A rare case of hydatid cyst-associated AA amyloidosis and literature review of hydatid cyst-associated nephropathy.

Hydatid disease is an infective picture caused by echinococcus, which progresses with cysts in various organs, especially in the liver. Renal involvement is an unusual location in the course of the disease. Although mostly asymptomatic renal cysts are seen, rarely glomerular or tubular associated nephropathy develops. In addition, the development of amyloidosis has been shown previously in patients with untreated chronic hydatid cysts. We wanted to bring a 27-year-old female patient with a 10-year history of hydatid cyst and AA amyloidosis to the literature. In addition, in our literature review for hydatid disease-associated nephropathies, we brought together data from 12 studies involving a total of 21 cases. Of these cases, 3 were membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN), 5 were, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), 1 was minimally change disease (MCD), 5 were AA amyloidosis (including our case), 3 were immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), 1 was tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN), 1 was chronic kidney disease (CKD), 1 was TIN with mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis (MesPGN), 1 was TIN with IgAN, 1 was MPGN with immunoglobulin M nephropathy (IgMN). In this way, we wanted to shed light on the relationship between Echinococcus and nephropathy. In this way, we wanted to emphasise the necessity of doing renal examinations in the follow-up of hydatid cyst patients.

A cross-sectional study on restless legs syndrome (RLS) in polycythemia vera (PV): is iron deficiency the only culprit?

INTRODUCTION: In polycythemia vera (PV) patients undergoing phlebotomy, iron deficiency (ID) may develop. ID has been linked to restless legs syndrome (RLS), and in one study, 29.6% of PV patients had RLS. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of RLS in PV and to evaluate factors that might play a role in RLS development among PV and essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients. METHODS: We consecutively included PV cases as the patient group, and ET and ID patients and healthy subjects (HSs) were included as controls. Those with conditions that could lead to RLS were excluded. All subjects were questioned according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group. RESULTS: Twenty-seven PV, 23 ET, and 22 ID patients and 23 HSs were included. RLS was detected in 25.9%, 34.8%, and 45.5% of PV, ET, and ID patients, respectively. None of the HSs had RLS. In univariate analysis, interferon-α and anagrelide use, magnesium levels, and the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs (LANSS) scores had a significant impact on RLS in PV and ET patients (p = 0.014, p = 0.032, p = 0.036, and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: RLS was more common among PV and ET patients than HSs, which was irrespective to the iron status. RLS was more frequent in ET patients than that observed in PV cases, indicating that ID may not be the only causative factor for RLS development in PV. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of RLS developing in PV and ET.

Current evidence on the efficacy and safety of generic imatinib in CML and the impact of generics on health care costs.

Since the introduction of imatinib, the management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has changed considerably. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the mainstay of CML treatment; however, the high financial burden of TKIs can be problematic for both the patients and health care systems. After the emergence of generics, reimbursement policies of many countries have changed, and generics offered an alternative treatment option for CML patients. There are many papers published on the use of generics in CML patients with conflicting results regarding both efficacy and safety. In this paper, we systematically reviewed the current literature on generic imatinib use in CML, and 36 papers were evaluated. Both in vitro and in vivo studies of generic imatinib showed comparable results with branded imatinib in terms of bioequivalence and bioavailability. In most studies, generics were comparable with the original molecule in terms of efficacy and safety, both in newly diagnosed patients and after switching from Gleevec. Some generic studies showed contradictory findings regarding efficacy and toxicity, and these differences can be attributed to some factors including the use of different generics in different countries. Both in hypothetical models and in real life, introduction of generic imatinib caused significant reduction in health care costs. In conclusion, generics are not inferior to original imatinib in terms of efficacy with an acceptable toxicity profile. Notwithstanding the generally favorable efficacy and safety of generics worldwide to date, we most probably still need more time to draw firmer conclusions on the longer-term outcomes of generics.