Endobronchial obstruction in connective tissue diseases: an uncommon but life threatening complication: two case reports.

BACKGROUND: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and relapsing polychondritis are rare, multisystemic and potentially life-threatening connective tissue diseases. We present two cases of severe endobronchial obstruction in the aforementioned conditions and discuss difficulties with detection and treatment. Despite differing underlying pathophysiologies, endobronchial disease is a less frequently reported but serious complication of both conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1, a 31-year-old South Asian woman with relapsing polychondritis, required partial tracheal resection and reconstruction in combination with immunosuppressive therapy to achieve respiratory recovery following collapse of her right main bronchus and a stricture in her left main bronchus. Case 2, a 22-year-old Caucasian male with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, underwent surgical resection of an endobronchial growth causing occlusion of his right main bronchus. Although his respiratory status was initially stabilised with increased immunosuppression, he continues to have disease progression in spite of this. CONCLUSIONS: Our cases highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach combining immunosuppression with supportive care and judicious use of surgical interventions in select cases. A further review of the literature shows endobronchial obstruction is potentially under-reported due to overlap in connective tissue disease symptomatology and there is no consensus on best practice.

Telehealth model of care for outpatient inflammatory bowel disease care in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Advances in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) monitoring, greater number of available treatments and a shift towards tight disease control, IBD care has become more dynamic with regular follow ups. AIMS: We assessed the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatient IBD patient care at a tertiary centre in Melbourne. More specifically, we assessed patient satisfaction with a telehealth model of care, failure to attend rates at IBD clinics and work absenteeism prior to and during the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, qualitative analysis to assess our aims through an online survey. We invited patients who attended an IBD outpatient clinic from April to June 2020 to participate. This study was conducted at a single, tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne. The key data points that we analysed were patient satisfaction with a telehealth model of care and the effect of telehealth clinics on work absenteeism. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen (88.1%) patients were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with the care received in the telehealth clinic. Eighty-four (60.4%) patients reported needing to take time off work to attend a face-to-face appointment, compared to 29 (20.9%) patients who needed to take time off work to attend telehealth appointments (P < 0.001). Clinic non-attendance rates were similar prior to and during the pandemic with rates of 11.4% and 10.4% respectively (P = 0.840). CONCLUSIONS: Patients report high levels of satisfaction with a telehealth model of care during the COVID-19 pandemic, with clinic attendance rates not being affected. Telehealth appointments significantly reduced work absenteeism when compared to traditional face-to-face clinics.