Heartburn relief with bicarbonate-rich mineral water: results of the randomised, placebo-controlled phase-III trial STOMACH STILL.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether the bicarbonate-rich mineral water Staatl. Fachingen STILL is superior over conventional mineral water in relieving heartburn. DESIGN: Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial STOMACH STILL in adult patients with frequent heartburn episodes since ≥6 months and without moderate/severe reflux oesophagitis. Patients drank 1.5 L/day verum or placebo over the course of the day for 6 weeks. Primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with reduction of ≥5 points in the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score for 'heartburn'. Secondary endpoints included symptom reduction (RDQ), health-related quality of life (HRQOL, Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD)), intake of rescue medication and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: Of 148 randomised patients (verum: n=73, placebo: n=75), 143 completed the trial. Responder rates were 84.72% in the verum and 63.51% in the placebo group (p=0.0035, number needed to treat=5). Symptoms improved under verum compared with placebo for the dimension 'heartburn' (p=0.0003) and the RDQ total score (p=0.0050). HRQOL improvements under verum compared with placebo were reported for 3 of 5 QOLRAD domains, that is, 'food/drink problems' (p=0.0125), 'emotional distress' (p=0.0147) and 'vitality' (p=0.0393). Mean intake of rescue medication decreased from 0.73 tablets/day at baseline to 0.47 tablets/day in week 6 in the verum group, whereas in the placebo group it remained constant during the trial. Only three patients had treatment-related adverse events (verum: n=1, placebo: n=2). CONCLUSION: STOMACH STILL is the first controlled clinical trial demonstrating superiority of a mineral water over placebo in relieving heartburn, accompanied by an improved HRQOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2017-001100-30.

Comparative Bioavailability Study of a Novel Multi-Day Patch Formulation of Rivastigmine (Twice Weekly) with Exelon® Transdermal Patch (Daily)- A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Rivastigmine, a reversible AChEI for symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's dementia, is administered once daily transdermal patches, enabling an easier and continuous drug delivery. A novel multi-day (twice week) patch formulation was developed with greater convenience for patients' therapeutic management. OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence under SS conditions of the multiple-day rivastigmine transdermal patch (Test Product, RID-TDS) in comparison to the once-daily Exelon® transdermal patch (Reference Product), both at a release rate of 9.5 mg/24 h. DESIGN: Single-center, open-label, randomized, multiple-dose study in healthy male adults in a 2- period, 2-sequence-crossover design with multiple applications. METHODS: Patches were applied on 11 consecutive days for Exelon® and a 4-3-4-day regimen for the multiday test patch (RID-TDS), separated by a 14-day wash-out period. The safety, local tolerability and inhibitory effect of rivastigmine on plasma BuChE activity were also evaluated. RESULTS: 57 subjects completed the study according to the protocol. Calculated point estimates and 90% CI for all primary parameters (AUC96-264, Cmax96-264 and Cmin96-264) were within the predefined acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%. They were 113.64% (107.33-120.33), 105.14% (98.38- 112.38) and 107.82% (97.78-118.89) respectively. Satisfactory adhesion (CI of mean adhesion above 90%) was demonstrated for RID-TDS but not for Exelon®. CONCLUSION: Bioequivalence was demonstrated between RID-TDS mg twice a week and Exelon® once daily in SS. Patch adhesion favored RID-TDS despite the longer dosing interval. Both products were well tolerated.

Bioavailability Study of a Transdermal Patch Formulation of Rivastigmine Compared with Exelon in Healthy Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rivastigmine is a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of all stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Transdermal patch formulation allows smooth and continuous drug delivery. Its tolerability, efficacy and convenience of use increase treatment compliance. This study was designed to evaluate the bioavailability and to assess the bioequivalence of two rivastigmine transdermal patches at steady state (RIV-TDS Test Product versus Exelon Marketed Reference Product), with a release rate of 13.3 mg/24 h, after multiple patch applications. As secondary objectives, safety, patch adhesion and skin irritation were evaluated. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, balanced, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study of healthy adults (n = 31). The treatment period consisted of two 5-day study periods during which consecutive daily application of the investigational patches with a release rate of 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine took place. Serial blood samples were collected to measure plasma concentrations. Adhesion and skin irritation assessments were performed after application of patches. RESULTS: Point estimates and 90% confidence intervals of pharmacokinetic parameters at steady state, viz. area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from dosing time to the end of the dosing interval τ (profile day) at steady state [AUC0-τ,ss] (97.4; 88.8-106.9), maximum plasma concentration within the dosing interval τ (profile day) at steady state [Cmax,ss] (99.6; 90.4-109.7) and trough plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval τ (profile day) at steady state [Cτ,ss] (96.8; 86.2-108.9), demonstrated that both patches were bioequivalent. Evaluation of patch adhesion showed better skin adherence for RIV-TDS as well as dermal response scores (skin tolerability after removal). CONCLUSIONS: For both products, bioequivalence was shown and systemic tolerability was in accordance with the safety profile of the drug substance. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03573050 and EudraCT: 2018-000968-28.

Effect on ovarian activity and ovulation inhibition of different oral dosages of levonorgestrel.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of different oral dosages of levonorgestrel (LNG) on ovarian activity and to identify the lowest dosage at which no ovulation occurred. Secondary objectives were to assess return of ovulation after stopping treatment, bleeding pattern, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and safety and tolerability. STUDY DESIGN: A parallel-group study with adaptive design was performed in 90 healthy women with proven ovulatory cycles. Investigated dosages were LNG 0.095, 0.115 and 0.135 mg per day. Measurements of follicular growth and estradiol (E2) and progesterone concentrations were performed every 3 (±1) days during a 56-day treatment and a post-treatment period. Follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone concentrations and multiple-dose PK parameters were determined during treatment. RESULTS: Two normal ovulations occurred in the LNG 0.095 mg group, none in the higher dose groups. Most subjects had active follicle-like structures without ovulation (Hoogland-Skouby scores 4). Ovarian activity was more suppressed in the highest dose group than in the other groups. Mean E2 concentrations were 241, 219 and 180 pmol/L during treatment with 0.095, 0.115 and 0.135 mg per day, respectively. PK results showed dose-proportionality. Most subjects ovulated during the post-treatment period. CONCLUSION: LNG 0.115 mg per day was the lowest effective dosage for consistent ovulation inhibition. All investigated dosages were safe and well-tolerated, and mean E2 concentrations were sufficient for prevention of hypoestrogenic side effects. IMPLICATIONS: Marketed progestogen-only pills (POP) containing 0.03 mg LNG do not consistently inhibit ovulation. Increasing the dosage to 0.115 mg or 0.135 mg per day, resulting in consistent ovulation inhibition, may improve the contraceptive efficacy of the LNG-POP.

Development of a furosemide-containing expandable system for gastric retention.

More than 50 years ago, the first gastroretentive dosage forms came up. Since then, no practical and at the same time reliable gastroretentive system is available on market. A major obstacle in the development of novel gastroretentive systems is the lack of proper predictive test methods. In the present work, we aimed at developing and fully characterizing an expandable gastroretentive system containing furosemide as model drug. On the one hand, we used well-established in vitro tests for drug dissolution and gastroretentive properties (paddle apparatus, swelling characteristics). On the other hand, we used two novel models (dissolution stress test device, mechanical antrum model) to assess these properties under biorelevant conditions. Moreover, we performed an in vivo study under fed and fasted conditions that combined blood sampling and a high-resolution imaging technique (magnetic marker monitoring) to determine gastrointestinal location with the assessment of a pharmacodynamic endpoint (urinary sodium excretion). In vitro dissolution tests confirmed prolonged drug release over more than 8 h independent from pH and with slight pressure sensitivity. Swelling studies indicated good swelling behavior within 4 h along with medium gastroretentive properties as determined with the mechanical antrum model. In vivo imaging showed prolonged gastric residence time after fed compared to fasted administration (481 min vs 38 min). Comparison of geometric means of AUCo-tlast of the model drug confirmed this observation with 10 times higher value after fed administration. Urinary excretion of sodium well reflected the increased sodium-reuptake inhibition due to higher furosemide exposure under fed conditions. However, the poor performance after fasted intake of the system is in line with data from several other gastroretentive formulations. The present study highlighted the value of novel test methods during the development of gastroretentive formulations. Yet, a system with reproducible gastroretentive properties especially under fasted conditions has to be designed.

A novel rizatriptan oral gel formulation: Bioavailability and bioequivalence.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the relative bioavailability between a newly developed oral gel and a marketed oral lyophilisate-containing rizatriptan benzoate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 47 out of 48 healthy subjects, aged 34 ± 10 (SD) years and body mass index 24.7 ± 3.3 (SD) kg/m2 completed this single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-period cross-over trial with single-dose fasted administrations. Intake of both investigational products was separated by a washout period of at least 6 days. For pharmacokinetic evaluation, blood samples were withdrawn until 24 hours post dose. A validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) was applied for the determination of rizatriptan in plasma. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.100 ng/mL. Adverse events (AEs) were descriptively analyzed in the study population. Palatability of the new product was investigated based on a questionnaire. RESULTS: The geometric means of the parameters related with the extent of total exposure, i.e., AUC0-tlast and AUC0-∞, were 60.285 ng × h/mL and 60.865 ng × h/mL for test and 62.729 ng × h/mL and 63.312 ng × h/mL for reference, respectively. The geometric means of the peak exposure, i.e., Cmax, were 21.262 ng/mL for test and 21.447 ng/mL for reference. The point estimates (PEs) of the test/reference (T/R) adjusted geometric mean ratios of AUC0-tlast, Cmax, and AUC0-∞ (secondary parameter) were 96.11%, 99.12%, and 96.15%, respectively, and all of them showed 90% confidence intervals (CIs) within the range of 80.00 - 125.00% as suggested by regulatory requirements for bioequivalence assessment. In total, 13 subjects experienced 20 AEs during the trial; the most frequently reported AEs were headache (5 cases) and dizziness (3 cases). No AEs of severe intensity were reported. Palatability assessment of the new product provided sufficient data to discuss its acceptability. CONCLUSION: Bioequivalence was demonstrated in terms of rate and extent of absorption after administration of test and reference products. Concerning the safety evaluation, no negative implications on the possible use of the test formulation could be determined. Based on ratings by the subjects no relevant problem concerning acceptability of the new formulation in particular regarding taste and smell is to be expected.

Ovulation inhibition with a new vaginal ring containing trimegestone.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the lowest trimegestone (TMG) dose, administered via a vaginal ring, that effectively inhibited ovulation. STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre, open-label, single-dose, parallel-group clinical trial with adaptive design. Eighty healthy female volunteers with proven ovulatory cycles were allocated to treatment with a vaginal ring during 28 days, with an average daily release rate of either 46 µg, 94 µg, 147 µg, or 184 µg TMG (20 women/group). Ultrasound measurements of follicular growth and endometrial thickness, and blood sampling for follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol and progesterone determinations were performed every 3rd (±1) day from treatment day 4 (±1) until day 28 (±1), and in a follow-up phase after ring removal, until study day 39 (±1). Trimegestone concentrations were measured at each visit in the treatment phase. RESULTS: Mean age and body mass index were 28.8 years and 23.15 kg/m2. One subject in the lowest dose group (46 µg/day) ovulated, no ovulations were seen in the higher dose groups. The degree of ovarian suppression increased with the dose. Median estradiol levels were 119, 36.5, 33.2 and 27.2 pg/mL in the 46, 94, 147 and 184 µg/day groups, respectively. Ovarian activity was resumed in the follow-up phase. Plasma TMG levels gradually declined over the treatment period and showed dose proportionality. The study treatment was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The release rate of 94 µg TMG per day was the lowest effective dose for ovulation inhibition. The study results justify further development of the TMG-ring as progestogen-only contraceptive. IMPLICATIONS: The vaginal ring releasing TMG seems to be an effective new progestogen-only contraceptive preparation, having the advantage of once-a-month vaginal insertion.

The global bioequivalence harmonisation initiative: Report of EUFEPS/AAPS third conference.

The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS) and American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) have collaborated since 2015 to organize international conferences to support global harmonization of regulatory requirements for bioequivalence (BE) assessment. This collaboration has resulted in three Global Bioequivalence Harmonization Initiative (GBHI) workshops which provided a unique opportunity for scientists from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies to discuss current, complex BE issues. The 3rd GBHI workshop was held in April 2018 in Amsterdam/The Netherlands and covered the following topics: (a) the necessity of multiple-dose studies in BE testing; (b) BE of transdermal delivery systems, and (c) liposomal parenteral preparations. This report summarizes the extensive discussions that led to better understanding of the similarities and differences across the major regulatory agencies on these topics and paved the way for future international harmonization.

Summary report of second EUFEPS/AAPS conference on global harmonization in bioequivalence.

The Global Bioequivalence Harmonization Initiative (GBHI) was launched by the Network on Bioavailability and Biopharmaceutics (BABP) under the auspices of European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS) several years ago. Since 2015, EUFEPS in collaboration with the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) has organized three international conferences to support global harmonization of regulatory requirements for bioequivalence (BE) assessment. These conferences provided an open forum for pharmaceutical scientists from academia, industry and regulatory agencies to discuss various BE topics at issue. The current report summarizes the discussion of BE issues at the 2nd GBHI conference held in 2016, Rockville, USA. Three important BE topics were discussed at the meeting: (a) prodrugs and compounds with pre-systemic extraction, (b) scaling procedures and two-stage designs, and (c) exclusion of pharmacokinetic data in BE assessment. The presentations and discussions of these issues have enhanced the mutual understanding of scientific background for BE evaluation and further facilitated harmonization of regulatory approaches for establishing BE of multisource drug products.

Topical administration of regorafenib eye drops: phase I dose-escalation study in healthy volunteers.

AIM: Regorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor under investigation for use in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. In this phase I study, regorafenib eye drops were administered to healthy volunteers to provide information on safety, tolerability and systemic exposure. METHODS: This was a single-centre, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled study. Subjects received regorafenib eye drops (30 mg ml-1 , 25 µl) as a 0.75 mg single dose (Cohort 1), 0.75 mg twice daily (bid) or thrice daily (tid) over 14 days (Cohorts 2 and 3, respectively), 1.5 mg tid unilaterally for 3 days, then bilaterally for up to 14 days (Cohort 4), or placebo. Plasma samples were taken to estimate systemic exposure. Safety and functional assessments were performed throughout the study. RESULTS: Thirty-six subjects received regorafenib and 12 received placebo. Regorafenib was safe and well tolerated over the dose range. No pathological changes occurred in the anterior, vitreous or posterior eye compartments. Mild eyelid redness, oedema and conjunctival hyperaemia were observed across all regorafenib cohorts; these were comparable with the effects seen with placebo. Predominant symptoms were blurred vision in the active and placebo groups. Systemic safety evaluations showed no clinically relevant findings. Absolute systemic exposure after multiple administrations of regorafenib eye drops at a dose of 0.75 mg was 600-700-fold lower than after multiple oral administration of 160 mg day-1 , the dose approved in cancer indications. CONCLUSION: These results indicate a favourable safety and tolerability profile of regorafenib eye drops up to 30 mg ml-1 tid for use in clinical studies.

The Global Bioequivalence Harmonization Initiative: Summary report for EUFEPS international conference.

Bioequivalence (BE) is considered one of the key questions in new and generic drug product development and registration worldwide. However, the regulations and jurisdiction vary from country to country and continent to continent. Harmonization of regulatory requirements and criteria for BE determination may avoid unnecessary repetition of BE studies and minimize drug exposure to humans. Harmonization around the globe may be achieved by a better understanding of scientific principles and expectations from different regulatory authorities. To facilitate global harmonization, the Network on Bioavailability and Biopharmaceutics (BABP) under the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences (EUFEPS) launched a Global Bioequivalence Harmonization Initiative (GBHI) several years ago. This international conference was the first in a series of workshops organized by EUFEPS/BABP under GBHI. The workshop provided a forum for pharmaceutical scientists from academia, industry and regulatory agencies to have open discussions on selected BE issues in the hope of identifying common ground and arriving at a harmonized view on these topics.

Relative bioavailability of a newly developed 5-mg levomethadone hydrochloride IR tablet (L-Polamidon® 5 mg tablets) in comparison with the 5-mg levomethadone hydrochloride oral solution (L-Polamidon® solution for substitution) as reference product.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the relative bioavailability (rBA) between two p.o. 5-mg levomethadone hydrochloride formulations, i.e., L-Polamidon® 5 mg tablets (test) vs. L-Polamidon® solution for substitution (reference). To assess the safety and tolerability of both formulations. SUBJECT AND METHODS: A total of 33 healthy male subjects, aged 29 ± 6 years (BMI: 23.9 ± 2.5 kg/m2) completed this single center, open-label, randomized, 2-period cross-over study with single dose administrations under fasting conditions and coadministration with naltrexone for safety reasons. Administrations of both investigational products were separated by a washout period of at least 2 weeks, i.e., 13 treatmentfree days. The total dose for each subject was 2 x 5 mg resulting in 10 mg levomethadone hydrochloride. For pharmacokinetic evaluation, blood samples were withdrawn until 72 hours postdose. A validated non-stereoselective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy method (LC-MS/MS) was applied for the determination of levomethadone in plasma. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.100 ng/mL. Adverse events were descriptively analyzed in the study population. RESULTS: The geometric means of the parameters related with the extent of total exposure of levomethadone, i.e., AUC(0-tlast) and AUC(0-∞), were 244.422 ng x h/mL and 332.999 ng x h/mL for test and 246.837 ng x h/mL and 329.467 ng×h/mL for reference, respectively. The geometric means of the peak exposure for levomethadone, i.e., Cmax, were 8.923 ng/mL for test and 8.635 ng/mL for reference. The point estimates (PEs) of the Test/Reference (T/R) adjusted geometric mean ratios of AUC(0-last), AUC(0-∞), and C(max) were 99.20%, 101.42%, and 104.11%, respectively, and all of them showed 90%-confidence intervals (CIs) within the range of 80.00 - 125.00% as suggested by regulatory requirements for bioequivalence assessment In total, 21 subjects experienced 55 AEs during the study, the most frequently reported AE, i.e., headache, accounted for 13 out of the total 55 AEs (23.6%) and no AEs of severe intensity were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Bioequivalence could be demonstrated in terms of rate and extent of absorption after administration of test and reference products under naltrexone protection. Concerning the safety evaluation, no negative implications on the possible use of the test formulation could be determined.

The influence of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) molecular weight, concentration and effect of food on in vivo erosion behavior of HPMC matrix tablets.

Four different hydrophilic matrix formulations based on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) were investigated for erosion properties in vivo. Three formulations contained a fixed amount of HPMC (40%) with varying proportions of two HPMC grades with different molecular weights (Methocel K100LV and K4M), and a fourth formulation contained a lower amount of the HPMC of lower molecular weight (20%). The effect of food on the in vivo erosion behavior was investigated on two formulations containing different contents of the same HPMC grade. The in vivo erosion behavior and gastrointestinal transit were investigated using magnetic marker monitoring (MMM). The in vitro and in vivo erosion-time profiles show that the erosion was strongly dependent on the composition of the formulation. The formulations containing a larger proportion of high molecular weight HPMC or higher content of HPMC exhibit relatively slower erosion rate and vice versa. In vivo erosion rates were significantly higher under postprandial administration as compared to fasted state administration. No rapid disintegration of any of the formulations (i.e. formulation failure that can potentially cause dose dumping) was observed.

Bioavailability and pharmacodynamics of two 10-mg estradiol valerate depot formulations following IM single dose administration in healthy postmenopausal volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the bioequivalence (BE) between two i.m. estradiol valerate (E2V) depot formulations, i.e., Estradiol-Depot 10 mg® (test) and Progynon Depot-10® (reference). To compare the effect of both treatments on the vaginal maturation index and on the increase of the endometrial thickness after administration of both formulations. METHODS: A total of 24 postmenopausal females aged 54.7 ± 5.35 year (BMI 25.84 ± 1.98 kg/m2) completed this BE assessment. The investigation was planned and designed as a single center, openlabel, single dose, cross-over study including 2 periods with 2 treatments and 2 sequences. Baseline levels were obtained for all subjects. Single doses of 10-mg E2V of each product were administered and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed over 2 weeks with a washout period of 4 weeks. A gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric method with negative chemical ionization and selected ion monitoring was applied, after validation, for the determination of estradiol (E2), estrone (E1) and internal standard estradiol-D4 derivatives. The cytology of the vaginal smear (parabasal, intermediate and superficial cells from lateral wall opposite tip of cervix) was assessed by investigation of ~ 200 cells. The vaginal maturation index (VMI) was calculated by the equation: VMI (%) = (superficial cells × 1) (%) + (intermediate cells × 0.5) (%). Endometrial thickness was measured by transvaginal ultrasonic scans and recorded in mm. RESULTS: The geometric means (Gmeans) of the measured values of Cmax and AUC0-t for E2 were 543.5 pg/ ml and 84,734 pg × h/ml for test and 505.7 pg/ml and 82,660 pg × h/ml for reference, whereas those for E1 were 219.0 pg/ml and 38,950 pg × h/ml for test and 204.9 pg/ml and 37,159 pg × h/ml for reference, respectively. The point estimates (PEs) of the Test/ Reference (T/R) mean ratios of the variables Cmax and AUC0-t for E2 (measured values) were 107.3% and 102.5%, respectively. The PEs of the T/R mean ratios of the variables Cmax and AUC0-t for E1 (measured values) were 106.9% and 105.0%, respectively. Median endometrial thickness increased in Period I from baseline levels of ~ 3 mm (Day -2) to ~ 7 mm (Day 21) after administration of both products without returning completely to baseline prior to the next administration. In Period II, median values of 7 mm were also reached (Day 21) after administration of both products. Median vaginal maturation indices increased in Period I from baseline levels of ranging from 45 - 60% (Day -2) to 86 - 94.5% (Day 21). In Period II maturation indices of ≥ 90% were calculated as baselines (Day -2) and these levels remained constant until the end of the assessment (Day 21) independently from the products. After 21 days of treatment, test and reference presented practically no differences in terms of their effects on endometrial thickness and vaginal maturation index. CONCLUSIONS: The 95% CIs for the T/R mean ratios of AUC0-t and Cmax for E2 and E1 fell within the acceptance limits of 80 - 125% and therefore bioequivalence could be demonstrated for both formulations. The changes in endometrial thickness and the vaginal maturation index indicated that the pharmacodynamic effect is pronounced already after the first administration and that the effect continued notably for longer time compared to the presence of E2 and E1 in plasma. A 4-week washout phase was insufficient to avoid residual pharmacological effects after the administration of both preparations.

Formulations of fentanyl for the management of pain.

Fentanyl is an opioid initially developed for parenteral administration. While oral administration is not an option due to a high first-pass metabolism, its high potency and lipophilicity have made a number of new routes of administration feasible. The transdermal therapeutic system offers an excellent option for long-term treatment of cancer and chronic pain, achieving stable plasma concentrations over the treatment period. The recent change from reservoir to matrix systems has made these systems more convenient to wear and safer to use, while being bioequivalent. In contrast, the patient-controlled iontophoretic transdermal system has been developed to enable on-demand delivery of transdermal bolus doses of fentanyl to treat postoperative pain. It offers a needle-free system to provide patient-controlled analgesia otherwise offered by intravenous pumps. However, due to technical difficulties the system is currently not clinically available. Oral transmucosal fentanyl utilizes the rapid uptake through the buccal mucosa to achieve high plasma concentrations rapidly and is indicated to treat breakthrough pain in patients who are not opioid-naive. The recently introduced fentanyl buccal tablets offer slightly better pharmacokinetics for the same indication. The intranasal route is another option to achieve rapid uptake of fentanyl, and is currently being investigated to provide acute and breakthrough pain relief. Transpulmonary administration of fentanyl remains experimental and this route of administration is not yet in clinical use. Overall, the specific pharmacological and physicochemical properties of fentanyl have made this compound highly suitable for novel routes of administration in a range of clinical indications.

Comparison of two marketed nifedipine modified-release formulations: an exploratory clinical food interaction study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the in vitro and in vivo characteristics of 2 nifedipine modified-release tablet formulations for once-daily dosing marketed in the European community, which were expected to be bioequivalent. METHODS: In vitro dissolution was tested at different pH values prior to the clinical part of the study. Either 1 tablet of a test formulation or of the reference formulation, both containing 30 mg nifedipine, were administered to healthy white male volunteers immediately after a high-fat breakfast in a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover design. Plasma samples obtained over the subsequent period of 48 hours were analyzed using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Safety profile and tolerability of the study medications were assessed by analysis of adverse events obtained by vital sign measurements, electrocardiography, and clinical laboratory analysis. RESULTS: Twelve volunteers were enrolled (median age, 28.0 years [range, 21-42 years]; mean body mass index, 24.2 kg/m(2) [range, 19.3-27.0 kg/m(2)]). In vitro dissolution experiments revealed a significant pH dependency in drug release from the investigational tablets, while the reference tablets were found to have pH-independent dissolution. After oral administration of both tablet formulations in the fed state, marked differences in rate and extent of bioavailability were observed. Geometric mean of AUC(0-last)(test, 504.21 h x ng/mL; reference, 361.28 h x ng/mL) was significantly higher for the test product, with a point estimate of 140% and a corresponding 90% CI of 121% to 161%. For the comparison of Cmax values, geometric means were: test, 76.46 ng/mL; reference, 19.20 ng/mL, with a point estimate of 398% and a CI of 316% to 503%. Thus, a significant difference in rate and extent of bioavailability was observed between the 2 products. CONCLUSIONS: Although both treatments were well tolerated by all volunteers, the test and reference tablets were found to have different pharmacokinetic properties when administered after a high-fat meal.

Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between steady-state roflumilast and single-dose midazolam in healthy subjects.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of roflumilast, an investigational PDE4 inhibitor for the treatment of COPD and asthma, on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A probe drug midazolam and its major metabolites. METHODS: In an open, randomized (for midazolam treatment sequence) study, 18 healthy male subjects received single doses of midazolam (2 mg oral and 1 mg i.v., 1 day apart) alone, repeated doses of roflumilast (500 microg once daily for 14 days) alone, and repeated doses of roflumilast together with single doses of midazolam (2 mg oral and 1 mg i.v., 1 day apart). RESULTS: A comparison of clearance and peak and systemic exposure to midazolam following administration of roflumilast indicated no effect of roflumilast dosed to steady state on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam. Point estimates (90% CI) were 0.97 (0.84, 1.13) for the AUC of i.v. midazolam and 0.98 (0.82, 1.17) for that of oral midazolam with and without roflumilast. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic steady state concentrations of roflumilast and its N-oxide do not alter the disposition of the CYP3A substrate midazolam in healthy subjects. This finding suggests that roflumilast is unlikely to alter the clearance of drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A4.

Lidocaine 8 mg sore throat lozenges in the treatment of acute pharyngitis. A new therapeutic option investigated in comparison to placebo treatment.

An acute pharyngitis is characterised by mild to severe sore throat mostly accompanied by inflammation, throat pain, pain on swallowing, and burning. This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was conducted for comparison of the efficacy and safety of a newly developed lidocaine (2-(diethylamino)-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl) acetamide, CAS 137-58-6) 8 mg lozenge formulation (Trachisan Halsschmerztabletten) for the treatment of acute sore throat not necessarily to be treated with antibiotics. 240 patients of both genders were enrolled. The study was performed in a single centre setting and consisted of two parts. A 2-h stationary phase (single dose treatment) was directly followed by a 46-h ambulatory phase, where patients were allowed to take up to a maximum of 11 further lozenges (multiple dose treatment). Pain intensity was assessed via Visual Analogue Scale during the course of the study. Moreover, the global efficacy and tolerability of the treatments were assessed. Lidocaine 8 mg sore throat lozenges were found to be superior to placebo for all efficacy parameters investigated. For the primary efficacy parameter, area under the curve of pain intensity from baseline over 2 h (AUC(0-2h)), i.e. after single-dose treatment, a significant treatment difference with a p-value of p < 0.001 in favour of the verum treatment could be demonstrated. Significant superiority could also be demonstrated for the descriptive AUC(0-48h) values, reflecting the treatment effect during the ambulatory multiple dose phase. Pain relief, minimum pain intensity, meaningful pain relief and the time of onset of meaningful pain relief as well as the assessments of global efficacy underlined the superiority of the treatment with lidocaine 8 mg sore throat lozenges. Global tolerability of the verum treatment was rated as "good" or "very good" in the majority of cases, the number of study drug related adverse events was low and evenly distributed to both treatment groups. Therefore, the results of the trial emphasise lidocaine 8 mg sore throat lozenges to be a favourable option in the treatment of pain symptoms of an acute sore throat.

Pharmacokinetic drug interaction profiles of proton pump inhibitors.

Proton pump inhibitors are used extensively for the treatment of gastric acid-related disorders because they produce a greater degree and longer duration of gastric acid suppression and, thus, better healing rates, than histamine H(2) receptor antagonists. The need for long-term treatment of these disorders raises the potential for clinically significant drug interactions in patients receiving proton pump inhibitors and other medications. Therefore, it is important to understand the mechanisms for drug interactions in this setting. Proton pump inhibitors can modify the intragastric release of other drugs from their dosage forms by elevating pH (e.g. reducing the antifungal activity of ketoconazole). Proton pump inhibitors also influence drug absorption and metabolism by interacting with adenosine triphosphate-dependent P-glycoprotein (e.g. inhibiting digoxin efflux) or with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system (e.g. decreasing simvastatin metabolism), thereby affecting both intestinal first-pass metabolism and hepatic clearance. Although interactions based on the change of gastric pH are a group-specific effect and thus may occur with all proton pump inhibitors, individual proton pump inhibitors differ in their propensities to interact with other drugs and the extent to which their interaction profiles have been defined. The interaction profiles of omeprazole and pantoprazole have been studied most extensively. A number of studies have shown that omeprazole carries a considerable potential for drug interactions, since it has a high affinity for CYP2C19 and a somewhat lower affinity for CYP3A4. In contrast, pantoprazole appears to have lower potential for interactions with other medications. Although the interaction profiles of esomeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole have been less extensively investigated, evidence suggests that lansoprazole and rabeprazole seem to have a weaker potential for interactions than omeprazole. Although only a few drug interactions involving proton pump inhibitors have been shown to be of clinical significance, the potential for drug interactions should be taken into account when choosing a therapy for gastric acid-related disorders, especially for elderly patients in whom polypharmacy is common, or in those receiving a concomitant medication with a narrow therapeutic index.

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of denaverine hydrochloride in healthy subjects following intravenous, oral and rectal single doses.

The neurotropic-musculotropic spasmolytic agent denaverine hydrochloride is used mainly in the treatment of smooth muscle spasms of the gastrointestinal and urogenital tract. Despite its commercial availability as a solution for intravenous or intramuscular administration (ampoule) and as a suppository formulation, no pharmacokinetic data in man was available to date. Therefore, the objectives of this clinical trial were to determine the basic pharmacokinetic parameters of denaverine after intravenous administration, to assess the feasibility of using the oral route of administration and to characterise the bioavailability of the suppository formulation. To achieve this, healthy subjects received 50 mg denaverine hydrochloride intravenously, orally and rectally in aqueous solutions and rectally as suppository in an open, randomised crossover design. Total body clearance, volume of distribution at steady-state and half-life of denaverine are 5.7 ml/min per kg, 7.1 l/kg and 33.8 h, respectively. The absolute bioavailability after oral administration of an aqueous solution is 37%. First-pass metabolism leading to the formation of N-monodemethyl denaverine was found to be one reason for the incomplete bioavailability after oral administration. Rectal administration of an aqueous solution of denaverine hydrochloride resulted in a decreased rate (median of C(max) ratios: 26%, difference in median t(max) values: 1.9 h) and extent (31%) of bioavailability compared to oral administration. Using the suppository formulation led to a further reduction in rate (median of C(max) ratios: 30%, difference in median t(max) values: 3 h) and extent (42%) of bioavailability compared to the rectal solution.