Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(7)2024 Mar 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38611004

RESUMEN

(1) Background: Screen-detected breast cancer patients tend to have better survival than patients diagnosed with symptomatic cancer. The main driver of improved survival in screen-detected cancer is detection at earlier stage. An important bias is introduced by lead time, i.e., the time span by which the diagnosis has been advanced by screening. We examine whether there is a remaining survival difference that could be attributable to mode of detection, for example, because of higher quality of care. (2) Methods: Women with a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis in 2000-2022 were included from a population-based cancer registry from Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, which also registers the mode of cancer detection. Mammography screening was available from 2005 onwards. We compared the survival for BC detected by screening with symptomatic BC detection using Kaplan-Meier, unadjusted Cox regressions, and Cox regressions adjusted for age, grading, and UICC stage. Correction for lead time bias was carried out by assuming an exponential distribution of the period during which the tumor is asymptomatic but screen-detectable (sojourn time). We used a common estimate and two recently published estimates of sojourn times. (3) Results: The analysis included 32,169 women. Survival for symptomatic BC was lower than for screen-detected BC (hazard ratio (HR): 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.21-0.25). Adjustment for prognostic factors and lead time bias with the commonly used sojourn time resulted in an HR of 0.84 (CI: 0.75-0.94). Using different sojourn times resulted in an HR of 0.73 to 0.90. (4) Conclusions: Survival for symptomatic BC was only one quarter of screen-detected tumors, which is obviously biased. After adjustment for lead-time bias and prognostic variables, including UICC stage, survival was 27% to 10% better for screen-detected BC, which might be attributed to BC screening. Although this result fits quite well with published results for other countries with BC screening, further sources for residual confounding (e.g., self-selection) cannot be ruled out.

2.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 121(2): 45-51, 2024 Jan 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38054977

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New treatment options for cutaneous melanomas with a poor prognosis have been available since 2011, including immune therapies and targeted drugs. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that these treatments improve survival, but no population- level studies have been available to date. METHODS: All patients in the database of the Center for Cancer Registry Data (Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten) who had a diagnosis of melanoma (ICD10: C43) in the years 2000 to 2019 were included in the study. The relative five-year survival (5YRS) was calculated for four 5-year periods (2000-04, 2005-09, 2010-14, 2015-19). The data were standardized/stratified according to sex, age group, and UICC stage to correct for differences between regions and over time. Regression models were used to detect statistically significant secular trends. RESULTS: 301 486 individuals were included in the study. The overall 5YRS rose from 93% (2000-04) to 95% (2015-19). The 5YRS in 2015-19 was similar to or greater than that in 2000-04 for all subgroups. The largest rises in 5YRS were between 2010-14 and 2015-19, and specifically in advanced stages: for UICC stage IV tumors, the 5YRS rose from 31% to 36%. There was a significant rising trend across the four time periods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The survival of melanoma patients has improved over the past 20 years. From 2010-14 to the most recent period, the largest changes were seen in advanced tumor stages. This favorable development coincided with the introduction of new therapies.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Alemania/epidemiología
3.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21 Suppl 5: 13-20, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The evidence for the benefit of the skin cancer screening introduced in Germany in 2008 is weak. We investigate to what extent data from the German epidemiological cancer registries are suitable to contribute to the evaluation of skin cancer screening and report these evaluation results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Skin cancer-related cancer registry data from 1999-2019 were described in terms of completeness and comprehensiveness. Regional pools with data of different validity were defined, missing data were multiply imputed where appropriate, and temporal trends were analyzed. In addition, data from the cause of death statistics were used. RESULTS: Reliable estimates of completeness are only available for malignant melanoma (ICD-10: C43). Based on a regional data pool covering approximately 21% of the German population, melanoma-related incidence can be validly described since 2005. Sufficient information for multiple imputation is available for T-stage and localization. The trend analyses show incidence changes that can be expected in the short term in the temporal context of the introduction of early detection, which changes into a long-lasting high incidence. The rate of advanced stages does not decrease significantly. From 2014 onwards, the melanoma mortality rate, which had been rising until then, decreases. CONCLUSIONS: Adequately selected and processed cancer registry data are suitable for population-based evaluation of skin cancer screening. An explanation of the persistently high incidence level is not possible based on the cancer registry data. Overdiagnosis or an increase in the background incidence can be considered. The benefit of skin cancer screening remains open.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/epidemiología , Datos de Salud Recolectados Rutinariamente , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Alemania/epidemiología , Incidencia , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Sistema de Registros
6.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21 Suppl 5: 33-40, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063282

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Germany-wide skin cancer screening was introduced in 2008 to reduce skin cancer mortality and morbidity. However, the effectiveness of the program is still unclear. We explore the relationship between early-stage melanoma incidence and melanoma mortality in subsequent years, using early-stage melanoma incidence as surrogate for screening participation and early detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on melanoma incidence for 2005-2016 and melanoma mortality for 2005-2018 were obtained for 244 German counties. We investigated the correlation between several measures of incidence and mortality with correlation analyses and linear regressions. RESULTS: Melanoma incidence of early stages (in situ and T1) rose by 69% between pre-screening (2005-2007) and screening period (2008-2010). In contrast, there was no temporal trend in mortality over time. Correlation coefficients between incidence and mortality variables ranged between -0.14 and 0.10 (not significant). Linear regression indicated that mortality 6 years after screening introduction decreases with increasing change in early-stage incidence (b = -0.0029, 95% confidence interval [-0.0066, 0.0007]). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated population-based effects of skin cancer screening on melanoma mortality were minimal and not significant. A potential effectiveness cannot be demonstrated.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Incidencia , Tamizaje Masivo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Piel/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer
7.
Cost Eff Resour Alloc ; 20(1): 48, 2022 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056371

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Germany, CRT devices with defibrillator capability (CRT-D) have become the predominant treatment strategy for patients with heart failure and cardiac dyssynchrony. However, according to current guidelines, most patients would also be eligible for the less expensive CRT pacemaker (CRT-P). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis for CRT-P devices compared to CRT-D devices from a German payer's perspective. METHODS: Longitudinal health claims data from 3569 patients with de novo CRT implantation from 2014 to 2019 were used to parametrise a cohort Markov model. Model outcomes were costs and effectiveness measured in terms of life years. Transition probabilities were derived from multivariable parametric survival regression that controlled for baseline differences of CRT-D and CRT-P patients. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The Markov model predicted a median survival of 84 months for CRT-P patients and 92 months for CRT-D patients. In the base case, CRT-P devices incurred incremental costs of € - 13,093 per patient and 0.30 incremental life years were lost. The ICER was € 43,965 saved per life year lost. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, uncertainty regarding the effectiveness was observed but not regarding costs. CONCLUSION: This modelling study illustrates the uncertainty of the higher effectiveness of CRT-D devices compared to CRT-P devices. Given the difference in incremental costs between CRT-P and CRT-D treatment, there would be significant potential cost savings to the healthcare system if CRT-D devices were restricted to patients likely to benefit from the additional defibrillator.

8.
Int J Immunogenet ; 46(1): 38-48, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30387553

RESUMEN

Knowledge of the macaque ABO blood group system has been critical in the development of nonhuman primates (NHPs) as a translational model. Serving not only as a useful homologue of the disease-linked ABO system in humans, macaque ABO blood groups must be typed in colonies prior to performing experimental procedures requiring blood transfusion or transplantation. While the rates of blood type incompatibility and the distributions of A, B and AB blood groups are known in large samples of rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus (M. fascicularis) macaques, there is a dearth of blood type data from macaque populations occupying the rhesus-cynomolgus hybrid zone in Southeast Asia. Using molecular phenotyping, we profiled ABO blood group distributions of 232 macaques from 10 populations in the hybrid zone and compared them to pure blood populations of the two species. We found that while these distributions are significantly different in most populations, there was a lack of differentiation between the hybrid and cynomolgus macaques as well as between the Thai and neighbouring populations. This supports a more expansive model of hybridization between rhesus and cynomolgus macaques than often proposed and highlights the increased need for consideration of population genetic structure in biomedical studies that employ macaques as animal models. Additionally, we report an enrichment of indeterminate blood types in the hybrid populations.


Asunto(s)
Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO/genética , Genética de Población , Macaca fascicularis/genética , Macaca mulatta/genética , Sistema del Grupo Sanguíneo ABO/inmunología , Animales , Tipificación y Pruebas Cruzadas Sanguíneas , Humanos , Hibridación Genética , Macaca fascicularis/inmunología , Macaca mulatta/inmunología , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Tailandia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...