[Opportunities and risks of advance directives : An appraisal of the practice in Germany after legal regulation in 2009]. / Chancen und Risiken der Patientenverfügung : Eine Bestandsaufnahme nach der gesetzlichen Regelung 2009.

BACKGROUND: Living wills/advance directives (AD) are an important tool for specifying patient wishes regarding medical care in the case of future inability to consent. Since 2009, German legislation defines framework conditions for the creation and validity of such directives in § 1901a BGB. METHODS: An extensive literature search in an international and a German-language database was conducted to identify, analyze, and evaluate scientific articles on opportunities, risks, and problems in the creation and implementation of living wills. RESULTS: Between 10 and 40% of patients have an AD. Among the stipulations in the AD, the demand for sufficient pain therapy is very important. However, numerous problems in the preparation and implementation of ADs reduce their value in everyday clinical practice. In particular, unclear conditions of validity, unspecific instructions for action, and lack of availability of the directives prevent practitioners from determining the patient's will. Other fundamental problems include frequent patient ambivalence and clinical ethical dissent. In addition, the framework condition of unlimited coverage set by the law carries the risk that changes of opinion in the course of life or disease are not taken into account. CONCLUSION: Preparing an AD requires a high level of information, consultation, and time, as well as regular review or adjustment of its content. These factors are often not considered, thus complicating implementation and reducing the value of living wills. Possible solutions to these problems or alternative concepts for different patient settings are discussed in this review.

Hantavirus Disease Cluster Caused by Seoul Virus, Germany.

A cluster of 3 persons in Germany experienced hantavirus disease with renal insufficiency. Reverse transcription PCR-based genotyping revealed infection by Seoul hantavirus transmitted from pet rats. Seoul virus could be responsible for disease clusters in Europe, and infected pet rats should be considered a health threat.

Autochthonous Ratborne Seoul Virus Infection in Woman with Acute Kidney Injury.

Outside Asia, Seoul virus (SEOV) is an underestimated pathogen. In Germany, autochthonous SEOV-associated hantavirus disease has not been unequivocally diagnosed. We found clinical and molecular evidence for SEOV infection in a young woman; her pet rat was the source of infection.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy - Too often? Too late? Who are the right patients for gastrostomy?

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is an established method to provide nutrition to patients with restricted oral uptake of fluids and calories. Here, we review the methods, indications and complications of this procedure. While gastrostomy can be safely and easily performed during gastroscopy, the right patients and timing for this intervention are not always chosen. Especially in patients with dementia, the indication for and timing of gastrostomies are often improper. In this patient group, clear data for enteral nutrition are lacking; however, some evidence suggests that patients with advanced dementia do not benefit, whereas patients with mild to moderate dementia might benefit from early enteral nutrition. Additionally, other patient groups with temporary or permanent restriction of oral uptake might be a useful target population for early enteral nutrition to maintain mobilization and muscle strength. We plead for a coordinated study program for these patient groups to identify suitable patients and the best timing for tube implantation.

Percutaneous ethanol injection or percutaneous acetic acid injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common global cancer. When HCC is diagnosed early, interventions such as percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI), or radiofrequency (thermal) ablation (RF(T)A) may have curative potential and represent less invasive alternatives to surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of PEI or PAI in adults with early HCC defined according to the Milan criteria, that is, one cancer nodule up to 5 cm in diameter or up to three cancer nodules up to 3 cm in diameter compared with no intervention, sham intervention, each other, other percutaneous interventions, or surgery. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (July 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 6), MEDLINE (1946 to July 2014), EMBASE (1976 to July 2014), and Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to July 2014). We handsearched meeting abstracts of six oncological and hepatological societies and references of articles to July 2014. We contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised clinical trials comparing PEI or PAI versus no intervention, sham intervention, each other, other percutaneous interventions, or surgery for the treatment of early HCC regardless of blinding, publication status, or language. We excluded studies comparing RFA or combination of different interventions as such interventions have been or will be addressed in other Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group systematic reviews. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, and extracted and analysed data. We calculated the hazard ratios (HR) for median overall survival and recurrence-free survival using the Cox regression model with Parmar's method. We reported type and number of adverse events descriptively. We assessed risk of bias by The Cochrane Collaboration domains to reduce systematic errors and risk of play of chance by trial sequential analysis to reduce random errors. We assessed the methodological quality with GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We identified three randomised trials with 261 participants for inclusion. The risk of bias was low in one and high in two trials.Two of the randomised trials compared PEI versus PAI; we included 185 participants in the analysis. The overall survival (HR 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 3.19) and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.68 to 2.94) were not statistically significantly different between the intervention groups of the two trials. Trial sequential analysis for the comparison PEI versus PAI including two trials revealed that the number of participants that were included in the trials were insufficient in order to judge a relative risk reduction of 20%. Data on the duration of hospital stay were available from one trial for the comparison PEI versus PAI showing a significantly shorter hospital stay for the participants treated with PEI (mean 1.7 days; range 2 to 3 days) versus PAI (mean 2.2 days; range 2 to 5 days). Quality of life was not reported. There were only mild adverse events in participants treated with either PEI or PAI such as transient fever, flushing, and local pain.One randomised trial compared PEI versus surgery; we included 76 participants in the analyses. There was no significant difference in the overall survival (HR 1.57; 95% CI 0.53 to 4.61) and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.69 to 2.63). No serious adverse events were reported in the PEI group while three postoperative deaths occurred in the surgery group.In addition to the three randomised trials, we identified one quasi-randomised study comparing PEI versus PAI. Due to methodological flaws of the study, we extracted only the data on adverse events and presented them in a narrative way.We found no randomised trials that compared PEI or PAI versus no intervention, best supportive care, sham intervention, or other percutaneous local ablative therapies excluding RFTA. We found also no randomised clinical trials that compared PAI versus other interventional treatments or surgery. We identified two ongoing randomised clinical trials. One of these two trials compares PEI versus surgery and the other PEI versus transarterial chemoembolization. To date, it is unclear whether the trials will be eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis as the data are not yet available. This review will not be updated until new randomised clinical trials are published and can be used for analysis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PEI versus PAI did not differ significantly regarding benefits and harms in people with early HCC, but the two included trials had only a limited number of participants and one trial was judged a high risk of bias. Thus, the current evidence precludes us from making any firm conclusions.There was also insufficient evidence to determine whether PEI versus surgery (segmental liver resection) was more effective, because conclusions were based on a single randomised trial. While some data from this single trial suggested that PEI was safer, the high risk of bias and the lack of any confirmatory evidence make a reliable assessment impossible.We found no trials assessing PEI or PAI versus no intervention, best supportive care, or sham intervention.There is a need for more randomised clinical trials assessing interventions for people with early stage HCC. Such trials should be conducted with low risks of systematic errors and random errors.

Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Percutaneous interventional therapies, such as radiofrequency (thermal) ablation (RFA), have been developed for early hepatocellular carcinoma. RFA competes with other interventional techniques such as percutaneous ethanol injection, surgical resection, and liver transplantation. The potential benefits and harms of RFA compared with placebo, no intervention, chemotherapy, hepatic resection, liver transplantation, or other interventions are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of RFA versus placebo, no intervention, or any other therapeutic approach in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science to September 2012. We handsearched meeting abstracts from ASCO, ESMO, AASLD, EASL, APASL, and references of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field (last search September 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered for inclusion randomised clinical trials investigating the effects of RFA versus placebo, no intervention, or any other therapeutic approach on hepatocellular carcinoma patients regardless of blinding, language, and publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed the selection of trials, assessment of risk of bias, and data extraction. We contacted principal investigators for missing information. We analysed hazard ratios (HR) as relevant effect measures for overall survival, two-year survival, event-free survival, and local recurrences with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In addition, we analysed dichotomous survival outcomes using risk ratios (RR). We used trial sequential analysis to control the risk of random errors ('play of chance'). MAIN RESULTS: We identified no trials comparing RFA versus placebo, no intervention, or liver transplantation. We identified and included 11 randomised clinical trials with 1819 participants that included four comparisons: RFA versus hepatic resection (three trials, 578 participants); RFA versus percutaneous ethanol injection (six trials, 1088 participants) including one three-armed trial that also investigated RFA versus acetic acid injection; RFA versus microwave ablation (one trial, 72 participants); and RFA versus laser ablation (one trial, 81 participants). Ten of the eleven included trials reported on the primary outcome of this review, overall survival. Rates of major complications or procedure-related deaths were reported in 10 trials. The overall risk of bias was considered low in five trials and high in six trials. For a subgroup analysis, we included only low risk of bias trials. Regarding the comparison RFA versus hepatic resection, there was moderate-quality evidence from two low risk of bias trials that hepatic resection seems more effective than RFA regarding overall survival (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.78) and two-year survival (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.84). However, if we included a third trial with high risk of bias, the difference became insignificant (overall survival: HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.15). With regards to the outcomes event-free survival and local progression, hepatic resection also yielded better results than RFA. However, the number of complications was higher in surgically treated participants (odds ratio (OR) 8.24; 95% CI 2.12 to 31.95). RFA seemed superior to percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection regarding overall survival (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.31 to 2.07). The RR for mortality was also in favour of RFA, but did not reach statistical significance (150/490 (30.6%) people in the percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid group versus 119/496 (24.0%) people in the RFA group; RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.97 to 3.22). The proportion of adverse events did not differ significantly between RFA and percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.48). Trial sequential analyses revealed that the number of participants in the included trials was insufficient and that more trials are needed to assess the effects of RFA versus other interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The effects of RFA versus no intervention, chemotherapeutic treatment, or liver transplantation are unknown. We found moderate-quality evidence that hepatic resection is superior to RFA regarding survival. However, RFA might be associated with fewer complications and a shorter hospital stay than hepatic resection. We found moderate-quality evidence showing that RFA seems superior to percutaneous ethanol injection regarding survival. There were too sparse data to recommend or refute ablation achieved by techniques other than RFA. More randomised clinical trials with low risk of bias and low risks of random errors assessing the effect of RFA are needed.

Thymostimulin versus placebo for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastasised hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Thymostimulin is a thymic peptide fraction with immune-mediated cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in vitro and palliative efficacy in advanced HCC in two independent phase II trials. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of thymostimulin in a phase III trial. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical phase III trial. Between 10/2002 and 03/2005, 135 patients with locally advanced or metastasised HCC (Karnofsky >or=60%/Child-Pugh

Pitfall alveolar echinococcosis in non-endemic areas. Alveolar echinococcosis migrating northward.

Alveolar echinococcosis of the liver can be mistaken as a liver tumor. The occurrence of the fox tapeworm echinococcus multilocularis is increasing in formerly unaffected European regions. As a consequence, alveolar echinococcosis is becoming an important differential diagnosis in Eastern and Northern Europe.

Percutaneous ethanol injection or percutaneous acetic acid injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common global cancer. When HCC is detected early, interventions such as percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI), and radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFTA) have curative potential and represent low invasive alternatives to surgery. The role of PEI or PAI has not been addressed in a systematic review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of PEI or PAI in adults with early HCC. SEARCH STRATEGY: A systematic search was performed in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science in May 2009. Meeting abstracts of six oncological and hepatological societies (ASCO, ESMO, ECCO, AASLD, EASL, APASL) and references of articles were handsearched. Researchers in the field were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing PEI or PAI with no intervention, sham intervention, other percutaneous interventions or surgery for the treatment of early HCC were considered regardless of blinding, publication status, or language. Studies comparing RFTA or combination treatments were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected trials for inclusion, and extracted and analysed data. The hazard ratios for median overall survival and recurrence-free survival were calculated using the Cox regression model with Parmar's method. Type and number of adverse events were reported descriptively. MAIN RESULTS: Three randomised trials with a total of 261 patients were eligible for inclusion. The risk of bias was high in all trials. Two of the trials compared PEI with PAI. Overall survival (HR 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 3.19) and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.68 to 2.94) were not significantly different. Data on the duration of hospital stay were inconclusive. Data on quality of life were not available. There were only mild adverse events in both treatment modalities.The other trial compared PEI with surgery. There was no significant difference in overall survival (HR 1.57; 95% CI 0.53 to 4.61) and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.69 to 2.63). No serious adverse events were reported in the PEI group. Three postoperative deaths occurred in the surgery group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PEI and PAI does not differ significantly regarding benefits and harms in patients with early HCC, but only a limited number of patients have been examined and the bias risk was high in all trials. There is also insufficient evidence to determine whether PEI or segmental liver resection is more effective, although PEI may seem safer.

Failure of screening or failure to screen? The screening behavior of patients with colorectal cancer in the Leipzig area.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer-related cause of death in Germany. Screening for colorectal cancer is effective and is covered by statutory health insurance in Germany. METHODS: The authors studied the screening behavior of patients with CRC in the Leipzig area in the 10 years before their diagnosis. The patients were asked to fill out a standardized questionnaire, and their primary care physicians were questioned, in order to determine what screening measures had been performed and why none had been performed in some cases. RESULTS: 212 patients with CRC were studied. In 175 (83%), cancer had been diagnosed after the appearance of symptoms ("symptomatic group"); in 37 (17%), it had been detected by screening ("screening group"). 51% of the overall patient group had undergone CRC screening in the 10 years before their diagnosis. A test of the stool for occult blood was the most common screening method but was generally not performed in conformity with guidelines. 25 patients (12%) had undergone a screening colonoscopy in the 10 years before their diagnosis; of these 25, 20 had undergone a screening colonoscopy in the 5 years before their diagnosis. The main reason why screening was not performed was ignorance of its availability. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study revealed that, of 212 patients with CRC, most had not previously undergone CRC screening in conformity with guidelines. Better patient education by physicians may improve the effectiveness of screening. Appropriate screening measures include fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy in conformity with guidelines.

Identification and quantitation of the N-acetyl-L-cysteine S-conjugates of bendamustine and its sulfoxides in human bile after administration of bendamustine hydrochloride.

We recently reported the detection of mercapturic acid pathway metabolites of bendamustine, namely, cysteine S-conjugates in human bile, which are supposed to subsequently undergo further metabolism. In this study, we describe the identification and quantitation of consecutive bendamustine metabolites occurring in human bile using authentic reference standards and the synthesis and structural confirmation of these compounds. Mass spectrometry data along with high-performance liquid chromatography retention data (fluorescence detection) of the synthetic reference standards were consistent with those of the metabolites found in human bile after administration of bendamustine hydrochloride to cancer patients. Analysis of the purified synthetic reference compounds showed a purity of at least 95%. Structural confirmation was achieved by one- and two-dimensional proton as well as carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. A total of 16 bendamustine-related compounds were detected in the bile of patients, 11 of them were recovered as conjugates. Eight conjugates have been structurally confirmed as novel mercapturic acids and sulfoxides. Biliary excretion of the sulfoxides was twice that of the mercapturate precursors. Glutathione S-conjugates of bendamustine have not been detected in bile samples, indicating rapid enzymatic cleavage in humans. Both the lack of glutathione (GSH) conjugates and occurrence of diastereomeric sulfoxides emphasize species-related differences in the GSH conjugation of bendamustine between humans and rats. The total amount recovered in the bile as the sum of all conjugates over the period of 24 h after dosing averaged 5.2% of the administered dose. The question of whether the novel metabolites contribute to urinary excretion should be a target of future investigations.

Impact of capsule endoscopy on outcome in mid-intestinal bleeding: a multicentre cohort study in 285 patients.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) sensitively detects the bleeding source in the small bowel. However, the influence of CE on long-term outcome is not well established. METHODS: In five tertiary hospitals, all CE investigations were retrospectively identified dating back to 3 years. Patients with intestinal bleeding and negative bidirectional endoscopy were included, and relapse of bleeding was recorded. RESULTS: A bleeding source was detected in 219 of 285 patients (76.8%); CE provided the diagnosis in 175 of 219 (79.9%) and other, repeated investigations in 44 cases (20.1%). Follow-up (mean+/-SD=20.7+/-9.4 months) in 240 patients identified rebleeding in 65 (27.1%), and readmission to a hospital in 42 (17.5%). Hospital readmission was most frequent in patients with angiectasias (31.3%, relative risk (RR)=5.0; 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.4-10.4). Other risk factors included patients being older than 60 years of age (RR=3.8; 95% CI=1.5-9.5), and anticoagulant medication (RR=3.0; 95% CI=1.5-6.0). Therapeutic measures had a mean recurrence rate of 3.7% in surgical candidates (Meckel's diverticulum, tumor), 40% in endoscopically treated and 16% in medically treated patients. In case all the detected angiectasias had been cauterized, the relapse rate was low (11.8%), but in incompletely treated patients, it was high (85.7%). Bleeding relapse was never lethal. CONCLUSION: CE guides therapeutic measures and predicts the risk of recurrent bleeding in small intestinal bleeding. High risk of rebleeding in angiectasias is significantly reduced by the cauterization of all demonstrable lesions.

A pilot study of bendamustine in advanced bile duct cancer.

We performed a pilot study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of bendamustine in patients with advanced hilar bile duct cancer and impaired liver function. Six patients with histologically proven, unresectable adenocarcinoma of the hilar bile duct were treated with bendamustine 140 mg/m intravenously on day 1 of the first cycle and with bendamustine 100 mg/m on days 1 and 2 of the second to fourth cycle. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days. Primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of the treatment; secondary endpoints were response rate, time to progression and overall survival. Transient lymphopenia grade 3 occurred in all six patients. No other grade 3 or 4 toxicities were present. The most common nonhematologic toxicity was mouth dryness grade 2 in six patients. Three patients had stable disease. No partial or complete responses were observed. Median time to progression was 3.3 months; median overall survival was 6 months. Our study demonstrates that bendamustine can be safely administered in patients with hilar bile duct cancer and impaired liver function. A potential role of bendamustine in combination therapies for bile duct cancer will be a subject of further trials.

Irinotecan with 5-FU/FA in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinomas: a multicenter phase II trial.

OBJECTIVES: Biliary cancer has a poor prognosis and lacks a standard palliative chemotherapy. The purpose of this prospective single-arm phase II study was to determine the activity and tolerability of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and folinic acid in advanced biliary cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) or gallbladder cancer (GBC) and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Irinotecan 80 mg/m2, followed by folinic acid 500 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2000 mg/m2 infused over 24 hours (Fufiri) were administered weekly 6 times, every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate, and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with ICC and 13 patients with GBC were enrolled. All patients were evaluable for safety. WHO grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events occurred in 8 patients (27%), consisting of diarrhea and leukopenia in 5 and 3 patients, respectively. One patient with diarrhea grade 4 finally succumbed to sepsis. Objective response rate was 10% (95% confidence interval, 2.1%-26.5%), with an additional 10% of patients showing stable disease. Median overall survival was 166 days and 273 days, and median progression-free survival was 84 days and 159 days for ICC and GBC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Fufiri is a well-tolerated regimen in patients with ICC and GBC but has only modest activity in advanced biliary tract cancer.

Wireless capsule endoscopy for diagnosis of acute intestinal graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: The small intestine is the most common location of intestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). EGD with duodenal biopsies yields the highest diagnostic sensitivity, but the jejunum and ileum are not accessible by regular endoscopy. In contrast, wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) is a noninvasive imaging procedure offering complete evaluation of the small intestine. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the diagnostic value of EGD, including biopsies, with the results of WCE in patients with acute intestinal symptoms who received allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation and to analyze the appearance and distribution of acute intestinal GVHD lesions in these patients. DESIGN: An investigator-blinded, single-center prospective study. PATIENTS: Patients with acute intestinal symptoms after allogeneic stem cell transplantation underwent both EGD and WCE within 24 hours. Clinical data were recorded during 2 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Fourteen consecutive patients with clinical symptoms of acute intestinal GVHD were recruited. In 1 patient, the capsule remained in the stomach and was removed endoscopically. In 7 of 13 patients who could be evaluated, acute intestinal GVHD was diagnosed by EGD with biopsies, but 3 of these would have been missed by EGD alone. In all 7 patients with histologically confirmed acute intestinal GVHD, WCE revealed typical signs of GVHD. Lesions were scattered throughout the small intestine, but were most accentuated in the ileum. LIMITATIONS: This study had a small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: WCE, which is less invasive than EGD with biopsies, showed a comparable sensitivity and a high negative predictive value for diagnosing acute intestinal GVHD. It may be helpful to avoid repeated endoscopic procedures in patients who have undergone stem cell transplantation.

Characterization of two phase I metabolites of bendamustine in human liver microsomes and in cancer patients treated with bendamustine hydrochloride.

PURPOSE: The metabolism of bendamustine (BM) hydrochloride, a bifunctional alkylator containing a heterocyclic ring, was investigated in vitro and in vivo for identification of cytochromes P450 (CYP) involved in the formation of two phase I metabolites, structural confirmation of these previously unidentified metabolites and assessment of their cytotoxic effect in relation to the parent compound. METHODS: Potential metabolites of BM were synthesized and structurally characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis. In vitro metabolism of BM hydrochloride in human hepatic microsomes was conducted to identify the CYP450 isoenzymes involved in the oxidative metabolism of BM. Samples from cancer patients after treatment with BM hydrochloride and microsomal preparations were analyzed by LC-MS and HPLC with fluorescence detection. The cytotoxic effect of the metabolites was analyzed in several lymphoma cell lines and peripheral blood lymphocytes and compared with that of the parent compound using an MTT assay. RESULTS: LC-MS as well as HPLC with fluorescence detection revealed hydroxylation of the methylene carbon at the C-4 position of the butanoic acid side chain and N-demethylation of the benzimidazole skeleton as the main metabolic pathways in human liver microsomes. Isoform-specific chemical inhibitors and correlation analysis pointed to CYP1A2 as the prominent enzyme in BM oxidation. The rate of formation for both metabolites correlated (r=0.931 and 0.933) with the activity of CYP1A2 and there were no other notable correlations with any of the other CYPs. In addition, both metabolites were identified in plasma, urine, and bile samples from cancer patients under BM hydrochloride therapy as shown by comparison with chromatograms obtained from the authentic reference standards. Cytotoxic activity observed for gamma-hydroxy BM was approximately equivalent to that obtained for the parental compound BM. N-demethyl BM displays five to tenfold less cytotoxic activity than BM. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that CYP1A2-catalyzed N-dealkylation and gamma hydroxylation are the major routes for BM phase I metabolism producing two metabolites less or similarly toxic than the parent compound. In contrast to the metabolic pathways of the structurally related chlorambucil, no beta-oxidation of the butanoic acid side chain leading to enhanced toxicity was detected for BM.

Radiochemotherapy followed by gemcitabine and capecitabine in extrahepatic bile duct cancer: a phase I/II trial.

OBJECTIVE: Both radiotherapy and chemotherapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine have efficacy in biliary cancer. Our aim was to determine the toxicity and efficacy of a postoperative regimen combining both treatment modalities in extrahepatic bile duct cancer. METHODS: Patients were eligible after surgery for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma. Surgery included resection of lymph node positive cancer, incomplete resections and diagnostic laparotomy in unresectable tumors. Patients received a fractionated radiotherapy of 49.6 Gy accompanied by gemcitabine once a week. After a 2-week rest, patients were treated with gemcitabine and capecitabine on a 3-week cycle. The treatment continued for 6 cycles in nonmeasurable disease or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: There were 18 patients (resection/laparotomy 7/11) enrolled between August 2003 and April 2005. Radiotherapy was completed in all patients and a total of 66 cycles of chemotherapy was applied. Fatigue and nausea were the most common mild adverse events. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was rare after resection but frequent in unresectable disease and consisted of fatigue, nausea, duodenal ulcer, cachexia, and cholangitis in 1, 2, 2, 4, and 4 patients, respectively. We observed a 50% disease stabilization rate in patients with measurable disease. Median overall survival was 7.9 months in patients with unresectable tumors. Median overall survival in patients after resection has not been reached at a median follow-up of 19.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Radiochemotherapy using gemcitabine followed by gemcitabine and capecitabine is an active regimen with manageable toxicity after resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer but has significant toxicity in unresectable disease.