Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Ambul Care Manage ; 46(1): 25-33, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35943352

RESUMEN

Primary care providers (PCPs), including physicians and advanced practice providers, are the front line of medical care. Patient access must balance PCP availability and patient needs. This work develops a new PCP staffing metric using panel size and full-time equivalent data to determine whether a clinic is adequately staffed and describes variation by clinic rurality. Data were from the Veterans Health Administration, 2017-2021. Results describe the gap staffing metric, provide summary graphics, and compare the gap staffing between rural and urban clinics. This novel gap staffing metric can inform strategic clinic staffing in health care systems.


Asunto(s)
Población Rural , Salud de los Veteranos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos , Atención a la Salud , Atención Primaria de Salud , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 23(7): 1461-1473, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30203231

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current literature suggests surgeons who perform large volumes of rectal cancer resections achieve superior outcomes, but only about half of rectal cancer resections are performed by high-volume surgeons in comprehensive hospitals. Little is known about the considerations of patients with rectal cancer when deciding where to receive surgery. METHODS: A purposive sample of stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma survivors diagnosed 2013-2015 were identified through the Iowa Cancer Registry and interviewed by telephone about factors influencing decisions on where to receive rectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: Fifteen survivors with an average age of 63 were interviewed: 60% were male, 53% resided in non-metropolitan areas, and 60% received surgery at low-volume facilities. Most patients considered surgeon volume and experience to be important determinants of outcomes, but few assessed it. Recommendation from a trusted source, usually a physician, appeared to be a main determinant of where patients received surgery. Patients who chose low-volume centers noted comfort and familiarity as important decision factors. CONCLUSION: Most rectal cancer patients in our sample relied on physician referrals to decide where to receive surgery. Interventions facilitating more informed decision-making by patients and referring providers may be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Toma de Decisiones , Prioridad del Paciente , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Humanos , Iowa , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Proctectomía , Investigación Cualitativa , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Derivación y Consulta , Sistema de Registros
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...