Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 144
Filtrar
1.
J Trauma ; 51(6): 1031-6, 2001 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11740246
2.
J Trauma ; 50(5): 843-7, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11371839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The radiographic diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration (BTAL) remains problematic. We reviewed our experience with chest radiographic signs of BTAL at a single trauma center. METHODS: The chest radiographs of 188 consecutive blunt trauma patients with suspected BTAL who underwent portable chest radiography and aortography were retrospectively reviewed by a thoracic radiologist. The presence or absence of 15 radiographic findings were recorded, and the sensitivity and specificity of individual radiographic signs and combinations of signs were determined. RESULTS: There were 10 patients with BTAL. Although three signs showed greater than 90% sensitivity for BTAL, these signs showed low specificity, and no significant improvement in overall accuracy was achieved by combining radiographic findings. CONCLUSION: The experience at our institution suggests that chest radiographs have limited utility in the accurate diagnosis of blunt traumatic aortic laceration. Cross-sectional imaging techniques will likely become the preferred imaging procedures for evaluating patients with suspected BTAL.


Asunto(s)
Aorta/lesiones , Laceraciones/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Trauma ; 50(4): 604-9; discussion 609-11, 2001 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11303153

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Urban geriatric trauma patients are known to die more often than their younger counterparts. Little is known of the fate of geriatric trauma patients in a rural environment where delays to definitive treatment are frequent. We hypothesized that rural trauma patients would do worse than their urban counterparts because of prolonged delays to definitive care. METHODS: Five-year retrospective analysis of all trauma deaths occurring within a rural state and retrospective outcome analysis of trauma patients admitted to a tertiary care facility who were less than 55 years old (defined as young) and 55 or more years old (defined as old). Outcome analysis was performed comparing old and young rural hospitalized patients to the Major Trauma Outcome Study data set collected in major urban trauma centers. RESULTS: Of the total trauma deaths in the state, 32.5% were old. Old patients were less likely to die at the scene of the injury than were their younger counterparts (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.001). Hospitalized old patients had a significantly higher mean Revised Trauma Score and a significantly lower Injury Severity Score, a higher complication rate, and a higher mortality rate than did hospitalized young patients. The young group had a significantly better survival (W = 0.59, Z = -3.49, p = 0.0001) than the MTOS data set, but the old group had a significantly worse survival (W = -1.8, Z = -3.49, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a rural environment, old trauma patients die more commonly in the hospital than their younger counterparts, who die more commonly at the scene. Old trauma patients who die in the hospital were less severely injured than their younger counterparts who died in the hospital. Old patients admitted to this rural trauma center have a significantly worse survival than their urban counterparts despite the fact that young rural trauma patients do significantly better than their urban counterparts. Understanding the demographics of rural geriatric trauma may be useful in allocating resources in rural trauma system design. It must be understood that despite relatively low injury severity and physiologic stability, there is a significant potential for rural geriatric trauma patients to do poorly.


Asunto(s)
Anciano/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismo Múltiple/mortalidad , Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Niño , Preescolar , Eutanasia Pasiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/clasificación , Traumatismo Múltiple/etiología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Vigilancia de la Población , Sistema de Registros , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vermont/epidemiología
4.
J Trauma ; 50(1): 96-101, 2001 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11231677

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) were developed to improve the survival of injured children, but it is currently unknown if children admitted to PTCs are more likely to survive than those admitted to adult trauma centers (ATCs). METHODS: Fifty-three thousand one hundred thirteen pediatric trauma cases from 22 PTCs and 31 ATCs included in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry were reviewed to evaluate survival rates at PTCs and ATCs. RESULTS: Overall, 1,259 children died. The raw mortality rate was lower at PTCs (1.81% of 32,554 children) than at ATCs (3.88% of 18,368 children). However, patients admitted to ATCs were more severely injured. When Injury Severity Score, Pediatric Trauma Score, mechanism (blunt or penetrating), gender, age, clustering, and American College of Surgeons (ACS) verification status were controlled for using a single logistic regression model, there was no statistically significant difference in survival between PTCs and ATCs (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.26; p = 0.587). A similar comparison of the 12 ACS-verified trauma centers with the 41 nonverified centers showed verification to be associated with improved survival (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.97; p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Although PTCs have higher overall survival rates than ATCs, this difference disappears when the analysis controls for Injury Severity Score, Pediatric Trauma Score, age, mechanism, and ACS verification status. ACS-verified centers have significantly higher survival rates than do unverified centers.


Asunto(s)
Sistema de Registros , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
5.
J Trauma ; 50(3): 409-13; discussion 414, 2001 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11265019

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Formalized systems of trauma care are believed to improve outcomes in an urban setting, but little is known of the applicability in a rural setting. METHODS: We conducted a population-based analysis of hospital survival after trauma comparing an American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center (TC) with the pooled results of 13 small community hospitals (CH) in a rural state with no formal trauma system. All patients admitted to any hospital within the state of Vermont over a 5-year period (1995-1999) with a trauma discharge diagnosis were included. Elderly patients with isolated femur fractures were excluded from the database. International Classification of Diseases Injury Severity Scores (ICISSs) were calculated for each patient and used to control for injury severity in an omnibus logistic regression model that included age, ICISS, and hospital type (TC vs. CH) as predictors of survival. Patients who died were characterized on the basis of ICISS into "expected" (ICISS < 0.25), "indeterminate" (ICISS = 0.26-0.50), and "unexpected" (ICISS > 0.5). RESULTS: In 16,354 trauma admissions over the 5-year period in the rural state of Vermont, 370 (2.2%) died. There were 5,964 (36%) admitted to TC. Patients admitted to TC were more injured (ICISS 0.94 vs. 0.96) and had a higher mortality (3.1% vs. 1.8). Overall, care at the CH provided an improved survival (odds ratio = 1.75, 95% confidence internal = 1.31-2.18, p = 0.000). However, in the more severely injured cohort of trauma patients (expected and indeterminate; n = 133), overall survival was higher in the TC (16% CH vs. 38% TC, p = 0.02, chi2). Because the TC was known to provide care equivalent to Major Trauma Outcome Study norms during this time period (Z = -0.03, M = 0.894), we believe this study confirms that trauma care throughout the state is in accordance with national norms. CONCLUSION: In a rural state, without a statewide formal trauma system, survival after trauma is no worse at CH than TC when corrected for injury severity and age. Future expenditures of resources might better be concentrated in other areas such as discovery or prehospital care to further improve outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Hospitales Comunitarios/organización & administración , Hospitales Rurales/organización & administración , Traumatismo Múltiple/mortalidad , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Traumatología/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/clasificación , Traumatismo Múltiple/complicaciones , Evaluación de Necesidades/organización & administración , Oportunidad Relativa , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Análisis de Supervivencia , Vermont/epidemiología
6.
J Trauma ; 48(5): 851-63; discussion 863-4, 2000 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10823528

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypotension doubles the adverse outcome of severe brain injury (BI). This finding is thought to be due to secondary ischemia caused by cerebral hypoperfusion. Aggressive prehospital fluid resuscitation in BI is advocated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP). Increasing MAP by prehospital fluid resuscitation before control of hemorrhage is thought to increase blood loss and reduce survival. We hypothesized that vasoconstrictor treatment of uncontrolled hemorrhage would increase MAP, reduce hemorrhage volume, and decrease the extent of BI compared with delayed fluid resuscitation (DR) or resuscitation with Ringer's lactate (RL). METHODS: Swine were randomly assigned to a control group or an experimental group: splenic laceration (uncontrolled hemorrhage) and cryogenic BI. The experimental group received one of three prehospital resuscitation regimens: DR, RL, or phenylephrine (Phen) to maintain baseline MAP. Variables were measured at baseline and at 20, 50, and 120 minutes during the simulated "prehospital and early hospital" phases and at 2 and 8 hours after surgical control of the uncontrolled hemorrhage. After killing, biopsies of the brain, liver, kidney, and gut were evaluated for histologic evidence of ischemia and compared between groups. RESULTS: Hemorrhage volume was similar in the experimental groups. Mortality was lowest in the Phen group (11%) compared with DR (40%) and RL (33%) groups. Phen increased MAP and cerebral perfusion pressure. RL infusion increased cerebral blood flow and resulted in less secondary injury than either Phen or DR. CONCLUSION: Phen improves MAP and systemic and cerebral perfusion pressure in the prehospital phase but does not reduce secondary neuronal ischemia. RL restores cerebral blood flow earlier and is associated with less secondary ischemia than either Phen or DR in this model. These data suggest that prehospital infusion of RL in patients with BI and shock is warranted and decreases secondary ischemia.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/uso terapéutico , Lesiones Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Fenilefrina/uso terapéutico , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/farmacología , Animales , Biopsia , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Lesiones Encefálicas/mortalidad , Lesiones Encefálicas/patología , Lesiones Encefálicas/fisiopatología , Circulación Cerebrovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Soluciones Isotónicas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Fenilefrina/farmacología , Distribución Aleatoria , Lactato de Ringer , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Choque Hemorrágico/patología , Choque Hemorrágico/fisiopatología , Porcinos , Factores de Tiempo , Vasoconstrictores/farmacología
8.
Arch Surg ; 134(11): 1274-7, 1999 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10555646

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS: Factors associated with fetal death in injured pregnant patients are related to increasing injury severity and abnormal maternal physiologic profile. DESIGN: A multi-institutional retrospective study of 13 level I and level II trauma centers from 1992 to 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Fetal survival. RESULTS: Of 27,715 female admissions, there were 372 injured pregnant patients (1.3%); 84% had blunt injuries and 16% had penetrating injuries. There were 14 maternal deaths (3.8%) and 35 fetal deaths (9.4%). The population suffering fetal death had higher injury severity scores (P<.001), lower Glascow Coma Scale scores (P<.001), and lower admitting maternal pH (P = .002). Most women who lost their fetus arrived in shock (P = .005) or had a fetal heart rate of less than 110 beats/min at some time during their hospitalization (P<.001). An Injury Severity Score greater than 25 was associated with a 50% incidence of fetal death. Placental abruption was the most frequent complication, occurring in 3.5% of patients and associated with 54% mortality. Cardiotrophic monitoring to detect potentially threatening fetal heart rates was performed on only 61% of pregnant women in their third trimester. Of these patients, 7 had abnormalities on cardiotrophic monitoring and underwent successful cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal death was more likely with greater severity of injury. Cardiotrophic monitoring is underused in injured pregnant patients in their third trimester even after admission to major trauma centers. Increased use of cardiotrophic monitoring may decrease the mortality caused by placental abruption.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Fetal/epidemiología , Muerte Fetal/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
J Trauma ; 47(5): 834-44, 1999 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10568709

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently acquired data suggest that prehospital fluid resuscitation may worsen outcome of patients with penetrating torso trauma. In patients with head injury, delayed resuscitation (DR) could lead to secondary cerebral ischemia. We hypothesized that standard prehospital resuscitation (SPR) with lactated Ringer's solution or diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin would reduce secondary cerebral ischemia compared with DR. METHODS: Anesthetized swine were randomized to receive SPR, diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin, or DR after cryogenic brain injury and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock and studied for 70 minutes after the combined insults. RESULTS: Hemorrhage volume was lowest in the DR group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in systemic or cerebral oxygen delivery. Intracranial pressure was lower and cerebral perfusion pressure higher in the diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin group compared with SPR (p<0.05). Lesion size was greatest in the SPR group, but the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: In this model, SPR leads to secondary cerebral ischemia. DR is no worse and may be superior to conventional prehospital resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Resucitación/métodos , Animales , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/análogos & derivados , Sustitutos Sanguíneos/administración & dosificación , Lesiones Encefálicas/fisiopatología , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Circulación Cerebrovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Femenino , Fluidoterapia , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Hemoglobinas/administración & dosificación , Presión Intracraneal/efectos de los fármacos , Presión Intracraneal/fisiología , Soluciones Isotónicas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Oxígeno/sangre , Lactato de Ringer , Choque Hemorrágico/fisiopatología , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Porcinos , Factores de Tiempo
10.
J Trauma ; 47(4): 802-21, 1999 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10528626

RESUMEN

Improving the care of trauma patients in a rural environment requires that several important issues be addressed. First, a universal definition of what constitutes "rural" must be established. We propose that a combined effort of the Federal Government and the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons develop this definition. Second, data on rural trauma demographics and outcome must be collected in a national database. We propose that this database be incorporated in the "TRACS" database of the Committee on Trauma of the American College of Surgeons. Such a database will allow a "needs assessment analysis of existing care in rural environments and facilitate planning and implementation of efficient systems of care. Funding for the rural database should come from the federal government. Finally, increased public awareness of problems unique to rural trauma care is necessary. The rural trauma subcommittee of the ACSCOT should go from an ad hoc committee to a standing committee with the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. We propose a national conference on rural trauma care hosted by the federal government for the purpose of addressing these issues and simultaneously increasing public awareness.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Traumatología/organización & administración , Predicción , Prioridades en Salud , Humanos , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Evaluación de Necesidades/organización & administración , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Mecanismo de Reembolso/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Transporte de Pacientes/organización & administración , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
J Trauma ; 46(4): 553-62; discussion 562-4, 1999 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10217217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) has been used by surgeons and emergency physicians (CLIN) to screen reliably for hemoperitoneum after trauma. Despite recommendations for "appropriate training," ranging from 50 to 400 proctored examinations, there are no supporting data. METHODS: We prospectively examined the initial FAST experience of CLIN in detecting hemoperitoneum by using diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomography, and clinical findings as the diagnostic "gold standard." RESULTS: 241 patients had FAST performed by 12 CLIN (average, 20/CLIN; range, 2-43); 51 patients (21.2%) had hemoperitoneum and 17 patients (7.1%) required laparotomy. Initial experience with FAST by CLIN produced 35 true positives, 180 true negatives, 16 false negatives, and 3 false positives; sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 98%. Initial error rate was 17%, which fell to 5% after 10 examinations (chi2; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Previous recommendations for the number of proctored examinations for individual nonradiologist clinician sonographers to develop competence are excessive.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemoperitoneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiología/educación , Ultrasonografía/normas , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Adulto , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Lavado Peritoneal , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Vermont , Heridas no Penetrantes/clasificación
12.
J Trauma ; 46(3): 380-5, 1999 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10088837

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of blunt cervical arterial injury (CAI) is made difficult by its infrequent occurrence and delayed presentation. Beginning in January of 1995, we used computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of the neck to screen for CAI. We hypothesized that CTA could be incorporated into the workup of patients sustaining blunt neck injury as a screening modality for CAI and that CTA would increase the early detection of CAI. METHODS: Retrospective review of all CAI for the years January of 1988 to June of 1997 at a Level I trauma center. CAI diagnosed before introduction of CTA (pre-CTA; January of 1988 to December of 1994) were compared with those after (post-CTA; January of 1995 to June of 1997). RESULTS: The overall incidence of CAI for the entire time period was 0.11%. Motor vehicle crash (53%) was the most common mechanism, with focal neurologic deficit (23%) or seizures (17.6%) the most common presenting clinical symptoms. CTA added only a few additional minutes to the time required for the workup of patients sustaining blunt neck injury in whom CAI was suspected. The incidence of CAI increased from 0.06% pre-CTA to 0.19% post-CTA (p = 0.02; Fisher exact test). CTA was associated with a decrease in mean time to make the diagnosis of CAI (156 hours pre-CTA vs. 5.9 hours post-CTA). In addition, CTA was associated with a decrease in the incidence of permanent neurologic sequelae from CAI (50% pre-CTA vs. 0% post-CTA; p = 0.07; Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: We conclude that CTA does not significantly increase the time of the diagnostic workup of the patient with injuries caused by blunt trauma. The introduction of CTA at our institution was associated with an increase in the detection rate of CAI. Earlier detection of CAI may allow for more timely therapeutic intervention and potentially prevent permanent neurologic sequelae.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Cuello/irrigación sanguínea , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Arteria Vertebral/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidentes de Tránsito , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Angiografía/métodos , Árboles de Decisión , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
13.
J Trauma ; 46(3): 483-7, 1999 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10088856

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children and the elderly are more likely to be underinsured compared with the general population of trauma patients. We performed financial analysis on all trauma patients admitted during an 18-month period to a Level I adult and pediatric trauma center to evaluate the financial impact of providing trauma care for children and the elderly. METHODS: Patients were categorized by age: PEDI<17 years, GERI>64 years and MID = 17 to 64 years. Reimbursement ratio (RR = reimbursement/cost; RR>1 = profit, RR<1 = loss), length of stay (LOS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were calculated for each age group. RESULTS: RR for GERI (RR = 0.99) was significantly lower than for PEDI (RR = 1.15) and MID (RR = 1.16). There was no difference in ISS, but the LOS of GERI was greater than that of PEDI and MID (p<0.05). Cost per patient and LOS were less in PEDI versus MID and GERI (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Trauma care reimbursement for the elderly is inadequate, whereas pediatric trauma care costs less to deliver and is profitable to the trauma center.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos/economía , Heridas y Lesiones/economía , Contabilidad/métodos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Mecanismo de Reembolso/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vermont , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
14.
J Trauma ; 46(2): 328-33, 1999 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10029042

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics and outcome of transferred trauma patients in a rural setting. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of all trauma admissions to a rural Level I trauma center to examine a 3.5-year (1993-1996) comparison of trauma patients admitted directly with those transferred (RTTP) after being initially stabilized at an outlying hospital. We used prehospital times, Injury Severity Score (ISS), LD50ISS (the ISS at which 50% of patients died), Revised Trauma Score, probability of survival, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, and observed survival as main outcome measures. RESULTS: RTTPs (39.4%) spent an average of 182+/-139 minutes at the outlying hospital and 72+/-42 minutes in transport to the trauma center. Proportionately more head/neck and patients with multiple injuries composed the RTTP group. The RTTP were more severely injured (ISS 11.1+/-8.5; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 16.2+/-5.8; Revised Trauma Score 7.44+/-1.1) than the trauma patients admitted directly (ISS 7.9+/-5.3; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II 13.1+/-6.3; Revised Trauma Score 7.8+/-0.4; p < 0.05). However, both groups had the same LD50ISS (ISS = 35). When logistic regression was applied with death as the dependent variable, both ISS and age contributed significantly (p = 0.0001) but transfer status did not (p = 0.473). CONCLUSION: Rural trauma centers admit a high percentage of RTTP. These RTTP have a higher injury severity and acuity than their trauma patients admitted directly counterparts. Trauma care in rural areas that involves initial stabilization at outlying hospitals does not adversely affect mortality.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Rurales , Traumatismo Múltiple/terapia , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Centros Traumatológicos , APACHE , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Hospitales Comunitarios , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismo Múltiple/clasificación , Traumatismo Múltiple/mortalidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Análisis de Supervivencia , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Triaje/normas , Vermont/epidemiología
15.
J Trauma ; 45(2): 234-7; discussion 237-8, 1998 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9715178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is an important tool because it permits comparison of patient populations for research and quality control. Unfortunately, currently available scoring systems were developed primarily in medical ICUs and have only mediocre performance in surgical ICUs. Moreover, they are very expensive to purchase and use. We conceived a simple risk-stratification tool for the surgical ICU that uses readily available International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes to predict outcome. Called ICISS (International Classification of Disease Illness Severity Score), our score is the product of the survival risk ratios (obtained from an independent data set) for all International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis codes. METHODS: A total of 5,322 noncardiac patients admitted to a surgical ICU during an 8-year period had their Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores compared with their ICISS as predictors of outcome (survival/nonsurvival, length of stay, and charges). RESULTS: ICISS proved to be a much better predictor of survival than APACHE (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) APACHE = 0.806; Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) APACHE = 22.56; ROC ICISS = 0.892; HL ICISS = 12.06) or the APACHE survival probability (ROC = 0.836; HL = 34.47). These differences were highly statistically significant (p < 0.001). ICISS was also better correlated with ICU length of stay (APACHE R2 = 0.06; ICISS R2 = 0.32) and ICU charges (APACHE R2 = 0.07; ICISS R2 = 0.39). When combined in a logistic model with ICISS, APACHE II added slightly to the predictive power of ICISS alone (combined ROC = 0.903) but degraded the calibration of the model (combined HL = 16.29; p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Because ICISS is both more accurate and much less expensive to calculate than APACHE II score, ICISS should replace APACHE II score as the standard risk stratification tool in surgical ICUs.


Asunto(s)
APACHE , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calibración , Niño , Preescolar , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/clasificación , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia
16.
Arch Surg ; 133(4): 390-8, 1998 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9565119

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of delayed vs early fluid resuscitation on cerebral hemodynamics after severe head injury and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled experimental trial. SETTING: Surgical research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Immature swine (N=16) weighing 40 to 50 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve swine were subjected to cryogenic brain lesion and hemorrhage to maintain a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 50 mm Hg. Animals were randomized to receive 1 L of Ringer lactate solution in 20 minutes, starting 20 minutes after injury and hemorrhage, followed by 1 L of Ringer lactate solution in 30 minutes (ER group) (n=6), or no fluid resuscitation (DR group) (n=6). The 4 control animals underwent instrumentation only. The study ended 70 minutes after head injury and hemorrhage. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Measurements of MAP, bilateral regional cerebral blood flow, serum hemoglobin level, systemic and regional cerebral oxygen delivery, and intracranial pressure performed at baseline and 20 (phase 1), 50 (phase 2), and 70 minutes (phase 3) after head injury and hemorrhage. Lesion size (percentage of ipsilateral cortex) was measured post mortem. RESULTS: All animals survived the experimental period. Systemic cerebral oxygen delivery in the DR group was significantly lower at phase 3 compared with that of the ER group (31.5% vs 53.1% at baseline) (P=.03). However, bilateral regional cerebral oxygen delivery was significantly greater in the DR group at phase 3 compared with that of the ER group (71.5% vs 47.0% at baseline in the injured side; 72.9% vs 48.4% at baseline in the noninjured side) (P=.02). Bilateral cerebral blood flow was similar in all groups at all times. The ER group showed a trend toward a greater intracranial pressure elevation (6.8 vs -0.25) (P=.07) and lesion size (37.0% vs 28.6%) (P=.07). Hemoglobin level became significantly lower in the ER group at phase 2 (7.0 vs 10.7) (P=.03) and remained lower at phase 3 (6.9 vs 11.7) (P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate solution following head injury and uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock worsens cerebral hemodynamics. Cerebral pressure autoregulation is sufficiently intact following head injury to maintain regional cerebral oxygen delivery without asanguineous fluid resuscitation.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/terapia , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Fluidoterapia , Soluciones Isotónicas/uso terapéutico , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Animales , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Lesiones Encefálicas/fisiopatología , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Presión Intracraneal/fisiología , Soluciones Isotónicas/efectos adversos , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Distribución Aleatoria , Lactato de Ringer , Choque Hemorrágico/complicaciones , Choque Hemorrágico/fisiopatología , Porcinos , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Arch Surg ; 133(4): 406-11; discussion 412, 1998 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9565121

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short- and long-term outcomes of vena cava filter (VCF) placement for prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism in patients at high risk due to trauma. DESIGN AND SETTING: Case series at a level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Patients were considered for prophylactic VCF placement if they met 1 of the injury criteria--spinal cord injuries with neurologic deficit, severe fractures of the pelvis or long bone (or both), and severe head injury--and had a contraindication to anticoagulation. INTERVENTION: Vena cava filters were placed percutaneously by the interventional radiologists when the acute trauma condition was stabilized following admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Filter tilt of 14 degrees or more, strut malposition, insertion-related deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or inferior vena cava patency. RESULTS: There were 132 prophylactic VCFs placed. A 3.1% rate of insertion-related deep vein thrombosis occurred, all of which were asymptomatic. Filter tilt occurred in 5.5% of patients and strut malposition in 38%. Three cases of pulmonary embolism (1 fatal) occurred in a prophylactic VCF, and all patients had either filter tilt or strut malposition. The risk of pulmonary embolism developing was higher in those patients with filter tilt or strut malposition than in those who did not have these complications (6.3% vs 0%; P=.05; Fisher exact test). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year inferior vena cava patency rates (+/-SD) were 97%+/-3%. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic VCF can be placed safely with an acceptable rate of insertion-related deep vein thrombosis and long-term inferior vena cava patency. Patients with prophylactic VCF remain at risk for pulmonary embolism if the filter is tilted 14 degrees or more or has strut malposition. In such patients, consideration should be given to placing a second filter.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Filtros de Vena Cava , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adulto , Anticoagulantes , Contraindicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboflebitis/epidemiología , Tromboflebitis/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos
18.
J Trauma ; 44(1): 50-8, 1998 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9464749

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical work has suggested that hypertonic saline (HTS) would be better than lactated Ringer's solution (LRS) for the resuscitation of patients with head injuries. No clinical study has examined the effect of HTS infusion on intracranial pressure (ICP) and outcome in patients with head injuries. We hypothesized that HTS infusion would result in a lower ICP and fewer medical interventions to lower ICP compared with LRS. METHODS/DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial at two teaching hospitals. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled and were similar in age and Injury Severity Score. HTS patients had a lower admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (HTS: 4.7+/-0.7; LRS: 6.7+/-0.7; p = 0.057), a higher initial ICP (HTS: 16+/-2; LRS: 11+/-2; p = 0.06), and a higher initial mean maximum ICP (HTS: 31+/-3; LRS: 18+/-2; p < 0.01). Treatment effectively lowered ICP in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups in ICP at any time after entry. HTS patients required significantly more interventions (HTS: 31+/-4; LRS: 11+/-3; p < 0.01). During the study, the change in maximum ICP was positive in the LRS group but negative in the HTS group (LRS: +2+/-3; HTS: -9+/-4; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: As a group, HTS patients had more severe head injuries. HTS and LRS used with other therapies effectively controlled the ICP. The widely held conviction that sodium administration will lead to a sustained increase in ICP is not supported by this work.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/terapia , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Resucitación/métodos , Solución Salina Hipertónica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Presión Intracraneal/efectos de los fármacos , Soluciones Isotónicas/química , Soluciones Isotónicas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Lactato de Ringer , Solución Salina Hipertónica/química
19.
J Trauma ; 43(3): 413-22, 1997 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9314301

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Specific cohorts of patients with blunt traumatic thoracic aortic laceration (BTTAL) might benefit from conservative or delayed management. We hypothesized that age and comorbidities would predict outcome. METHODS: BTTAL data from 14 trauma centers over 11 years. Hospital and autopsy records of confirmed BTTAL were retrospectively reviewed. Regression analysis evaluated outcome by trauma indices, age, premorbidities, interventions, adjuvant therapy, and delay of repair. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-five cases of BTTAL were identified, 233 who were stable. Stable cohort survival was 71.9%. No trauma indices predicted outcome. Comorbidities, especially coronary artery disease (CAD), were associated with mortality. The use of beta-blocking agents and maintenance of normal blood pressure were associated with survival. Delay of >4 hours to operative repair was not associated with increased mortality. Increasing age was associated with higher mortality. Multivariate regression found CAD and AGE predictive of mortality (log odds formula: exp [-2.0858 + 0.0253(AGE) + 2.0428(CAD)]). CONCLUSIONS: AGE and CAD are associated with worse outcome in stable BTTAL patients undergoing operative repair. Treating comorbidities and managing associated injuries should be undertaken in stable BTTAL patients. Physiologic stability should be established before repair of BTTAL.


Asunto(s)
Arterias Torácicas/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Pronóstico , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Arterias Torácicas/cirugía , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas no Penetrantes/clasificación , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...