Gas-exchange deficit and systemic hypoperfusion in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 young adult patients with pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Lung damage leading to gas-exchange deficit and sepsis leading to systemic hypoperfusion are well-known features of severe pneumonia. Although frequently described in COVID-19, their prognostic impact in COVID-19-related pneumonia vs COVID-19-urelated pneumonia has never been compared. This study assesses fundamental gas-exchange and hemodynamic parameters and explores their prognostic impact in COVID-19 pneumonia and non-COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated arterial pO2/FiO2, alveolar to arterial O2 gradient, shock index, and serum lactate in 126 COVID-19 pneumonia patients, aged 18- 65, presenting to the emergency department with acute, non-hypercapnic respiratory failure. As a control group we identified 1:1 age-, sex-, and pO2/FiO2-matched COVID-19-urelated pneumonia patients. Univariate and multivariable predictors of 30-day survival were identified in both groups. RESULTS: COVID-19 patients showed lower arterial serum lactate concentration (p<0.001) and shock index (p<0.001) values as compared to non-COVID-19 patients. While we did not observe differences in lactate concentration or in shock index values in deceased vs surviving COVID-19 patients (respectively, p=0.7 and p=0.6), non-COVID-19 deceased patients showed significantly higher lactate and shock index than non-COVID-19 survivors (p<0.001 and p=0.03). The pO2/FiO2 was the most powerful determinant of survival by Cox regression multivariate analysis in COVID-19 patients (p=0.006), while it was lactate in non-COVID-19 patients (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: As compared to COVID19-unrelated pneumonia, COVID-19 pneumonia outcome seems more strictly correlated to the extent of lung damage, rather than to the systemic circulatory and metabolic derangements typical of sepsis.

Role of cardiological specialistic evaluation in patients with chest pain presenting in the emergency department.

AIMS: Aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cardiological and echocardiographic evaluation in addition to a standard clinical and instrumental approach on diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in patients presenting in the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP). Acute coronary syndromes, pulmonary embolism and acute aortic syndromes (AAS) (triple-rule-out/TRO) were considered. METHODS: From 7040 patients presenting with CP from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2017, we randomly selected a sample of 1119. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical course and definitive diagnosis according to the ED final report. A 6-month follow-up to assess incident acute cardiovascular events was made by telephone interview in discharged patients; in hospitalized patients, clinical records were analyzed to evaluate the appropriateness of admissions. Diagnostic and prognostic accuracy wasd estimated through sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, according to the presence or absence of cardiological and echocardiographic consultation. RESULTS: Complete information of 1099 patients out of 1119 was retrieved. Seven hundred and eighty-eight patients (71.70%) had been discharged, eight inappropriately (0.73%). Three hundred eleven (28.30%) had been hospitalized, 14 (1.27%) inappropriately. Diagnostic performance showed 97.38% sensitivity, 98.24% specificity, 95.5% PPV and 99% NPV, with an overall accuracy of 98.00%. In patients evaluated by the cardiologist in addition to the ED physician (n = 387) we observed an improvement of sensitivity and NPV at the expense of specificity. Among improperly discharged patients, 7/8 had normal troponin, 7/8 normal ECG and only 1 was evaluated by a cardiologist. Only one inappropriately hospitalized patient was not evaluated by a cardiologist. CONCLUSIONS: Early consultation with a cardiologist and echocardiography improves clinical judgment in doubtful cases of CP, increasing diagnostic performance mainly by reducing inappropriate patient discharge and guaranteeing a low rate of inappropriate hospitalizations.

Stranger Months: How SARS-CoV-2, Fear of Contagion, and Lockdown Measures Impacted Attendance and Clinical Activity During February and March 2020 at an Urban Emergency Department in Milan.

OBJECTIVES: An unprecedented wave of patients with acute respiratory failure due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease 2019 (COVID-19) hit emergency departments (EDs) in Lombardy, starting in the second half of February 2020. This study describes the direct and indirect impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on an urban major-hospital ED. METHODS: Data regarding all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 presenting from February 1 to March 31, 2020, were prospectively collected, while data regarding non-COVID patients presenting within the same period in 2019 were retrospectively retrieved. RESULTS: ED attendance dropped by 37% in 2020. Two-thirds of this reduction occurred early after the identification of the first autochthonous COVID-19 case in Lombardy, before lockdown measures were enforced. Hospital admissions of non-COVID patients fell by 26%. During the peak of COVID-19 attendance, the ED faced an extraordinary increase in: patients needing oxygen (+239%) or noninvasive ventilation (+725%), transfers to the intensive care unit (+57%), and in-hospital mortality (+309%), compared with the same period in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 outbreak determined an unprecedented upsurge in respiratory failure cases and mortality. Fear of contagion triggered a spontaneous, marked reduction of ED attendance, and, presumably, some as yet unknown quantity of missed or delayed diagnoses for conditions other than COVID-19.