Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 8580-8585, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34645356

RESUMEN

Objective: To identify maternal and/or fetal characteristics associated with delivery within seven days for patients who present with vaginal bleeding in the antepartum period.Methods: This is a retrospective chart review performed at a community-academic tertiary care center. Three hundred and twenty-two consecutive charts associated with admission for vaginal bleeding during pregnancy between January 2015 and May 2020 were reviewed. One hundred and twenty-six women were included based on singleton gestation, gestational age 24 0/7 - 36 6/7 weeks, self-limited vaginal bleeding, vital sign stability (blood pressure >100/60 mmHg, heart rate >60 beats per minute, respiratory rate <20 breaths per minute), absence of signs of labor, no known placenta previa/accreta, recent vaginal intercourse, or trauma. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact and two-sample t-tests tests when appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to predict delivery within 7 days.Results: Thirty-four percent of women who presented with light vaginal bleeding delivered within seven days, with a mean of 2.6 days (n = 44/126). Patients without evidence of labor but with sterile vaginal exam (SVE) >2 cm on admission were 14 times more likely to deliver within 7 days than SVE ≤ 2 cm (AOR 14.49, 95% CI 3.33-63.03); however, 35.2% of women with SVE ≤ 2 cm still delivered in this timeframe (n = 12/34). Of the 59 patients who had cervical lengths (CL) performed, those with CL ≤2.5 cm were 4.22 times more likely to deliver within 7 days (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.10-16.20). Seventy-eight percent of the patients who had CL >2.5 cm and SVE 0-1 cm went on to deliver >14 days from their initial bleeds (n = 18/23).Conclusion: Patients who present with self-limited vaginal bleeding and SVE > 2 cm should be admitted for antenatal steroids. Prolonged inpatient observation beyond the typical steroid window of 48-72 h should be dependent on the individual patient. Given that CL ≤2.5 cm and regular contractions are known risk factors for preterm delivery, these characteristics alone may also warrant extended inpatient observation, though even in conjunction with vaginal bleeding, neither was a significant predictor for delivery in our study. In contrast, the majority of patients with vaginal bleeding and SVE <2 cm delivered >14 days after their initial bleeds and are likely eligible for shorter periods of observation.


Asunto(s)
Placenta Accreta , Placenta Previa , Nacimiento Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemorragia Uterina/etiología , Hemorragia Uterina/complicaciones , Placenta Accreta/diagnóstico , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 38(9): 869-879, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33368094

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We compare maternal morbidity and clinical care metrics before and after the electronic implementation of a maternal early warning trigger (MEWT) tool. STUDY DESIGN: This is a study of maternal morbidity and clinical care within three linked hospitals comparing 1 year before and after electronic MEWT implementation. We compare severe maternal morbidity overall as well as within the subcategories of hemorrhage, hypertension, cardiopulmonary, and sepsis in addition to relevant process metrics in each category. We describe the MEWT trigger rate in addition to MEWT sensitivity and specificity for morbidity overall and by morbidity type. RESULTS: The morbidity rate ratio increased from 1.6 per 100 deliveries in the pre-MEWT period to 2.06 per 100 deliveries in the post-MEWT period (incidence rate ratio = 1.28, p = 0.018); however, in cases of septic morbidity, time to appropriate antibiotics decreased (pre-MEWT: 1.87 hours [1.11-2.63] vs. post-MEWT: 0.75 hours [0.31-1.19], p = 0.036) and in cases of hypertensive morbidity, the proportion of cases treated with appropriate antihypertensive medication within 60 minutes improved (pre-MEWT: 62% vs. post-MEWT: 83%, p = 0.040). The MEWT trigger rate was 2.3%, ranging from 0.8% in the less acute centers to 2.9% in our tertiary center. The MEWT sensitivity for morbidity overall was 50%; detection of hemorrhage morbidity was lowest (30%); however, it ranged between 69% for septic morbidity, 74% for cardiopulmonary morbidity, and 82% for cases of hypertensive morbidity. CONCLUSION: Overall, maternal morbidity did not decrease after implementation of the MEWT system; however, important clinical metrics such as time to antibiotics and antihypertensive care improved. We suspect increased morbidity was related to annual variation and unexpected lower morbidity in the pre-MEWT comparison year. Because MEWT sensitivity for hemorrhage was low, and because hemorrhage dominates administrative metrics of morbidity, process metrics around sepsis, hypertension, and cardiopulmonary morbidity are important to track as markers of MEWT efficacy. KEY POINTS: · MEWT was not associated with a decrease in maternal morbidity.. · MEWT was associated with improvements in some clinical care metrics.. · MEWT is more sensitive in detecting septic, hypertensive, and cardiopulmonary morbidities than hemorrhage morbidity..


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Precoz , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , California/epidemiología , Vías Clínicas , Femenino , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/diagnóstico , Mortalidad Materna/tendencias , Morbilidad , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Curva ROC , Tiempo de Tratamiento
3.
AJP Rep ; 10(4): e362-e368, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33214931

RESUMEN

Objective American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recently published the California (CA) cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening algorithm for pregnant and postpartum women. We aim to prospectively determine screen-positive and true-positive rates of CVD among women across two populations. Study Design This is a prospective cohort study of obstetrical patients from April 2018 to July 2019 at academic medical centers in CA and New York (NY). We attempted to screen all patients at least once during their pregnancy care (prenatal or postpartum). Women who screened positive ("Red Flags," >3-4 moderate risk factors, abnormal physical examination, and persistent symptoms) underwent further testing. The primary outcome was the screen-positive rate. Secondary outcomes included the true-positive rate and the strength of each moderate factor in predicting a positive CVD screen. Results We screened 846 women. The overall screen-positive rate was 8% (5% in CA vs. 19% in NY). The sites differed in ethnicity, that is, African American women (2.7% in CA vs. 35% in NY, p < 0.01) and substance use (2.7 vs. 5.6%, p < 0.04). The true-positive rate was 1.5% at both sites. The percentage of screen-positive patients who did not complete follow-up studies was higher in NY (70%) than in CA (27%). CVD was confirmed in 30% with positive screens with complete follow-up. Combinations of moderate factors were the main driver of screen-positive rates in both populations. Conclusion This is the first data describing the performance of the CVD screening algorithm in a general obstetric population. Factors, such as proportion of African American women affect the likelihood of a positive screen. The screening algorithm highlights patients at higher lifetime risk of CVD and may identify a group that could be targeted for more direct care transitions postpartum. Data may be used to design a larger validation study.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...