An Eye on COVID-19: A Meta-analysis of Positive Conjunctival Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction and SARS-CoV-2 Conjunctivitis Prevalence.

SIGNIFICANCE: This analysis and review demonstrate that, although emerging data indicate that the prevalence of severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on the ocular surface and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) conjunctivitis is rare, the ocular surface remains of interest as a potential inoculation and transmission site for SARS-CoV-2. Continued safety precautions should be taken as more data become available.COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, is a novel, global pandemic that has infected millions and, up to this point, caused more than two million fatalities worldwide. The ocular surface has become of interest as a possible vector for transmission by acting as a direct inoculation site, being a conduit for the virus into the respiratory system or as a method of transmission from potentially infected conjunctiva or tears. The components necessary for SARS-CoV-2 to theoretically infect ocular tissues are present: binding receptors (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and cluster of differentiation 147) and mechanisms for cell entry (transmembrane protease serine 2 and cathepsin L). This meta-analysis of COVID-19 prevalence data indicates that SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been infrequently found in conjunctival samples when tested with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. This review estimates the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 on the ocular surface and prevalence of conjunctivitis in patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. There is much to be learned regarding ocular tropism of SARS-CoV-2.

History of community health center affiliations with The New England College of Optometry.

BACKGROUND: Since the 1970s, The New England College of Optometry (NECO) has been a leader in community-based educational programming. This was accomplished through the development of affiliation agreements with health care facilities that care for the underserved, notably community health centers (CHCs). The college's clinical system, the New England Eye Institute (NEEI), develops CHC programs, manages professional services agreements, initiates teaching affiliation agreements, and leads staff recruitment and retention efforts. OVERVIEW: CHC collaborations, which effectively address disparities in access to health care and visual health status, represent a significant component of the college's primary care clinical training venues. Since their inception in 1972, these CHC academic-community partnerships have provided more than 650,000 eye examinations to the underserved and have trained more than 3,200 graduates in community-based eye care, interdisciplinary care management environment, clinical prevention strategies, and population health. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes NECO's longstanding success with CHCs, explains the scope of practice at CHCs, explains how students are involved in the CHCs' eye care services, and discusses the various management and business arrangements. The benefits and challenges of CHC affiliations with optometry schools and colleges are also discussed.

Temporal integration characteristics of the axial and choroidal responses to myopic defocus induced by prior form deprivation versus positive spectacle lens wear in chickens.

PURPOSE: In chicks, the temporal response characteristics to form deprivation and to spectacle lens wear (myopic and hyperopic defocus) show essential differences, suggesting that the emmetropization system "weights" the visual signals differently. To further explore how the eye integrates opposing visual signals, we examined the responses to myopic defocus induced by prior form deprivation vs. that induced by positive spectacle lenses, in both cases alternating with form deprivation. METHODS: Three experimental paradigms were used: 1) Form deprivation was induced by monocular occluders for 7 days. Over the subsequent 7 days, the occluders were removed daily for 12 hours (n = 13), 4 hours (n = 7), 2 hours (n = 7), or 0 hours (n = 6). 2) Birds were form-deprived on day 12. Over the subsequent 7 days, occluders were replaced with a +10 D lens for 2 hours per day (n = 13). 3) Starting at day 11, a +10 D lens was placed over one eye for 2 hours (n = 13), 3 hours (n = 5), or 6 hours (n = 10) per day and were otherwise untreated. Ocular dimensions were measured with high-frequency A-scan ultrasonography; refractive errors were measured by streak retinoscopy at various intervals. RESULTS: In recovering eyes, 2 hours per day of myopic defocus was as effective as 12 hours at inducing refractive and axial recovery (change in refractive error: +10 D vs. +13 D, respectively). By contrast, 2 hours of lens-induced defocus (alternating with form deprivation) was not sufficient to induce refractive or axial compensation (change in refractive error: -1.7 D). When myopic defocus alternated with unrestricted vision, 6 hours per day were sufficient to induce nearly full compensation (2 hours vs. 6 hours: 4.4 D vs. 8.2 D; p < 0.0005). Choroids showed rapid increases in thickness to the daily episodes of myopic defocus; these resulted in "long-term" thickness changes in recovering eyes and eyes wearing lenses for 3 or 6 hours per day. CONCLUSIONS: The response to myopic defocus induced by prior form deprivation is more robust than the response induced by positive lenses, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms differ. Presumably, this difference is related to the size of the eye at the onset. Compensatory decreases in growth rate occur without full compensatory choroidal thickening.