Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 72: 58-63, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37481955

RESUMEN

The increasing complexity of ED physician performance measures has resulted in significant challenges, including duplicative and conflicting measures that fail to account for different ED settings. We performed a cross sectional analysis of correlations between measures to characterize their relationships and determine if differences exist between academic versus non-academic ED settings. Pearson correlations were calculated for 12 measures among 220 ED physicians at 11 EDs. Higher admission rate was strongly correlated with higher CT utilization rate (R = 0.7, p < 0.01) and longer room to discharge time (R = 0.7, p < 0.01). Higher patients per hour was strongly correlated with shorter room to doctor time (R = -0.7, p < 0.01). Stronger measure correlations were found in the academic setting compared to the non-academic setting. Strong correlations between ED measures imply opportunities to reduce competing performance demands on clinicians. Differences in correlations at academic versus non-academic settings suggest that it may be inappropriate to apply the same performance standards across settings.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Médicos , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Estudios Transversales
2.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 158(3): 401-408, 2022 09 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35648100

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In the fall of 2020, US medical centers were running out of rapid coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) tests. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an intervention to eliminate rapid test misutilization and to quantify the effect of the countermeasures to control rapid test ordering using a test utilization dashboard. METHODS: Interventions were made to preserve a severely limited supply of rapid diagnostic tests based on real-time analysis of a COVID-19 test utilization dashboard. This study is a retrospective observational study evaluating pre- and postintervention rates of appropriate rapid test use, reporting times, and cost/savings of resources used. RESULTS: This study included 14,462 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction tests ordered during the study period. After the intervention, there was a 27.3% decrease in nonconforming rapid tests. Rapid test reporting time from laboratory receipt decreased by 1.47 hours. The number of days of rapid test inventory on hand increased by 39 days. CONCLUSIONS: Performing diagnostic test stewardship, informed by real-time review of a test utilization dashboard, was associated with significantly improved appropriate utilization of rapid diagnostic COVID-19 tests, improved reporting times, implied cost savings, and improved reagent inventory on hand, which facilitated the management of scarce resources during a pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Indicadores y Reactivos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Am J Disaster Med ; 16(2): 85-93, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34392521

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: During pandemics, emergency departments (EDs) are challenged by the need to replace quarantined ED staff and avoid staffing EDs with nonemergency medicine (EM) trained physicians. We sought to design and examine three feasible ED staffing models intended to safely schedule EM physicians to staff three EDs within a health system during a prolonged infectious disease outbreak. METHODS: We conducted simulation analyses examining the strengths and limitations of three ED clinician staffing models: two-team and three-team fixed cohort, and three-team unfixed cohort. Each model was assessed with and without immunity, and by varying infection rates. We assumed a 12-week pandemic disaster requiring a 2-week quarantine. MAIN OUTCOME: The outcome, time to staffing shortage, was defined as depletion of available physicians in both 8- and 12-hour shift duration scenarios. RESULTS: All staffing models initially showed linear physician attrition with higher infection rates resulting in faster staffing shortages. The three-team fixed cohort model without immunity was not viable beyond 11 weeks. The three-team unfixed cohort model without immunity avoided staffing shortage for the duration of the pandemic up to an infection rate of 50 percent. The two-team model without immunity also avoided staffing shortage up to 30 percent infection rate. When accounting for immunity, all models behaved similarly initially but returned to adequate staffing during week 5 of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation analyses reveal fundamental tradeoffs that are critical to designing feasible pandemic disaster staffing models. Emergency physicians should test similar models based on local assumptions and capacity to ensure adequate staffing preparedness for prolonged pandemics.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Médicos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Recursos Humanos
4.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(20): e017208, 2020 10 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33047624

RESUMEN

Background Despite investments to improve quality of emergency care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), few studies have described national, real-world trends in AMI care in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to describe trends in the epidemiology and quality of AMI care in US EDs over a recent 11-year period, from 2005 to 2015. Methods and Results We conducted an observational study of ED visits for AMI using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative probability sample of US EDs. AMI visits were classified as ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI. Outcomes included annual incidence of AMI, median ED length of stay, ED disposition type, and ED administration of evidence-based medications. Annual ED visits for AMI decreased from 1 493 145 in 2005 to 581 924 in 2015. Estimated yearly incidence of ED visits for STEMI decreased from 1 402 768 to 315 813. The proportion of STEMI sent for immediate, same-hospital catheterization increased from 12% to 37%. Among patients with STEMI sent directly for catheterization, median ED length of stay decreased from 62 to 37 minutes. ED administration of antithrombotic and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents rose for STEMI (23%-31% and 10%-27%, respectively). Conclusions National, real-world trends in the epidemiology of AMI in the ED parallel those of clinical registries, with decreases in AMI incidence and STEMI proportion. ED care processes for STEMI mirror evolving guidelines that favor high-intensity antiplatelet therapy, early invasive strategies, and regionalization of care.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Triaje/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Emerg Med J ; 37(8): 463-466, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32581052

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to rapid changes in community and healthcare delivery policies creating new and unique challenges to managing ED pandemic response efforts. One example is the practice of social distancing in the workplace as an internationally recommended non-pharmaceutical intervention to reduce transmission. While attention has been focused on public health measures, healthcare workers cannot overlook the transmission risk they present to their colleagues and patients. Our network of three EDs are all high traffic areas for both patients and staff, which makes the limitation of close person-to-person contact particularly difficult to achieve. To design, implement and communicate contact reduction changes in the ED workplace, our COVID-19 task force formalised a set of multidisciplinary recommendations that enumerated concrete ways to reduce healthcare worker transmission to coworkers and to patients from ED patient arrival to discharge. We also addressed staff-to-staff contact reduction strategies when not performing direct patient care. We describe our conceptual approach and successful implementation of workplace distancing.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Control de Infecciones , Relaciones Interpersonales , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Lugar de Trabajo/organización & administración , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Innovación Organizacional , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Formulación de Políticas , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...