RESUMEN
Venous thromboembolic events are frequent complications of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs). The overexpression of tissue factor (TF) plays an essential role in the local hypercoagulable phenotype that underlies these complications. Our aim was to build an MRI radiomics model for the non-invasive exploration of the hypercoagulable status of LGG/GBM. Radiogenomics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and REMBRANDT (Repository for molecular BRAin Neoplasia DaTa) cohorts were used. A logistic regression model (Radscore) was built in order to identify the top 20% TF-expressing tumors, considered to be at high thromboembolic risk. The most contributive MRI radiomics features from LGG/GBM linked to high TF were identified in TCGA using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. A logistic regression model was built, whose performance was analyzed with ROC in the TCGA/training and REMBRANDT/validation cohorts: AUC = 0.87 [CI95: 0.81-0.94, p < 0.0001] and AUC = 0.78 [CI95: 0.56-1.00, p = 0.02], respectively. In agreement with the key role of the coagulation cascade in gliomas, LGG patients with a high Radscore had lower overall and disease-free survival. The Radscore was linked to the presence of specific genomic alterations, the composition of the tumor coagulome and the tumor immune infiltrate. Our findings suggest that a non-invasive assessment of the hypercoagulable status of LGG/GBM is possible with MRI radiomics.
RESUMEN
Patients hospitalised with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), and notably patients with pulmonary embolism, often remain in hospital for extended periods due to the perceived risk of complications. However, several studies have shown that home treatment of selected patients is feasible and safe, with a low incidence of adverse events. This may offer clear benefits for patients' quality of life, hospital planning and cost to the health service. Nonetheless, there is a need for a VTE risk-stratification tool specifically addressing prognosis in patients with cancer. This may aid in the selection of low-risk patients with cancer and VTE who are suitable for outpatient treatment. Although several prognostic scores have been proposed, we suggest using a pragmatic clinical decision-making tool such as the Hestia criteria for selecting patients for home care in everyday clinical practice. Once patients have been discharged, it is mandatory to monitor patients regularly (we suggest after 3 days, 10 days, 1 month and 3 months, or more frequently if needed) with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, so that appropriate and timely remedial action can be taken in case of warning signs of complications. If patients are selected carefully and monitored effectively, many patients who experience acute VTE can be cared for safely at home.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/normas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/organización & administración , Francia/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , PronósticoRESUMEN
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is associated with a high risk of bleeding complications and hospitalisation, as well as with increased mortality. Good practice recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of VTE in patients with cancer have been developed by a number of professional bodies. Although these guidelines provide consistent recommendations on what treatment should be offered to patients presenting with cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT), many questions remain unanswered, in particular about the modalities of management (Who? When? Where?) and, for this reason, we have developed a consensus proposal for an appropriate multidisciplinary care pathway for patients with CAT, which is presented in this article. The proposal was informed by the recent scientific literature retrieved through a systematic literature review. This proposal is centred on the development of a shared care plan individualised to each patient's needs and expectations, patient information and shared decision-making to promote adherence, involvement of all relevant hospital- and community- based healthcare providers in the development and implementation of the care plan, and regular re-evaluation of the treatment strategy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Trombosis , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Vías Clínicas , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a relatively frequent and potentially fatal complication arising in patients with cancer who require a central catheter placement for intravenous treatment. In everyday practice, CRT remains a challenge for management; despite its frequency and its negative clinical impact, few data are available concerning diagnosis and treatment of CRT. In particular, no diagnostic studies or clinical trials have been published that included exclusively patients with cancer and a central venous catheter (CVC). For this reason, many questions regarding optimal management of CRT remain unanswered. Due to the paucity of high-grade evidence regarding CRT in cancer patients, guidelines are derived from upper extremity DVT studies for diagnosis, and from those for lower limb DVT for treatment. This article addresses the issues of diagnosis and management of CRT through a review of the available literature and makes a number of proposals based on the available evidence. In symptomatic patients, venous ultrasound is the most appropriate choice for first-line diagnostic imaging of CRT because it is noninvasive, and its diagnostic performance is high (which is not the case in asymptomatic patients). In the absence of direct comparative clinical trials, we suggest treating patients with CRT with a therapeutic dose of either a LMWH or a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor, with or without a loading dose. These anticoagulants should be given for a total of at least three months, including at least one month after catheter removal following initiation of therapy.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Neoplasias , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior , Humanos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/etiología , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Patients hospitalised with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), and notably patients with pulmonary embolism, often remain in hospital for extended periods due to the perceived risk of complications. However, several studies have shown that home treatment of selected patients is feasible and safe, with a low incidence of adverse events. This may offer clear benefits for patients' quality of life, hospital planning and cost to the health service. Nonetheless, there is a need for a VTE risk-stratification tool specifically addressing prognosis in patients with cancer. This may aid in the selection of low-risk patients with cancer and VTE who are suitable for outpatient treatment. Although several prognostic scores have been proposed, we suggest using a pragmatic clinical decision-making tool such as the Hestia criteria for selecting patients for home care in everyday clinical practice. Once patients have been discharged, it is mandatory to monitor patients regularly (we suggest after 3 days, 10 days, 1 month and 3 months, or more frequently if needed) with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, so that appropriate and timely remedial action can be taken in case of warning signs of complications. If patients are selected carefully and monitored effectively, many patients who experience acute VTE can be cared for safely at home.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/terapia , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Many patients with cancer require palliative care at some stage and the vast majority of people followed in palliative care are cancer patients. Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and this is particularly true during the advanced palliative phase when mobility is limited or absent. Patients with cancer in palliative cancer are at higher bleeding risk compared to non-cancer patients. Decisions to treat VTE or withhold anticoagulation for these patients have proven to be difficult and depend largely on an individual clinician's judgment. For this reason, we have developed a consensus proposal for appropriate management of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT) in patients in palliative care, which is presented in this article. The proposal was informed by the recent scientific literature retrieved through a systematic literature review. In cancer patients in advanced palliative care, the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulation seems unfavourable with a higher haemorrhagic risk than the benefit associated with prevention of CAT recurrence and, above all, in the absence of any benefit on quality of life. For this reason, we recommend that patients should be prescribed anticoagulants on a case-by-case basis. The choice of whether to treat, and with which type of treatment, should take into account anticipated life expectancy and patient preferences, as well as clinical factors such as the estimated bleeding risk, the type of VTE experienced and the time since the VTE event.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de Vida , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
Based on the results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) assessing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), DOACs have been proposed as alternative to low molecular weight heparin by several international guidelines. However, the proportion of CAT patients who would have not been eligible for such trials is currently unknown. Our primary aim was to assess the proportion of patients seen in clinical practice for acute CAT who would not have been eligible for CARAVAGGIO or HOKUSAI-VTE RCT. Secondary aim was to describe patients outcomes according to eligibility. In a multicenter, observational study, all patients consecutively admitted from January 2017 to December 2019 for an acute CAT event were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of non-inclusion criteria for CARAVAGGIO or HOKUSAI-VTE RCT. Event free survival during a 6-month follow-up were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Among the 302 patients (women: 53 %, mean age: 67.9 ± 13.2) analyzed, 138 (46 %) for HOKUSAI-VTE cancer and 161 (53 %) for CARAVAGGIO met one or more non-inclusion criteria. Main criteria were upper limb and unsual site thrombosis (n = 63, 18.5 %), anemia/thrombopenia (n = 43, 14.2 %), brain tumors (n = 33, 10.9 %), ECOG PS >2 (n = 28, 9.3 %), severe renal failure (n = 16, 5.3 %). At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was not statistically different between the two groups. Almost half of CAT patients would have not been able to participate to a modern DOAC RCT. Evaluation of DOACs safety and efficacy in this subset of patients deserves further research.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Neoplasias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trombosis , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/epidemiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Selección de PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUNDSlow-flow vascular malformations frequently harbor activating mutations in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR cascade. Phase II trials pinpointed sirolimus effectiveness as a drug therapy. Efficacy and safety of sirolimus thus need to be evaluated in large prospective phase III trials.METHODSThe Vascular Anomaly-Sirolimus-Europe (VASE) trial, initiated in 2016, is a large multicentric prospective phase III trial (EudraCT 2015-001703-32), which evaluates efficacy and safety of sirolimus for 2 years in pediatric and adult patients with symptomatic slow-flow vascular malformations. In this interim analysis, we studied all patients enrolled up to October 2021 who received sirolimus for 12 or more months or who prematurely stopped the treatment.RESULTSThirty-one pediatric and 101 adult patients were included in this analysis; 107 completed 12 or more months of sirolimus, including 61 who were treated for the whole 2-year period. Sirolimus resulted in a clinical improvement in 85% of patients. The efficacy appeared within the first month for the majority of them. Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 24 (18%) patients; all resolved after treatment interruption/arrest. Sirolimus increased feasibility of surgery or sclerotherapy in 20 (15%) patients initially deemed unsuitable for intervention. Among the 61 patients who completed the 2-year treatment, 33 (54%) reported a recurrence of symptoms after a median follow-up of 13 months after sirolimus arrest. While there was no difference in efficacy, clinical improvement was faster but subsided more rapidly in PIK3CA-mutated (n = 24) compared with TIE2-mutated (n = 19) patients.CONCLUSIONSirolimus has a high efficacy and good tolerance in treatment of slow-flow vascular malformations in children and adults.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02638389 and EudraCT 2015-001703-32.FUNDINGThe Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS grants T.0247.19, P.C005.22, T.0146.16, and P.C013.20), the Fund Generet managed by the King Baudouin Foundation (grant 2018-J1810250-211305), the Walloon Region through the FRFS-WELBIO strategic research programme (WELBIO-CR-2019C-06), the MSCA-ITN network V.A. Cure no. 814316, the Leducq Foundation Networks of Excellence Program grant "ReVAMP" (LFCR grant 21CVD03), the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 874708 (Theralymph), the Swiss National Science Foundation under the Sinergia project no. CRSII5_193694, and a Pierre M. fellowship.
Asunto(s)
Sirolimus , Malformaciones Vasculares , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Europa (Continente) , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas , Estudios Prospectivos , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Malformaciones Vasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Malformaciones Vasculares/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For complex extensive TASC-II D lesions, the standard of care remains conventional surgery. Nevertheless, guidelines tend to broaden endovascular surgery indications in expert centers for patients at high surgical risk with TASC-II D lesions. Due to the increasing use of endovascular surgery in this setting, we planned to evaluate the patency rate of this approach. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary center. All patients treated for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with classified D lesions according to the TASC-II classification and requiring management of the aortoiliac bifurcation were retrospectively included between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. The type of surgical approach was classified as a pure percutaneous approach or hybrid surgery. The main objective was to describe long-term patency results. The secondary objectives were to identify risk factors for loss of patency and long-term complications. The primary outcomes were primary patency, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency at 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-six patients were included. For the overall population, the primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency proportions at 5 years were 71.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 63.2-81%), 82.1% (95% CI 74.9-89.3%), 96.3% (95% CI 92-100%), respectively. For primary patency, there was a significant difference in favor of the covered stent group at 36 months (P < 0.01) and 60 months (P = 0.037). In a multivariate model, only CS and age were associated with a better primary patency (hazard ratio (HR) 0.36, CI 95% [0.15-0.83], P = 0.0193 and an HR 0.07, 95% CI [0.05-0.09], P = 0.005, respectively). The overall rate of perioperative complications was 11%. CONCLUSIONS: We report that endovascular and hybrid surgery are safe and effective in the management of TASC-D complex aortoiliac lesions in mid to long-term follow-up. Short-term and long-term complications were all considered as minor.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Stents , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/etiologíaRESUMEN
Long-term indwelling central venous catheters (CVC) are frequently used to secure vascular access to deliver injectable treatment. Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) occurs in approximately 2-6% of cancer patients. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to assess the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence in cancer patients; 200 patients were included. Mean age was 56 ± 15.15 years, median follow-up duration was 16.5 [range: 10-36] months. The incidence of recurrence was estimated using Gray's method for competing risk with death as the competing event of VTE. Recurrent VTE occurred in 25.5% of patients with a median occurrence time of 6.5 [range: 5-11.25] months. In case of recurrence, 94.6% of patients were treated for cancer and 80.4% of them received anticoagulants; 4 major bleeds and 17 non-major bleeds occurred during follow-up. In multivariate analysis, previous VTE (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.48 (95% CI 1.42-4.32) and presence of CVC (HR 5.56 (95% CI 1.96-15.75) were significant recurrence risk factors. After a first episode of CRT, 25.5% of patients experienced VTE recurrence as UEDVT in 30 cases (55.5%), PE in 17 cases (31.5%), and DVT in 7 cases (13%), mostly during anticoagulation therapy. Anticoagulation therapy does not avoid CRT in case of cancer and must be balanced with hemorrhagic risk.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Solid tumors often establish a locally hypercoagulant state that promotes vascular complications, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE). Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is associated with a broad range of hemostatic complications. Although VTE rarely occurs in ambulatory patients with OSCC, the coagulation cascade is typically activated by surgical resection and local hemorrhage. We present the recent progress in the understanding of the role and regulation of coagulation in OSCC. RECENT FINDINGS: Application of systems biology, using bulk tumor and single cell genomic analyses, unveiled the landscape of the tumor coagulome. Of all tumor types, OSCC express the highest mRNA levels of F3 and PLAU, the genes that encode the tissue factor (TF) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), the key regulators of coagulation and fibrinolysis, respectively. It also brought to light the intimate and reciprocal regulation between coagulation/fibrinolysis and the tumor microenvironment (TME). SUMMARY: OSCC have a specific coagulome, with consequences that likely extend beyond the vascular risk. We discuss the attractive possibility that biomarkers of the coagulation cascade might reflect some important characteristics of the TME, offering new opportunities to better understand the impact of surgical procedures, better predict their oncological outcome and improve current therapeutic approaches.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias de la Boca , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Análisis de Sistemas , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal strength of compression needed to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after a proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is debated. We aimed to assess whether 25 mm Hg elastic compression stockings (ECS) are non-inferior to 35 mm Hg ECS in preventing PTS after a DVT. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial, we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with a first ipsilateral proximal DVT attending 46 French vascular medicine hospital departments or private practices. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1, stratified by centre, age, and sex; with varying block sizes of two and four) to wear 25 mm Hg or 35 mm Hg ECS for 2 years. The primary outcome was the cumulative rate of PTS 2 years after inclusion, defined by a Villalta scale (≥5). Efficacy was assessed by intention-to-treat and in eligible participants who had complete primary outcome data. A per-protocol analysis was also conducted among compliant patients as a secondary outcome measure. Safety was assessed in all participants who used ECS at least once, and for which we have at least some tolerance information during follow-up. The margin for non-inferiority was 12·5%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01578122, and has been completed. FINDINGS: Between June 28, 2012, and July 21, 2017, we enrolled 341 eligible participants who consented to randomisation. 233 (68%) were men and median age was 59 years (IQR 45-70). Collection of ethnicity and race as a routine research variable is not authorised in France. Median follow-up was 735 days (IQR 721-760). 249 (73%) had complete data at 2 years. For the primary analysis, 40 (31%) of 129 participants with complete data in the 25 mm Hg ECS group and 40 (33%) of 120 in the 35 mm Hg group had PTS (absolute difference -2·3% [90% CI -12·1 to 7·4], pnon-inferiority=0·0062; relative risk 0·93, 95% CI 0·65 to 1·33). Results remained similar after imputation of missing data in patients we were authorised to do so: the cumulative proportion of PTS was 45 (29%) of 154 in the 25 mm Hg ECS group versus 52 (35%) of 148 in the 35 mm Hg ECS group (relative risk 0·83, 95% CI 0·60 to 1·16). Absolute difference was -5·9%, (90% CI -14·7 to 2·9), p=0·0003 for non-inferiority. Adherence was optimal (>80% and modified GIRERD score of 0-2) for 75 (51%) of 146 patients assigned to 25 mm Hg ECS and for 56 (42%) of 134 patients assigned to 35 mm Hg ECS (p=0·11). Regarding major adverse events related to ECS, there were no between-group differences in rates of deep vein thrombosis (0 vs 1 [0·6%]), ipsilateral leg ulcer (0 vs 1 [0·6%]), infection (0 vs 0), or death (0 vs 0) between the 169 patients evaluated in the 25 mm Hg ECS group and the 159 patients in the 35 mm Hg ECS group. Two (1%) of 328 patients who ever wore ESC developed ECS-related serious adverse events, one distal DVT and one leg ulcer (both in the 35 mm Hg ECS group). In the 25 mm Hg group, 6 patients died, 14 had a venous thromboembolic recurrence (proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism), and 7 had a major bleed. In the 35 mm Hg group, 5 patients died, 10 had a venous thromboembolic recurrence (proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism), and 6 had a major bleed. INTERPRETATION: Although we did not reach the prespecified sample size, our results suggest that 25 mm Hg ECS are non-inferior to 35 mm Hg ECS in preventing PTS. Larger more powerful studies are needed. FUNDING: Laboratoires Innothera, France.
Asunto(s)
Úlcera de la Pierna , Síndrome Postrombótico , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Medias de Compresión , Síndrome Postrombótico/etiología , Síndrome Postrombótico/prevención & control , Método Doble Ciego , VenasRESUMEN
Screening for cancer in case of venous thromboembolism: when and how? Cancer associated thrombosis (cat) is an important challenge. When venous thromboembolism (vte) occurs without any identified risk factors, the risk of cat raises the question of a hidden cancer and the need for an extensive screening or not. Several series have shown a prevalence between 5% and 10% of cancer when non provoqued vte is diagnosed. Most of cancers occur during the following year of vte. If we consider diagnosing the cancer in early stage, we might improve the patient outcome and reduce cancer mortality. A simple screening, including clinical examina¬tion, personal and familial history of cancer, basic laboratory tests and recommended age and sex testing is mandatory. Other exams are considered as useless at present time. Whether a tep-scan, prescribed in patients older than 50, brings a clinical benefit, is still unresolved. Screening for cancer in case of venous thromboembolism: when and how? Cancer associated thrombosis (cat) is an important challenge. When venous thromboembolism (vte) occurs without any identified risk factors, the risk of cat raises the question of a hidden cancer and the need for an extensive screening or not. Several series have shown a prevalence between 5% and 10% of cancer when non provoqued vte is diagnosed. Most of cancers occur during the following year of vte. If we consider diagnosing the cancer in early stage, we might improve the patient outcome and reduce cancer mortality. A simple screening, including clinical examina¬tion, personal and familial history of cancer, basic laboratory tests and recommended age and sex testing is mandatory. Other exams are considered as useless at present time. Whether a tep-scan, prescribed in patients older than 50, brings a clinical benefit, is still unresolved.
Quand et comment rechercher un cancer en cas de maladie thromboembolique veineuse ? L'association thrombose et cancer est connue depuis longtemps et pose des problèmes diagnostiques et thérapeutiques spécifiques. La maladie thromboembolique veineuse (mtev) peut précéder le cancer et servir de signe d'alerte. Plusieurs publications font état d'une prévalence comprise entre 5 et 10 % de cancer occulte en cas de mtev non provoquée. La plupart des cancers apparaissent dans l'année qui suit le diagnostic de mtev. Dépister un cancer au stade infraclinique, au moment du diagnostic de la thrombose, permettrait de diminuer le risque d'extension du cancer et d'améliorer le pronostic des patients. Une recherche de cancer, simple, incluant interrogatoire, examen clinique et bilan biologique minimal, sans examens complémentaires inutiles et adaptée aux facteurs de risque, doit donc être effectuée. La question est aujourd'hui de savoir si une stratégie plus extensive, comprenant un tep-scan, notamment chez les patients de plus de 50 ans, apporte un bénéfice clinique.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas , Tromboembolia Venosa , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: D-dimer measurement is a safe tool to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE), but its specificity decreases in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Our aim was to derive a new algorithm with a specific D-dimer threshold for COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We conducted a French multicenter, retrospective cohort study among 774 COVID-19 patients with suspected PE. D-dimer threshold adjusted to extent of lung damage found on computed tomography (CT) was derived in a patient set (n = 337), and its safety assessed in an independent validation set (n = 337). RESULTS: According to receiver operating characteristic curves, in the derivation set, D-dimer safely excluded PE, with one false negative, when using a 900 ng/mL threshold when lung damage extent was <50% and 1,700 ng/mL when lung damage extent was ≥50%. In the derivation set, the algorithm sensitivity was 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.7-100.0) and its specificity 28.4% (95% CI: 24.1-32.3). The negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.44) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67). In the validation set, sensitivity and specificity were 96.7% (95% CI: 88.7-99.6) and 39.2% (95% CI: 32.2-46.1), respectively. The NLR was 0.08 (95% CI; 0.02-0.33), and the AUC did not differ from that of the derivation set (0.68, 95% CI: 0.64-0.72, p = 0.097). Using the Co-LEAD algorithm, 76 among 250 (30.4%) COVID-19 patients with suspected PE could have been managed without CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and 88 patients would have required two CTs. CONCLUSION: The Co-LEAD algorithm could safely exclude PE, and could reduce the use of CTPA in COVID-19 patients. Further prospective studies need to validate this strategy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno , Pulmón , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thrombosis is the main complication in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). A JAK2V617F mutation has been shown to be a risk factor for thrombosis. The implication of other risk factors alongside a mutation allele burden needs to be clarified (Trifa et al., 2018; Borowczyk et al., 2015). OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the role of the JAK2 mutation allele burden in the risk of cardiovascular events (CVE) and/or venous thrombosis (VTE) in a cohort of patients with confirmed MPN, as well as in patients without confirmed MPN. METHODS: We restrospectively included all consecutive patients who were positive for JAK2V617F seen by our unit between December 2008 and September 2016. Inclusion criteria were a positive test for the JAK2V617F mutation, with at least 1% allele burden, with or without confirmed MPN. RESULTS: We included 239 patients of median age 71 years [60-81], followed-up for a median of 82.8 months [41.08-146.88]. For JAK2V617F positive patients having an allele burden superior to 50% the cumulative incidence of VTE was significantly higher than for those with an allele burden inferior to 50% (HR 3.11 95% CI [1.10-8.76] p = 0.031). The cumulative incidence of VTE was also higher in patients with obesity (HR 4.58 95% CI [1.33-15.8] p = 0.016). There was no significant association between a JAK2V617F allele burden and arterial thrombosis (manifesting as CVE). Previous VTE was also associated with a higher cumulative incidence of recurrence during follow-up HR 3.22 95% CI [1.17-8.81] p = 0.0231. CONCLUSION: We show that a JAK2V617F allele burden is associated with risk of VTE but not with CVE.
Asunto(s)
Janus Quinasa 2 , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos , Trombosis , Trombosis de la Vena , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alelos , Humanos , Janus Quinasa 2/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/complicaciones , Trastornos Mieloproliferativos/genética , Trombosis/complicaciones , Trombosis/genética , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombosis de la Vena/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemostatic complications, ranging from thromboembolism to bleeding, are a significant source of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. The tumor coagulome represents the multiple genes and proteins that locally contribute to the equilibrium between coagulation and fibrinolysis. We aimed to study the coagulome of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) and examine its link to the tumor microenvironment (TME). METHODS: We used data from bulk tumor DNA/RNA-seq (The Cancer Genome Atlas), single-cell RNA-seq data and OSCC cells in culture. RESULTS: Among all tumor types, OSCC was identified as the tumor with the highest mRNA expression levels of F3 (Tissue Factor, TF) and PLAU (urokinase type-plasminogen activator, uPA). Great inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity were observed. Single-cell analyses showed the coexistence of subpopulations of pro-coagulant and pro-fibrinolytic cancer cells within individual tumors. Interestingly, OSCC with high F3 expressed higher levels of the key immune checkpoint molecules CD274/PD-L1, PDCD1LG2/PD-L2 and CD80, especially in tumor dendritic cells. In vitro studies confirmed the particularity of the OSCC coagulome and suggested that thrombin exerts indirect effects on OSCC cells. CONCLUSIONS: OSCC presents a specific coagulome. Further studies examining a possible negative modulation of the tumor's adaptive immune response by the coagulation process are warranted.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin for treating cancer-associated VTE. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is rivaroxaban as efficient and safe as dalteparin to treat patients with cancer-associated VTE? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a randomized open-label noninferiority trial, patients with active cancer who had proximal DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), or both were assigned randomly to therapeutic doses of rivaroxaban or dalteparin for 3 months. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE, a composite of symptomatic or incidental DVT or PE, and worsening of pulmonary vascular or venous obstruction at 3 months. RESULTS: Of 158 randomized patients, 74 and 84 patients were assigned to receive rivaroxaban and dalteparin, respectively. Mean age was 69.4 years, and 115 patients (76.2%) had metastatic disease. The primary outcome occurred in 4 and 6 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations: cumulative incidence, 6.4% vs 10.1%; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.21-2.66). Major bleeding occurred in 1 and 3 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (cumulative incidence, 1.4% vs 3.7%; SHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.04-3.43). Major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 9 and 8 patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (cumulative incidence, 12.2% vs 9.8%; SHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.49-3.26). Overall, 19 patients (25.7%) and 20 patients (23.8%) died in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.97). INTERPRETATION: In this trial comparing rivaroxaban and dalteparin in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, the number of patients was insufficient to reach the predefined criteria for noninferiority, but efficacy and safety results were consistent with those previously reported with DOACs. An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing DOACs with low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer-associated VTE is provided. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02746185; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Asunto(s)
Dalteparina , Neoplasias , Rivaroxabán , Tromboembolia Venosa , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Dalteparina/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologíaRESUMEN
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality; however, data on its etiology and evolution in patients under 50 years old are scarce. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of data from medical records, including cardiovascular risk factors, etiology, medical and surgical treatment, and follow-up. We included all patients with PAD aged between 18 and 50 years attending our university hospital between 2005 and 2015. Of the 87 patients included, 32 (36%) were women. Smoking was acknowledged by 81 patients (93%), and 37 had dyslipidemia (42.5%). Median follow-up was 24 months (10-59). Recurrence occurred in 41 patients (47.1%), all active smokers, with a median delay of 14 months (7-47). Acute limb ischemia at diagnosis was significantly associated with major amputation, odds ratio (OR) 5.95 (95%CI 1.41-40.90, P = .029), which was needed by 11 patients (12.6%). Treatments included antiplatelet therapy (76; 87.4%), statins (67; 77%), and anti-hypertensives (60; 69%), and 29 (32.1%) patients benefited from vascular rehabilitation. This cohort of relatively young patients with PAD showed a high level of symptom recurrence. Atherosclerosis was the most common etiology. Our study revealed that medical treatment is often under-prescribed in this age group and needs to be improved.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Adolescente , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Characterisation of arterial Doppler waveforms is a persistent problem and a source of confusion in clinical practice. Classifications have been proposed to address the problem but their efficacy in clinical practice is unknown. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the categorisation rate of Descotes and Cathignol, Spronk et al. and the simplified Saint-Bonnet classifications. METHODS: This is a multicentre prospective study where 130 patients attending a vascular arterial ultrasound were enrolled and Doppler waveform acquisition was performed at the common femoral, the popliteal, and the distal arteries at both sides. Experienced vascular specialists categorized these waveforms according to the three classifications. RESULTS: of 1033 Doppler waveforms, 793 (76.8%), 943 (91.3%) and 1014 (98.2%) waveforms could be categorized using Descotes and Cathignol, Spronk et al. and the simplified Saint-Bonnet classifications, respectively. Differences in categorisation between classifications were significant (Chi squared test, p < 0.0001). Of 19 waveforms uncategorized using the simplified Saint-Bonnet classification, 58% and 84% were not categorized using the Spronk et al. and Descotes and Cathignol classifications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study suggest that the simplified Saint-Bonnet classification provides a superior categorisation rate when compared with Spronk et al. and Descotes and Cathignol classifications.