Adverse events associated with manual therapy of peripheral joints: A scoping review.

METHODS: We performed a systematic review of potential adverse events (AEs) of manual therapy to peripheral joints using PubMed, CINAHL, PEDro, AMED, and Google Scholar with a single term for each peripheral body region (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle, foot). Inclusion criteria included articles that examined or reported the occurrence of AEs. Exclusion criteria included literature discussing treatment other than manual therapy or surgery. RESULTS: Twenty total articles meeting the inclusion criteria were found. A total of fifty-three adverse events were analyzed. Most AEs were benign. Little evidence exists for serious AEs with manual therapy. Scant serious AEs were reported with acupuncture or massage near the shoulder, hip, and knee. DISCUSSION: AEs with manual therapy to the spine have garnered ample attention in literature. Traditional manual therapy consists of joint mobilization, thrust manipulation, and a variety of soft tissue techniques. However, with the popularity of other "manual therapies", outside the traditional definition, the practitioner and client should be aware of the risks. CONCLUSION: AEs occurring with most manual therapy techniques to the peripheral joints are transient and mild. It is difficult to attribute true AEs to manual therapy in multi-modal treatment paradigms with numerous single session interventions. Since there are no international definitions or classifications of AEs, and the definition of manual.

Employer-Sponsored Health Centers Provide Access to Integrated Care via a Hybrid of Virtual and In-Person Visits.

Background: Since the explosion of telemedicine resulting from the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, employers have been particularly interested in virtual primary care as a novel means of expanding primary care services. The purpose of this study is to describe a model of integrated care delivered both in-person and virtually at employer-sponsored health centers nationwide. The key outcomes of this analysis were the proportion of all care delivered in-person and virtually by clinical discipline, the types of care and member satisfaction for care delivered in-person and virtually, and a description of the use of multiple clinical disciplines by the employee population. Methods: Retrospective observational study comparing health services utilization of primary care, behavioral health, and physical medicine services both in-person and virtually in employer-sponsored clinics between January 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021. Results: Of the 331,967 visits with employer-sponsored health center staff, 63% were in-person and 37% were delivered virtually. Most visits were for primary care services (59.5%), with physical medicine visits and behavioral health visits accounting for 25.1% and 15.4%, respectively. Whereas the preponderance of behavioral health visits were virtual visits (72.5%), less than a quarter (18.2%) of physical medicine visits were delivered virtually. 19.6% of patients were seen by more than two clinical disciplines and 2.6% were seen by three different disciplines. Overall, patients were highly likely to recommend the health center across both modalities (Net Promoter Score 89.1 for in-person care and 88.4 for virtual care). Discussion: The future of employer-sponsored integrated team-based care may require a hybrid approach that can lean heavily on virtual visits but requires the infrastructure necessary for in-person care.