ML) methods is a growing EEG research area. Previous studies on binary EEG pathology decoding have mainly used the Temple University Hospital (TUH) Abnormal EEG Corpus (TUAB) which contains approximately 3,000 manually labelled EEG recordings. To evaluate and eventually even improve the generalisation performance of machine learning methods for EEG pathology, decoding larger, publicly available datasets is required. A number of studies addressed the automatic labelling of large open-source datasets as an approach to create new datasets for EEG pathology decoding, but little is known about the extent to which training on larger, automatically labelled dataset affects decoding performances of established deep neural networks. In this study, we automatically created additional pathology labels for the Temple University Hospital (TUH) EEG Corpus (TUEG) based on the medical reports using a rule-based text classifier. We generated a dataset of 15,300 newly labelled recordings, which we call the TUH Abnormal Expansion EEG Corpus (TUABEX), and which is five times larger than the TUAB. Since the TUABEX contains more pathological (75%) than non-pathological (25%) recordings, we then selected a balanced subset of 8,879 recordings, the TUH Abnormal Expansion Balanced EEG Corpus (TUABEXB). To investigate how training on a larger, automatically labelled dataset affects the decoding performance of deep neural networks, we applied four established deep convolutional neural networks (ConvNets) to the task of pathological versus non-pathological classification and compared the performance of each architecture after training on different datasets. The results show that training on the automatically labelled TUABEXB dataset rather than training on the manually labelled TUAB dataset increases accuracies on TUABEXB and even for TUAB itself for some architectures. We argue that automatically labelling of large open-source datasets can be used to efficiently utilise the massive amount of EEG data stored in clinical archives. We make the proposed TUABEXB available open source and thus offer a new dataset for EEG machine learning research.

Machine-learning-based diagnostics of EEG pathology.

Machine learning (ML) methods have the potential to automate clinical EEG analysis. They can be categorized into feature-based (with handcrafted features), and end-to-end approaches (with learned features). Previous studies on EEG pathology decoding have typically analyzed a limited number of features, decoders, or both. For a I) more elaborate feature-based EEG analysis, and II) in-depth comparisons of both approaches, here we first develop a comprehensive feature-based framework, and then compare this framework to state-of-the-art end-to-end methods. To this aim, we apply the proposed feature-based framework and deep neural networks including an EEG-optimized temporal convolutional network (TCN) to the task of pathological versus non-pathological EEG classification. For a robust comparison, we chose the Temple University Hospital (TUH) Abnormal EEG Corpus (v2.0.0), which contains approximately 3000 EEG recordings. The results demonstrate that the proposed feature-based decoding framework can achieve accuracies on the same level as state-of-the-art deep neural networks. We find accuracies across both approaches in an astonishingly narrow range from 81 to 86%. Moreover, visualizations and analyses indicated that both approaches used similar aspects of the data, e.g., delta and theta band power at temporal electrode locations. We argue that the accuracies of current binary EEG pathology decoders could saturate near 90% due to the imperfect inter-rater agreement of the clinical labels, and that such decoders are already clinically useful, such as in areas where clinical EEG experts are rare. We make the proposed feature-based framework available open source and thus offer a new tool for EEG machine learning research.

Hybrid Brain-Computer-Interfacing for Human-Compliant Robots: Inferring Continuous Subjective Ratings With Deep Regression.

Appropriate robot behavior during human-robot interaction is a key part in the development of human-compliant assistive robotic systems. This study poses the question of how to continuously evaluate the quality of robotic behavior in a hybrid brain-computer interfacing (BCI) task, combining brain and non-brain signals, and how to use the collected information to adapt the robot's behavior accordingly. To this aim, we developed a rating system compatible with EEG recordings, requiring the users to execute only small movements with their thumb on a wireless controller to rate the robot's behavior on a continuous scale. The ratings were recorded together with dry EEG, respiration, ECG, and robotic joint angles in ROS. Pilot experiments were conducted with three users that had different levels of previous experience with robots. The results demonstrate the feasibility to obtain continuous rating data that give insight into the subjective user perception during direct human-robot interaction. The rating data suggests differences in subjective perception for users with no, moderate, or substantial previous robot experience. Furthermore, a variety of regression techniques, including deep CNNs, allowed us to predict the subjective ratings. Performance was better when using the position of the robotic hand than when using EEG, ECG, or respiration. A consistent advantage of features expected to be related to a motor bias could not be found. Across-user predictions showed that the models most likely learned a combination of general and individual features across-users. A transfer of pre-trained regressor to a new user was especially accurate in users with more experience. For future research, studies with more participants will be needed to evaluate the methodology for its use in practice. Data and code to reproduce this study are available at https://github.com/TNTLFreiburg/NiceBot.