Cumulative epinephrine dose during cardiac arrest and neurologic outcome after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine is recommended without an apparent ceiling dosage during cardiac arrest. However, excessive alpha- and beta-adrenergic stimulation may contribute to unnecessarily high aortic afterload, promote post-arrest myocardial dysfunction, and result in cerebral microvascular insufficiency in patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥ 18 years) who received ECPR at large academic ECMO center from 2018 to 2022. Patients were grouped based on the amount of epinephrine given during cardiac arrest into low (≤ 3 mg) and high (> 3 mg) groups. The primary endpoint was neurologic outcome at hospital discharge, defined by cerebral performance category (CPC). Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between cumulative epinephrine dosage during arrest and neurologic outcome. RESULTS: Among 51 included ECPR cases, the median age of patients was 60 years, and 55% were male. The mean cumulative epinephrine dose administered during arrest was 6.2 mg but ranged from 0 to 24 mg. There were 18 patients in the low-dose (≤ 3 mg) and 25 patients in the high-dose (> 3 mg) epinephrine groups. Favorable neurologic outcome at discharge was significantly greater in the low-dose (55%) compared to the high-dose (24%) group (p = 0.025). After adjusting for age, those who received higher doses of epinephrine during the arrest were more likely to have unfavorable neurologic outcomes at hospital discharge (odds ratio 4.6, 95% CI 1.3, 18.0, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: After adjusting for age, cumulative epinephrine doses above 3 mg during cardiac arrest may be associated with unfavorable neurologic outcomes after ECPR and require further investigation.

Unresponsiveness of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Bivalirudin in Adults Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the standard for monitoring bivalirudin but demonstrates a nonlinear response at higher drug concentrations. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between bivalirudin dose and aPTT in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to determine a threshold where aPTT unresponsiveness occurs. Two hundred fourteen adults receiving bivalirudin during ECMO between 2018 and 2022 were included. Piecewise regression in a linear mixed effects model was used to determine a bivalirudin dose threshold of 0.21 mg/kg/hr for aPTT unresponsiveness. For doses of less than 0.21 mg/kg/hr (n = 135), every 0.1 mg/kg/hr dose increase led to an aPTT increase of 11.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.85-13.20) seconds compared to only a 3.81 (95% CI = 1.55-6.06) seconds increase when dose was greater than or equal to 0.21 mg/kg/hr (n = 79) ( pinteraction < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, venovenous configuration (odds ratio [OR] = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.38-5.77) and higher fibrinogen concentration (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.05-1.42) were associated with greater odds of unresponsiveness, whereas older age (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.63-0.98), kidney dysfunction (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.25-0.92), and a higher baseline aPTT (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.82-0.97) were associated with lower odds. Alternative methods are necessary to ascertain bivalirudin's hemostatic impact when doses exceed 0.21 mg/kg/hr during ECMO.

Acute kidney injury in patients before and after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) - Retrospective longitudinal analysis of the hospital outcomes.

PURPOSE: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) occurs in up to 85% of patients managed by ECMO support. Limited data are available comparing the outcomes among patients who develop AKI before and after ECMO initiation. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal observational study was performed on all adult patients placed on ECMO from January 2000 to December 2015 at our institution. Longitudinal multivariate logistic regressional analysis was performed to identify the variables that are associated with the outcome measures (post-ECMO AKI and in-hospital mortality). RESULTS: A total of 329 patients were included in our analysis in which AKI occurred in 176 (53%) and 137 (42%) patients before and after ECMO, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, increasing age, pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD), increasing bilirubin, decreasing fibrinogen, and use of LVAD had significant association with post-ECMO AKI. In-hospital mortality was seen in 128 out of 176 (73%) patients in the pre-ECMO AKI group and 32 out of 137 (42%) in the post-ECMO AKI group. In the multivariate analysis, age, interstitial lung disease, pre-ECMO AKI, and post-ECMO RRT requirement were independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: AKI before ECMO initiation and the need for RRT post-ECMO are independently associated with poor patient survival.

The use of flumazenil for benzodiazepine associated respiratory depression in postanesthesia recovery: risks and outcomes / O uso de flumazenil para depressão respiratória associada ao benzodiazepínico na recuperação pós-anestésica: riscos e resultados

Abstract Background and objectives The primary aim was to determine risk factors for flumazenil administration during postanesthesia recovery. A secondary aim was to describe outcomes among patients who received flumazenil. Methods Patients admitted to the postanesthesia recovery room at a large, academic, tertiary care facility after surgery under general anesthesia from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2015, were identified and matched to 2 controls each, by age, sex, and surgical procedure. Flumazenil was administered in the recovery phase immediately after general anesthesia, according to the clinical judgment of the anesthesiologist. Demographic, procedural, and outcome data were extracted from the electronic health record. Conditional logistic regression, accounting for the 1:2 matched-set case-control study designs, was used to assess characteristics associated with flumazenil use. Results The incidence of flumazenil administration in the postanesthesia care unit was 9.9 per 10,000 (95% CI, 8.4-11.6) general anesthetics. History of obstructive sleep apnea (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.27; 95% CI 1.02-5.09), longer anesthesia (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.24 per 30 minutes), use of total intravenous anesthesia (OR = 6.09; 95% CI 2.60-14.25), and use of benzodiazepines (OR = 8.17; 95% CI 3.71-17.99) were associated with risk for flumazenil administration. Among patients who received midazolam, cases treated with flumazenil received a higher median (interquartile range) dose than controls: 3.5 mg (2.0-4.0 mg) vs. 2.0 mg (2.0-2.0 mg), respectively (p < 0.001). Flumazenil use was correlated with a higher rate of unanticipated noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, longer postanesthesia care unit stay, and increased rate of intensive care unit admissions. Conclusions Patients who required flumazenil postoperatively had received a higher dosage of benzodiazepines and utilized more postoperative health care resources. More conservative perioperative use of benzodiazepines may improve postoperative recovery and use of health care resources.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos Determinar os fatores de risco da administração de flumazenil durante a recuperação pós-anestésica e descrever os desfechos entre os pacientes que receberam flumazenil. Métodos Os pacientes admitidos em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica de um grande centro universitário em setor terciário de cuidados pós-cirurgia sob anestesia geral entre 1° de janeiro de 2010 e 30 de abril de 2015 foram identificados e pareados com dois controles cada por idade, sexo e procedimento cirúrgico. Flumazenil foi administrado na fase de recuperação imediatamente após a anestesia geral, de acordo com a avaliação clínica do anestesiologista. Os dados demográficos, dos procedimentos e dos desfechos foram extraídos do registro eletrônico de saúde. A regressão logística condicional para os desenhos do estudo de caso-controle pareado em 1:2 foi usada para avaliar as características associadas ao uso de flumazenil. Resultados A incidência da administração de flumazenil em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica foi de 9,9 por 10.000 (95% IC: 8,4-1,6) anestesias gerais. História da apneia obstrutiva do sono (razão de chances [OR] = 2,27; IC 95%: 1,02-5,09), anestesia de longa duração (OR = 1,13; IC 95%: 1,03-1,24 por 30 minutos), uso de anestesia intravenosa total (OR = 6,09; IC de 95%: 2,60-14,25) e uso de benzodiazepínicos (OR = 8,17; IC 95%: 3,71-17,99) foram associados a risco para a administração de flumazenil. Entre os pacientes que receberam midazolam, os casos tratados com flumazenil receberam uma dose mediana mais alta (intervalo interquartil) do que os controles: 3,5 mg (2,0-4,0 mg) vs. 2,0 mg (2,0-2,0 mg), respectivamente (p < 0,001). O uso de flumazenil foi correlacionado com uma taxa maior não prevista de ventilação não invasiva com pressão positiva, permanência mais longa em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica e aumento da taxa de admissões em unidade de terapia intensiva. Conclusão Os pacientes que precisaram de flumazenil no pós-operatório receberam uma dose maior de benzodiazepínicos e usaram mais recursos de cuidados da saúde no pós-operatório. O uso mais conservador de benzodiazepínicos no período perioperatório pode melhorar a recuperação e o uso de recursos de cuidados da saúde no pós-operatório.