Comparing Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori Identification Using Traditional Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Glass Slides With Digital Whole Slide Imaging.

With advancements in the field of digital pathology, there has been a growing need to compare the diagnostic abilities of pathologists using digitized whole slide images against those when using traditional hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained glass slides for primary diagnosis. One of the most common specimens received in pathology practices is an endoscopic gastric biopsy with a request to rule out Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The current standard of care is the identification of the organisms on H&E-stained slides. Immunohistochemical or histochemical stains are used selectively. However, due to their small size (2-4 µm in length by 0.5-1 µm in width), visualization of the organisms can present a diagnostic challenge. The goal of the study was to compare the ability of pathologists to identify H. pylori on H&E slides using a digital platform against the gold standard of H&E glass slides using routine light microscopy. Diagnostic accuracy rates using glass slides vs digital slides were 81% vs 72% (P = .0142) based on H&E slides alone. When H. pylori immunohistochemical slides were provided, the diagnostic accuracy was significantly improved to comparable rates (96% glass vs 99% digital, P = 0.2199). Furthermore, differences in practice settings (academic/subspecialized vs community/general) and the duration of sign-out experience did not significantly impact the accuracy of detecting H. pylori on digital slides. We concluded that digital whole slide images, although amenable in different practice settings and teaching environments, does present some shortcomings in accuracy and precision, especially in certain circumstances and thus is not yet fully capable of completely replacing glass slide review for identification of H. pylori. We specifically recommend reviewing glass slides and/or performing ancillary stains, especially when there is a discrepancy between the degree of inflammation and the presence of microorganisms on digital images.

Crystal-storing Histiocytosis in the Stomach: A Clue to Subtle Hematolymphoid Malignancies.

Crystal-storing histiocytosis (CSH) is an under-recognized entity with a striking association with lymphoproliferative disorders. To study the typical morphologic features of gastric CSH, all lymphomas diagnosed on in-house gastric specimens at The Ohio State University between January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2017 were retrieved. This search yielded 66 specimens from 51 unique patients. All cases were reviewed with CSH identified in 7 stomach biopsies from 4 patients (2 men:2 women; average age, 69 y; range, 56 to 82 y). Endoscopic findings were all abnormal: diffuse nodularity and white discoloration (n=1), patchy nodularity (n=1), and malignant-appearing fundic mass with lymphadenopathy (n=2). We report the typical gastric CSH lesion displays full-thickness expansion of the lamina propria by a lymphohistiocytic infiltrate that distorts the usual gastric glandular architecture. On high power, all cases were defined by the presence of macrophages with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm containing nonrefractile, nonpolarizable fibrillary cytoplasmic inclusions. Three of the 4 patients had a kappa-restricted lymphoma; the 1 patient with a lambda-restricted lymphoma had the fewest macrophages. Follow-up data were available up to 228 weeks. All 4 patients had persistent/recurrent lymphoma, and 2 patients died of lymphoma-related complications. None of the CSH cases were prospectively recognized as CSH, and 1 case was initially misdiagnosed as a xanthoma. In summary, CSH is an under-recognized lesion historically associated with lymphoproliferative disorders and we found associated with a high mortality in this small series. Since CSH can be so florid as to obscure the concomitant lymphoma, awareness is crucial for accurate diagnosis.