Fit-for-Future: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Primary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Transports of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients.

(1) Background: The COVID-19 pandemic presented significant challenges in managing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) being a critical but resource-intensive intervention. (2) Methods: This retrospective study analyzed veno-venous (VV) ECMO therapy in ARDS patients before and during the pandemic at a high-volume ECMO center in Germany. The study used a reduced ECMO team (one medical and one nursing specialist) to optimize patient care with limited resources, aiming to offer insights for future pandemic management. Data from 181 adult patients (age ≥ 18) with severe ARDS were analyzed: 57 pre-pandemic and 124 during the pandemic. (3) Results: Despite increased isolation measures during the pandemic (25% pre-COVID-19 vs. 79% during COVID-19, p < 0.0001), there was no significant change in transportation mode (ground vs. air) or ECMO implantation times at local hospitals. Similarly, time and distance for primary ECMO transport remained unchanged between the two periods. Complication rates related to ECMO circuit placement and prolonged transport were also insignificant across groups. However, ECMO therapy duration (median 12 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 19 days during COVID-19, p < 0.0001) and hospital stays (median 3 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 7 days during COVID-19, p < 0.01) were longer during the pandemic. Mortality rates were also higher during the pandemic (49% pre-COVID-19 vs. 65% during COVID-19, p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, a reduced ECMO team proved to be an effective resource-saving strategy that maintained high-quality care with low complication rates, despite the additional challenges posed by pandemic-related isolation measures.

Estimation of Cardiac Output Under Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Comparing Thermodilution Methods to 3D Echocardiography.

Thermodilution methods to determine cardiac output (CO) may be affected by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared CO estimations by pulmonary arterial thermodilution using a pulmonary arterial catheter (COPAC), transpulmonary thermodilution (COTPTD), and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) (CO3DEcho) in 18 patients under veno-venous ECMO. Comparisons between CO3DEcho and COPAC, and COTPTD were performed using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. Blood flow on ECMO support ranged from 4.3 to 5.8 L/min (median 4.9 L/min). Cardiac output measured with three-dimensional echocardiography was 5.2 L/min (3.8/5.9), COPAC was 7.3 L/min (5.9/7.9), and COTPTD was 7.3 L/min (6/8.2) (median [25%/75% percentile]). Bland-Altman analysis of CO3DEcho and COPAC revealed a mean bias of -2.06 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.16 to 0.04 L/min. Bland-Altman analysis of CO3DEcho and COTPTD revealed a mean bias of -2.22 L/min, with limits of agreement from -4.18 to -0.25 L/min. We found a negative mean bias and negative limits of agreement between CO3DEcho and COPAC/COTPTD. We concluded an influence on the estimation of CO by thermodilution under ECMO most likely due to loss of indicator resulting in an overestimation of CO. Clinicians should consider this when monitoring thermodilution-based CO under ECMO.

Prevalence and prognostic relevance of invasive fungal disease during veno-arterial ECMO: A retrospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence and relevance of invasive fungal disease (IFD) during veno-arterial (V-A) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: Retrospective analysis from January 2013 to November 2023 of adult V-A ECMO cases at a German University Hospital. Parameters relating to IFD, demographics, length of stay (LoS), days on ECMO and mechanical ventilation, prognostic scores and survival were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses with IFD and death as dependent variables were performed. Outcome was assessed after propensity score matching IFD-patients to non-IFD-controls. RESULTS: 421 patients received V-A ECMO. 392 patients with full electronic datasets were included. The prevalence of IFD, invasive candidiasis and probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis was 4.6%, 3.8% and 1.0%. Severity of acute disease, pre-existing moderate-to-severe renal disease and continuous kidney replacement therapy were predictive of IFD. In-hospital mortality (94% (17/18) compared to 67% (252/374) in non-IFD patients (p = 0.0156)) was predicted by female sex, SOFA score at admission, SAVE score and IFD (for IFD: OR: 8.31; CI: 1.60-153.18; p: 0.044). There was no difference in outcome after matching IFD-cases to non-IFD-controls. CONCLUSIONS: IFD are detected in about one in 20 patients on V-A ECMO, indicating mortality >90%. However, IFD do not contribute to prognosis in this population.

COVID-19 Is an Independent Risk Factor for Detrimental Invasive Fungal Disease in Patients on Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Retrospective Study.

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is associated with the mortality of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Several risk factors for IFD have been identified in patients with or without ECMO. Here, we assessed the relevance of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) for the occurrence of IFD in patients on veno-venous (V-V) ECMO for respiratory failure. In a retrospective analysis of all ECMO cases between January 2013 and December 2022 (2020-2022 for COVID-19 patients), active COVID-19 and the type, timing and duration of IFD were investigated. Demographics, hospital, ICU length of stay (LoS), duration of ECMO, days on invasive mechanical ventilation, prognostic scores (Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS)-10, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)-II) and length of survival were assessed. The association of COVID-19 with IFD was investigated using propensity score matching and uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses. We identified 814 patients supported with ECMO, and 452 patients were included in further analyses. The incidence of IFD was 4.8% and 11.0% in patients without and with COVID-19, respectively. COVID-19 status represented an independent risk factor for IFD (OR 4.30; CI 1.72-10.85; p: 0.002; multivariable regression analysis). In patients with COVID-19, 84.6% of IFD was candidemia and 15.4% represented invasive aspergillosis (IA). All of these patients died. In patients on V-V ECMO, we report that COVID-19 is an independent risk factor for IFD, which is associated with a detrimental prognosis. Further studies are needed to investigate strategies of antifungal therapy or prophylaxis in these patients.

Be Patient: Prolonged Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support Including Full System Switch With Favorable Outcome.

Despite tremendous advances in treatment, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a disease with high mortality (42-48%). Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is often used as a last treatment option, which poses complex problems for the treatment team, especially with prolonged ECMO support. We report an interesting case of a 40-year-old female patient who developed influenza pneumonia leading to ARDS and subsequently requiring ECMO. Due to severe clotting complications, a prolonged ECMO run time with numerous filter changes was required. After a total of 56 days of ECMO therapy, the patient was successfully weaned. Fortunately, further in the course of treatment, complete recovery with restitutio ad integrum was achieved. A distinguishing feature of this case report is the description of a complete ECMO system change and the concurrent use of two ECMO systems for the same patient. Additionally, we provide data on the patient's current health-related quality of life as measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

Secondary ARDS Following Acute Pancreatitis: Is Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Feasible or Futile?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or life support (ECLS) as last resort life support therapy in patients with acute pancreatitis and subsequent secondary acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Retrospective analysis from January 2013, to April 2020, of ECMO patients with pancreatitis-induced ARDS at a German University Hospital. Demographics, hospital and ICU length of stay, duration of ECMO therapy, days on mechanical ventilation, fluid balance, need for decompressive laparotomy, amount of blood products, prognostic scores (CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index), SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), RESP(Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction), SAVE (Survival after Veno-Arterial ECMO)), and the total known length of survival were assessed. RESULTS: A total of n = 495 patients underwent ECMO. Eight patients with acute pancreatitis received ECLS (seven veno-venous, one veno-arterial). Five (71%) required decompressive laparotomy as salvage therapy due to abdominal hypertension. Two patients with acute pancreatitis (25%) survived to hospital discharge. The overall median length of survival was 22 days. Survivors required less fluid in the first 72 h of ECMO support and showed lower values for all prognostic scores. CONCLUSION: ECLS can be performed as a rescue therapy in patients with pancreatitis and secondary ARDS, but nevertheless mortality remains still high. Thus, this last-resort therapy may be best suited for patients with fewer pre-existing comorbidities and no other organ failure.