Surgical Management of Clostridium difficile Colitis.

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) will progress to fulminant disease in 3 to 5% of cases. With the emergence of hypervirulent, multidrug-resistant strains, the incidence and severity of disease are continuing to rise. Prompt identification, early resuscitation, and treatment are critical in preventing morbidity and mortality in this increasingly common condition. Discontinuation of antibiotics and treatment with oral vancomycin and intravenous or oral metronidazole are first-line treatments, but complicated cases may require surgery. Subtotal colectomy with ileostomy remains the standard of care when toxic megacolon, perforation, or an acute surgical abdomen is present, but mortality rates are high. Recognition of risk factors for fulminant CDI and earlier surgical intervention may decrease mortality from this highly lethal disease.

The effect of antireflux surgery on esophageal carcinogenesis in patients with barrett esophagus: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with Barrett esophagus who undergo antireflux surgery differ from medically treated patients in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and probability of disease regression/progression. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Barrett esophagus is a risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A question exists as to whether antireflux surgery reduces this risk. METHODS: Query of PubMed (1966 through October 2005) using predetermined search terms revealed 2011 abstracts, of which 100 full-text articles were reviewed. Twenty-five articles met selection criteria. A review of article references and consultation with experts revealed additional articles for inclusion. Studies that enrolled adults with biopsy-proven Barrett esophagus, specified treatment-type rendered, followed up patients with endoscopic biopsies no less than12 months of instituting therapy, and provided adequate extractable data. The incidence of adenocarcinoma and the proportion of patients developing progression or regression of Barrett esophagus and/or dysplasia were extracted. RESULTS: In surgical and medical groups, 700 and 996 patients were followed for a total of 2939 and 3711 patient-years, respectively. The incidence rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma was 2.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.3) per 1000 patient-years among surgically treated patients and 6.3 (3.6-10.1) among medically treated patients (P = 0.034). Heterogeneity in incidence rates in surgically treated patients was observed between controlled studies and case series (P = 0.014). Among controlled studies, incidence rates were 4.8 (1.7-11.1) and 6.5 (2.6-13.8) per 1000 patient-years in surgical and medical patients, respectively (P = 0.320). Probability of progression was 2.9% (1.2-5.5) in surgical patients and 6.8% (2.6-12.1) in medical patients (P = 0.054). Probability of regression was 15.4% (6.1-31.4) in surgical patients and 1.9% (0.4-7.3) in medical patients (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Antireflux surgery is associated with regression of Barrett esophagus and/or dysplasia. However, evidence suggesting that surgery reduces the incidence of adenocarcinoma is largely driven by uncontrolled studies.

A model for gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity: the effect of chronic partial gastric outlet obstruction on esophageal physiology.

OBJECTIVE: This work establishes an animal model for nonadjustable gastric banding and characterizes the effect of gastric banding on esophageal physiology. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Obstruction at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) results in esophageal dilation and aperistalsis. Although laparoscopic gastric banding as a primary treatment of morbid obesity has been widely accepted, the effects of this therapy on esophageal function remain unknown. METHODS: Twenty-five opossums were randomly divided into sham (n = 5), EGJ band (n = 5), and gastric band (n = 15) groups. Gastric and EGJ bands were surgically placed, and esophageal manometry was performed prebanding, at 2-week intervals during the banding period (up to 14 weeks), and 2 and 4 weeks after band removal. RESULTS: Manometric measures were equivalent prior to banding in all groups. There were no changes in LES or esophageal pressures during the study period in the sham group. During banding, there was a 36% decrease in baseline mean resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure in the gastric band group (P = 0.003). Mean distal esophageal peristaltic pressure decreased from baseline by 36% in gastric band animals (P < 0.001). The incidence of esophageal motility disorder during the study period for sham, EGJ band, and gastric band groups, was 2.9%, 42.1%, and 31.3%, respectively (P = 0.001, P = 0.381, pairwise comparisons of gastric band vs. sham and gastric band versus EGJ groups, respectively). Immediately prior to band removal, the probability of an abnormal peristaltic sequence with each swallow was 1%, 38%, and 16% for sham, EGJ, and gastric band groups, respectively (P < 0.005, pairwise comparisons of band groups with sham). CONCLUSIONS: Nonadjustable gastric banding results in impaired esophageal body motility, a reduction in esophageal peristaltic pressure, and a reduction in resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure. These findings suggest that gastric banding causes esophageal outlet obstruction and subsequent decompensation of peristaltic function as well as a compromise of the native antireflux mechanism.

Endoscopic measurement of cardia circumference as an indicator of GERD.

BACKGROUND: It is theorized that repeated gastric distention leads to dilatation of the cardia and the development of GERD. We hypothesize that cardia circumference correlates with the presence and the severity of GERD, and we developed software to measure cardia circumference from static endoscopic images. Our aims were to validate the software and to quantify cardia circumference along the spectrum of GERD. METHODS: Software-based measurements were compared with actual measurements in animal and mechanical models. A retrospective review of an endoscopic database and patient charts produced 273 subjects, grouped as follows: controls, GERD, < or = 3-cm Barrett's esophagus, or > 3-cm Barrett's esophagus. A blinded abstractor measured cardia circumference by using images from the database. RESULTS: Software and actual measurements correlated closely and were reproducible among observers. Median cardia circumference for each group was the following: control, 31.8 mm; GERD, 37.8 mm; < or = 3-cm Barrett's esophagus, 38.4 mm; and > 3-cm Barrett's esophagus, 45.0 mm (p < 0.001). By using 34.3 mm as a cutoff, cardia circumference was 85.3% sensitive and 89.6% specific for the diagnosis of GERD. CONCLUSIONS: There was a direct relationship between cardia circumference and the presence of GERD. This finding augments our understanding of the anatomic contributions of the esophagogastric junction in the pathogenesis of GERD. Cardia measurement may prove to be a useful diagnostic tool.