Effect of an Inflatable Colon on Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Intent Among Male Attendees at State Fairs in Two Midwestern States, 2023.

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most-diagnosed cancer among men and women in the US. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of an interactive inflatable colon exhibit on CRC knowledge and screening intent among men attending state fairs in 2 midwestern states. Methods: At the 2023 state fairs in 2 midwestern states, eligible participants (men aged 18-75 y who could speak and read English and resided in 1 of the 2 states) completed a presurvey, an unguided tour of the inflatable Super Colon, and a postsurvey. Primary outcomes were changes in knowledge (actual and perceived) and CRC screening intent from presurvey to postsurvey. We used χ2 tests to examine differences in survey results between the 2 sites and the association between demographic characteristics and behaviors (knowledge and intentions) before entering the Super Colon exhibit. We used the McNemar test to examine differences in presurvey to postsurvey distributions. Results: The study sample (N = 940) comprised 572 men at site A (60.8%) and 368 men at site B (39.2%). Except for 1 question, baseline CRC knowledge was relatively high. Greater perceived knowledge was inversely associated with greater actual knowledge. After touring the Super Colon, participants improved their actual knowledge of CRC prevention and self-perceived CRC knowledge. Most participants (95.4%) agreed that the Super Colon was effective for teaching people about CRC. Conclusion: These findings emphasize the role of community-based educational initiatives in encouraging CRC screening uptake and increasing research participation among men and affirm that the inflatable colon is as an effective educational tool for increasing CRC knowledge and encouraging early-detection screening behavior among men.

Sociocultural and masculinity influences on colorectal cancer screening participation among Hispanic/Latino men in Florida, New York, and Texas.

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional study explored how masculinity beliefs may influence colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participation among ethnic subgroups of screening-age-eligible (45-75 years) Hispanic/Latino men. METHODS: Using a consumer panel, we recruited self-identified Hispanic/Latino men fluent in English or Spanish, and residing in Florida, New York, or Texas. The Masculinity Barriers to Medical Care (MBMC) scale and its six subscales were used to assess masculinity beliefs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between MBMC and CRC screening participation, adjusting for Hispanic/Latino subgroup, marital status, survey language, age group, and health insurance status. Results were then stratified by Hispanic/Latino subgroup. RESULTS: Of the participants (n=611), approximately 31% identified as Puerto Rican, 30% as other Hispanic/Latino, 26% as Mexican, and 14% as Cuban; 63% had ever been screened for CRC. We found no differences in the prevalence of screening participation by Hispanic/Latino subgroup. The majority of participants had completed both a stool-based test and an exam-based screening test (29.3%). After adjusting for confounding, MBMC reduced the odds of screening participation. Slight MBMC-subscale differences were observed by Hispanic/Latino subgroup. For example, higher scores on the Restrictive Emotionality subscale were associated with a lower likelihood of screening participation among Puerto Rican men, but higher odds of screening for Cuban men. CONCLUSIONS: Masculinity barriers to CRC screening may exist. Tailored interventions to address masculinity barriers among specific Latino subgroups may improve CRC screening uptake in this population.

#CRCandMe: results of a pre-post quasi-experimental study of a mass media campaign to increase early-onset colorectal cancer awareness in Utah and Wisconsin.

Overall colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have been decreasing for several decades; however, since the early 1990s CRC incidence rates have nearly doubled among adults aged under 50 years. This study pilot-tested a community-based mass-media campaign aimed at improving knowledge and awareness of early-onset CRC in this population. The campaign (#CRCandMe) was deployed from June to September 2023 in Utah and Wisconsin. To evaluate its success (reach) and inform future campaigns, key performance indicators were defined (e.g., impressions, website traffic). To evaluate change in knowledge in the target population, the knowledge and awareness of participants recruited via consumer panels was assessed at baseline (n=235) and follow-up (n=161). The number of correct answers for each of seven knowledge items was calculated at baseline (pre-intervention) and follow-up (post-intervention). McNemar's test was employed to assess significant differences in the seven knowledge items between the two timepoints. The campaign delivered over 26.7 million impressions and nearly 43,000 clicks. A 15-second video ad received 221,985 plays, with 57,270 users watching to completion. Pre-survey results revealed that while 74% of participants were able to correctly identify CRC signs, only 18% could identify risk factors. Knowledge scores slightly improved from baseline to follow-up, with statistically significance for the question related to CRC signs (P=0.0004). This study demonstrated wide reach and may inform future larger-scale interventions and public health initiatives aimed at reducing CRC incidence and improving health outcomes for at-risk adults aged under 50 years.

Impact of Quitline Services on Tobacco Cessation: An Application of Modern Epidemiological Methods.

This study investigated the effectiveness of quitline service intensity (high vs. low) on past 30-day tobacco abstinence at 7-months follow-up, using observational data from the Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline (OTH) between April 2020 and December 2021. To assess the impact of loss to follow-up and non-random treatment assignment, we fit the parameters of a marginal structural model to estimate inverse probability weights for censoring (IPCW) and treatment (IPTW) and combined (IPCTW). The Risk Ratio (RR) was estimated using modified Poisson regression with robust variance estimator. Of the 4,695 individuals included in the study, 64% received high-intensity cessation services, and 53% were lost to follow-up. Using the conventional complete case analysis (responders only), high-intensity cessation services were associated with abstinence (RR=1.18; 95 CI: 1.04, 1.34). The effect estimate was attenuated after accounting for censoring (RR=1.14; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.30). After adjusting for both baseline confounding and selection bias via IPTCW, high-intensity cessation services were associated with 1.23 times (95% CI: 1.08, 1.41) the probability of abstinence compared to low-intensity services. Despite relatively high loss to follow-up, accounting for selection bias and confounding did not notably impact quit rates or the relationship between intensity of quitline services and tobacco cessation among OTH participants.

Cannabis Use and Subsequent CIGARETTE Discontinuation among U.S. Adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, Waves 1-5.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the association between current co-use of cannabis and cigarettes in the past 30 days, and subsequent cigarette discontinuation (past 30-day point prevalence abstinence) among U.S. adults with established cigarette use in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Additionally, we investigated the impact of co-use on the subsequent discontinuation of all combustible tobacco products. METHODS: A total of 26,381 observations contributed by 8,218 adults with established cigarette use (i.e., smoked ≥ 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, and currently smoking cigarettes every day or some days) from Waves 1-5 of the PATH Study were included in the analysis. Weighted Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) models were used to evaluate the association between current co-use at baseline (Waves 1-4) with the outcomes assessed at the subsequent wave (cigarette and combustible tobacco discontinuation at Waves 2-5). Final models included: demographic characteristics (age, sex, race and ethnicity, educational attainment), behavior characteristics (intention to quit, internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, substance use problems), and wave-pair. RESULTS: Over one-third (35.91%) of cigarette users self-reported co-use during the study period. Cannabis use among adults with established cigarette use increased over time. Co-use was associated with a decreased odds of cigarette smoking discontinuation at follow-up, after adjusting for covariates (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.93; p=0.0018). Similar effect sizes were observed for discontinuation of all combustible tobacco products (aOR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.86; p<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis use among adults who smoke cigarettes was inversely related to subsequent cigarette discontinuation, suggesting that co-use may reduce likelihood of successful tobacco cessation. IMPLICATIONS: Findings demonstrate that cannabis use may lead to lower odds of discontinuation among adults with established cigarette use; therefore, individuals that co-use cigarettes and cannabis may need additional tobacco cessation support. Notably, this study observed an increase in co-use of cigarettes and cannabis, emphasizing the need for researchers and public health programs to shift their focus towards understanding and addressing concurrent substance use among adults who smoke cigarettes.

Investigation of Geographical Disparities: The Use of An Interpolation Method For Cancer Registry Data.

The American Cancer Society estimated 1.9 million diagnosed cancer cases and 608,570 cancer deaths in 2021 in the US; for Oklahoma, they estimated 22,820 cases and 8,610 deaths. This project aimed to demonstrate a method to systematically describe cancer in an accurate and visually attractive, yet simple to make, interpolated map using ZIP Code level registry data, as it is the smallest area unit with high accuracy using inverse distance weighting. We describe a process of creating smoothed maps with an appropriate, well-described, simple, replicable method. These smoothed maps display low (cold) or high (hot) areas of incidence rates of: (a) all cancer combined, (b) colorectal cancer and lung cancer rates by gender, (c) female breast cancer, and (d) prostate cancer, by ZIP Codes for Oklahoma from 2013-2017. The methods we present in this paper provide an effective visualization to pinpoint low (cold) or high (hot) areas of cancer incidence.

Population and Neighborhood Correlates of Cannabis Dispensary Locations in Oklahoma.

Background: Cannabis dispensaries have proliferated exponentially in Oklahoma since the state legalized medical cannabis in 2018. Oklahoma is unique from many other legalized states given its high number of lower income, rural, and uninsured residents, who may seek medical cannabis as an alternative to traditional medical treatment. Methods: This study examined demographic and neighborhood characteristics associated with dispensary density (n = 1,046 census tracts) in Oklahoma. Results: Compared to census tracts with no dispensaries, those with at least one dispensary had a higher proportion of uninsured individuals living below the poverty level and a greater number of hospitals and pharmacies. Almost half (42.35%) of census tracts with at least one dispensary were classified as a rural locale. In fully adjusted models, percent uninsured, percent of household rentals, and the number of schools and pharmacies were positively associated with greater number of cannabis dispensaries, while the number of hospitals was negatively associated. In the best fitting interaction models, dispensaries were predominant in areas with a higher percentage of uninsured residents and no pharmacies, suggesting that cannabis retailers may capitalize on the health needs of communities with limited healthcare outlets or access to medical treatment. Conclusions: Policies and regulatory actions that seek to decrease disparities in dispensary locations should be considered. Future studies should examine whether people living in communities with a scarcity of health resources are more likely to associate cannabis with medical uses than those living in communities with more resources.

Cannabis use among cancer survivors in 22 states: Results from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2020.

BACKGROUND: This study identified factors associated with recent cannabis use and cannabis use for medical purposes among cancer survivors relative to individuals without a history of cancer. METHODS: Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were analyzed for the 22 states completing the optional cannabis module in 2020. Weighted multiple logistic regression was performed to explore variables associated with past 30-day cannabis use and cannabis use for medical purposes, stratified by history of cancer. Covariates included state-level cannabis policy, sociodemographic characteristics, health status indicators, and substance use. RESULTS: Cannabis use was lower among cancer survivors compared to individuals with no history of cancer (7.57% vs. 10.83%). However, a higher proportion of cancer survivors reported use for medical purposes (82.23% vs. 62.58%). After adjusting for state-level policy, biological sex, age, educational attainment, self-reported race/ethnicity, home ownership, mental health status and physical health status, current smoking (odds ratio [OR], 5.14 vs. 3.74) and binge drinking (OR, 2.71 vs. 2.69) were associated with cannabis use in both groups. Characteristics associated with medical cannabis use varied for the two groups; however, daily use (20-30 days; OR, 1.72 vs. 2.43) was associated with cannabis use for medical purposes in both groups after adjusting for other variables in the model. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of individuals report cannabis use for medical purposes with higher rates among cancer survivors. Findings support the urgent need for ongoing cannabis research to better understand and inform its use for medical purposes, as well as the development of high-quality standardized education materials and clinical practice guidelines.

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to undertake a comprehensive systematic review to describe multilevel factors (barriers and facilitators) that may influence the implementation of low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening in the United States. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were performed using 6 online databases and citation indexes for peer-reviewed studies, for articles published from 2013 to 2021. Studies were classified into 3 perspectives, based on the study's unit of analysis: system, health-care provider, and patient. Barriers and facilitators identified for each study included in our final review were then coded and categorized using the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains. RESULTS: At the system level, the 2 most common constructs were external policy and incentives and executing the implementation process. At the provider level, the most common constructs were evidence strength and quality of the intervention characteristics, patient needs and resources, implementation climate, and an individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention. At the patient level, the most common constructs were patient needs and resources, individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, and engaging in the implementation process. These constructs can act as facilitators or barriers to lung cancer screening implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains and constructs to understand and specify factors facilitating uptake of lung cancer screening as well as cataloging the lessons learned from previous efforts helps inform the development and implementation processes of lung cancer screening programs in the community setting. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021247677.

Inequalities in Tobacco Retailer Compliance Violations Across the State of Oklahoma, 2015-2019.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between compliance check violations, and characteristics of the tobacco retailer and neighborhood social vulnerability in Oklahoma. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study utilized the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Compliance Check Inspections of Tobacco Product Retailers database for 2015-2019. These data were combined with Neighborhood social vulnerability variables using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index. SETTING: The setting of this study is the state of Oklahoma, USA. OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome variable for this analysis was whether a sale was made to the youth during the compliance check (e.g., violation; yes/no) regardless of the outcome of the violation, and number of violations per a retailer. RESULTS: We observed a strong association between having a violation and retailer store type, after controlling for socioeconomic vulnerability and percentage of mobile homes. The proportion of a tobacco retailer's violations also varied by store type. CONCLUSIONS: More targeted enforcements and retailer education by store type may be necessary to increase compliance.

Barriers and Factors Associated with HPV Vaccination Among American Indians and Alaska Natives: A Systematic Review.

American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons bear a disproportionate burden of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers and face unique challenges to HPV vaccination. We undertook a systematic review to synthesize the available evidence on HPV vaccination barriers and factors among AI/AN persons in the United States. We searched fourteen bibliographic databases, four citation indexes, and six gray literature sources from July 2006 to January 2021. We did not restrict our search by study design, setting, or publication type. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts (stage 1) and full-text (stage 2) of studies for selection. Both reviewers then independently extracted data using a data extraction form and undertook quality appraisal and bias assessment using the modified Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We conducted thematic synthesis to generate descriptive themes. We included a total of 15 records after identifying 3017, screening 1415, retrieving 203, and assessing 41 records. A total of 21 unique barriers to HPV vaccination were reported across 15 themes at the individual (n = 12) and clinic or provider (n = 3) levels. At the individual level, the most common barriers to vaccination-safety and lack of knowledge about the HPV vaccine-were each reported in the highest number of studies (n = 9; 60%). The findings from this review signal the need to develop interventions that target AI/AN populations to increase the adoption and coverage of HPV vaccination. Failure to do so may widen disparities.

Factors associated with low-dose CT lung cancer screening participation in a high burden state: Results from the 2017-2018 BRFSS.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to examine low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS) eligibility, utilization, and factors associated with self-reported participation among eligible individuals. METHODS: Data from the 2017 and 2018 Oklahoma Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) were used and analysis was restricted to data from individuals eligible for screening based on the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Analyses using recursive partitioning and weighted logistic regression were conducted from November 2019 to March 2020. The final study sample consisted of 596 respondents. RESULTS: Only 10.84 % of participants reported LCS participation. Differences in participation by sex were observed. Among males, those with COPD were more likely to report participating in screening. Among females, those who self-reported their health status as "fair or worse" were more likely to participate in LCS. CONCLUSION: Rates of utilization were higher in this study than in earlier estimates; however, utilization of LCS remains suboptimal. Although LCS participation rates were similar for males and females, differences were observed by sex. Opportunities exist to increase screening participation among eligible individuals, and findings from this study can be used for program planning such as patient engagement resources and effective clinical decision support. POLICY STATEMENT: This study further demonstrates the complex nature of cancer screening participation, specifically LDCT LCS. Under the current USPSTF guidelines only a small proportion of the population is considered eligible thus to prevent lung cancer mortality, the eligibility criteria regarding smoking history and screening age may need to be reevaluated. Furthermore, this study adds to the evidence that strategies to increase screening participation among eligible individuals may need to differ by sex.

HPV vaccination and Native Americans: protocol for a systematic review of factors associated with HPV vaccine uptake among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: The nine-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine could prevent an estimated 92% of the cancers attributable to HPV types targeted by the vaccine. However, uptake of the HPV vaccine among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adolescents has been low. AI/ANs also bear a disproportionate burden of cervical and other HPV-associated cancers. Increasing HPV vaccination rates is a national priority, but reviews and national surveys on HPV vaccination factors are lacking for the AI/AN population. The objective of this systematic review is to assess factors associated with HPV vaccination among AI/ANs in the USA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review is proposed to synthesise the current literature on HPV vaccination factors in AI/ANs from 1 July 2006 until 30 September 2019. As applicable, controlled vocabulary terms, keywords and special features (eg, limits, explode and focus) will be incorporated into database searches. To maximise the identification of relevant studies, citation indexes and databases that index dissertations, preprints and grey literature are included. Studies will be screened and selected independently in two stages. In stage 1, titles and abstracts will be screened. In stage 2, full-text articles will be screened and selected. A data extraction form and quality assessment tool will be piloted, revised and implemented. If available, measures of frequency and association will be presented. A narrative synthesis of the included studies will also be undertaken and reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As our review will use publicly available data and publications, an Institutional Review Board review will not be required. We will disseminate the findings from this review through peer-reviewed publication(s) and conference presentation(s). POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS: In the event of amendments to the protocol, we will provide the date, rationale, and description of the change for each amendment. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020156865.

Comparison of Urban and Rural Physical Activity and Outdoor Play Environments of Childcare Centers and Family Childcare Homes.

The purpose of this study was to examine the physical activity environment in childcare programs across type (childcare centers [CCCs] and family childcare homes [FCCHs]) and geographic location (urban and rural) as assessed by physical activity best practices according to the Go Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-assessment in Child Care. Results showed CCCs compared with FCCHs reported higher achievement of best practices. Further, urban childcare programs (CCCs and FCCHs) reported higher achievement of best practices in comparison to rural childcare programs. There is a need to deliver targeted interventions that promote children's physical activity in FCCHs and CCCs in rural areas.

Impact of Initiating Screening Programs on Referral and Management of Cervical Cancer in Tanzania.

PURPOSE: We investigated the impact of screening rural patients on referral and management of cervical cancer in Tanzania. METHODS: After reviewing more than 10,000 medical records of patients with cervical cancer who visited Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) from 2005 to 2014, 108 patients were from the rural communities of Bagamoyo and Chalinze. We abstracted demographic, clinical, and lifestyle factors and linked the data set to databases of all 1,151 patients who visited the Bagamoyo screening clinic from 2011 to 2014 and 1,273 patients who visited the Chalinze screening clinic from 2012 to 2014. RESULTS: After initiation of the rural screening clinics, difference in duration from diagnosis to prescribed treatment increased from 50.5 to 88 days (P = .030), and duration from referral to treatment increased from 38.6 to 101.3 days (P = .041). Proportion of patients who received combination chemoradiotherapy increased from 34.3% to 69% (P = .001) and completion of treatment decreased from 94.4% to 72.41% (P = .002) after initiation of the ORCI screening clinic. Patients who visited Muhimbili National Hospital had significantly shorter periods between referral and prescribed treatment than patients who did not use the Muhimbili National Hospital (mean ± standard deviation, 49.4 ± 128.8 and 112.1 ± 195.31 days, respectively; P = .010). Patients who were treated at ORCI had significantly shorter periods between diagnosis and referral to treatment (mean ± standard deviation, 31.4 ± 62.35 and 36.4 ± 121.79 days, respectively; P = .005). CONCLUSION: Future research should focus on investigating barriers to seeking cancer care, benefits of chemoradiotherapy in this population considering the change in prescribed treatment, and time until diagnosis and treatment. Prescription of complex treatments that require more visits to treatment centers may also contribute to decline in completion of treatment.

Assessing Workplace Health and Safety Strategies, Trends, and Barriers through a Statewide Worksite Survey.

Chronic diseases have added to the economic burden of the U.S. healthcare system. Most Americans spend most of their waking time at work, thereby, presenting employers with an opportunity to protect and promote health. The purpose of this study was to assess the implementation of workplace health governance and safety strategies among worksites in the State of Nebraska, over time and by industry sector using a randomized survey. Weighted percentages were compared by year, industry sector, and worksite size. Over the three study periods, 4784 responses were collected from worksite representatives. Adoption of workplace health governance and planning strategies increased over time and significantly varied across industry sector groups. Organizational safety policies varied by industry sector and were more commonly reported than workplace health governance and planning strategies. Time constraints were the most common barrier among worksites of all sizes, and stress was reported as the leading employee health issue that negatively impacts business. Results suggest that opportunities exist to integrate workplace health and safety initiatives, especially in blue-collar industry sectors and small businesses.

A Qualitative Exploration of a Worksite Wellness Mini-Grant Program.

Mini-grant programs are an increasingly popular method for outside organizations (eg, non-profits, state agencies) to support wellness initiatives. However, little is known about mini-grant programs in worksites. The present study explored the implementation and outcomes of a worksite wellness mini-grant program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 wellness champions representing 12 worksites that were involved in a mini-grant program over a 4-year span. Interviews focused on general use, barriers and facilitators, and outcomes of the mini-grant initiatives. Mini-grants were generally used to support a short-term activity, such as purchasing food, which was not allowed per grant funding, or supporting a one-time event-this type of use diverged from recommended use of funds. Participants reported that outcomes from the mini-grant initiates were largely positive, highlighting culture shifts and increased awareness/perception of employer support for wellness. Barriers included culture (eg, employee attitudes, motivation), environment (eg, infrastructure, weather), and worksite characteristics (eg, multiple locations, number of employees), while facilitators included employee interest and involvement, established wellness culture, awareness and accessibility (eg, providing options, education), and support (eg, employer support, support from outside organizations). There was overlap between certain barriers and facilitators, indicating key areas of focus for future research and mini-grant programs.

Improving the nutrition and screen time environment through self-assessment in family childcare homes in Nebraska.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if family childcare homes (FCCH) in Nebraska meet best practices for nutrition and screen time, and if focusing on nutrition and screen time policies and practices improves the FCCH environment. DESIGN: A pre-post evaluation was conducted using the Go Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Childcare (Go NAP SACC). SETTING: FCCH in Nebraska, USA. SUBJECTS: FCCH enrolled in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP; n 208) participated in a pre-post evaluation using Go NAP SACC. RESULTS: At baseline, all FCCH met the minimum childcare standards for fifty-four of fifty-six practices in nutrition and screen time. After the intervention, FCCH demonstrated significant improvement in fourteen of the forty-four Child Nutrition items and eleven of the twelve Screen Time items. However, FCCH providers did not meet best practices at post-intervention. Lowest scores were found in serving meals family-style, promoting visible support for healthy eating, planned nutrition education and written policy on child nutrition. For screen time, lowest scores were reported on the availability of television, offering families education on screen time and having a written policy on screen time. CONCLUSIONS: FCCH in Nebraska were able to strengthen their policies and practices after utilizing Go NAP SACC. Continued professional development and participation in targeted interventions may assist programmes in sustaining improved practices and policies. Considering the varying standards and policies surrounding FCCH, future studies comparing the current findings with childcare centres and non-CACFP programmes are warranted.

Improving the Physical Activity and Outdoor Play Environment of Family Child Care Homes in Nebraska Through Go Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine if the Go Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment in Child Care (Go NAP SACC) intervention was effective in improving best practices in the areas of infant and child physical activity and outdoor play and learning in family child care homes (FCCHs) in Nebraska. METHODS: FCCHs (n = 201) participated in a pre-post evaluation using the Infant and Child Physical Activity and Outdoor Play and Learning assessments from the Go NAP SACC validated measure to assess compliance with best practices. RESULTS: At post, FCCHs demonstrated significant differences in 85% of the Infant and Child Physical Activity items (17 of 20) and 80% of the Outdoor Play and Learning items (12 of 15). Significant differences in best practices between urban and rural FCCH providers were also found. CONCLUSION: Go NAP SACC appears to be an effective intervention in Nebraska as, after participation in the initiative, providers were improving child care physical activity best practices. Additional research is needed to objectively determine if these changes resulted in objective improvements in children's physical activity levels. Further, efforts are needed to develop and/or identify geographic-specific resources for continued improvement.