Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in necrotic tumors after melanoma neoadjuvant anti-PD1 therapy correlate with pathological response and recurrence-free survival.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant anti-PD1 therapy in melanoma may increase tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and more TILs are associated with better treatment response. A major pathological response (MPR) in melanoma after neoadjuvant anti-PD1 therapy usually comprises tumor necrosis and fibrosis. The role of TILs in necrotic tumor necrosis (nTILs) has not been explored. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed CD3 and CD8 immunohistochemical stains on 41 melanomas with geographic necrosis. 14 were immunotherapy-naïve, and 27 had been treated with one dose of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 in two clinical trials. CD3+ and CD8+ nTILs were graded as absent/minimal or moderate/brisk. The percentage of necrotic areas in the tumor bed before and after treatment was quantified. Endpoints were MPR and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: In the immunotherapy-naïve cohort, 3/14 (21%) specimens had moderate/brisk CD3+, and 2/14 (14%) had moderate/brisk CD8+ nTILs. In the treated cohort, 16/27 (59%) specimens had moderate/brisk CD3+, and 15/27 (56%) had moderate/brisk CD8+ nTILs, higher than the naïve cohort (CD3, p=0.046; CD8, p=0.018). Tumor necrosis was significantly increased after anti-PD1 therapy (p=0.007). In the treated cohort, moderate/brisk CD3+ and CD8+ nTILs correlated with MPR (p=0.042, p=0.019, respectively). Treated patients with moderate/brisk CD3+ nTILs had higher 5-year RFS than those with absent/minimal nTILs (69% versus 0%; p=0.006). This persisted on multivariate analysis (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.84, p=0.03), adjusted for pathologic response, which was borderline significant (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-1.01, p=0.051). CONCLUSIONS: CD3+ and CD8+ nTILs are associated with pathological response and 5-year RFS in melanoma patients after neoadjuvant anti-PD1 therapy.

Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee II for the Optimization of Surgical Education and Training in the United States: The Surgical Trainee Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to appraise recommendations from an expert panel of surgical educators on optimizing surgical education and training in the setting of contemporary challenges. BACKGROUND: The Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC II), a group of surgical educators, was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current changes in the landscape of surgical education. Surgical trainees were recruited to assess their impressions of the recommendations. METHODS: A mixed-methods study design was employed, with a survey, followed by focus group interviews. Participating residents and fellows were recruited through a purposeful sampling approach. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the survey data, and a thematic data analysis on interview transcripts was employed. RESULTS: The majority of trainee respondents (n=16) thought that all of the subcommittee recommendations should be included in the final BRC II recommendations and paper. According to the interviews, overall, the feedback from the trainees was positive, with particular excitement around work-life integration, education support and faculty development, and funding pitfalls. Some themes about concerns included a lack of clarity about the recommendations, concern about some recommendations being in conflict with one another, and a disconnect between the initial BRC II survey and the subsequent recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: The residents gathered for this focus group were encouraged by the thought, effort, and intention that gathered the surgical leaders across the country to make the recommendations. While there were areas the trainees wanted clarity on, the overall opinion was in agreement with the recommendations.

Neoadjuvant therapy for resectable melanoma.

The standard of care for patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma classically included upfront resection with adjuvant therapy. However, in more recent years, the amount of systemic therapies available for neoadjuvant use for these patients has increased. This article reviewed clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant therapy for patients with resectable stage III/IV melanoma. The outcomes of these trials have identified optimal treatment regimens to maximise patient response and minimize toxicities. Additionally, the date demonstrate advantages to neoadjuvant treatment compared to adjuvant therapy alone. Further research is needed to utilize a patient's response to neoadjuvant treatment for prognostication and creation of an individualized treatment plan.

Impact of travel burden on the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although historic studies of state registries have demonstrated decreased radiation therapy use for patients with breast cancer living further away from radiation facilities, the association between travel distance and breast cancer treatment in a modern national cohort remains unknown. METHODS: Female patients with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative pathologic stages I to II breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database (2018-2020) and dichotomized by distance ≤20 miles or >20 miles (75th percentile) from the treatment facility. The association between travel distance and type of surgery and treatment administered was analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression and after 1:1 propensity matching. RESULTS: Of the 293,318 patients identified for inclusion, the median age was 63 years, and most patients (n = 190,567, 65%) lived ≤20 miles of the treatment facility. Patients with a travel burden >20 miles were more likely to receive a mastectomy (≤20 miles 30.4% vs >20 miles 34.0%, P < .001; odds ratio 1.14, P = .016), and less likely to receive radiation (≤20 miles 63.3% vs >20% miles 60.1%, P < .001; odds ratio 0.81, P < .001). These findings persisted after propensity score matching (n = 33,544 per cohort), with patients living further being more likely to undergo a mastectomy (≤20 miles 30.3% vs >20 miles 35.3%, P < .001) and less likely to receive radiation (≤ 20 miles 65.4% vs. >20 miles 58.5%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with hormone receptor-positive stage I to II breast cancer with a larger travel burden are more likely to receive a mastectomy and less likely to undergo radiation therapy to treat their disease.

Delayed time to radiation and overall survival in Merkel cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Clinically localized Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is commonly treated with surgical excision and radiotherapy. The relationship between time to adjuvant radiotherapy and overall survival (OS) remains understudied. METHODS: This retrospective study used data from the National Cancer Database (2006-2019). Patients with clinically localized MCC who received surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy were included. Multivariate regressions were used to account for various patient and tumor factors. The primary outcome was 5-year OS, and the secondary outcome was time from diagnosis to adjuvant radiation (TTR). RESULTS: Of the 1965 patients included, most were male (n = 1242, 63.2%) and white (n = 1915, 97.5%), and the median age was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-81). The median TTR was 83 days (IQR: 65-106). A total of 83.6% of patients received radiotherapy to the primary site, 21.3% to the draining nodal basin, 17.1% to both, and 12.2% whose target location of radiotherapy was not recorded in the data. TTR of ≥79 days (the 45th percentile) was associated with worse OS on both univariate and multivariate analyses (log-rank p = 0.0014; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.258, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.055-1.500, p = 0.010). This persisted on sub-analyses of patients <80 years old (n = 1407; HR: 1.380, 95% CI: 1.080-1.764, p = 0.010) and of patients with Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 0 (n = 1411; HR: 1.284, 95% CI: 1.034-1.595, p = 0.024). Factors associated with delayed TTR included greater age (p = 0.039), male sex (p = 0.04), CCI > 1 (p = 0.036), academic facility (p < 0.001), rural county (p = 0.034), AJCC T2 stage (p = 0.010), negative margins (p = 0.017), 2+ pathologically positive regional nodes (p = 0.011), and margin size >2 cm (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed radiotherapy (≥79 days) was associated with worse OS of MCC patients. Further study in controlled cohorts is needed to ascertain this relationship.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A National Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Management of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial, with the mainstay of treatment being surgery. While neoadjuvant radiation demonstrated no improvement in recurrence-free survival in a prospective randomized trial (STRASS), the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains unknown and is the subject of ongoing study (STRASS2). METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical resection of high-grade RP leiomyosarcoma (LMS) or dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) were identified from the National Cancer Database (2006-2019). Predictors of NCT were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Differences in 5-year survival were examined using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and by Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: A total of 2656 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven percent of patients had DDLS and 43.5% had LMS. Six percent of patients underwent NCT. Patients who received NCT were younger (median age 60 vs 64 years, p < 0.001) and more likely to have LMS (OR 1.4, p = 0.04). In comparing NCT with no-NCT patients, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) on KM analysis (57.3% vs 52.8%, p = 0.38), nor was any difference seen after propensity matching (54.9% vs 49.1%, p = 0.48, N = 144 per group). When stratified by histology, there was no difference in OS based on receipt of NCT (LMS: 59.8% for NCT group, 56.6% for no-NCT, p = 0.34; DDLS: 54.2% for NCT group, 50.1% for no-NCT, p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgical resection of RP LMS or DDLS, NCT does not appear to confer an OS advantage. Prospective randomized data from STRASS2 will confirm or refute these retrospective data.

Current Patterns of Treatment and Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma at a Single Institution.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of advanced melanoma has been transformed by novel systemic therapies. The purpose of this study is to describe the current utilization patterns of immunotherapies with respect to survival outcomes in advanced melanoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with Stage 3 and 4 melanoma at our institution (2009-2019). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis evaluated associations between covariates and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Of 244 patients, 5-y OS was 62.4%. Lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.462, P = 0.030) was associated with shorter PFS whereas female gender (HR = 0.324, P = 0.010) was associated with longer PFS. Residual tumor (HR = 146, P = 0.006) and Stage 4 disease (HR = 3.349, P = 0.011) were associated with shorter OS. Use of immunotherapy increased from 2% to 23% over the study period, and use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy also increased up to 2016. Timing of immunotherapy administration was not significantly associated with survival. Of the 193 patients who received 2 or more treatment types, the most common treatment sequence was surgery followed by immunotherapy (n = 117, 60.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy is increasingly used for treatment of advanced melanoma. In this heterogeneous cohort, there was no significant association between timing of immunotherapy and survival outcomes.

Impact of Patient Comorbidities on Presentation Stage of Breast and Colon Cancers.

BACKGROUND: While patients with multiple comorbidities may have frequent contact with medical providers, it is unclear whether their healthcare visits translate into earlier detection of cancers, specifically breast and colon cancers. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-IV breast ductal carcinoma and colon adenocarcinoma were identified from the National Cancer Database and stratified by comorbidity burden, dichotomized as a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Score of <2 or ≥2. Characteristics associated with comorbidities were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Propensity-score matching was performed to determine the impact of CCI on stage at cancer diagnosis, dichotomized as early (I-II) or late (III-IV). RESULTS: A total of 672,032 patients with colon adenocarcinoma and 2,132,889 with breast ductal carcinoma were included. Patients with colon adenocarcinoma who had a CCI ≥ 2 (11%, n = 72,620) were more likely to be diagnosed with early-stage disease (53% vs. 47%; odds ratio [OR] 1.02, p = 0.017), and this finding persisted after propensity matching (CCI ≥ 2 55% vs. CCI < 2 53%, p < 0.001). Patients with breast ductal carcinoma who had a CCI ≥ 2 (4%, n = 85,069) were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease (15% vs. 12%; OR 1.35, p < 0.001). This finding also persisted after propensity matching (CCI ≥ 2 14% vs. CCI < 2 10%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more comorbidities are more likely to present with early-stage colon cancers but late-stage breast cancers. This finding may reflect differences in practice patterns for routine screening in these patients. Providers should continue guideline directed screenings to detect cancers at an earlier stage and optimize outcomes.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing neoadjuvant radiation for trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) develop distant metastases. Meta-analyses suggest that chemotherapy confers a small survival benefit, though few studies focus on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). There has been more frequent use of neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NRT) in STS, but the utility of NCT for these patients remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with stage II-III trunk/extremity STS who underwent NRT and resection were identified using the National Cancer Database (2006-2019). Predictors of NCT were analyzed using logistic regression. Change in rate of NCT use over time was assessed using log-linear regression modeling. Survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: Of 5740 patients, 25% underwent NCT. The overall median age was 62, 55% of patients were male, and 67% had stage III disease. The most common histological subtypes were fibrosarcoma/myxofibrosarcoma (39%) and liposarcoma (16%). Use of NCT decreased by 4.0% per year throughout the study period (p < 0.01). Predictors of NCT included younger age (median 54, IQR 42-64 vs. median 65, IQR 53-75, p < 0.01), treatment at an academic center (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, p < 0.01), and stage III disease (OR 2.2, p < 0.01). Histologic predictors of NCT included synovial sarcoma (52%) and angiosarcoma (45%). With a median follow-up time of 77 months, NCT was associated with improved 5-year survival compared to NRT alone on KM analysis (70% vs. 63%, p < 0.01). This difference persisted on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.86, p = 0.027) and after propensity matching (70% vs. 65%, p = 0.0064). CONCLUSION: Despite risk of distant failure in high-risk STS, use of NCT has decreased over time in patients receiving NRT. In this retrospective analysis, NCT was associated with a modestly improved overall survival.

Radiation, Lymph Node Dissection, or Both: Management of Lymph Node Micrometastases from Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Regional lymph node micrometastases from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can be treated with completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and/or radiation therapy (RT). It is unclear how these options compare in terms of survival benefits for patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from years 2012-2019 of the National Cancer Database. Patients with MCC and clinically negative, but pathologically positive, lymph node metastases who received RT to and/or CLND of the regional lymph node basin were included. Inverse probability weight balancing was performed using covariates followed by Cox proportional hazards modeling for survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 962 patients were included [median (interquartile range) age, 74 (67-80) years, 662 (68.8%) male patients, 926 (96.3%) white patients]. The majority (63%, n = 606) had a CLND only, while 18% (n = 173) had RT only, and 19% (n = 183) had both CLND and RT. From 2016 to 2019, usage of RT only increased from 10% to 31.8%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that treatment modality was not associated with survival [RT versus CLND, hazard ratio (HR) 0.842, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.621-1.142, p = 0.269, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.029, 95% CI 0.775-1.367, p = 0.844]. This persisted after balancing weights (RT versus CLND, HR 0.837, 95% CI 0.614-1.142, p = 0.262, RT+CLND versus CLND, HR 1.085, 95% CI 0.801-1.470, p = 0.599). CONCLUSIONS: The usage of RT for nodal micrometastasis in MCC is increasing as compared with CLND. This strategy appears to be safe, with no significant difference in survival outcomes.

Frailty Assessment and Prehabilitation as Part of a PeRioperative Evaluation and Planning (PREP) Program for Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.

Frailty assessment and prehabilitation can be incrementally implemented in a multidisciplinary, multiphase pathway to improve patient care. To start, modifications can be made to a surgeon's practice with existing resources while adapting standard pathways for frail patients. Frailty screening can identify patients in need of additional assessment and optimization. Personalized utilization of frailty data for optimization through prehabilitation can improve postoperative outcomes and identify patients who would benefit from adapted care. Additional utilization of the multidisciplinary team can lead to improved outcomes and a strong business case to add additional members of the team.

Clinical Trials in Melanoma: Margins, Lymph Nodes, Targeted and Immunotherapy.

Multiple randomized controlled trials have influenced the current standard of care for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Since the development of targeted and immune therapy, studies of adjuvant therapy for patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma have led to the approval of combined B-raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors for patients with a BRAF mutation, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4 or antiprogrammed cell death-1 therapy for patients without a BRAF mutation. This article discusses the details of the trials that have influenced these treatment decisions, in addition to discussing ongoing trials and possible future directions.