RESUMEN
The study aimed to describe the prevalence of lymph node metastases per lymph node station for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant treatment. Clinicopathological variables of ESCC patients were retrieved from the prospective database of the Surgical Esophageal Cancer Patient Registry in West China Hospital, Sichuan University. A two-field lymphadenectomy was routinely performed, and an extensive three-field lymphadenectomy was performed if cervical lymph node metastasis was suspected. According to AJCC/UICC 8, lymph node stations were investigated separately. The number of patients with metastatic lymph nodes divided by those who underwent lymph node dissection at that station was used to define the percentage of patients with lymph node metastases. Data are also separately analyzed according to the pathological response of the primary tumor, neoadjuvant treatment regimens, pretreatment tumor length, and tumor location. Between January 2019 and March 2023, 623 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by transthoracic esophagectomy were enrolled. Lymph node metastases were found in 212 patients (34.0%) and most frequently seen in lymph nodes along the right recurrent nerve (10.1%, 58/575), paracardial station (11.4%, 67/587), and lymph nodes along the left gastric artery (10.9%, 65/597). For patients with pretreatment tumor length of >4 cm and non-pathological complete response of the primary tumor, the metastatic rate of the right lower cervical paratracheal lymph nodes is 10.9% (10/92) and 10.6% (11/104), respectively. For patients with an upper thoracic tumor, metastatic lymph nodes were most frequently seen along the right recurrent nerve (14.2%, 8/56). For patients with a middle thoracic tumor, metastatic lymph nodes were most commonly seen in the right lower cervical paratracheal lymph nodes (10.3%, 8/78), paracardial lymph nodes (10.2%, 29/285), and lymph nodes along the left gastric artery (10.4%, 30/289). For patients with a lower thoracic tumor, metastatic lymph nodes were most frequently seen in the paracardial station (14.2%, 35/247) and lymph nodes along the left gastric artery (13.1%, 33/252). The study precisely determined the distribution of lymph node metastases in ESCC after neoadjuvant treatment, which may help to optimize the extent of lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of ESCC patients after neoadjuvant therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery have been recommended as the standard treatments for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In addition, nodal metastases decreased in frequency and changed in distribution after neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to examine the optimal strategy for lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with ESCC who underwent nCRT. METHODS: The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model. To determine the minimal number of LNDs (n-LNS) or least station of LNDs (e-LNS), the Chow test was used. RESULTS: In total, 333 patients were included. The estimated cut-off values for e-LNS and n-LNS were 9 and 15, respectively. A higher number of e-LNS was significantly associated with improved OS (HR: 0.90; 95% CI 0.84-0.97, P = 0.0075) and DFS (HR: 0.012; 95% CI: 0.84-0.98, P = 0.0074). The e-LNS was a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analyses. The local recurrence rate of 23.1% in high e-LNS is much lower than the results of low e-LNS (13.3%). Comparable morbidity was found in both the e-LNS and n-LND subgroups. CONCLUSION: This cohort study revealed an association between the extent of LND and overall survival, suggesting the therapeutic value of extended lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy. Therefore, more lymph node stations being sampled leads to higher survival rates among patients who receive nCRT, and standard lymphadenectomy of at least 9 stations is strongly recommended.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Pronóstico , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Esofagectomía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whether T2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma should be subclassified remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the impact of the depth of muscularis propria invasion on nodal status and survival outcomes. METHODS: We identified patients with pT2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent primary surgery from January 2009 to June 2017. Clinical data were extracted from prospectively maintained databases. Tumor muscularis propria invasion was stratified into superficial or deep. Binary logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for lymph node metastases. The impact of the depth of muscularis propria invasion on survival was investigated using KaplanâMeier analysis and a Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: A total of 750 patients from three institutes were investigated. The depth of muscularis propria invasion (odds ratio [OR]: 3.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46-6.35; p < 0.001) was correlated with lymph node metastases using logistic regression. T substage (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.05-1.79; p < 0.001) and N status (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.05-2.17; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors in multivariate Cox regression analysis. The deep muscle invasion was associated with worse overall survival (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.19-1.94; p = 0.001) than superficial, specifically in T2N0 patients (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08-1.94; p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: We found that deep muscle invasion was associated with significantly worse outcomes and recommended the substaging of pT2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in routine pathological examination.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Metástasis Linfática , Invasividad Neoplásica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/mortalidad , Anciano , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esofagectomía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Background: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a common pathological esophageal cancer with poor prognosis. Vitamin D deficiency reportedly occurs in ESCC patients, and this is related to single nucleotide polymorphism of vitamin D receptor (VDR). Objective: We investigated the effect of VDR on ESCC proliferation, invasion, and metastasis and its potential mechanism. Methods: ESCC and normal tissues were collected from 20 ESCC patients. The ESCC tissue microarray contained 116 pairs of ESCC and normal tissues and 73 single ESCC tissues. VDR expression and its clinicopathological role were determined by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry staining. sh-VDR and VDR overexpression were used to validate the effect of VDR on ESCC cell phenotype, and tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomics and bioinformatics methods identified differential VDR-related proteins. The downstream pathway and regulatory effect were analyzed using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA). Differentially expressed proteins were verified through parallel reaction monitoring and Western blot. In vivo imaging visualized subcutaneous tumor growth following tail vein injection of VDR-deficient ESCC cells. Results: High VDR expression was observed in ESCC tissues and cells. Gender, T stage, and TNM stage were related to VDR expression, which was the independent prognostic factor related to ESCC. VDR downregulation repressed ESCC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration in vitro and subcutaneous tumor growth and lung metastases in vivo. The cell phenotype changes were reversed upon VDR upregulation, and differential proteins were mainly enriched in the p53 signaling pathway. TP53 cooperated with ABCG2, APOE, FTH1, GCLM, GPX1, HMOX1, JUN, PRDX5, and SOD2 and may activate apoptosis and inhibit oxidative stress, cell metastasis, and proliferation. TP53 was upregulated after VDR knockdown, and TP53 downregulation reversed VDR knockdown-induced cell phenotype changes. Conclusions: VDR may inhibit p53 signaling pathway activation and induce ESCC proliferation, invasion, and metastasis by activating oxidative stress.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The impact of changes in skeletal muscle and sarcopenia on outcomes during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) for patients with esophageal cancer remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer who received NACR followed by esophagectomy between June 2013 and December 2021. The images at third lumbar vertebra were analyzed to measure the cross-sectional area and calculate skeletal muscle index (SMI) before and after NACR. SMI less than 52.4 cm2/m2 for men and less than 38.5 cm2/m2 for women were defined as sarcopenia. The nonlinearity of the effect of percent changes in SMI (ΔSMI%) to survival outcomes was assessed by restricted cubic splines. RESULTS: Overall, data of 367 patients were analyzed. The survival outcomes between sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups had no significant differences before NACR. However, patients in post-NACR sarcopenia group showed poor overall survival (OS) benefit (P = 0.016) and poor disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.043). Severe postoperative complication rates were 11.9% in post-NACR sarcopenia group and 5.0% in post-NACR non-sarcopenia group (P = 0.019). There was a significant non-linear relationship between ΔSMI% and survival outcomes (P < 0.05 for non-linear). On the multivariable analysis of OS, ΔSMI% > 12% was the independent prognostic factor (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.03-2.99, P = 0.039) and significant difference was also found on DFS analysis (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy sarcopenia have worse survival and adverse short-term outcomes. Moreover, greater loss in SMI is associated with increased risks of death and disease progression during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with maximum impact noted with SMI loss greater than 12%.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Esofagectomía , Músculo Esquelético , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Sarcopenia , Humanos , Sarcopenia/etiología , Sarcopenia/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/complicaciones , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Pronóstico , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Quimioradioterapia AdyuvanteRESUMEN
Background: We aimed to construct and validate the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)-related m6A regulators by means of machine leaning. Methods: We used ESCC RNA-seq data of 66 pairs of ESCC from West China Hospital of Sichuan University and the transcriptome data extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-ESCA database to find out the ESCC-related m6A regulators, during which, two machine learning approaches: RF (Random Forest) and SVM (Support Vector Machine) were employed to construct the model of ESCC-related m6A regulators. Calibration curves, clinical decision curves, and clinical impact curves (CIC) were used to evaluate the predictive ability and best-effort ability of the model. Finally, western blot and immunohistochemistry staining were used to assess the expression of prognostic ESCC-related m6A regulators. Results: 2 m6A regulators (YTHDF1 and HNRNPC) were found to be significantly increased in ESCC tissues after screening out through RF machine learning methods from our RNA-seq data and TCGA-ESCA database, respectively, and overlapping the results of the two clusters. A prognostic signature, consisting of YTHDF1 and HNRNPC, was constructed based on our RNA-seq data and validated on TCGA-ESCA database, which can serve as an independent prognostic predictor. Experimental validation including the western and immunohistochemistry staining were further successfully confirmed the results of bioinformatics analysis. Conclusion: We constructed prognostic ESCC-related m6A regulators and validated the model in clinical ESCC cohort as well as in ESCC tissues, which provides reasonable evidence and valuable resources for prognostic stratification and the study of potential targets for ESCC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal interval between neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer remains controversial. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by oesophagectomy between June 2017 and December 2020 were prospectively enrolled and retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: timely (group A; < 10 weeks) and delayed (group B; ≥ 10 weeks) surgery groups. Survival was the primary outcome, and tumour response and post-operative complications were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 224 patients were recruited; 116 patients (51.8%) underwent timely surgery within 10 weeks (group A), and 108 patients (49.2%) underwent delayed surgery over 10 weeks (group B) after chemoradiotherapy. In patients with clinical complete response (cCR), two groups had no significant difference of survival benefit (P = 0.618). However, in patients without cCR, delayed surgery was associated with poor survival (P = 0.035) and cancer progression (P = 0.036). A total of 40 patients (34.5%) in group A and 54 patients (50.0%) in group B achieved pCR (P = 0.019). pCR rates were significantly different across the four groups and increased over time (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a prolonged time interval from neoadjuvant chemoradiation to surgery had higher pCR rates. For patients with cCR to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the time interval to surgery can be safely prolonged for at least 10 weeks. However, for patients with non-cCR to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, delayed surgery is associated with poor survival, and surgery should be performed within 10 weeks of neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Quimioradioterapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: This study aims to investigate the relationship between preoperative body mass index changes (ΔBMI) and prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy. Methods: We identified 1,883 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent curative resection in our department between January 2005 and December 2013. Patients were grouped into a stable body mass index (ΔBMI = 0) group and a decreased body mass index (ΔBMI < 0) group. Risk factors for ΔBMI were assessed using logistic regression analysis. The impact of ΔBMI on survival was investigated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. A nomogram for survival prediction was constructed and validated. Results: The results showed that T stage (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.16-1.45, P < 0.001) and N stage (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.11-1.38, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for ΔBMI. The ΔBMI < 0 group had worse overall survival than the stable body mass index group (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08-1.44, P = 0.002). When stratified by stage, ΔBMI had the greatest prognostic impact in stage I tumors (HR: 1.82, 95%: 1.05-3.15, P = 0.033). In addition, multiple comparisons showed that decreasing ΔBMI correlated with worse prognosis. The ΔBMI-based nomogram presented good predictive ability with a C-index of 0.705. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that ΔBMI < 0 had an adverse impact on the long-term survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy. These results may support further investigation of preoperative nutrition support.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the predictive value of tumor regression grade (TRG) and nodal status on survival in esophageal carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS: Tumor pathologic regression and nodal status were assessed. Differences in survival stratified by TRG or nodal status were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic value of TRG and nodal status were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS: From July 2016 to June 2019, 253 patients with esophageal cancer underwent nCRT followed by surgery. Significant differences were presented in survival according to nodal status but not TRG. Multivariate analysis showed that nodal status and not TRG was the only independent predicter for overall survival (HR: 3.550, 95% CI: 2.264-5.566, P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.801, 95% CI: 1.874-4.187, P < 0.001). The modified TRG system combining tumor regression with nodal status stratified patients survival with good discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node status impacts more importantly than TRG on survival for patients with esophageal cancer undergoing nCRT plus esophagectomy. The modified TRG system may facilitate postoperative treatment decisions and survival surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Pronóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether circumferential resection margin (CRM) status has an impact on survival and recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods: We screened patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy from January 2017 to December 2019. The CRM was reassessed. Patients were grouped into a CRM of 1 mm or less (0 < CRM ≤ 1 mm) and a CRM greater than 1 mm (CRM>1 mm). The impact of CRM on survival was investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression modeling. The optimal CRM cut point was evaluated using restricted cubic spline curve. Results: A total of 89 patients were enrolled in this study. The CRM status was an independent risk factor for the prognosis (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73). Compared with a CRM of 1 mm or less, a CRM greater than 1 mm had better overall survival (HR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, log-rank P = 0.011), longer disease-free survival (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.95, log-rank P = 0.040), and less recurrence (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23-0.85, log-rank P = 0.015). We visualized the association between CRM and the hazard ratio of survival and identified the optimal cut point at 1 mm. Conclusions: A CRM greater than 1 mm had better survival and less recurrence compared to a CRM of 1 mm or less. A more radical resection with adequate CRM could benefit survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of surgery in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) and explore potential prognostic factors. METHODS: We screened patients with SCCE who underwent esophagectomy from 2010 to 2018 at three institutes. Differences in survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included. Multivariate analysis showed that TNM stage (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57-10.75, p = 0.004) and adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.51, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB disease were merged into the surgery response disease (SRD), whereas stage III disease into the surgery nonresponse disease (SNRD). The SRD group had significantly improved survival compared to the SNRD group (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19-0.58, p < 0.001). In addition, adjuvant therapy increased survival benefit in the SNRD group (p < 0.001) but not in the SRD group (p = 0.061). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery alone appears to be adequate for disease control in the SRD group, whereas multimodality therapy was associated with improved survival in the SNRD group.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Humanos , Esofagectomía/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Pequeñas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Pronóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NACI) followed by oesophagectomy for locally advanced oesophageal squamous carcinoma. METHODS: Patients receiving NACI or chemoradiotherapy between September 2019 and September 2021 were identified. The primary outcomes were tumour response and survival. Secondary outcomes were toxic effects and postoperative complications. The propensity score matching for enrolled patients was performed. RESULTS: Data of 149 patients with clinical stage II-IV oesophageal squamous cancer, including 55 receiving NACI and 94 receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR), were analysed after propensity score matching. With regard to tumour response score, 24 (43.6%) and 59 (62.8%) patients were scored 0/1 in the NACI and NACR groups, respectively (P = 0.023). Of note, 17 (30.9%) patients in the NACI group achieved pathological complete response (CR) (ypT0N0), while 48 (51.1%) patients in NACR group achieved pathological CR (P = 0.026). NACR was associated with the higher risk of postoperative pneumonia (P = 0.034) and less lymph nodes and stations dissected (P ≤ 0.001). The 1-year cumulative overall survival rate was 94.5% and 86.2% in the NACI and NACR groups, respectively (P = 0.170). CONCLUSIONS: We found that NACI compared with NACR was associated with lower pneumonia rate and was safe and feasible for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cancer. However, the tumour regression score and the pathological CR rate of patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy were lower than those of patients treated with NACR. The short-term follow-up results were comparable between 2 treatment modalities.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Esofagectomía/métodos , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: This study aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of esophagectomy after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (n = 38) in our center between 2020 and 2021. The primary end point was the risk of major complications (grade ≥3) according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary end points were surgical details, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readministration. Results: The most commonly used regimens of immunotherapy were camrelizumab (36.8%), pembrolizumab (31.5%), tislelizumab (15.8%), sintilimab (13.2%), and toripalimab (2.6%). The median interval to surgery was 63 days (range, 40-147). Esophagectomy was performed in 37 of 38 patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. All procedures were performed minimally invasively, except for 1 patient who was converted to thoracotomy. Of 37 surgical patients, R0 resection was achieved in 36 patients (97.3%). Pathologic complete response was observed in 9 patients (24.3%). Tumor regression grade I was identified in 17 patients (45.9%). Morbidity occurred in 12 of 37 patients (32.4%). The most common complication was pneumonia (16.2%). There were no deaths or readministration within 30 days. Conclusions: Esophagectomy following neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma appears to be safe and feasible, with acceptable complication rates.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We examined the association between the number of resected lymph nodes and survival to determine the optimal lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with negative lymph node. METHODS: We included 1,836 patients from Chinese three high-volumed hospitals with corresponding clinicopathological characters such as gender, age, tumor location, tumor grade and TNM stage of patients. The median follow-up of included patients was 45.7 months (range, 1.03-117.3 months). X-Tile plot was used to identify the lowest number of lymphadenectomy. The multivariate model's construction was in use of parameters with clinical significance for survival and a nomogram based on clinical variable with P<0.05 in Cox regression analysis. Both two models were validated using a cohort extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database between 1975 and 2016 (n=951). RESULTS: More lymphadenectomy numbers were significantly associated with better survival in patients both in training cohort [hazard ratio (HR) =0.980; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.971-0.988; P<0.001] and validation cohort (HR =0.980; 95% CI: 0.968-0.991; P=0.001). Cut-off point analysis determined the lowest number of 9 for thoracic ESCC patients in N0 stage through training cohort (C-index: 0.623; sensitivity: 80.7%; 1 - specificity: 72.5%) when compared with 10 in validation cohort (C-index: 0.643; sensitivity: 78.2%; 1 - specificity: 63.0%). The cut-off points of 9 were examined in training cohort and validated in the divided cohort from validation cohort (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, nomograms for both cohorts were constructed and the calibration curves for both cohorts agreed well with the actual observations in terms of predicting 3- and 5-year survival, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Larger number for lymphadenectomy was associated with better survival in thoracic ESCC patients in N0 stage. Nine was what we got as the lowest number for lymphadenectomy in pN0 ESCC patients through this study, and our result should be confirmed further.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nodal-skip metastasis (NSM) is found in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but its prognostic role is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of NSM for thoracic ESCC patients. METHODS: Categorization of NSM was according to the N groupings of Japan Esophagus Society (JES) staging system, which is dependent on tumor location. Using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-regression analysis, this study retrospectively analyzed the overall survival (OS) for 2325 ESCC patients after radical esophagectomy at three high-volume esophageal cancer centers. Predictive models also were constructed. RESULTS: The overall NSM rate was 20% (229/1141): 37.4% in the in upper, 12.9% in the middle, and 22.2% in the lower thoracic ESCC. The patients with NSM always had a better prognosis than those without NSM. Furthermore, NSM was an independent prognostic factor for thoracic ESCC patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.633; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.499-0.803; P < 0.001). By integrating the prognostic values of NSM and N stage, the authors proposed the new N staging system. The categories defined by the new N staging system were more homogeneous in terms of OS than those defined by the current N system. Moreover, the new N system was shown to be an independent prognostic factor also for thoracic ESCC patients (HR, 1.607; 95% CI, 1.520-1.700; P < 0.001). Overall, the new N system had slightly better homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradient than the current N system. CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasized the prognostic power of NSM and developed a modified node-staging system to improve the efficiency of the current International Union for Cancer Control (UICC)/American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N staging system.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The published evidence from several randomized controlled clinical trials of immunotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has shown promising results. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched for relevant articles published before December 30, 2020. The data for efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven clinical trials comprising 1733 patients were included. The results showed that immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment as second- or later-line treatment was associated with an increased risk of the objective response rate (relative risk: 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.82-4.04; P=0.002) and median overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.85; P<0.001) compared with chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was associated with significant improvement in median overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.77, P<0.001) compared with chemotherapy in the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive population. However, immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was also effective in all patients independent of PD-L1 expression. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy were anemia, asthenia, rash, fatigue, decreased appetite, diarrhea, pneumonia, decreased neutrophil count, and vomiting. Patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy was associated with a decreased risk of treatment-related adverse events (relative risk: 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.08; P<0.001) and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (relative risk: 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.60; P<0.001) compared with those undergoing chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Immune checkpoint inhibitors as second- or later-line therapy may improve overall response rate and overall survival but not all oncological outcomes for patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors might experience fewer treatment-related adverse events of any grade, but specifically grade ≥3, compared with those treated with chemotherapy.