RESUMEN
Introduction: Renal colic is frequently treated with opioids; however, narcotic analgesic use can lead to dependence and abuse. We evaluated use trends of opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for pain management of kidney stones in United States emergency departments (EDs) from 2015 to 2021. Methods: Kidney stone encounters were identified using National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data. We applied a multistage survey weighting procedure to account for selection probability, nonresponse, and population weights. Medication use trends were estimated through logistic regressions on the timing of the encounter, adjusted for selected demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Between 2015 and 2021, there were an estimated 9,433,291 kidney stone encounters in United States EDs. Opioid use decreased significantly (annual odds ratio [OR]: 0.87, p = 0.003), and there was no significant trend in NSAID use. At discharge, male patients were more likely than females (OR: 1.93, p = 0.001) to receive opioids, and Black patients were less likely than White patients (OR: 0.34, p = 0.010) to receive opioids. Regional variation was also observed, with higher odds of discharge prescriptions in the West (OR: 3.15, p = 0.003) and Midwest (OR: 2.49, p = 0.010), compared with the Northeast. Thirty-five percent of patients received opioids that were stronger than morphine. Conclusion: These results suggest improved opioid stewardship from ED physicians in response to the national opioid epidemic. However, regional variation as well as disparities in discharge prescriptions for Black and female patients underscore opportunities for continued efforts.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Utilización de Medicamentos , Cálculos Renales , Cólico Renal , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Cálculos Renales/complicaciones , Cólico Renal/tratamiento farmacológico , Cólico Renal/etiología , Estados Unidos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Prescripciones de MedicamentosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: There are limited data on ablation effects of thulium fiber laser (TFL) settings with varying stone composition. Similarly, little is known surrounding the photothermal effects of TFL lithotripsy regarding the chemical and structural changes after visible char formation. We aim to understand the TFL's ablative efficiency across various stone types and laser settings, while simultaneously investigating the photothermal effects of TFL lithotripsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human specimens of calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, uric acid, struvite, cystine, carbonate apatite, and brushite stones were ablated using 13 prespecified settings with the Coloplast TFL Drive. Pre- and postablation mass, ablation time, and total energy were recorded. Qualitative ablative observations were recorded at 1-minute intervals with photographs and gross description. Samples were analyzed with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy pre- and postablation and electron microscopy postablation to assess the photothermal effects of TFL. RESULTS: Across all settings and stone types, 0.05 J × 1000 Hz was the best numerically efficient ablation setting. When selected for more clinically relevant laser settings (ie, 10-20 W), 0.2 J × 100 Hz, short pulse was the most numerically efficient setting for calcium oxalate dihydrate, cystine, and struvite stones. Calcium oxalate monohydrate ablated with the best numerical efficiency at 0.4 J × 40 Hz, short pulse. Uric acid and carbonate apatite stones ablated with the best numerical efficiency at 0.3 J × 60 Hz, short pulse. Brushite stones ablated with the best numerical efficiency at 0.5 J × 30 Hz, short pulse. Pulse duration impacted ablation effectiveness greatly with 6/8 (75%) of inadequate ablations occurring in medium or long pulse settings. The average percent of mass lost during ablation was 57%; cystine stones averaged the highest percent mass lost at 71%. Charring was observed in 36/91 (40%) specimens. Charring was most often seen in uric acid, cystine, and brushite stones across all laser settings. Electron microscopy of char demonstrated a porous melting effect different to that of brittle fracture. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy of brushite char demonstrated a chemical composition change to amorphous calcium phosphate. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the optimal ablation settings based on stone composition, which may guide urologists towards more stone-specific care when using thulium laser for treating renal stones (lower energy settings would be safer for ureteral stones). For patients with unknown stone composition, lasers can be preset to target common stone types or adjusted based on visual cues. We recommend using short pulse for all TFL lithotripsy of calculi and altering the settings based on visual cues and efficiency to minimize the charring, an effect which can make the stone refractory to further dusting and fragmentation.
Asunto(s)
Apatitas , Fosfatos de Calcio , Cálculos Renales , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Litotripsia por Láser , Cálculos Urinarios , Humanos , Cálculos Urinarios/cirugía , Cálculos Urinarios/química , Tulio/química , Estruvita , Cistina , Ácido Úrico , Cálculos Renales/terapia , Rayos Láser , Litotripsia por Láser/métodos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Background: Updated in 2019, the American Urological Association's (AUA) Best Practice Statement on Urologic Procedures and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis outlines prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Recent studies have challenged these recommendations. We hypothesized that endourologists do not routinely follow the AUA's statement on antibiotic use during PCNL and assessed their prescribing patterns. Methods: A 24-question survey was distributed to members of the Endourological Society. The primary outcome was adherence to the AUA's recommendations. Two multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with demographics and antibiotic preference as predictors of following the AUA. Results: A total of 51.4% of endourologists follow the AUA Best Practice Statement for antimicrobial prophylaxis of uncomplicated PCNL. No demographic data were predictive of following the AUA. 90.9% and 83.6% reported they have "never" used the first-line recommendation options of metronidazole and aztreonam, respectively. Preferred antibiotics were cephalosporins (uncomplicated 60%, complicated 52.6%), fluoroquinolones (13.3%, 7.2%), aminoglycosides (12.7%, 17.8%), penicillins (7.9%, 11.2%), carbapenems (0.6%, 0.7%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (2.4%, 5.9%), fosfomycin (0.6%, 0.7%), nitrofurantoin (2.4%, 2.6%), aztreonam (0%, 0.7%), and clindamycin (0%, 0.7%). For uncomplicated PCNL, 63.1% prescribe ≤24 hours of perioperative antibiotics. For complicated PCNL, 16.2% prescribe ≤24 hours of perioperative antibiotics, while 20.4% begin antibiotics 7 or more days prior. Conclusions: Nearly half of respondents do not follow the AUA's recommendations for antibiotic choice for PCNL. Few endourologists prescribe 7 days of preoperative antibiotics for complicated PCNL despite supporting data. Metronidazole and aztreonam are rarely used as a first-line antibiotic choice for PCNL and their roles needs to be further evaluated as first-line prophylaxis recommendations. Updates on antibiotic recommendations for PCNL are needed based on current literature, antimicrobial stewardship, and contemporary practice patterns.
Asunto(s)
Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Urología , Humanos , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea/métodos , Aztreonam , Metronidazol , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis AntibióticaRESUMEN
Introduction: Recent retrospective literature suggests that the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scoring tool is a potentially superior tool over use of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery. Here we examine use of qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock within data series collected prospectively on PCNL patients as part of a greater study of infectious complications. Materials and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter studies including PCNL patients across nine institutions. Clinical signs informing SIRS and qSOFA scores were collected no later than postoperative day 1. The primary outcome was sensitivity and specificity of SIRS and qSOFA (high-risk score of greater-or-equal to two points) in predicting admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for vasopressor support. Results: A total of 218 cases at 9 institutions were analyzed. One patient required vasopressor support in the ICU. The sensitivity/specificity was 100%/72.4% (McNemar's test p < 0.001) for SIRS and was 100%/90.8% (McNemar's test p < 0.001) for qSOFA. Conclusion: Although positive predictive value for both qSOFA and SIRS in prediction of post-PCNL septic shock is low, prospectively collected data demonstrate use of qSOFA may offer greater specificity than SIRS criteria when predicting post-PCNL septic shock.
Asunto(s)
Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/etiología , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Pronóstico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/etiología , Curva ROCRESUMEN
Urinary stone disease is common and affects approximately 10% of the American adults. The role of diet in stone formation is well-recognized; however, the literature focus has been on dietary excess rather than micronutrient inadequacy. As patients with stones may be at risk for nutrient inadequacies, we investigated the role of micronutrient inadequacy in stone formation by performing a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey on adults who were not taking dietary supplements. Micronutrient intake was obtained from 24-h dietary recalls, and usual intake was calculated. Survey-weighted, adjusted logistic regression was used for an incident analysis on having any history of stones. An additional analysis on recurrent stone-formers was performed with the outcome being 2 or more stones passed. Finally, a sensitivity analysis using quasi-Poisson regression was performed with the outcome being number of stones passed. There were 9777 respondents representing 81,087,345 adults, of which 9.36% had a stone history. Our incident analysis revealed inadequate vitamin A intake to be associated with stone formation (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.03-1.71). Recurrent analysis did not find any significant associations, while our sensitivity analysis revealed inadequate vitamin A (IRR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.28-3.00) and pyridoxine (IRR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.11-3.55) to be associated with a higher number of recurrent stones. Hence, inadequate dietary intake of vitamin A and pyridoxine was associated with nephrolithiasis. Further research is needed to identify the roles of these micronutrients in stone-formers and the potential for evaluation and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Oligoelementos , Adulto , Humanos , Encuestas Nutricionales , Micronutrientes , Vitamina A , Piridoxina , Estudios Transversales , Dieta/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To understand the indications and outcomes of renal autotransplantation, and when to consider this unique procedure for patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Renal autotransplantation confers acceptably low rates of graft failure and prevents need for long-term dialysis. Renal autotransplantation remains an important management strategy in very select patients for complex renovascular disease, ureteral stricture disease, ureteral trauma, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, and Loin-Pain Hematuria Syndrome. With advancements in minimally invasive procedures, the application of renal autotransplantation for refractory stone disease is rare but exists. Robot-assisted laparoscopic renal autotransplantation demonstrates reproducible graft success and complication rates with improved perioperative outcomes (ex. hospital length of stay) - though comparative studies are lacking. Patients would benefit from a multidisciplinary approach from renal transplant surgeons, vascular surgeons, urologists, nephrologists, dieticians, pain management providers, social workers, and psychiatrists. SUMMARY: In experienced hands, renal autotransplantation is a reasonable treatment approach for complex and refractory renal vascular disease, Loin-Pain Hematuria Syndrome, ureteral strictures and trauma, upper urinary tract malignancy, and stone disease in highly select patients.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias Renales , Obstrucción Ureteral , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Humanos , Trasplante Autólogo/métodos , Hematuria/etiología , Hematuria/cirugía , Diálisis Renal , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , DolorRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Obstructing ureteral stones complicated by urinary tract infection are urologic emergencies that require prompt decompression. We explore the association of pregnancy with rates of and delays in decompression in a cohort of women of reproductive age. METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2015, a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis of women of reproductive age (15 to 44 years old) diagnosed with obstructing ureteral stones and urinary tract infection was performed and stratified by pregnancy status. Survey-weighted regression models were used to assess the association of pregnancy on decompression, delays in decompression, and hospital length of stay. Additional exploratory analyses on the association of timing and type of decompression with maternal-fetal outcomes were performed. RESULTS: A weighted total of 38 783 hospitalizations were identified, with 6.1% of admissions occurring in pregnant women. On multivariable regression, pregnant women with obstructing ureteral stones and urinary tract infection were 38% less likely of undergoing decompression (adjusted OR: 0.62; p < 0.001) compared with nonpregnant women. Among those decompressed, pregnant women had greater odds of delayed decompression (adjusted OR: 2.28; p < 0.001) and longer length of stay (adjusted IRR: 1.11; p = 0.007). Delayed decompression among pregnant women was associated with increased rates of C-section, early or threatened labor, fetal distress, and umbilical cord complications. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, pregnant women had reduced odds of decompression, as well as increased odds of delayed decompression, when compared with nonpregnant women of reproductive age. Delays in decompression among pregnant women were also associated with increased maternal and fetal complications.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Ureterales , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Mujeres Embarazadas , Estudios Transversales , Cálculos Ureterales/complicaciones , Cálculos Ureterales/cirugía , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Retained ureteral stents can result in significant morbidity and can be surgically challenging to urologists. A multimodal approach is often necessary for removal, potentially including retrograde and antegrade procedures performed over multiple anesthetic sessions. We describe the novel "Tri-Glide" technique for treating retained stents, particularly those with stent shaft encrustation prohibiting safe removal. Case Presentation. Two patients with nephrolithiasis and retained, encrusted ureteral stents were managed with the "Tri-Glide" technique. Patient #1 was a 58-year-old man with a severely calcified ureteral stent, retained for 14 years. After undergoing simultaneous cystolitholapaxy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat proximal and distal encrustations, the stent shaft remained trapped in the ureter due to heavy calcifications. Three hydrophilic guidewires were passed alongside the stent, allowing it to easily slide out of the ureter intact. Patient #2 was a 74-year-old man who after only 3-months of stent dwell time developed severe stent shaft encrustation preventing removal. After multiple maneuvers failed, the "Tri-Glide" technique was used to create a smooth track for stent to slide out intact with gentle traction. Both patients did well postoperatively with no complications. CONCLUSION: The "Tri-Glide" technique can aid in the management of complex encrusted stent extractions, especially when there is significant shaft encrustation.
RESUMEN
Background: In the absence of overt infection signs, clinical criteria for early intervention in patients with ureteral stones are poorly defined. We aimed to develop a model that can identify patients who are at risk for developing sepsis if discharged home from the emergency department (ED). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients between January 2010 and December 2019 who were discharged from the ED after diagnosis of ureteral stones. The primary outcome was sepsis requiring urgent surgical decompression. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of sepsis. We refined the model using backward stepwise regression with a threshold p-value of 0.05. Results: We identified 1331 patients who were discharged from the ED with ureteral stones. Of these patients, 22 (2%) subsequently developed sepsis requiring urgent decompression. In the initial multivariable model, female gender (odds ratio [OR]: 2.82, p = 0.039) and urine white blood cells (WBCs) (OR: 1.02 per cell count, p < 0.001) were predictive of sepsis. After performing backward stepwise regression, female gender, urine WBCs, and leukocytosis (WBCs >15,000/mm3) met criteria for inclusion in the model. A logistic model including these variables predicted sepsis with an internally cross-validated area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. Among patients with urine cultures completed in the ED, rates of sepsis were 9% in patients with positive cultures and 1% in patients with negative cultures (p < 0.001). Antibiotic usage was not protective against developing sepsis. Conclusions: Sepsis is a rare complication among patients with ureteral stones selected for conservative management. The presence of elevated urine WBCs and female gender can help identify patients who are at risk of developing sepsis. Patients with risk factors should be managed with an increased index of suspicion for infection and may benefit from early intervention to reduce the risk of sepsis. Sepsis is more common in patients with positive urine cultures.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Cálculos Ureterales , Área Bajo la Curva , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/complicaciones , Cálculos Ureterales/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background: The acute care surgery model has led to improved outcomes for emergent surgical conditions, but similar models of care have not been implemented in urology. Our department implemented an acute care urology (ACU) service in 2015, and the service evolved in 2018. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the ACU model on the management of nephrolithiasis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with urology consults in the emergency department for nephrolithiasis, who required surgical intervention from 2013 to 2019. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on date of consultation: Pre-ACU (2013-2014), Phase 1 (2015-2017), and Phase 2 (2018-2019). Results: We identified 733 patients with nephrolithiasis requiring intervention (162 pre-ACU, 334 Phase 1, and 237 Phase 2). Before ACU implementation, median time from consult to definitive intervention was 36 days. After ACU implementation, median time to intervention decreased to 22 days in Phase 1 (p < 0.001) and 15 days in Phase 2 (p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression, the hazard of definitive intervention improved in Phase 1 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.90, p < 0.001) and in Phase 2 (HR 1.80, p < 0.001). Rates of primary definitive intervention without initial decompression and loss to follow-up were also significantly improved, compared to the pre-ACU cohort. Conclusions: Implementation of a structured ACU service was associated with improved time to treatment for patients with acute nephrolithiasis, as well as increased primary definitive intervention and improved follow-up care. This model of care has potential to improve patient outcomes for nephrolithiasis and other acute urological conditions.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Nefrolitiasis , Urología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/complicaciones , Masculino , Nefrolitiasis/cirugía , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Ureteral stents have been utilized for decades in maintaining ureteral patency, most commonly after ureteroscopy in the treatment of urolithiasis. Since their initial development, ureteral stents have had many technological advances that have allowed for better patient outcomes with improvements in comfort, durability, patency, encrustation resistance, biocompatibility, ease of insertion, migration, and biofilm development. Several new ureteral stents enter the market every year, each with their own touted benefits. It is essential to understand the different advantages for each ureteral stent to provide the best available care to patients when possible. The purpose of this review is to give a brief history of ureteral stent development and summarize the recent developments in ureteral stent designs. We aim to review the data supporting the clinical advantages of the latest ureteral stents available for use by urologists.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION To assess the relationship between pain after ureteral stent removal and patient and procedural factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated survey designed to assess the relationship between quality of life and treatment decisions in kidney stone disease was randomly distributed to patients with a history of a ureteral stent in seven medical centers across North America participating in an endourology research collaborative between July 2016 and June 2018. The primary outcome was increased pain after ureteral stent removal. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 327 surveys were analyzed. Twenty seven percent of patients reported increased pain in the hours after ureteral stent removal. Patients with a stent ≤ 7 days were significantly more likely to experience pain after stent removal compared to those with a stent > 7 days (33.3% versus 22.8%, p = 0.04). Female gender (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.42-4.10) was associated with increased pain after stent removal, while increasing age was inversely associated (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.74). After adjustment, patients with a stent > 7 days were significantly less likely to report pain in the hours after removal (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in four patients will experience increased pain after ureteral stent removal. Female patients, younger patients, and patients with a stent ≤ 7 days were more likely to experience an increase in pain immediately following stent removal. Understanding factors associated with post-stent removal pain may be helpful in counseling patients at high risk stent removal morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Falla de Prótesis , Stents , Uréter/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Autoinforme , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Hypercalcemia and nephrolithiasis have been associated with various etiologies, including dysregulation of the parathyroid glands, malignancies, or sarcoidosis. Other causes of hypercalcemia, such as granulomatous disease resulting from silicone-based cosmetic injections, have been reported but without specific emphasis on nephrolithiasis. Herein, we report an unusual case of simultaneous bilateral obstructing ureteral calculi (SBUC) triggered by recalcitrant hypercalcemia and granulomatous disease due to silicone-based cosmetic injections. A careful surgical history, physical exam, and imaging identified the underlying etiology, which was confirmed by final histopathology. Using a multidisciplinary approach, the patient's condition was successfully managed with endoscopic procedures and concurrent corticosteroid therapy.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Many urology practices offer after-hours answering services through which patients or outside providers may access an on-call provider. These lines of communication are often unfiltered, allowing for a combination of urgent and non-urgent matters to reach the provider. The objective of this study was to evaluate the nature and frequency of after-hours phone calls among urological subspecialties. METHODS: Phone calls occurring after-hours during the week (5 pm-7:59 am), weekends, and federal holidays were captured over 2019. The patient's provider and reason for calling were captured. The adult subspecialties included were endourology, oncology, reconstructive urology, female urology/voiding dysfunction, andrology/sexual medicine, and multispecialty/general. The reason for calling was categorized as either urgent/non-avoidable or non-urgent/avoidable, and the volume of after-hours and overnight calls was compared amongst subspecialties using the number of calls per 100 unique patients. RESULTS: There were 2,224 after-hours calls over the 1-year period; 48% of telephone calls were regarding urgent matters, while the remainder were non-urgent or potentially avoidable. Reconstructive and endourology had the highest number of after-hours calls (34.8 calls and 17.3 calls per 100 patients, respectively). Reconstructive received the most urgent overnight phone calls at 3 calls per 100 patients, followed by oncology (1.55 per 100 patients) and endourology (1.35 per 100 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Each urological subspecialty has varying acuity, which may influence the number of after-hours calls. Providers and their staff should optimize their work flow through triaging, counseling, and education in order to reduce the number of non-urgent after-hours calls.
RESUMEN
Introduction and Objectives: Patients with obstructive pyelonephritis (OPN) require urgent decompression through retrograde ureteral stent (RUS) or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN). In 2016, the urology and interventional radiology (IR) departments at our institution established a protocol for patients with OPN with sepsis. The primary objectives were to assess this protocol's impact on improving time to decompression and whether more expedient decompression decreased length of stay (LOS). Secondarily, we assessed the impact of the protocol and clinical factors on receipt of PCN over RUS. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty-seven patients at our institution who underwent PCN from 2012 to 2017 or stent from 2014 to 2017 for stone-related OPN meeting sepsis criteria were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate descriptive statistics compared patient characteristics and outcomes between RUS and PCN pre- and postprotocol implementation. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of decompression with PCN (vs RUS) and of prolonged LOS (pLOS; >5 days). Results: Utilization of PCN increased after implementation of the protocol from 4 to 14 PCN/year with a decrease in the median time from urologic consultation to PCN from 9.2 to 4.3 hours (p = 0.001) with overall median time to decompression decreasing from 5.4 to 4.5 hours (p = 0.017). Predictors of undergoing PCN (vs RUS) included increasing comorbidity and ≥1 cm obstructing stone. On multivariable analysis controlling for comorbidity, leukocytosis, and septic shock, increasing hours to decompression increased odds of pLOS (1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.15, p = 0.014). Conclusions: After implementing our OPN with sepsis protocol, time to decompression decreased with dramatic improvement in time to PCN. Quicker decompression was independently associated with reduced odds of prolonged hospital stay. A well-designed protocol engages both urology and IR in the management of these acutely ill patients and improves outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Nefrostomía Percutánea , Pielonefritis , Sepsis , Obstrucción Ureteral , Descompresión , Hospitales , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Pielonefritis/complicaciones , Pielonefritis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/complicaciones , Sepsis/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Postoperative infectious related complications are not uncommon after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Previously, we noted that 7 days of antibiotics did not decrease sepsis rates compared to just perioperative antibiotics in a low risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy population. This study aimed to compare the same regimens in individuals at moderate to high risk for sepsis undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized in this multi-institutional study to either 2 days or 7 days of preoperative antibiotics. Enrolled patients had stones requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy and had either a positive preoperative urine culture or existing indwelling urinary drainage tube. Primary outcome was difference in sepsis rates between the groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients at 7 institutions were analyzed. There was no difference in sepsis rates between groups on univariate analysis. Similarly, there were no differences in nonseptic bacteriuria, stone-free rate and length of stay. On multivariate analysis, 2 days of antibiotics increased the risk of sepsis compared to 7 days of antibiotics (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.9, p=0.031). Patients receiving antibiotics for 2 days had higher rates of staghorn calculus than the 7-day group (58% vs 32%, p=0.006) but post hoc subanalysis did not demonstrate increased sepsis in the staghorn only group. CONCLUSIONS: Giving 7 days of preoperative antibiotics vs 2 days decreases the risk of sepsis in moderate to high risk percutaneous nephrolithotomy patients. Future guidelines should consider infectious risk stratification for percutaneous nephrolithotomy antibiotic recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Sepsis/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Sepsis/epidemiología , Método Simple Ciego , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The management of small, non-obstructing renal stones in adults with recurrent lower urinary tract infections remains unclear. Whereas for larger or obstructing stones the decision to intervene becomes clearer, for stones smaller than 5 to 6 mm the decision to intervene requires consideration of multiple factors. This review describes these factors, including history, imaging, laboratory studies, as well as a comprehensive review of the literature. It remains of utmost importance that patients have additional possible etiologies appropriately evaluated and managed prior to intervention for their small renal stones.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Obstructive pyelonephritis is considered a urological emergency but there is limited evidence regarding the importance of prompt decompression. We sought to investigate whether delay in decompression is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Secondarily, we aimed to determine the impact of patient, hospital and disease factors on the likelihood of receipt of delayed vs prompt decompression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2015, all patients 18 years old or older with ICD-9 diagnosis of urinary tract infection who had either a ureteral stone or kidney stone with hydronephrosis (311,100) were identified. Two weighted sample multivariable logistic regression models assessed predictors of the primary outcome of death in the hospital and secondly, predictors of delayed decompression (2 or more days after admission). RESULTS: After controlling for patient demographics, comorbidity and disease severity, delayed decompression significantly increased odds of death by 29% (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.63, p=0.032). Delayed decompression was more likely to occur with weekend admissions (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.15-1.30, p <0.001), nonwhite race (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25-1.44, p <0.001) and lower income demographic (lowest income quartile OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.36, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While the overall risk of mortality is fairly low in patients with obstructing upper urinary tract stones and urinary tract infection, a delay in decompression increased odds of mortality by 29%. The increased likelihood of delay associated with weekend admissions, minority patients and lower socioeconomic status suggests opportunities for improvement.