Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Intensive Care Med ; 32(2): 158-162, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28103769

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors associated with inappropriate continuation of neuroleptics postdischarge from the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed including all patients greater than 18 years of age who received neuroleptic medications in an ICU. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients were included during the 12- month study period. There were 85 (53%) patients discharged from the ICU with inappropriate continuation of a neuroleptic medication. There were 54 (34%) patients discharged from the hospital with inappropriate continuation of a neuroleptic medication. Patients were more likely to be discharged from the ICU with an inappropriate neuroleptic if they were prescribed multiple neuroleptics ( P = .02), did not have a urine drug screen collected at admission ( P = .023), or if trazodone was utilized in their therapy ( P = .004). Patients were more likely to be discharged from the hospital with a neuroleptic if they had multiple neuroleptic orders ( P = .0001) or if trazodone was utilized in their therapy ( P = .0023). CONCLUSION: Risk factors associated with the continuation of inappropriate neuroleptic medications upon discharge from the ICU or the hospital include multiple neuroleptic medications prescribed, the lack of a urine drug screen upon admission, and the utilization of trazodone.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Ther Adv Respir Dis ; 9(6): 302-12, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26294418

RESUMEN

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a syndrome of acute lung injury that is characterized by noncardiogenic pulmonary edema and severe hypoxemia second to a pathogenic impairment of gas exchange. Despite significant advances in the area, mortality remains high among ARDS patients. High mortality and a limited spectrum of therapeutic options have left clinicians searching for alternatives, spiking interest in selective pulmonary vasodilators (SPVs). Despite the lack of robust evidence, SPVs are commonly employed for their therapeutic role in improving oxygenation in patients who have developed refractory hypoxemia in ARDS. While inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) also impacts arterial oxygenation by decreasing ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) mismatching and pulmonary shunt flow, this effect is not different from inhaled nitric oxide (iNO). The most effective and safest dose for yielding a clinically significant increase in PaO2 and reduction in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) appears to be 20-30 ng/kg/min in adults and 30 ng/kg/min in pediatric patients. iEPO appears to have a ceiling effect above these doses in which no additional benefit may be derived. iNO and iEPO have shown similar efficacy profiles; however, they differ with respect to cost and ease of therapeutic administration. The most beneficial effects of iEPO have been seen in adult patients with secondary ARDS as compared with primary ARDS, most likely due to the difference in etiology of the two disease states, and in patients suffering from baseline right ventricular heart failure. Although iEPO has demonstrated improvements in hemodynamic parameters and oxygenation in ARDS patients, due to the limited number of randomized clinical trials and the lack of studies investigating mortality, the use of iEPO cannot be recommended as standard of care in ARDS. iEPO should be reserved for those refractory to traditional therapies.


Asunto(s)
Epoprostenol/administración & dosificación , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Circulación Pulmonar/efectos de los fármacos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Vasodilatación/efectos de los fármacos , Vasodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Administración por Inhalación , Factores de Edad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Esquema de Medicación , Costos de los Medicamentos , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Epoprostenol/efectos adversos , Epoprostenol/economía , Humanos , Pulmón/irrigación sanguínea , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Recuperación de la Función , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/economía , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/efectos adversos , Fármacos del Sistema Respiratorio/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasodilatadores/efectos adversos , Vasodilatadores/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...