Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arthrosc Tech ; 7(11): e1215-e1219, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30533371

RESUMEN

Deep medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury leads to meniscal lift-off and extrusion of the medial meniscus, resulting in instability and increased medial compartment pressures with subsequent cartilage damage. Repair of the deep MCL meniscotibial ligament in concert with superficial MCL repair or reconstruction is intended to restore the native anatomy , stability, and function of the medial meniscus. We present an arthroscopically assisted technique using standard arthroscopy portals and a medial open approach.

2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 29(10): 465-9, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25938598

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the radiographic parameters of femoral head coverage by the intact posterior wall, acetabular version, and location of the fracture or a history of dislocation were determinates of hip stability in patients with posterior wall acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level I trauma hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients with isolated unilateral posterior wall (OTA 62-A1) acetabular fractures. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent dynamic stress fluoroscopic examination under general anesthesia to determine hip stability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: A number of radiographic measurements were performed, and an examination under anesthesia served as a standard to compare stable versus unstable hips. RESULTS: Examination under anesthesia (EUA) determined 116 hips to be stable and 22 hips as unstable. Moed and Keith method of wall size measurements and cranial exit point of fracture was statistically different between stable and unstable hips. Twenty-three percent of the unstable hips had wall sizes less than 20%. Average cranial exit point of fracture from dome was 5.0 mm in the unstable group and 9.5 mm in the stable group, and fractures that extend into the dome demonstrate a statistically significant increase in hip instability. CONCLUSIONS: Determination of hip stability can be challenging in patients with posterior wall acetabular fractures. Our data suggest that the location of the exit point of the fracture in relation to the dome of the acetabulum is a radiographic marker that can be used to aid physician in determining stability, and wall sizes less than 20% is not a reliable indicator of stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Acetábulo/lesiones , Fracturas Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...