Paramedic Global Impression of Change During Prehospital Evaluation and Transport for Acute Stroke.

Background and Purpose- The prehospital setting is a promising site for therapeutic intervention in stroke, but current stroke screening tools do not account for the evolution of neurological symptoms in this early period. We developed and validated the Paramedic Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale in a large, prospective, randomized trial. Methods- In the prehospital FAST-MAG (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium) randomized trial conducted from 2005 to 2013, EMS providers were asked to complete the PGIC Scale (5-point Likert scale values: 1-much improved, 2-mildly improved, 3-unchanged, 4-mildly worsened, 5-much worsened) for neurological symptom change during transport for consecutive patients transported by ambulance within 2 hours of onset. We analyzed PGIC concurrent validity (compared with change in Glasgow Coma Scale, Los Angeles Motor Scale), convergent validity (compared with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale severity measure performed in the emergency department), and predictive validity (of neurological deterioration after hospital arrival and of final 90-day functional outcome). We used PGIC to characterize differential prehospital course among stroke subtypes. Results- Paramedics completed the PGIC in 1691 of 1700 subjects (99.5%), among whom 635 (37.5%) had neurological deficit evolution (32% improvement, 5.5% worsening) during a median prehospital care period of 33 (IQR, 27-39) minutes. Improvement was associated with diagnosis of cerebral ischemia rather than intracranial hemorrhage, milder stroke deficits on emergency department arrival, and more frequent nondisabled and independent 3-month outcomes. Conversely, worsening on the PGIC was associated with intracranial hemorrhage, more severe neurological deficits on emergency department arrival, more frequent treatment with thrombolytic therapy, and poor disability outcome at 3 months. Conclusions- The PGIC scale is a simple, validated measure of prehospital patient course that has the potential to provide information useful to emergency department decision-making. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00059332.

Aggressive imaging protocol for hanging patients yields no significant findings: Over-imaging of hanging injuries.

BACKGROUND: Despite rising rates of hanging injuries, few high-quality data and no national trauma guidelines are available to standardize the evaluation of these patients. We sought to identify the yield of imaging hanging patients at our institution. METHODS: This is a retrospective study at an urban Level I Trauma Center. Charts for patients diagnosed with "Hanging, Strangulation, or Asphyxiation" (ICD-9 E93.0) from February 2008 to March 2014 were reviewed. Frequency of imaging orders and their results were recorded. Logistic regression analyses were done to determine factors associated with increased rates of imaging. RESULTS: 78 patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 34 years, 86% were male, and 65% were witnessed hangings. In total, 195 CT scans and 67 X-rays were done. Frequency of imaging in our cohort: 77% received CT of the head (CTH); 88% CT of the neck; 85% CT angiography (CTA) of the neck; 86% chest X-ray. Highest-level trauma activation occurred in 76% of patients and was associated with an increased rate of imaging, with the likelihood of CTH being increased by 31% (p < 0.01), CT of the neck without contrast by 19% (p < 0.01), CTA of the neck by 25% (p < 0.01), and chest X-ray by 25% (p < 0.01). Of the 78 patients, none had significant findings that required intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the highest-level trauma activation was associated with increased rates of imaging, but did not alter patient care. A more selective approach in the evaluation of hanging injuries should be considered.