Barriers to Informational Support for Care Partners of People With Aphasia After Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Care partners of people with aphasia after stroke need various informational supports, such as aphasia education and resources for psychosocial support. However, informational support may vary across clinicians, and access to these supports remains a persistent unmet need. Using implementation science frameworks can help to assess the gap between what is known about an issue and what is occurring in practice. AIM: The aim was to identify barriers to providing informational support for care partners of people with aphasia after stroke. METHOD AND PROCEDURE: We performed a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected from two of our previous studies. New themes were identified by comparing feedback from both speech-language pathologists and care partners, and previously assigned codes were interpreted relative to the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: We identified four implementation themes that were specifically related to the action cycle of the KTA framework: (a) Aphasia rehabilitation tends to exclude care partners, (b) aphasia rehabilitation can be hard to understand, (c) structure is lacking for care partner check-ins, and (d) care partner informational support rarely extends beyond the acute phases of recovery. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that changes are needed at both systemic and care provider levels to ensure that tailored information is provided to care partners of people with aphasia.

Speech patterns and enunciation for encephalopathy determination-A prospective study of hepatic encephalopathy.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complication of cirrhosis that benefits from early diagnosis and treatment. We aimed to characterize speech patterns of individuals with HE to investigate its potential to diagnose and monitor HE. This was a single-center prospective cohort study that included participants with cirrhosis with HE (minimal HE [MHE] and overt HE [OHE]), cirrhosis without HE, and participants without liver disease. Audio recordings of reading, sentence repetition, and picture description tasks were obtained from these groups. Two certified speech-language pathologists assessed speech rate (words per minute) and articulatory precision. An overall severity metric was derived from these measures. Cross-sectional analyses were performed using nonparametric Wilcoxon statistics to evaluate group differences. Change over time in speech measures was analyzed descriptively for individuals with HE. The study included 43 total participants. Speech results differed by task, but the overall pattern showed slower speech rate and less precise articulation in participants with OHE compared to other groups. When speech rate and precision ratings were combined into a single speech severity metric, the impairment of participants with OHE was more severe than all other groups, and MHE had greater speech impairment than non-liver disease controls. As OHE improved clinically, participants showed notable improvement in speech rate. Participants with OHE demonstrated impaired speech rate, precision, and speech severity compared with non-liver disease and non-HE cirrhosis. Participants with MHE had less pronounced impairments. Speech parameters improved as HE clinically improved. Conclusion: These data identify speech patterns that could improve HE diagnosis, grading, and remote monitoring.

Caregivers navigating rehabilitative care for people with aphasia after stroke: a multi-lens perspective.

BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of stroke survivors acquire aphasia and require long-term caregiver assistance after discharge from the hospital. Caregivers assume multiple roles as they help people with aphasia to access outpatient rehabilitative care in an increasingly person-centred model of care. Examining caregiver roles and how different stakeholders in the rehabilitative journey perceive these roles may be the first step in providing more tailored support to caregivers and improving outcomes for both caregivers and people with aphasia. AIMS: To characterize the roles caregivers assume while navigating outpatient rehabilitative care for people with aphasia after stroke from the perspective of different stakeholders in the rehabilitative process. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Thirty-six people participated in the study, including seven caregivers, 22 stroke survivors with aphasia and seven healthcare providers. Focus groups were conducted, and an iterative thematic analysis was used to identify themes. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Results indicate that caregivers are perceived differently by varying stakeholders, and that caregivers adopt diverse roles as advocates, therapists, motivators and guardians. They assume these roles in order to fill gaps in services or otherwise to facilitate the recovery journey for the person with aphasia. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This study provides a valuable glimpse into how varying stakeholders view the role of the caregiver during rehabilitation for people with aphasia after stroke. Providing caregivers with the training and support they need throughout the recovery journey by treating them as partners in the process may mitigate the perception of caregivers as feeling compelled to adopt multiple roles.