Using a novel concept to measure outcomes in solid organ recipients provided promising results.

OBJECTIVES: Efforts to evaluate the health of solid organ transplant recipients are hampered by the lack of adequate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) targeting this group. We developed the Transplant ePROM (TXP), which is based on a novel measurement model and administered through a mobile application to fill this gap. The main objective of this article is to elucidate how we derived the weights for different items, and to report initial empirical results. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The nine health items in the TXP were fatigue, skin, worry, self-reliance, activities, weight, sexuality, stooling, and memory. Via an online survey solid organ recipient participating in the TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort study (NCT03272841) were asked to describe and then compare their own health state with six other health states. Coefficients for item levels were obtained using a conditional logit model. RESULTS: A total of 232 solid organ transplant recipients (mean age: 54 years) participated. The majority (106) were kidney recipients, followed by lung, liver, and heart recipients. Fatigue was the most frequent complaint (54%). The strongest negative coefficients were found for activities and worry, followed by self-reliance and memory. CONCLUSION: A set of coefficients and values were developed for TXP. The TXP score approximated an optimal health state for the majority of respondents and recipients of different organs reported comparable health states.

Health items with a novel patient-centered approach provided information for preference-based transplant outcome measure.

OBJECTIVES: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely applied to assess perceived health status. To date, no transplant-specific PROM is available for generating a single, standardized score regarding the health status of transplant recipients. The objective of this study is to generate health items for a new patient-centered PROM for organ recipients: the Transplant PROM (TXP). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A five-phase, mixed-method approach was applied to identify and select the health items: scoping literature review, expert meetings, focus-group meetings with organ recipients, a special judgmental task within an online survey, and expert meetings for final selection of health items. RESULTS: Based on a previously published scoping literature review, a first round of expert meetings, and a total of four focus-group meetings with kidney, lung, and liver transplant recipients (N = 18), a list of 83 relevant health items relating to post-transplant life was selected. In an online survey, 183 transplant recipients selected the 10 most important health items from this list. After evaluating the frequency of selected health items and combining items that assess closely related or similar concepts in the second round of expert meetings, nine health items were chosen to be included in TXP: fatigue, skin, worry/anxiety, self-reliance, activities, weight, sexuality, stooling, and memory/concentration. CONCLUSION: The nine TXP health items reflect the most prominent issues transplant recipients experience. The TXP can be administered by means of a mobile phone app.

A Scoping Review of Key Health Items in Self-Report Instruments Used Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

The overall aim of this scoping review of the literature is twofold: (1) to provide an overview of all instruments that have been used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after solid organ transplantation and (2) to provide a list of health items they include to support future studies on the development of a new-generation HRQoL instrument. All studies that administered any form of HRQoL instrument to post-transplant solid organ recipients were identified in a comprehensive search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science, with a cut-off date of May 2018. The search used various combinations of the following keywords: lung, heart, liver, kidney, or pancreas transplantation; quality of life; well-being; patient-reported outcome; instrument; questionnaire; and health survey. In total, 8013 distinct publications were identified and 1218 of these were selected for review. Among the instruments applied, 53 measured generic, 51 organ-specific, 271 domain-specific, and 43 transplant-specific HRQoL. A total of 78 distinct health items grouped into 16 sub-domains were identified and depicted graphically. The majority of publications did not report a logical rationale for the choice of specific HRQoL instrument. The most commonly used types of instruments were generic health instruments, followed by domain-specific instruments. Despite the availability of transplant-specific instruments, few studies applied these types of instruments. Based on the 78 items, further research is planned to develop a patient-centered, transplant-specific HRQoL instrument that is concise, easy to apply (mobile application), and specifically related to the health issues of solid organ recipients.