Toxicity and outcome of a phase II trial of taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 3-dimensional, conformal, accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate prospectively the acute and late adverse effects of taxane/carboplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 3-dimensional, conformal radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Forty-two patients were entered into a nonrandomized Phase II study of continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) week-end less (CHARTWEL) to a dose of 60 grays (Gy). Three cycles of chemotherapy were given over 9 weeks before radiotherapy. Dose escalation with paclitaxel was from 150 mg/m2 to 225 mg/m2. Systemic toxicity to chemotherapy was monitored throughout. Radiation-induced, early, adverse effects were assessed during the first 9 weeks from the start of radiotherapy, and late effects were assessed from 3 months onward. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and locoregional tumor control also were monitored. RESULTS: Twenty percent of patients failed to receive chemotherapy as planned, primarily because of neutropenia. The incidence of Dische Dictionary Grade >or=2 and Grade >or=3 dysphagia was 57.5% and 10%, respectively, with an average duration of 1.2 weeks and 1.5 days, respectively. By 9 weeks, <3% of patients were symptomatic; and, eventually, all acute reactions were healed, and there has been no evidence of consequential damage. At 6 months, the actuarial incidence of moderate-to-severe pneumonitis was 10%. During this time, all patients were free of severe pulmonary complications. Actuarial estimates of Grade >or=2 late lung dysfunction were 3% at 1 year, 10% at 2 years, and remained at this level thereafter. The actuarial 3-year locoregional control and overall survival rates were 54% and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by 3-dimensional, conformal CHARTWEL 60-Gy radiotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC was feasible and was tolerated well. Historic comparisons indicated that locoregional tumor control is not compromised by the use of conformal techniques.

Low dose hyper-radiosensitivity in metastatic tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The laboratory phenomenon of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity (LDHRS) describes excess cell kill at doses below 1 Gy relative to that predicted by the linear quadratic model. These data have stimulated the investigation of whether LDHRS can be exploited clinically. METHODS: Patients with metastatic tumor nodules to skin were recruited. The nodules were measured in three dimensions, consecutively numbered according to volume, and randomized, in matched pairs, to receive either conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (1.5 Gy/day) or ultrafractionated radiotherapy (0.5 Gy TDS: 4-h gap). Both groups were treated for 12 days. Measurements were taken Days 0, 5, 8, 12, and 26 and monthly until regrowth occurred. Tumor volumes were normalized to those on Day 0 and plotted against time from the start of treatment. Time to regrowth to original volume was calculated and compared between groups using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Eight patients with a total of 40 paired nodules were analyzed; 36 nodules have regrown and are therefore evaluable. Analysis of the whole data set demonstrates a two-tailed p-value of 0.14 in favor of the "ultrafractionated" treatment. Analysis of the tumors generally accepted as being radioresistant and known to show LDHRS in vitro demonstrates a two-tailed p value of 0.009. CONCLUSIONS: LDHRS can be demonstrated in tumors clinically. An "ultrafractionated" radiotherapy regime produces significantly increased growth delay in radioresistant malignant tumors.

The evaluation of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity in normal human skin.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The laboratory phenomenon of low dose hyper-radiosensitivity (LDHRS) describes an excess of cell kill at doses below 1Gy relative to that predicted by the linear quadratic model. These data have stimulated clinical investigation into LDHRS in vivo. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Skin was used as a model of normal human tissue. Two studies were initiated investigating the response to low doses of radiation. Study 1 compared once daily skin doses of approximately 0.5 and >1.0Gy in 24 patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. Skin biopsies before and during radiotherapy were analysed histologically to assess the basal cell density (BCD). Study 2 compared two regimens of equal dose/time intensity--an ultrafractionated regimen (0.5Gy TDS x 12 days) with a conventional regimen (1.5Gy OD x 12 days). Skin biopsies taken during treatment assessed BCD and proliferative index. In both studies the changes in BCD were compared using non-linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Study 1. The results show a significantly greater reduction in BCD in the low dose group when BCD is plotted against dose. This effect is lost when BCD is plotted against time Study 2. The results demonstrate a significantly greater reduction in BCD in the higher dose/fraction arm. The proliferative response was similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that LDHRS does not occur in skin following doses of approximately 0.5Gy/fraction when regimens of equal dose/time intensity are compared. As only small volumes of normal tissue were irradiated it is difficult to predict the biological relevance of this with respect to larger field low dose per fraction irradiation regimens or risk of cancer induction. Equally we cannot extrapolate to effects resulting from exposure to doses <0.5Gy or to the effects of low doses on other endpoints.

The modification of human tumour blood flow using pentoxifylline, nicotinamide and carbogen.

AIM: To assess the effect of combining oral nicotinamide, oral pentoxifylline and carbogen gas (2% CO2, 98% O2) breathing on human tumour red cell flux. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Microregional red blood cell flux was measured in accessible tumour nodules using laser Doppler microprobes in 11 patients with histologically proven malignancy. Patients received single oral doses of nicotinamide 40 mgkg-1 and pentoxifylline 1200 mg 2h before a 10-min period of carbogen gas breathing, corresponding to peak plasma concentrations of these drugs. Red cell flux in up to six microregions in each tumour was measured for 30 min, recording pre-, during and post-carbogen breathing for 10 min each. RESULTS: Data from ten of the 11 patients could be assessed. The red cell flux in 48 microregions was analysed and the mean red cell flux was calculated. A mean relative increase in red cell flux of 1.18 (+/-0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI)) was observed after 6 min of carbogen breathing, 2h after the administration of nicotinamide and pentoxifylline. This compares to relative increases of 1.4 (+/-0.39, 95%CI) after nicotinamide with carbogen and 1.15 (+/-0.10, 95%CI) after pentoxifylline with carbogen. These differences are not statistically significant (P>0.05). The increased red cell flux persisted after the cessation of carbogen gas breathing. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of pentoxifylline, nicotinamide and carbogen produces an increase in human tumour red cell flux, similar to that observed when each of the drugs are used alone with carbogen breathing.