Anti-brolucizumab immune response as one prerequisite for rare retinal vasculitis/retinal vascular occlusion adverse events.

In October 2019, Novartis launched brolucizumab, a single-chain variable fragment molecule targeting vascular endothelial growth factor A, for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. In 2020, rare cases of retinal vasculitis and/or retinal vascular occlusion (RV/RO) were reported, often during the first few months after treatment initiation, consistent with a possible immunologic pathobiology. This finding was inconsistent with preclinical studies in cynomolgus monkeys that demonstrated no drug-related intraocular inflammation, or RV/RO, despite the presence of preexisting and treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in some animals. In this study, the immune response against brolucizumab in humans was assessed using samples from clinical trials and clinical practice. In the brolucizumab-naïve population, anti-brolucizumab ADA responses were detected before any treatment, which was supported by the finding that healthy donors can harbor brolucizumab-specific B cells. This suggested prior exposure of the immune system to proteins with structural similarity. Experiments on samples showed that naïve and brolucizumab-treated ADA-positive patients developed a class-switched, high-affinity immune response, with several linear epitopes being recognized by ADAs. Only patients with RV/RO showed a meaningful T cell response upon recall with brolucizumab. Further studies in cynomolgus monkeys preimmunized against brolucizumab with adjuvant followed by intravitreal brolucizumab challenge demonstrated that high ADA titers were required to generate ocular inflammation and vasculitis/vascular thrombosis, comparable to RV/RO in humans. Immunogenicity therefore seems to be a prerequisite to develop RV/RO. However, because only 2.1% of patients with ADA develop RV/RO, additional factors must play a role in the development of RV/RO.

A root cause analysis to identify the mechanistic drivers of immunogenicity against the anti-VEGF biotherapeutic brolucizumab.

Immunogenicity against intravitreally administered brolucizumab has been previously described and associated with cases of severe intraocular inflammation, including retinal vasculitis/retinal vascular occlusion (RV/RO). The presence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in these patients led to the initial hypothesis that immune complexes could be key mediators. Although the formation of ADAs and immune complexes may be a prerequisite, other factors likely contribute to some patients having RV/RO, whereas the vast majority do not. To identify and characterize the mechanistic drivers underlying the immunogenicity of brolucizumab and the consequence of subsequent ADA-induced immune complex formation, a translational approach was performed to bridge physicochemical characterization, structural modeling, sequence analysis, immunological assays, and a quantitative systems pharmacology model that mimics physiological conditions within the eye. This approach revealed that multiple factors contributed to the increased immunogenic potential of brolucizumab, including a linear epitope shared with bacteria, non-natural surfaces due to the single-chain variable fragment format, and non-native drug species that may form over prolonged time in the eye. Consideration of intraocular drug pharmacology and disease state in a quantitative systems pharmacology model suggested that immune complexes could form at immunologically relevant concentrations modulated by dose intensity. Assays using circulating immune cells from treated patients or treatment-naïve healthy volunteers revealed the capacity of immune complexes to trigger cellular responses such as enhanced antigen presentation, platelet aggregation, endothelial cell activation, and cytokine release. Together, these studies informed a mechanistic understanding of the clinically observed immunogenicity of brolucizumab and associated cases of RV/RO.

Chronopharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide and acyl glucuronide metabolites in kidney transplant recipients converted from cyclosporine to everolimus.

BACKGROUND: The influence of the conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to everolimus (EVR) on the chronopharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its glucuronide (MPAG) and acyl glucuronide (acyl-MPAG) metabolites in patients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluated daytime and nighttime steady-state MPA, MPAG, and acyl-MPAG pharmacokinetics in 24 stable kidney transplant recipients while receiving cyclosporine and 28 days after conversion from CsA to EVR. The effect of concomitant treatment and the circadian difference on AUC(t,ss) and C(max,ss) were assessed using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: After conversion from CsA to EVR, MPA AUC(t,ss) was 43% higher (29% daytime and 58% during nighttime), whereas MPAG AUC(t,ss) was 33% lower (35% daytime and 30% during nighttime) and acyl-MPAG AUC(t,ss) was 31% lower (36% during daytime and 26% nighttime). Compared with daytime, MPA AUC(t,ss) was 25% lower (32% with CsA and 17% with EVR), MPAG AUC(t,ss) was 24% lower (26% with CsA and 21% with EVR), and acyl-MPAG AUC(t,ss) was 26% lower (32% with CsA and 21% with EVR) during nighttime. After conversion from CsA to EVR, MPAG:MPA and acyl-MPAG:MPA AUC(t,ss) ratios were 50% lower but were not different during daytime compared with nighttime EC-MPS administration. There was no correlation between CsA or EVR concentrations with MPA, MPAG, and acyl-MPAG exposures during daytime and nighttime. At least 1 adverse event was reported in 70.8% of patients receiving EC-MPS and CsA and in 91.7% receiving EC-MPS and EVR. CONCLUSION: In stable kidney transplant recipients receiving EC-MPS and steroids, exposures to MPA, MPAG, and acyl-MPAG were lower during nighttime compared with daytime, both with CsA or EVR. This circadian effect on MPA exposure did not correlate with CsA or EVR concentrations or with altered MPAG and acyl-MPAG formation.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of fingolimod.

Fingolimod (FTY720), a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, is the first in a new class of therapeutic compounds and is the first oral therapy approved for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Fingolimod is a structural analogue of endogenous sphingosine and undergoes phosphorylation to produce fingolimod phosphate, the active moiety. Fingolimod targets MS via effects on the immune system, and evidence from animal models indicates that it may also have actions in the central nervous system. In phase III studies in patients with relapsing-remitting MS, fingolimod has demonstrated efficacy superior to that of an approved first-line therapy, intramuscular interferon-ß-1a, as well as placebo, with benefits extending across clinical and magnetic resonance imaging measures. The pharmacokinetic profiles of fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate have been extensively investigated in studies in healthy volunteers, renal transplant recipients (the indication for which fingolimod was initially under clinical development, but the development was subsequently discontinued) and MS patients. Results from these studies have demonstrated that fingolimod is efficiently absorbed, with an oral bioavailability of >90%, and its absorption is unaffected by dietary intake, therefore it can be taken without regard to meals. Fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate have a half-life of 6-9 days, and steady-state pharmacokinetics are reached after 1-2 months of daily dosing. The long half-life of fingolimod, together with its slow absorption, means that fingolimod has a flat concentration profile over time with once-daily dosing. Fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate show dose-proportional exposure in single- and multiple-dose studies over a range of 0.125-5 mg; hence, there is a predictable relationship between dose and systemic exposure. Furthermore, fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate exhibit low to moderate intersubject pharmacokinetic variability. Fingolimod is extensively metabolized, with biotransformation occurring via three main pathways: (i) reversible phosphorylation to fingolimod phosphate; (ii) hydroxylation and oxidation to yield a series of inactive carboxylic acid metabolites; and (iii) formation of non-polar ceramides. Fingolimod is largely cleared through metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 4F2. Since few drugs are metabolized by CYP4F2, fingolimod would be expected to have a relatively low potential for drug-drug interactions. This is supported by data from in vitro studies indicating that fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate have little or no capacity to inhibit and no capacity to induce other major drug-metabolizing CYP enzymes at therapeutically relevant steady-state blood concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic evaluations indicate that CYP3A inhibitors and CYP3A inducers have no effect or only a weak effect on the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate. However, blood concentrations of fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate are increased moderately when fingolimod is coadministered with ketoconazole, an inhibitor of CYP4F2. The pharmacokinetics of fingolimod are unaffected by renal impairment or mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment. However, exposure to fingolimod is increased in patients with severe hepatic impairment. No clinically relevant effects of age, sex or ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod have been observed. Fingolimod is thus a promising new therapy for eligible patients with MS, with a predictable pharmacokinetic profile that allows effective once-daily oral dosing.

Population pharmacokinetics of fingolimod phosphate in healthy participants.

Fingolimod (FTY720) is a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulator currently being evaluated for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Fingolimod undergoes phosphorylation in vivo to yield fingolimod phosphate (fingolimod-P), which modulates S1PRs expressed on lymphocytes and cells in the central nervous system. The authors developed a population model, using pooled data from 7 phase 1 studies, to enable characterization of fingolimod-P pharmacokinetics following oral administration of fingolimod and to evaluate the impact of key demographic variables on exposure. The fingolimod-P concentration-time course after either single or multiple doses of fingolimod was described by a 2-compartment model with first-order apparent formation and elimination, lag time in the apparent formation, and dose-dependent relative bioavailability and apparent central volume of distribution. Body weight and ethnicity were identified as demographic covariates correlated with the disposition of fingolimod-P. Model predictions indicated no need for dose adjustment of fingolimod based on body weight; the effect of ethnicity on the disposition of fingolimod requires further investigation. The accurate prediction of the pharmacokinetic profile of fingolimod-P determined empirically in 2 large phase 3 trials provides external validation of the model.

Ketoconazole increases fingolimod blood levels in a drug interaction via CYP4F2 inhibition.

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod is predominantly hydroxylated by cytochrome CYP4F2. In vitro experiments showed that ketoconazole significantly inhibited the oxidative metabolism of fingolimod by human liver microsomes and by recombinant CYP4F2. The authors used ketoconazole as a putative CYP4F2 inhibitor to quantify its influence on fingolimod pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. In a 2-period, single-sequence, crossover study, 22 healthy subjects received a single 5-mg dose of fingolimod in period 1. In period 2, subjects received ketoconazole 200 mg twice daily for 9 days and a single 5-mg dose of fingolimod coadministered on the 4th day of ketoconazole treatment. Ketoconazole did not affect fingolimod t(max) or half-life, but there was a weak average increase in C(max) of 1.22-fold (90% confidence interval, 1.15-1.30). The AUC over the 5 days of ketoconazole coadministration increased 1.40-fold (1.31-1.50), and the full AUC to infinity increased 1.71-fold (1.53-1.91). The AUC of the active metabolite fingolimod-phosphate was increased to a similar extent by 1.67-fold (1.50-1.85). Ketoconazole predose plasma levels were not altered by fingolimod. The magnitude of this interaction suggests that a proactive dose reduction of fingolimod is not necessary when adding ketoconazole to a fingolimod regimen. The clinician, however, should be aware of this interaction and bear in mind the possibility of a fingolimod dose reduction based on clinical monitoring.

The ability of atropine to prevent and reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod in healthy subjects.

AIMS: The authors determined whether intravenous atropine can prevent or counteract the negative chronotropic effect of the immunomodulator fingolimod. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study, 12 healthy subjects received 5 mg fingolimod orally concurrently with intravenous atropine (titrated to a heart rate of 110-120 beats min(-1)) or intravenous placebo. A second group of 12 subjects received atropine/placebo 4 h after the fingolimod dose. Continuous telemetry measurements were made for 24 h after each fingolimod dose. RESULTS: Fingolimod administration alone yielded a heart rate nadir of 51 +/- 5 beats min(-1) at a median 4 h postdose with heart rate remaining depressed at 51-64 beats min(-1) over the rest of the day. Concurrent administration of fingolimod and atropine yielded a nadir of 66 +/- 6 beats min(-1) resulting in an atropine: placebo ratio (90% confidence interval) of 1.30 (1.22, 1.36). When atropine was administered at the time of the nadir, it was able to reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod from a heart rate of 56 +/- 9 beats min(-1) (placebo) to 64 +/- 8 beats min(-1) (atropine) resulting in an atropine: placebo ratio of 1.15 (1.04, 1.26). Atropine had no influence on the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. CONCLUSIONS: Atropine administered concurrently with fingolimod prevented the heart rate nadir that typically occurs 4 h postdose. Atropine administered at the time of the heart rate nadir was able to reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod.

A mechanistic study to assess whether isoproterenol can reverse the negative chronotropic effect of fingolimod.

The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) elicits a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates thereafter. The authors determined whether isoproterenol can counteract this effect. In this randomized, crossover study, 14 healthy subjects received 5 infusions of isoproterenol (titrated to increase heart rate to 100-120 bpm) or intravenous placebo. The first infusion was 2 hours before and the other 4 infusions were between 3 and 6 hours after a 5-mg oral dose of fingolimod. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected for 24 hours. During isoproterenol infusion 1 (before fingolimod administration), heart rate was increased 80% from preinfusion 68 +/- 9 bpm to a maximum 122 +/- 15 bpm. Administration of fingolimod decreased heart rate from 73 +/- 11 bpm predose to a nadir of 57 +/- 8 bpm. The subsequent isoproterenol infusion 2 in the presence of fingolimod increased mean heart rate by 85% to a maximum 105 +/- 21 bpm. A 41% higher total isoproterenol dose was needed to increase heart rate to the target range with fingolimod (97 +/- 6 mcg) compared with isoproterenol alone (69 +/- 27 mcg). Isoproterenol infusions 3 to 5 had similar effects on heart rate as infusion 2. Fingolimod had no significant influence on blood pressure responses to isoproterenol. Isoproterenol did not alter the pharmacokinetics of fingolimod. The pure beta-agonist isoproterenol can reverse the heart rate reduction that occurs transiently after initiating fingolimod treatment.

The effect on heart rate of combining single-dose fingolimod with steady-state atenolol or diltiazem in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) is known to elicit a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates over time with continued dosing. The authors determined the effect of combining a single dose of fingolimod with steady-state atenolol or diltiazem on heart rate and mean arterial pressure. METHODS: In a partially randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, crossover study, 25 healthy subjects received (1) a single oral 5-mg dose of fingolimod, (2) either 50 mg atenolol or 240 mg diltiazem once daily for 5 days, and (3) the antihypertensive for 5 days and a single dose of fingolimod on day 5. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected. RESULTS: The daytime mean heart rate nadir was 15% lower when fingolimod was combined with atenolol (42 +/- 7 bpm) compared with fingolimod alone (51 +/- 9 bpm) yielding a combination/monotherapy ratio of 0.85 (90%CI, 0.79-0.92). The daytime mean heart rate nadir from fingolimod alone (55 +/- 5 bpm) was not altered when combined with diltiazem (56 +/- 8 bpm) yielding a ratio of 0.99 (0.94-1.05). There was no clinically relevant change in mean arterial pressure when fingolimod was administered with atenolol or diltiazem compared with administration of the drugs alone in normotensive subjects. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs were not altered during coadministration. CONCLUSION: Adding fingolimod to a beta-blocker such as atenolol resulted in a moderately lower mean heart rate nadir compared with fingolimod alone. However, subjects who had a stronger negative chronotropic response to fingolimod alone (nadir < 50 bpm) had minimal or no further reduction in heart rate with the drug combination. Adding fingolimod to a calcium channel blocker such as diltiazem did not further lower the heart rate compared to fingolimod alone.

Oral-intravenous crossover study of fingolimod pharmacokinetics, lymphocyte responses and cardiac effects.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics and lymphocyte responses to the immunomodulator fingolimod (FTY720) were characterized after oral and intravenous administration. METHODS: In this randomized, two-period crossover study 11 evaluable healthy subjects received single doses of fingolimod 1.25 mg orally and 1 mg intravenously infused over 2 h. The pharmacokinetics of fingolimod, blood lymphocyte counts and heart rate were characterized for 28 days after each dose. RESULTS: After oral administration, Cmax was 1.1+/-0.2 ng/ml occurring at 12 h postdose and the AUC was 201+/-31 ng.h/ml. After intravenous infusion, Cmax was 4.9+/-0.8 ng/ml, AUC was 175+/-50 ng. h/ml, clearance was 6.3+/-2.3 l/h and distribution volume was 1199+/-260 l. The oral/intravenous ratio of dose-normalized AUCs was 0.94 (95%CI: 0.78-1.12). The pharmacologically active metabolite fingolimod-phosphate was quantifiable near its peak after oral administration but not after intravenous administration. The mean lymphocyte nadir occurred on day 1 and was 35% lower after oral (0.74x10(9)/l) than after intravenous (1.15x10(9)/l) administration. Lymphocytes recovered to the normal range by day 15 for both treatments. The mean heart rate nadir occurred 3-4 h postdose and was 11% lower after oral administration (47 bpm) versus intravenous administration (53 bpm). CONCLUSIONS: Average systemic exposure to fingolimod was similar after oral and intravenous administration. However, the acute decrease in lymphocyte counts was weaker after intravenous administration, likely because of lower blood levels of the active metabolite fingolimod-phosphate compared with oral administration.

Everolimus drug interactions: application of a classification system for clinical decision making.

INTRODUCTION: More than half of all drugs used in medical practice are metabolized by cytochrome CYP3A. Coadministration of drugs that share this elimination pathway may lead to pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Efforts are underway by clinical, drug development and regulatory scientists to classify CYP3A-related drug interactions with the ultimate goal of improving guidance for clinical intervention. The CYP3A inhibitory classification system ranks inhibitors according to the fold-increase in area-under-the-curve (AUC) of a probe substrate as: strong (> or =5-fold), moderate (>2.0- to 4.9-fold), or weak (< or =2.0-fold). This classification system was applied to characterize everolimus as a CYP3A substrate.Methods. Five open-label crossover drug interaction studies were performed in 12-16 healthy subjects each. Subjects received a single 2 mg dose of everolimus alone and again during single- or multiple-dose treatment with the probe inhibitors ketoconazole, erythromycin, verapamil, cyclosporine and atorvastatin.Results. The fold-increase in everolimus AUC was: 15.0 with the strong inhibitor ketoconazole; 4.4, 3.5 and 2.7 with the moderate inhibitors erythromycin, verapamil and cyclosporine; and no change with the weak inhibitor atorvastatin. Subjects with low baseline AUCs when everolimus was given alone tended to have AUC increases of a higher magnitude (more potent interaction) in the presence of an inhibitor.Conclusions. Strong CYP3A inhibitors should be avoided when possible during everolimus treatment as compensatory everolimus dose reductions could be difficult to manage. Everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring should be used to guide individualized dose adjustments when moderate CYP3A inhibitors are added to or withdrawn from the regimen. Routine everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring should be sufficient to determine whether dose adjustments are needed when weak CYP3A inhibitors are coadministered. This rational and systematic approach to drug interactions on everolimus yielded clinically useful, structured guidelines for dose adjustment.

Differentiation of innovator versus generic cyclosporine via a drug interaction on sirolimus.

OBJECTIVE: Both sirolimus and cyclosporine are immunosuppressants used in a combined regimen after organ transplantation. When coadministered with the innovator formulation of cyclosporine, sirolimus blood levels increase 3.3-fold due to a pharmacokinetic interaction. We assessed this drug interaction for potential differences when the innovator formulation is replaced by a generic cyclosporine. METHODS: In this randomized single-dose crossover study, 28 healthy subjects received 5 mg sirolimus oral solution with 250 mg cyclosporine soft gelatin capsules given as the innovator formulation (reference treatment) versus a generic formulation (test treatment). Sirolimus peak blood concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were compared between test and reference treatments by standard bioequivalence testing. RESULTS: Sirolimus Cmax was significantly lower by 17% in the presence of generic versus innovator cyclosporine (p=0.0003) and failed bioequivalence criteria with a test/reference ratio of 0.83 (90% confidence interval, 0.77-0.90). Nearly half of the subjects (46%) had sirolimus Cmax changes which fell outside the bioequivalence window with individual Cmax decreases up to 52% and increases up to 39%. Sirolimus AUC was significantly lower by 11% in the presence of generic versus innovator cyclosporine (p=0.041) but satisfied average bioequivalence criteria with a test/reference ratio of 0.89 (0.83-0.95). Nonetheless, over a third of the subjects (43%) had sirolimus AUC changes outside the standard bioequivalence window with individual AUC decreases up to 39% and increases up to 42%. CONCLUSIONS: Switching between innovator and generic cyclosporine may have a clinically-relevant impact on coadministered sirolimus pharmacokinetics. If such a switch is initiated by the prescriber, follow-up therapeutic monitoring of both cyclosporine and sirolimus blood levels should be performed to guide dose adjustments as necessary. If the switch is made without consulting the prescriber, potentially significant changes in sirolimus exposure could go unnoticed by the clinician and patient.

Fingolimod (FTY720) in severe hepatic impairment: pharmacokinetics and relationship to markers of liver function.

The authors assessed the impact of severe hepatic impairment on the disposition of fingolimod--a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor immunomodulator primarily metabolized by CYP4F2--in 6 patients and 6 matched healthy controls who received a single 5-mg oral dose. Compared with healthy controls, severe hepatic-impaired subjects had a doubled area under the concentration time curve (AUC) and 50% prolonged elimination half-life but a similar peak blood concentration. When these data were combined with those from a previous study in mild and moderate hepatic-impaired subjects, there were significant positive correlations between fingolimod AUC versus bilirubin (r = 0.683) and prothrombin time (r = 0.777) and a significant negative correlation versus albumin (r = 0.578), confirming the importance of liver function for fingolimod clearance. For patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C), a standard first dose of fingolimod could be given followed by a maintenance dose that is reduced by half from the normal maintenance dose.

Overview of FTY720 clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacology.

Drug discovery programs are actively exploring for therapeutic agents targeting enzymes and receptors regulating sphingolipid metabolism and biologic functions. FTY720 is a close structural analogue of sphingosine with immunomodulatory properties. After oral administration, FTY720 is phosphorylated by sphingosine kinase to form the active moiety FTY720-phosphate, which subsequently binds to the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor. In characterizing the safety and pharmacological effects of FTY720, detailed clinical pharmacology studies in healthy subjects and renal transplant recipients have focused on cardiac responses and lymphocyte trafficking. After the first dose, FTY720 causes a mild, transient decrease in heart rate that returns to baseline in approximately 1 to 2 weeks despite continued administration of the drug. FTY720 elicits a prompt and dose-dependent decrease in peripheral blood lymphocytes by redirecting them from the circulation to the lymph nodes without impairing lymphocyte functions. An association among FTY720 blood concentration, decrease in lymphocyte counts, and freedom from acute rejection episodes has been observed in early clinical development trials in de novo kidney transplantation.

FTY720 and cyclosporine: evaluation for a pharmacokinetic interaction.

BACKGROUND: FTY720 is a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonist intended for use in immunoprophylaxis regimens to prevent acute rejection after organ transplantation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic drug interaction between the immunomodulator FTY720 and cyclosporine to support the use of this drug combination in organ transplantation. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized crossover study, 12 subjects with psoriasis received a single dose of FTY720 1 mg alone and on day 5 of an 8-day course of cyclosporine 200 mg twice daily. The single-dose pharmacokinetics of FTY720 and the steady-state pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine were characterized when given alone and during coadministration. Routine safety data were collected, with special attention to total blood lymphocyte counts and heart rate. RESULTS: Cyclosporine coadministration compared with FTY720 given alone did not significantly alter FTY720 maximum concentration (C(max)) (0.57 +/- 0.17 vs 0.58 +/- 0.19. ng/mL, respectively) or AUC(0-t) (41 +/- 13 vs 41 +/- 13 ng. h/mL, respectively). Likewise for cyclosporine, FTY720 coadministration did not alter the steady-state Cmax compared with cyclosporine given alone (1452 +/- 308 vs 1376 +/- 149 ng/mL, respectively) or AUC(tau) (6385 +/- 1578 vs 6031 +/- 1051 ng. h/mL, respectively). Mean lymphocyte counts decreased from baseline by an average of 35% over the first 2 days after FTY720 administration and thereafter increased to prestudy values by day 5 similarly in the absence and presence of cyclosporine. The morning mean supine heart rate decreased approximately 10% and returned to prestudy rates by day 5 after administration of FTY720 alone and with cyclosporine. Heart rate changes were asymptomatic in all study participants. One subject experienced asymptomatic second-degree type 1 atrioventricular (Wenckebach) block. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of single-dose FTY720 and steady-state cyclosporine were not altered during coadministration.

Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of multiple doses of FTY720 in stable renal transplant patients: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I study.

BACKGROUND: FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, displays potent immunosuppressive activity in a variety of preclinical transplant models. This study examined the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of FTY720 in stable renal transplant patients. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study included adults who had been maintained on a regimen of cyclosporine A (CsA) microemulsion and prednisone (or its equivalent) for at least 1 year after renal transplantation. Patients received once-daily doses of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg FTY720, or placebo for 28 days. After completion of study drug administration, the patients were monitored until day 56 by serial laboratory tests, clinical examinations, and recording of adverse events. The study includes 76 treatment courses (61 FTY720 and 15 placebo), with 65 patients enrolled once and 11 reenrolled. RESULTS: FTY720 doses greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/day produced a significant reduction in peripheral blood lymphocyte count by up to 85%, which reversed within 3 days after discontinuation of study medication. Compared with placebo-treated patients, FTY720 subjects did not show a major increase in adverse events or a change in renal function. Pharmacokinetic measurements revealed that FTY720 displayed linear relations of doses and concentrations over a wide range, but had no effect on CsA exposure. CONCLUSIONS: At doses up to 5.0 mg/day for 28 days, stable renal transplant patients treated with FTY720 in combination with CsA and prednisone displayed a dose-dependent, reversible decline in peripheral blood lymphocytes without an enhanced incidence of collateral toxicities, except possibly bradycardia.

First human trial of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, in stable renal transplant patients.

FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator to be developed for use in organ transplantation. The primary objective of this study was to measure safety, single-dose pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics in stable renal transplant patients-the first human use of FTY720. This study used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design that explored single oral doses of FTY720 from 0.25 to 3.5 mg in 20 stable renal transplant patients on a cyclosporine-based regimen. Safety assessments and blood samples were taken predose and at multiple time points during a 96-h period postdose. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from the FTY720 whole blood concentrations, measured by HPLC/MS/MS. FTY720 was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events. Transient, asymptomatic bradycardia occurred after administration in 10 of 24 doses of FTY720. Pharmacokinetics are characterized by a prolonged absorption phase; the terminal elimination phase started 36 h after the administration, with elimination half-life (t(1/2)) ranging from 89 to 157 h independent of dose. Maximum plasma concentration and AUC were proportional to dose with low intersubject variability, the apparent volume of distribution (V(d)/F) ranged from 1116 to 1737 L. FTY pharmacodynamics were characterized by a reversible transient lymphopenia within 6 h, the nadir being 42% of baseline. The lymphocyte count returned to baseline within 72 h in all dosing cohorts except the highest. Single oral doses of FTY720 ranging from 0.25 to 3.5 mg were well tolerated and caused a reversible selective lymphopenia. Transient, but asymptomatic bradycardia was the most common adverse event. The long t(1/2) suggests less frequent dosing intervals. The size of V(d)/F is in excess of blood volume, consistent with widespread tissue distribution