Prognostic factors for progression in atypical meningioma.

In patients with postoperative residual atypical meningiomas, by using volumetric instead of linear measurements in follow-up imaging studies, the authors detected disease progression earlier. By using this approach, treatment for recurrent disease can be instituted promptly with potentially better tumor control and less toxicity due to smaller volume of residual disease.

Transrectal implantation and stability of gold markers in prostate bed for salvage radiotherapy of macroscopic recurrences.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to verify the stability of gold markers in the prostatic bed (PB) during salvage radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven patients, diagnosed with a macroscopic nodule visible on MRI, underwent targeted MRI-guided biopsies. Three gold markers were implanted into the PB close to the relapsing nodule for CT/MRI fusion. A dose of 60Gy was delivered using IMRT to the PB followed by a dose escalation up to 72Gy to the macroscopic nodule. Daily anterior and left-lateral kV-images were acquired for repositioning. The coordinates of the center of each marker were measured on the two kV-images. The distance variations (Dvar) of the markers in the first session and the subsequent ones were compared. RESULTS: No marker was lost during treatment. The average distance between markers was 7.8mm. The average Dvar was 0.8mm, in absolute value. A total of 380/528 (72%) Dvar were ⩽1mm. A Dvar greater than 2mm was observed in 5.7% of measurements, with a maximum value of 4.8mm. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the absence of the prostate, the implantation of gold markers in the PB remains feasible, with Dvar often less than 2mm, and could be used to develop new approaches of salvage focal radiotherapy on the macroscopic relapse after prostatectomy.

Setup margins and geometric uncertainties in intensity-modulated radiation therapy in treating pituitary adenomas: the experience of Lyon Sud Hospital.

PURPOSE: The authors retrospectively evaluated the setup uncertainties in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for pituitary adenomas and verified the margins used in daily practice (3 mm). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Craniocaudal (CC), anteroposterior (AP) and laterolateral (LL) displacements were measured during the first 3 days of treatment and then weekly by comparing two orthogonal images obtained by an electronic system of portal imaging with Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs). Setup Margins (SM) were defined according to the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU)-62 formula, the Stroom equation and the van Herk equation. The systematic (Σ) and random (σ) errors of the population were calculated as standard deviation (SD) of the population mean and the mean of SDs for every patient, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated by IMRT for pituitary adenomas, and a total of 231 measurements were obtained. Σ and σ were 0.6 and 1.3 mm, 0.8 and 1 mm, 1.2 and 1.5 mm in the AP, LL and CC direction, respectively. Larger setup margin was 2.4, 2.7 and 4 mm in the AP, LL and CC direction, respectively (van Herk formula). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT is a highly sophisticated treatment technique that requires precise definition and optimisation of local setup errors and, finally, of the irradiated volumes. The role of image-guided RT in these kinds of treatments should be prospectively evaluated.

Does weight loss predict accuracy of setup in head and neck cancer patients treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy?

PURPOSE: This prospective study reports the impact of weight loss on setup of head and neck (H&N) cancer patients treated by Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Setup errors of H&N cancer patients treated by IMRT from January to June 2010 were prospectively analysed and statistically related to weight loss. A mixed linear model was used for statistical evaluations. Setup margins of our institute were also calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients and 128 pairs of Electronic Portal Images (EPI) were analysed. Setup errors varied between -0.6 and +0.6, -0.7 and +0.8 and -0.2 and +0.8 in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior and right-left direction, respectively. Median and mean weight loss were 2.1 and 3.1 kg (range 0-12 kg), respectively; median and mean percent of weight loss were 2.95% and 4.64% (range 0.3-19.7%), respectively. No statistical relation was seen between weight loss and the setup errors. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss is not a good clinical parameters for predicting an increase of setup errors. Other clinical and/or anthropometrical features should be prospectively evaluated in order to assess the need for re-planning.

[Should the treatment of anal carcinoma be adapted in the elderly? A retrospective analysis of acute toxicities in a French centre and a review of the literature]. / Faut-il adapter le traitement du carcinome du canal anal pour les patients âgés? Analyse rétrospective de la toxicité dans un centre français et revue de la littérature.

PURPOSE: To study the tolerance to radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy, followed by brachytherapy, in elderly patients (75 years or older) suffering from anal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 12 elderly patients with a curative intent. Median age was 78 years (range: 75-90). Ten patients had a stage II or IIIA (UICC 2009) tumour and six out of 12 were N+. Taking into account the age, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and comorbidities, five patients received exclusive radiotherapy ("RT group") and seven a concomitant radiochemotherapy ("RT-CT group"). All patients received a boost by interstitial brachytherapy. One patient of the "RT-CT group" presented rectorragies during brachytherapy. The irradiation was completed by external beam radiotherapy focalized on the tumour volume. RESULTS: Grade 3 acute reactions (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group [RTOG]) were reported in three out of 12 patients. One grade 2-3 leucopoenia was observed in one out of 7 patients ("RT-CT group"). After brachytherapy, one grade 3 rectal toxicity (rectorragia) (in "RT group") and one grade 4 (in "RT-CT group") were observed. One patient ("RT-CT group") presented a late grade 3 rectal toxicity (evaluated only for patients with at least 12 months of follow-up). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant radiochemotherapy followed by brachytherapy showed an acceptable toxicity profile, and seems to be adapted in selected elderly patients. It could be recommended as reference treatment in elderly patients with a good physiological status.