Choice of standards for sonographic fetal abdominal circumference percentile.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of abnormal fetal abdominal circumference is based on values >90th or <10th percentile. There are dozens of established norms that can be used to determine the percentile of a given abdominal circumference measurement, but there is no established method to determine which norms should be used. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of 5 established abdominal circumference norms to our measurements and to determine which, if any, should be used for the diagnosis of abnormal fetal abdominal circumference. STUDY DESIGN: Data were pooled from 6 maternal-fetal medicine practices to conduct a cross-sectional study. The inclusion criteria were a singleton fetus at 22.0 to 39.9 weeks of gestation with cardiac activity present, complete fetal biometry measured, and examination from 2019 or 2020. For patients with >1 eligible examination during the study period, a single examination was chosen at random for inclusion. Five norms of abdominal circumference were studied: the Hadlock formula, the World Health Organization Fetal Growth Curves, the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st-Century Project; and the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies (fetuses of White patients and unified standard). Using formulas relating abdominal circumference to gestational age, we calculated the z scores of abdominal circumference (standard deviations from the mean), standard deviation of the z score, Kolmogorov-Smirnov D statistic, and relative mean squared error. The 5 norms were assessed for fit to our data based on 6 criteria: mean z score close to 0, standard deviation of the z score close to 1, low D statistic, low mean squared error, fraction of values >90th percentile close to 10%, and fraction of values <10th percentile close to 10%. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met in 40,684 ultrasound examinations in 15,042 patients. Considering the 6 evaluation criteria, observed abdominal circumferences had the best fit to the World Health Organization standard (mean z score of 0.11±1.05, D statistic of 0.041, mean squared error of 0.84±1.46, 13% of examinations >90th percentile, and 7% of examinations <10th percentile). The Hadlock reference had an anomaly in its assumption of a constant standard deviation, resulting in the underdiagnosis of abnormal values at early gestational ages and overdiagnosis at late gestational ages. The International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st-Century Project standard had a mean circumference smaller than all the other norms, resulting in the underdiagnosis of small circumferences and the overdiagnosis of large circumferences. Similar results were observed when restricting the analyses to a low-risk subgroup of 5487 examinations without identified risk factors for large for gestational age or small for gestational age. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of abnormal abdominal circumference depends on the norms used to define abdominal circumference percentiles. The World Health Organization standard had the best fit for our data.

Antepartum vaginal bleeding: characteristics associated with delivery within seven days.

Objective: To identify maternal and/or fetal characteristics associated with delivery within seven days for patients who present with vaginal bleeding in the antepartum period.Methods: This is a retrospective chart review performed at a community-academic tertiary care center. Three hundred and twenty-two consecutive charts associated with admission for vaginal bleeding during pregnancy between January 2015 and May 2020 were reviewed. One hundred and twenty-six women were included based on singleton gestation, gestational age 24 0/7 - 36 6/7 weeks, self-limited vaginal bleeding, vital sign stability (blood pressure >100/60 mmHg, heart rate >60 beats per minute, respiratory rate <20 breaths per minute), absence of signs of labor, no known placenta previa/accreta, recent vaginal intercourse, or trauma. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact and two-sample t-tests tests when appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to predict delivery within 7 days.Results: Thirty-four percent of women who presented with light vaginal bleeding delivered within seven days, with a mean of 2.6 days (n = 44/126). Patients without evidence of labor but with sterile vaginal exam (SVE) >2 cm on admission were 14 times more likely to deliver within 7 days than SVE ≤ 2 cm (AOR 14.49, 95% CI 3.33-63.03); however, 35.2% of women with SVE ≤ 2 cm still delivered in this timeframe (n = 12/34). Of the 59 patients who had cervical lengths (CL) performed, those with CL ≤2.5 cm were 4.22 times more likely to deliver within 7 days (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.10-16.20). Seventy-eight percent of the patients who had CL >2.5 cm and SVE 0-1 cm went on to deliver >14 days from their initial bleeds (n = 18/23).Conclusion: Patients who present with self-limited vaginal bleeding and SVE > 2 cm should be admitted for antenatal steroids. Prolonged inpatient observation beyond the typical steroid window of 48-72 h should be dependent on the individual patient. Given that CL ≤2.5 cm and regular contractions are known risk factors for preterm delivery, these characteristics alone may also warrant extended inpatient observation, though even in conjunction with vaginal bleeding, neither was a significant predictor for delivery in our study. In contrast, the majority of patients with vaginal bleeding and SVE <2 cm delivered >14 days after their initial bleeds and are likely eligible for shorter periods of observation.

Application of a Proposed Algorithm to Cesarean Deliveries for Nonreassuring Fetal Heart Rate Tracing.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to evaluate how current management of Category II fetal heart rate tracings compares with that suggested by a published algorithm and whether these differences lead to disparate neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study from the resident service at an academic-community tertiary care center from 2013 to 2018. We reviewed archived fetal heart rate tracings from patients with cesarean delivery performed for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and interpreted tracings against the algorithm. We assigned tracings to one of three categories: Group A-consistent; Group B-inconsistent too early (algorithm permits the patient to labor longer); Group C-inconsistent too late (algorithm suggests performing the cesarean delivery sooner). Maternal demographics, features of labor, and neonatal outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of the 110 cases, 27 (24.5%) had a cesarean delivery performed in group A, 49 (44.5%) in group B, and 34 (30.9%) in group C. Baseline characteristics were similar. Of the 49 in group B, 46 (93.9%) violated the algorithm at the same branchpoint. In group C, cesarean deliveries would have been performed on average 244 minutes earlier had the algorithm been used. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly different among the groups, including 5-minute Apgar <7, pH <7.1, and NICU admit. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective application of the algorithm showed that 44.5% of patients who have cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing may be able to labor longer and that violation at a common decision point on the algorithm (moderate variability or accelerations, but a lack of recurrent decelerations) is responsible for nearly all such cesarean deliveries. More studies are needed to evaluate if cesarean delivery rates for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing can be reduced without impacting neonatal outcomes using the algorithm. KEY POINTS: · There is a potential to further standardize management of Category II fetal heart rate tracings.. · In our practice, 25% of cesareans performed for fetal distress were consistent with the algorithm.. · A subset of patients (45%) with cesarean for fetal distress may have been able to labor longer..

Maternal high-fat-diet programs rat offspring liver fatty acid metabolism.

In offspring exposed in utero to a maternal diet high in fat (HF), we have previously demonstrated that despite similar birth weights, HF adult offspring at 6 months of age had significantly higher body weights, greater adiposity, and increased triacylglycerol (TAG) levels as compared to controls. We hypothesized that a maternal HF diet predisposes to offspring adiposity via a programmed increase in the synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids in the liver and hence increased substrate availability for liver TAG synthesis. We further hypothesized that programmed changes in offspring liver fatty acid metabolism are associated with increased liver expression of the lipogenic enzyme stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (SCD-1). Female rats were maintained on a HF diet rich in monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) prior to and throughout pregnancy and lactation. After birth, newborns were nursed by the same dam, and all offspring were weaned to control diet. Plasma and liver fatty acid compositions were determined using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Fatty acid C16 desaturation indices of palmitoleic/palmitic and (vaccenic + palmitoleic)/palmitic and the C18 desaturation index of oleic/stearic were calculated. Liver protein abundance of SCD-1 was analyzed in newborns and adult offspring. Plasma and liver C16 desaturation indices were decreased in HF newborns, but increased in the adult offspring. Liver SCD-1 expression was increased in the HF adult offspring. These data show that the maternal HF diet during pregnancy and lactation increases offspring liver SCD-1 protein abundance and alters the liver C16 desaturase pathway.

Placenta accreta: depth of invasion and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes between women with placenta accreta and placenta increta or percreta. METHODS: This was a single institution retrospective cohort study of women with abnormal placentation (placenta accreta, increta, and percreta) who delivered from 1982-2002. Cases were divided into superficial invasion (placenta accreta) and deep invasion (placenta increta or percreta), and compared. The primary outcomes studied were gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and size for gestational age. RESULTS: 103 viable pregnancies with abnormal placentation were observed (1.6/1000 pregnancies). Cases of deep invasion had higher parity and were more likely to have had a prior cesarean delivery. The mean gestational age at delivery was 33 5/7 weeks with deep placental invasion and 35 2/7 weeks in the superficial invasion group (p = 0.18). Rates of preterm birth were 64.7% and 52.3% (p = 0.43) and low birthweight were 24% and 29% (p = 0.76) in the deep and superficial invasion groups respectively. There were no differences in the remaining outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by placenta increta and percreta are not different than those with placenta accreta.