Comparative analysis of stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes for supratentorial hemangioblastomas in von hippel-lindau disease and sporadic cases: A multi-center international study.

BACKGROUND: Hemangioblastomas (HBs) are rare, benign central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms that rarely occur in the supratentorial. Resection with the goal of gross total resection (GTR) is often considered the primary treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been utilized more commonly in unresectable or partially resected cases. In this study, we aimed to evaluate SRS's effectiveness and clinical outcomes in supratentorial HBs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of multi-centers from 1993 to 2022 was conducted on patients with supratentorial HB treated with SRS. RESULTS: The study included 13 patients with 30 supratentorial HBs (24 von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), 6 sporadic). Median age was 26 years. Most tumors were solid (86.2 %). SRS was primary treatment in 86.7 % of cases and adjuvant in 13.3 %. VHL lesions were significantly smaller than sporadic ones (0.2 vs. 3.7 cc, p = 0.009). Median margin dose was higher in VHL cases (17 vs. 13.0 Gy, P = 0.031). For VHL cases, local control (LC) was 100 % at 6 months, 96 % (95 % CI: 88 %, 100 %) from 12 to 60 months post-SRS. For sporadic cases, LC was 100 % at 6 months, 80 % (95 % CI: 52 %, 100 %) from 12 to 60 months post-SRS (p = 0.39). No adverse radiation events or mortality occurred. CONCLUSION: SRS demonstrated a promising role in the clinical course of supratentorial HBs. It can be considered an effective alternative to surgical resection and even a first-line therapeutic option in appropriately selected cases.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations in pediatric patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial arteriovenous malformations are the most common cause of intracranial hemorrhages in pediatric patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been used extensively to treat these lesions. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to report treatment outcomes and long-term complications. METHODS: This study follows the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, with the search spanning electronic databases up to February 6, 2024. The outcome measures included obliteration rate, hemorrhage in the latency period, symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RICs), cyst formation, and radiation-induced tumorigenesis. RESULTS: A total of 1493 patients across 24 studies were included. The pooled complete obliteration after single-fraction SRS was 64.7% (95% CI 58%-69%). The pooled post-SRS hemorrhage rate at the final follow-up was 6.2% (95% CI 5%-8%). The overall incidence rate of RIC was 31.3% (267/854 patients), and the incidence of symptomatic RIC was 8.8% (114/1289 patients). For permanent symptomatic RIC, the pooled incidence was 4.8% (62/1283 patients). At final follow-up, 17 cases of radiation-induced necrosis were documented among 654 patients (2.6%). Similarly, cyst formation was reported in 1.3% of cases (17/1265 patients) and radiation-induced tumors occurred in 0.15% of cases (2/1342 patients). CONCLUSIONS: SRS can be considered an effective intervention for appropriately selected pediatric patients with arteriovenous malformations. Long-term complication rates appear to be low but additional longitudinal studies are required to better define the long-term outcomes.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent/residual nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: a single-arm systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are a significant subtype of pituitary tumors, accounting for 30% of all pituitary tumors and 10-20% of intracranial tumors. The primary treatment for NFPAs is resection, but complete resection is often challenging due to the tumor's proximity to critical structures, leading to frequent recurrences. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a viable treatment option for recurrent or residual NFPAs, but its long-term efficacy and safety profile require further investigation. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included studies published up to February 2024. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating SRS for recurrent/residual NFPAs. Inclusion criteria focused on studies reporting outcomes and complications of SRS, while exclusion criteria omitted case reports, case series, and non-English studies. Data extracted included demographic details, dosimetry parameters, and follow-up durations. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and statistical analyses were performed using single-arm meta-analyses. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies involving 3,781 patients were included. The mean follow-up duration was 60 months. Tumor control was achieved in approximately 92.3% of patients. The risk of developing hypopituitarism post-SRS was 13.62%, while the risk for panhypopituitarism was 2.55%. New visual field deficits occurred in 3.94% of patients. Cranial nerve deficits were rare, with event rates below 1% for CN III, CN V, and CN VI. CONCLUSION: SRS is effective in managing recurrent or residual NFPAs, achieving high tumor control rates. However, the risk of hypopituitarism remains a significant concern, necessitating regular endocrinological monitoring. While generally safe, the potential for new visual field deficits and other cranial nerve deficits must be considered. SRS remains a valuable treatment option, but clinicians should be aware of its potential complications.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Melanoma Brain Metastases Patients on Immunotherapy or Target Therapy: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Better local control but higher rates of adverse radiation events (ARE) have been reported when combining American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO)-guideline-suggested dose (SD) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with immunotherapy or targeted therapy for melanoma brain metastases. The objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of lower prescription doses compared with ASTRO guidelines for single-fraction SRS for patients with melanoma metastases who are concurrently receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study on 194 patients who underwent SRS between 2009 and 2022. After propensity score matching, 71 patients with 292 metastases were included in the ASTRO-SD (20-24 Gy for <2 cm, 18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) group and 33 patients with 292 metastases in the reduced dose (RD, <20 Gy for <2 cm, <18 Gy for ≥2 to <3 cm) group. RESULTS: The median diameter (5.4 vs 5.2 mm, P = .6), prescription volume (0.2 vs 0.2 cm3, P = .2), and radiographic follow-up (11 vs 12 months, P = .2) were similar in the 2 groups. The cumulative incidence of progressing metastases was significantly higher in the SD compared with the RD group (P = .018). Higher prescription volumes and ASTRO-suggested radiation doses were associated with local progression in multivariable analysis. Radiographic AREs were significantly more common in the SD compared with the RD group (8.6% vs 3.1%, P = .005). BRAF and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors' concurrent use, higher prescription volumes, and ASTRO-suggested radiation doses were associated with an increased risk of radiographic ARE. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that RD SRS could offer reduced toxicity rates, while maintaining high local control as compared with the current guideline-SDs for the treatment of melanoma brain metastases.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Cavernous Malformations: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Practice Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: The International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) aims to establish evidence-based guidelines for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treating intracranial cavernous malformations. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, searching electronic databases up to January 2024 to assess SRS's impact on post-treatment hemorrhage rates. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and confidence intervals were utilized to quantify this effect, along with assessments of lesion volume changes, seizure outcomes, and SRS-related adverse effects. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 32 studies with 2672 patients. A significant decrease in annual hemorrhage rates was observed post-treatment (RR=0.17), with rates of RR=0.29 in the first 2 years and RR=0.11 thereafter. Hemorrhage rates significantly differed before and after 2 years post-SRS (RR=0.36). Among epileptic patients, 20.2% had epilepsy pre-treatment, and 49.9% were seizure-free post-SRS, while 30.6% experienced reduced seizure frequency. Lesion volume changes showed a reduction in 46.9%, stability in 47.1%, and an increase in 6.7%. Symptomatic radiation effects affected 8% of patients. Subgroup analysis revealed symptomatic change rates of 6% at doses ≤13Gy compared to 9% at doses >13Gy. Permanent clinical deficits were rare (2%). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests SRS is an effective intervention for intracranial cavernous malformations, significantly reducing hemorrhage rates and improving seizure outcomes. ISRS practice guidelines are provided.

Comparison of Repeat Versus Initial Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Retrospective Multicenter Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Studies comparing neurological and radiographic outcomes of repeat to initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) intracranial arteriovenous malformations are scarce. Our aim was to perform a retrospective matched comparison of patients initially treated with SRS with those undergoing a second radiosurgical procedure. METHODS: We collected data from arteriovenous malformations managed in 21 centers that underwent initial and repeated radiosurgery from 1987 to 2022. Based on arteriovenous malformations volume, margin dose, deep venous drainage, deep, and critical location, we matched 1:1 patients who underwent an initial SRS for treatment-naive arteriovenous malformations and a group with repeated SRS treatment. RESULTS: After the selection process, our sample consisted of 328 patients in each group. Obliteration in the initial SRs group was 35.8% at 3 and 56.7% at 5 years post-SRS, while the repeat SRS group showed obliteration rates of 33.9% at 3 years and 58.6% at 5 years, without statistically significant differences (P = .75 and P = .88, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for obliteration rates (hazard ratio = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.13; P = .5), overall radiation-induced changes (RIC) (OR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.75-1.6; P = .6), symptomatic RIC (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5; P = .4), and post-SRS hemorrhage (OR = 0.68; 95% CI; P = .3). CONCLUSION: In matched cohort analysis, a second SRS provides comparable outcomes in obliteration and RIC compared with the initial SRS. Dose reduction on repeat SRS may not be warranted.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Outcomes in Arteriovenous Malformations: A Pediatric-Adult Comparative Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established treatment for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), but outcomes between pediatric and adult populations are not well compared. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing SRS outcomes for pediatric versus adult AVMs. METHODS: PubMed was searched for studies reporting SRS outcomes for pediatric or adult AVMs up to January 2024. Primary outcome was obliteration rate, with secondary outcomes including post-SRS hemorrhage, symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RICs), and permanent RICs. Pooled estimates were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS: Analysis included 22 studies with 3469 patients (1316 pediatric, 2153 adult). Pooled obliteration rate was 63% (95% confidence interval: 56%-70%) overall, with no significant difference between pediatric (61%) and adult (67%) cohorts (P = 0.38). Post-SRS hemorrhage rates were similar (5% pediatric, 6% adult, P = 0.60). Symptomatic RICs occurred in 9% (95% confidence interval: 6%-13%) overall, with 10% in both cohorts (P = 0.91). Permanent RIC rates were 4% in pediatric and 3% in adult cohorts (P = 0.43). Cyst formation (0.6%) and radiation-induced tumors (0.2%) were rare. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the pediatric cohort (2.6% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.003). Hemorrhagic AVM presentation was inversely correlated with symptomatic RICs across both groups. CONCLUSIONS: SRS is a reasonable treatment option for appropriately selected AVM patients in both pediatric and adult populations, offering comparable obliteration rates and adverse event profiles. The lower mortality in pediatric patients underscores the importance of early intervention in this population given their high cumulative lifetime rupture risks.

Focused ultrasound blood-brain barrier disruption in high-grade gliomas: Scoping review of clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: This scoping review aims to comprehensively review the available literature on the safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound (FUS) for blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) in patients with high-grade gliomas, including glioblastoma (GBM). High-grade gliomas pose significant challenges in neuro-oncology due to their aggressiveness and intricate location, often limiting the efficacy of traditional treatments. FUS offers a promising approach by transiently disrupting the blood-brain barrier, thereby facilitating enhanced drug delivery to tumor cells while minimizing systemic side effects. METHODS: A scoping review adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted to explore the literature on FUS-induced BBBD in glioma patients. PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception to April 2024 using defined keywords. Original clinical studies focusing on FUS for BBBD in gliomas were included. Two reviewers independently screened records, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed accordingly. RESULTS: A total of 1,310 studies were initially identified, resulting in nine eligible studies after screening and selection. These studies, published between 2016 and 2024, included 106 patients (39.6 % female) with ages ranging from 29 to 80 years. Recurrent GBM was the most common diagnosis (100 patients), with other diagnoses including anaplastic astrocytoma, diffuse infiltrating glioma, and oligodendroglioma. Various FUS devices and microbubble contrast agents were employed across the studies. Safety and efficacy were assessed in both experimental and clinical settings, with no significant adverse events reported during BBBD procedures. Notably, BBBD facilitated enhanced drug delivery to tumor tissue, demonstrating potential therapeutic benefits. CONCLUSION: Studies investigating BBBD using FUS demonstrate promising outcomes in experimental and clinical settings. BBBD procedures in patients with malignant gliomas and recurrent GBM show safety and successful enhancement of drug delivery potential. Overall, FUS-mediated BBBD emerges as a safe and feasible approach for improving therapeutic outcomes in brain tumor patients, warranting further clinical exploration and optimization.

Biological effective dose as a predictor of local tumor control in stereotactic radiosurgery treated parasellar meningioma patients.

INTRODUCTION: The radio-surgical literature increasingly uses biological effective dose (BED) as a replacement for absorbed dose to analyze outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). There are as yet no studies which specifically investigate the association of BED to local tumor control in para-sellar meningioma. METHODS: we did a retrospective analysis of patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for para-sellar meningioma during the period of 1995-2022. Demographic, clinical, SRS parameters, and outcome data were collected. The target margin BED with and without a model for sub-lethal repair was calculated, as well as a ratio of BED at the target margin to the absorbed dose at the target margin. Factors related to local control were further analyzed. RESULTS: The study was comprised of 91 patients, 20 (22.0%) and 71 (78.0%) of whom were male and female, respectively. The median age was 55.0 (interquartile range Q1, Q3:47.5,65.5years). 34 (37%) patients had a resection of their meningioma prior to SRS. The median interval from SRS to last clinical follow up or progression was 89 months. 13 (14.3%) patients were found to have progression. 3-, 5- and 10-years local tumor control were 98%, 92% and 77%, respectively. In cox univariate analysis, the following factors were significant: Number of prior surgical resections (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.08-3.05, p = 0.024), BED (HR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92-1.00, p = 0.03), and BED/margin (HR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.21-0.92, p = 0.028). A BED threshold above 68 Gy was associated significantly with tumor control (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: BED and BED /margin absorbed dose ratio can be predictors of local control after SRS in parasellar meningioma. Optimizing the BED above 68Gy2.47 may afford better long-term tumor control.

Defining the quality of interdisciplinary care for patients with brain metastases: modified Delphi panel recommendations.

The value of interdisciplinary teams in improving outcomes and quality of care of patients with brain metastases remains uncertain, partly due to the lack of consensus on key indicators to evaluate interprofessional care. We aimed to obtain expert consensus across disciplines on indicators that evaluate the quality and value of brain metastases care. A steering committee of key opinion leaders curated relevant outcomes and process indicators from a literature review and a stakeholder needs assessment, and an international panel of physicians rated the outcomes and process indicators using a modified Delphi method. After three rounds, a consensus was reached on 29 indicators encompassing brain-directed oncological treatment, surgery, whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, supportive or palliative care, and interdisciplinary team care. The Brain Metastases Quality-of-Care measure reflects the value and quality of brain metastases team-based care according to treatment modality and provides a benchmark of care for this under-studied patient population. The adoption, implementation, and sustainability of this set of indicators could help address the need expressed by patients with cancer, caregivers, and clinicians for more coordinated care across inpatient, outpatient, home, community, and tertiary academic settings.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Versus Without Neoadjuvant Endovascular Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations With Associated Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with neoadjuvant embolization is a treatment strategy for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), especially for those with large nidal volume or concomitant aneurysms. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of pre-SRS embolization in AVMs with an associated intracranial aneurysm (IA). METHODS: The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM database from 1987 to 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. SRS-treated AVMs with IAs were included. Patients were categorized into those treated with upfront embolization (E + SRS) vs stand-alone SRS (SRS). Primary end point was a favorable outcome (AVM obliteration + no permanent radiation-induced changes or post-SRS hemorrhage). Secondary outcomes included AVM obliteration, mortality, follow-up modified Rankin Scale, post-SRS hemorrhage, and radiation-induced changes. RESULTS: Forty four AVM patients with associated IAs were included, of which 23 (52.3%) underwent pre-SRS embolization and 21 (47.7%) SRS only. Significant differences between the E + SRS vs SRS groups were found for AVM maximum diameter (1.5 ± 0.5 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 cm3, P = .019) and SRS treatment volume (9.3 ± 8.3 vs 4.3 ± 3.3 cm3, P = .025). A favorable outcome was achieved in 45.4% of patients in the E + SRS group and 38.1% in the SRS group (P = .625). Obliteration rates were comparable (56.5% for E + SRS vs 47.6% for SRS, P = .555), whereas a higher mortality rate was found in the SRS group (19.1% vs 0%, P = .048). After adjusting for AVM maximum diameter, SRS treatment volume, and maximum radiation dose, the likelihood of achieving favorable outcome and AVM obliteration did not differ between groups (P = .475 and P = .820, respectively). CONCLUSION: The likelihood of a favorable outcome and AVM obliteration after SRS with neoadjuvant embolization in AVMs with concomitant IA seems to be comparable with stand-alone SRS, even after adjusting for AVM volume and SRS maximum dose. However, the increased mortality among the stand-alone SRS group and relatively low risk of embolization-related complications suggest that these patients may benefit from a combined treatment approach.

Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) delivers a high dose of radiation to a specific brain area while limiting radiation to nearby healthy tissue. While most SRS has traditionally been performed with a stereotactic frame-based approach, this study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. Our study followed the recommended guidelines summarized in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were searched from inception to 10 October 2023. The pooled rate of outcomes was calculated using random effect model and Restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA V.17. A total of 499 studies were recruited from the electronic databases. After removing duplicates (n = 117), 382 studies were used for title/abstract, and 329 were removed from the study selection process. A total of 53 articles were used for full-text assessment, and 35 studies were included for data extraction. Our analysis revealed a significant increase across all pooled survival rates and local control rates by initiating the radiosurgery for patients, estimating the pooled 6-month OSR of 75% (95% CI: 68-81%), 1-year overall survival rate (OSR) of 60% (95% CI: 51-69%), 18-month OSR of 48% (95% CI: 10-85%), 2-year OSR of 39% (95% CI: 19-58%), 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFSR) of 68% (95% CI: 39-98%), 2-year PFSR of 75% (95% CI: 58-91%), 6-month local control rate (LCR) of 93% (95% CI: 90-96%), and 12-month LCR of 86% (95% CI: 82-90%). Our meta-analysis findings confirm the efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in treating brain metastases. Using data from several trials, we were able to demonstrate stereotactic radiosurgery's effectiveness as a therapy option for brain metastasis patients, demonstrating local control and reasonable overall survival.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intermediate (III) or High (IV-V) Spetzler-Martin Grade Arteriovenous Malformations: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guideline.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Consensus guidelines do not exist to guide the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of patients with Spetzler-Martin Grade III-V arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). We sought to establish SRS practice guidelines for Grade III-V AVMs based on a critical systematic review of the published literature. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant search of Medline, Embase, and Scopus, 1986 to 2023, for publications reporting post-SRS outcomes in ≥10 Grade III-V AVMs with the median follow-up ≥24 months was performed. Primary end points were AVM obliteration and post-SRS hemorrhage. Secondary end points included dosimetric variables, Spetzler-Martin parameters, and neurological outcome. RESULTS: : In total, 2463 abstracts were screened, 196 manuscripts were reviewed, and 9 met the strict inclusion criteria. The overall sample of 1634 AVMs consisted of 1431 Grade III (88%), 186 Grade IV (11%), and 11 Grade V lesions (1%). Total median post-SRS follow-up was 53 months for Grade III and 43 months for Grade IV-V AVMs (ranges, 2-290; 12-262). For Grade III AVMs, the crude obliteration rate was 72%, and among Grade IV-V lesions, the crude obliteration rate was 46%. Post-SRS hemorrhage was observed in 7% of Grade III compared with 17% of Grade IV-V lesions. Major permanent deficits or death from hemorrhage or radiation-induced complications occurred in 86 Grade III (6%) and 22 Grade IV-V AVMs (12%). CONCLUSION: Most patients with Spetzler-Martin Grade III AVMs have favorable SRS treatment outcomes; however, the obliteration rate for Grade IV-V AVMs is less than 50%. The available studies are heterogenous and lack nuanced, long-term, grade-specific outcomes.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Hypothalamic Hamartoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study on Safety, Efficacy, and Complication Profile.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a safe and effective treatment option for hypothalamic hamartomas (HH), but there is no consensus opinion on its timing, dosage, and follow-up. The aim of this study was to define the safety, efficacy, outcome, and complication profile of GKRS in this patient population. METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study involved 39 patients with the mean age of 16 ± 14.84 years. Early seizures resulted in an earlier age of diagnosis in 97% of patients. At baseline, no endocrine abnormalities were seen in 75% of patients while 18.9% showed precocious puberty (PP). The median target volume was 0.55 cc (0.1-10.00 cc), and a median margin dose of 16 Gy (8.1-20.0 Gy) was delivered in a single session. All patients were evaluated for clinical, endocrinological, and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5 (0.1-15) years. The median target volume of the cohort was 0.55 (0.35-1.77) cc. The largest HH was of 10 cc. 24/39 (61.5%) were small HH (Regis I-III). At presentation, 94.8% patients suffered from seizures (87.18% with gelastic seizures). 7/39 patients (17.9%) were presented with both PP and epilepsy. Only one (2.6%) patient presented with PP alone. 29 patients had more than 3-year follow-up. All received ≥16 Gy targeting complete HH. 28% of patients showed regression in HH volume. Patients with Regis grade I-III and longer follow-up (>75 months) showed gradual improvement in seizures. 16/29 patients (55.2%) achieved good seizure control (Engel I/II) while 13 (44.8%) were in Engel III/IV status. Nine patients needed adjuvant treatment because of poor seizure control. Eight patients suffered from transient increase in seizures. One patient developed poikilothermia, and 2 patients developed new onset hormonal deficiency. CONCLUSION: GKRS is a safe and effective modality for treatment of HH with significant improvement in seizure control with minimal disruption of endocrine profile. It provides an excellent safety, efficacy, and complication profile, especially for small HH. Latency of results and its adjuvant nature remain the areas of research and breakthroughs among contemporary treatment options.

Risk of new tumor, carotid stenosis, and stroke after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Pituitary Tumor: A multicenter study of 2254 patients with imaging follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Higher risk of secondary brain tumor, carotid stenosis and stroke has been reported after conventional sella irradiation for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), which is a more focused approach, is now increasingly used instead. The aim was to assess the risk of secondary brain tumor, carotid stenosis/occlusion and stroke after SRS. METHODS: In this multicentric retrospective study, 2,254 patients with PitNET were studied, 1,377 in the exposed group and 877 in the control group. RESULTS: There were 9,840.1 patient-years at risk for the SRS and 5,266.5 for the control group. The 15-year cumulative probability of secondary intracranial tumor was 2.3% (95%CI:0.5%, 4.1%) for SRS and 3.7% (95%CI:0%, 8.7%) for the control group (p=0.6), with an incidence rate of 1.32 per 1,000 and 0.95 per 1,000, respectively. SRS was not associated with increased risk of tumorigenesis when stratified by age (HR: 1.59 [95%CI: 0.57, 4.47], p=0.38). The 15-year probability of new carotid stenosis/occlusion was 0.9% (95%CI: 0.2, 1.6) in the SRS and 2% (95%CI: 0, 4.4) in the control group (p=0.8). The 15-year probability of stroke was 2.6% (95%CI: 0.6%, 4.6%) in the SRS and 11.1% (95%CI: 6%, 15.9%) in the control group (p<0.001). In cox multivariate analysis stratified by age, SRS (HR 1.85[95%CI:0.64, 5.35], p=0.26) was not associated with risk of new stroke. CONCLUSION: No increased risk of long-term secondary brain tumor, new stenosis or occlusion and stroke was demonstrated in SRS group compared to control in this study with imaging surveillance.

Assessment of High-fidelity Anatomical Models for Performing Pterional Approach: A Practical Clinic in American Association of Neurological Surgeons Meeting 2024.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, simulation models have been increasingly applied as an adjunct for surgical training in neurosurgery. We aim through a practical course at a national neurosurgical conference to evaluate 3D non-cadaveric simulation models along with augmented reality for learning and practicing the pterional craniotomy approach among a wide variety of participants including medical students, neurosurgery residents, and attending neurosurgeons. METHODS: Our course was conducted during an international neurosurgery meeting with 93 participants but the course surveys (pre- and post-course) were completed by 42 participants. RESULTS: Most participants were medical students (31; 73.8%). Participants with no experience (the majority) in cadaver lab dissections, craniotomy as first operator, and as second operator represented 12 (27.9%), 29 (69%), and 22 (52.4%), respectively. Participants with moderate experience in cadaver lab dissections were 23 (53.5%). Post-course survey respondents noted positive feedback in most items queried including enhancement of familiarity and acquiring skills, confidence with neurosurgery instruments, confidence with microscope, part of standard training, traditional training, and lifelong training. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation model combining augmented reality with physical simulation for hybrid experience can be a promising and valuable tool especially for medical students or early career neurosurgical residents.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for intraventricular meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular meningioma (IVM) is a rare subtype of intracranial meningioma, accounting for 9.8 to 14% of all intraventricular tumors. Currently, there is no clear consensus on which patients with IVM should receive conservative treatment, surgery, or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This research aims to analyze the outcomes, including survival and recurrence rates of patients who undergo SRS for IVM as a primary or adjuvant treatment. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase till June 5th 2023. Screening and data extraction were performed by two independent authors. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the tumor control proportion of IVM cases treated with SRS. Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed for the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the follow-up time. All analyses were performed using the R programming language. RESULTS: Out of the overall 132 records, 14 were included in our study, of which only 7 had enough data for the meta-analysis. The tumor control proportion was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.69-0.98) in patients who underwent SRS for primary IVM. The overall tumor control in both primary and adjuvant cases was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.34-0.99). the heterogeneity was not significant in both meta-analyses (P = 0.73 and P = 0.92, respectively). Post-SRS perifocal edema occurred in 16 out of 71 cases (0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.56), with no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.32). IPD meta-analysis showed a PFS of 94.70% in a 2-year follow-up. Log-rank test showed better PFS in primary SRS compared to adjuvant SRS (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, patients with IVM can achieve high rates of tumor control with a low risk of complications when treated with SRS, regardless of whether they have received prior treatment. Although SRS could be a promising first-line treatment option for asymptomatic IVM, its efficacy in symptomatic patients and its comparison with resection require further investigation.